well...here i go again...going against the grain
i will further support my argument later if i ever get around to going thru some of my stuff from undergrad BUT...
when i saw the cover i chuckled sarcastically at that animalistic pose they had him in and how she was the exact opposite
according to him he said he was just expressing emotion and he took a couple of different shots and this was the best one...uh huh sure
unfortunately...i have a headache right now so i don't feel up to getting too deep but in an advertising class we covered many techniques, biases and so on soooo here is something just off of looking at the cover
IF the cover shot was purely off of showing the best physique then y is most of Mr. James physique covered?
It's covered by:
-words
-his clothing
-his stance
- & Giselle
-you see no biceps (barely), no calve muscles...nothing like that
WHEREAS GISELLE
-has a wind machine that was able to press her dress against her body enough for her physique to come thru
-you see her calves, her arms and etc....
this pic also plays on stereotypes of men taking up more space versus women taking up less space
yeah some of yall are gonna say i'm trippin but ehh
-i had to read book and articles about it
-plus watched documentaries about it
-and was at a presentation from an African-American advertising firm and they talked about this
am i saying this cover was maliciously made this way...no, not at all...most of these techniques are sooo passed down that ppl just take them as the standard