*********6 INSANE Discoveries that science cannot explain*********

[mike123]

Thanks for the links (no colin) dont worry bout it lol

It is less of a theory and more of an observation as far as the nature of earth is concern if you ask me. For example, we don't know WHY gravity works or how but we can observe it's effects and talk intelligently on that. To explain the questions you ask would require more theory and diggin (literally)

My theory on that though is that the earth is not a closed isolated system rather it is along with all of the planets on this level of understanding part of a larger system, which the sun's energy when coinciding with certaind orbits depending on it's stage of star life 'activate' certain planets. Making it possible for ecosystems and life. So in another few billion years saturn may be in the same 'life zone" as the Earth is now. Also several prehistoric planets may have already been consumed by the sun.


(I am actually paralleling a lot of this into my blog which I can share with you when I finish it may make some youtube vids as well, if I ever get along to it)

i agree wit this
i think that the idea that our planet is separate from anything is more of a western idea
but even still i have to agree that the planets are all linked by way of the sun
and the life cycles on the planets in the solar system are determined by the life cycle of the sun
where our star goes we follow

 

[Les W]

i agree wit this
i think that the idea that our planet is separate from anything is more of a western idea
but even still i have to agree that the planets are all linked by way of the sun
and the life cycles on the planets in the solar system are determined by the life cycle of the sun
where our star goes we follow

Yeah gotta co-sign this 100% as well

Mos def I am not a scientist or astronomer/astro-physicist but the whole "simplest most likely explanation" (Arcrum's [sp?] Razor) thinking gets thrown out the window by western science as soon as they don't like the answer...

 

[SeekoGT]

Just went through all 8 pages, and I must say, I am glad that I have a hunger for knowledge. There's nothing like it.

 

[smokedacane]

That's interesting, how could having more gravity make things bigger?? Seems to defy physics. Either way that would make the rocks and stones that many more times heavier to lift as well right?

The thing about the theory I propose is that it makes the seemingly impossible today possible in the past through a combination of lighter objects and stronger people and animals. Also it explains why this is found everywhere around the world pretty logically imo

I'm with you, I fairly certain that a planet with lesser gravity makes organisms on that planet much bigger/taller, vs more gravity which makes organisms on a planet smaller because gravities force has a much strong pull on your body thus restricting your frame.

 

[Andros the magician]

Great read. I am really interested in The Resurrection of Lake Vostok and the bloop noise. Very interesting. I'm actually planning a trip to some odd places like punma punka or whatever and some other places.

 

[Daimy0]

 

[mike123]

bump

 

[mk23666]

I'm with you, I fairly certain that a planet with lesser gravity makes organisms on that planet much bigger/taller, vs more gravity which makes organisms on a planet smaller because gravities force has a much strong pull on your body thus restricting your frame.

Bingo.

 

[ScorpDiesel]

I'm with you, I fairly certain that a planet with lesser gravity makes organisms on that planet much bigger/taller, vs more gravity which makes organisms on a planet smaller because gravities force has a much strong pull on your body thus restricting your frame.

How are you "certain" of this? Gravity didn't determine the size of dinosaurs so, please explain your logic.

 

[smokedacane]

How are you "certain" of this? Gravity didn't determine the size of dinosaurs so, please explain your logic.

The size of the dinosaurs was totally different. There was a tremendous amount of oxygen in the Earths atmosphere millions of years ago. Due to the increased amounts of oxygen in the atmosphere dinosaurs, mammals, and plant life on the planet in the distant past were capable of tremendous growth do the the available utilization of oxygen in the body.


I am unable to find the NC State study I posted here awhile back about the role the increased amounts of oxygen played into manifesting the great size of the dinosaurs but I found another link which explains that same occurrence of increased amounts of oxygen being the reason for the gigantic size of mammals millions of years ago.

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=big-mammals-evolved-thank



***********EDIT***************

found the study

http://www.ncsu.edu/news/press_releases/04_01/026.htm

 

[mk23666]

The size of the dinosaurs was totally different. There was a tremendous amount of oxygen in the Earths atmosphere millions of years ago. Due to the increased amounts of oxygen in the atmosphere dinosaurs, mammals, and plant life on the planet in the distant past were capable of tremendous growth do the the available utilization of oxygen in the body.


I am unable to find the NC State study I posted here awhile back about the role the increased amounts of oxygen played into manifesting the great size of the dinosaurs but I found another link which explains that same occurrence of increased amounts of oxygen being the reason for the gigantic size of mammals millions of years ago.

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=big-mammals-evolved-thank

And even then gravity (and physics) would have placed a limit on that growth. Muscles and bones can only carry so much, the heart can only pump blood so far and the brain can only send signals so fast. Increasing the upper limits on any or all of these systems are a recipe for catastrophy.

 

[smokedacane]

Great read. I am really interested in The Resurrection of Lake Vostok and the bloop noise. Very interesting. I'm actually planning a trip to some odd places like punma punka or whatever and some other places.

You lucky bastard


They still can not definitely answer when those structures were built. I know some crazy estimations have been thrown out that the stone monoliths were constructed over 15 thousand years ago.

 

[smokedacane]

And even then gravity (and physics) would have placed a limit on that growth. Muscles and bones can only carry so much, the heart can only pump blood so far and the brain can only send signals so fast. Increasing the upper limits on any or all of these systems are a recipe for catastrophy.

You're absolutely right

It was a catastrophy, the sheer size of the dinosaurs played a key role in killing them off the surviving dinosaurs after the meteor impacted the Earth. For exmaple both the T-Rex and Brontosaurus needed tons of vegetation and meat respectively just to function. As soon as the trees stopped growing and all the carcases turned to bones there was nothing left to eat.

That is why smaller mammals were able to persevere during the harsh environment because they did not require much sustenance to function.

 

[mk23666]

You're absolutely right

It was a catastrophy, the sheer size of the dinosaurs played a key role in killing them off the surviving dinosaurs after the meteor impacted the Earth. For exmaple both the T-Rex and Brontosaurus needed tons of vegetation and meat respectively just to function. As soon as the trees stopped growing and all the carcases turned to bones there was nothing left to eat.

That is why smaller mammals were able to persevere during the harsh environment because they did not require much sustenance to function.

Not to mention the change in the ratio of oxygen to other gases in the atmosphere dropped drastically. This would have made it difficult for those large animals that may have survived to function. There was a program on the Science Channel recently about this very topic.

 

[smokedacane]

Not to mention the change in the ratio of oxygen to other gases in the atmosphere dropped drastically. This would have made it difficult for those large animals that may have survived to function. There was a program on the Science Channel recently about this very topic.

You don't recall the name of the program do you? Damn.

 

[mk23666]

You don't recall the name of the program do you? Damn.

Nope, sorry. What I do recall thos is that there were two opposite views of what the levels of oxygen would have done to the dinos tho.

 

[Count23]

check this shit out

This shit

I really would like to know what made this sound!

 

[(0_0)..l.. finger]

WTF...How I miss this thread

 

[(0_0)..l.. finger]

So much information in this thread, I don't know where to start from? This is the best post I seen in a while. It almost make you think about everything that you was taught at a younger age to be false.

 

[Bluelaser]

Exactly, the Aztecs, Incas, and Mayans, according to the book Mystery of The Olmecs(by David Hatcher Childress) did not build those structures at all. They just inhabited them. The Olmecs were the ones who built them.

NBA baller Stephen Jackson could be a descendant of the Olmecs.