A chunk of ice the size of Ireland "broke off" of Antarctica...

Zero

Star
Registered
Satellite images reveal that a large chunk of the Wilkins ice shelf fell into the ocean sometime around the end of February, suggesting that climate change could be causing it to disintegrate faster than scientists had predicted.

The 160-square-mile piece, about seven times the size of Manhattan, had been attached to Antarctica for hundreds, or maybe even 1,500 years.
Scientists fear that the entire Wilkins shelf, more than 6,000 square miles, could be next.


• Click here to visit FOXNews.com's Natural Science Center.

British Antarctic Survey researcher David Vaughan blamed global warming for the smaller piece's disintegration.


Satellite images of the initial breakaway on Feb. 28 were noticed within hours, and scientists diverted satellite cameras and even flew an airplane over the ongoing collapse for rare pictures and video.


"It's an event we don't get to see very often," said Ted Scambos, lead scientist at the National Snow and Ice Data Center in Boulder, Colo. "The cracks fill with water and slice off and topple... That gets to be a runaway situation."



While icebergs naturally break away from the mainland, collapses like this are unusual but are happening more frequently in recent decades, Vaughan said. The collapse is similar to what happens to hardened glass when it is smashed with a hammer, he said.


The rest of the Wilkins ice shelf is holding on by a narrow beam of thin ice. Scientists worry that it too may collapse.


Larger, more dramatic ice collapses occurred in 2002 and 1995.
Vaughan had predicted the Wilkins shelf would collapse about 15 years from now. The part that recently gave way makes up about 4 percent of the overall shelf, but it's an important part that can trigger further collapse.
There's still a chance the rest of the ice shelf will survive until next year because this is the end of the Antarctic summer and colder weather is setting in, Vaughan said.


Scientists said they are not concerned about a rise in sea level from the latest event, but say it's a sign of worsening global warming.
Such occurrences are "more indicative of a tipping point or trigger in the climate system," said Sarah Das, a scientist at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute.


"These are things that are not re-forming," Das said. "So once they're gone, they're gone."
Climate in Antarctica is complicated and more isolated from the rest of the world.
Much of the continent is not warming and some parts are even cooling, Vaughan said.


However, the western peninsula, which includes the Wilkins ice shelf, juts out into the ocean and is warming. This is the part of the continent where scientists are most concern about ice-melt triggering sea level rise.

37178717.jpg
 
Bush's Response:

[FLASH]http://www.youtube.com/v/Q5r6TqpOQGc&hl=en[/FLASH]

"Would be funny, if it weren't so True..!":smh::(
 
GLOBAL WARMING DUE TO CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS...
YALL BETTER GO KOP A LANDCRUISER, WHEN THE FLOOD WATERS RISE
THAT TOYOTA YARIS IS GOING TO GET SWEPT AWAY.


15i41fb.jpg
 
Global warming, strangly enough, can cause a bounce back global ice age.

Yeah, something about water levels rising and affecting the distribution of heat from the warm to the cold parts of the ocean (causing land masses to cool off). So global warming melts off the ice sheets, the ice cools off the oceans and the oceans cool off the land.
 
The article didn't mention that the ice shelves rests on the water and because of that they won't raise the ocean levels. It also failed to mention that the ice shelves act as a dam that keep the glaciers on land from sliding into the sea. Once the ice shelves go then any ice breaking off into the oceans will begin to raise sea levels.
 
Yeah, something about water levels rising and affecting the distribution of heat from the warm to the cold parts of the ocean (causing land masses to cool off). So global warming melts off the ice sheets, the ice cools off the oceans and the oceans cool off the land.

Bingo^
 
The article didn't mention that the ice shelves rests on the water and because of that they won't raise the ocean levels. It also failed to mention that the ice shelves act as a dam that keep the glaciers on land from sliding into the sea. Once the ice shelves go then any ice breaking off into the oceans will begin to raise sea levels.

There was a longer, more detailed article, I just figured I'd go ahead and "Colin proof" this post...

Antarctic ice shelf 'hangs by a thread'
 
Wait a minute! Not too long ago. Some scientist found volcanic activity under Antarctica. Could this be the reason?

I guess some people we don't read or remember shit now days.:smh:


Code:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080120160720.htm

Code:
http://www.antarctica.ac.uk/press/press_releases/press_release.php?id=341
 
"Scientific American" also just recently did an article about the melting ice shelves and mentioned volcanic activity under the ice caps as a partial cause for the melting.
 
How could the ice from Antarctica flood the whole planet though? Isn't ice, i.e. Antarctica, only on the southern hemisphere?

If some shit like the Day After Tomorrow happened I'd think those in the south would be somewhat okay. But a flood would fuck us all up. In Houston, it can't rain for five damn minutes without flooding the freeway.
 
Wait a minute! Not too long ago. Some scientist found volcanic activity under Antarctica. Could this be the reason?

I guess some people we don't read or remember shit now days.:smh:


Code:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080120160720.htm
Code:
http://www.antarctica.ac.uk/press/press_releases/press_release.php?id=341

The article you posted said the eruption happened 2000 years ago and that the volcano is still active. Still active doesn't mean it's spewing lava 24x7, it just means it's not a dormant volcano. Scientists are pretty much in agreement that the ice shelves are breaking due to global warming, not volcanoes. Outside of the ring of fire in the pacific, a huge amount of the seismic and volcanic activity on the planet happens at or near the poles. The fact that there is volcanic activity at the poles doesn't prove there is no such thing as global warming, regardless.
 
How could the ice from Antarctica flood the whole planet though? Isn't ice, i.e. Antarctica, only on the southern hemisphere?

If some shit like the Day After Tomorrow happened I'd think those in the south would be somewhat okay. But a flood would fuck us all up. In Houston, it can't rain for five damn minutes without flooding the freeway.

There is a LOT of water trapped in that ice. I think I've read that ice shelf is more than a mile think in areas. Also, it's fresh water, so when it gets released, it will desalinate the oceans and disrupt the entire planet's balance.
 
If millions of Americans started to head to Mexico and South America, would we be welcome? Hell no!
 
How could the ice from Antarctica flood the whole planet though? Isn't ice, i.e. Antarctica, only on the southern hemisphere?

If some shit like the Day After Tomorrow happened I'd think those in the south would be somewhat okay. But a flood would fuck us all up. In Houston, it can't rain for five damn minutes without flooding the freeway.

The ice at the poles (north and south) are almost miles deep in some places. That is a lot of weight/mass AND stored kinetic energy locked up in the ice. If ALL of it melted it could raise the oceans between 200-300 feet.

The slow release of this ice is usually replaced with new snow/ice every year. The ice has begun to melt faster than the new snow/ice can replace it.

If the ice shelves are no longer bracing the glaciers they will begin to fall into the oceans. Much of the ice and glaciers are resting on a slurry of mud and water this could act like a slickened street and speed the fall of the ice into the oceans.

We are living in interesting times.
 
The article you posted said the eruption happened 2000 years ago and that the volcano is still active. Still active doesn't mean it's spewing lava 24x7, it just means it's not a dormant volcano. Scientists are pretty much in agreement that the ice shelves are breaking due to global warming, not volcanoes. Outside of the ring of fire in the pacific, a huge amount of the seismic and volcanic activity on the planet happens at or near the poles. The fact that there is volcanic activity at the poles doesn't prove there is no such thing as global warming, regardless.

The volcanic activity is enough to melt the ice from the bottom up in some areas and this water flows in rivers under the ice. If the ice shelves break away/melt away faster than they can be replaced the possible ramifications of millions of tons of ice slipping into the oceans at some speed is truly cataclysmic.
 
So what can we do to rectify this? Get a more fuel efficient car, i.e. a Prius? I don't have a car since I'm a student.

Don't really recycle as we really don't have recycling bins, and I don't have a means, nor enough recyclable stuff to take it somewhere to be recycled, if that's even feasible.

I'm pretty conscious as far as the environment goes, but does global warming only pertain to emissions from automobiles, factories, etc.? If so it would take us decades to find a suitable source to replace the oil/coal based infrastructure we have now. And if we did we're talking global collapse - railways, airplanes, trucks, we've gotten to the point where we're dependent on these things.

And how could we have caused so much damage in such a short period of time? Fuck, automobiles are barely over a century old...
 
So what can we do to rectify this? Get a more fuel efficient car, i.e. a Prius? I don't have a car since I'm a student.

Don't really recycle as we really don't have recycling bins, and I don't have a means, nor enough recyclable stuff to take it somewhere to be recycled, if that's even feasible.

I'm pretty conscious as far as the environment goes, but does global warming only pertain to emissions from automobiles, factories, etc.? If so it would take us decades to find a suitable source to replace the oil/coal based infrastructure we have now. And if we did we're talking global collapse - railways, airplanes, trucks, we've gotten to the point where we're dependent on these things.

And how could we have caused so much damage in such a short period of time? Fuck, automobiles are barely over a century old...

You are right it's not just cars, it's industry, it's methane from waste dumps and farm animal dung. It's carbon from the burning of forests for farmland and the burning of wood for fuel. There are several factors and most of them are human made.

Global Warming and Global Cooling are natural cycles the Earth goes through, but man has sped up the natural rise of the temp. Our part of the damage is cumulative. The particles and gasses we have put in the atmosphere don't dissipate quickly enough and we aren't helping by increasing the amounts we release in the air year after year.

Changing will take time, but if we start now we could make a difference before we get to the tipping point. Every little bit helps.
 
Back
Top