I'm saying their information is purposely flawed because of motivations.
The Truth About The Sphinx
- Thread starter smokedacane
- Start date
I'm saying their information is purposely flawed because of motivations.
I'm saying their information is purposely flawed because of motivations.
check my edit
What you all have to do is think about the information provided, then form your own informed conclusions.
Motivations are something we ALL possess. the thing that needs to be done is to take info analyze it, then form your own thoughts.
I happen to think An Inconvenient truth is a GREAT movie. Once you remove all the political bullshit.
Same thing with West.
Im pretty sure some people hearing Michio Kaku think he's nuts by what he's talking on. YET the information he has is relevant.
Motivations are something we ALL possess. the thing that needs to be done is to take info analyze it, then form your own thoughts.
I happen to think An Inconvenient truth is a GREAT movie. Once you remove all the political bullshit.
Same thing with West.
Im pretty sure some people hearing Michio Kaku think he's nuts by what he's talking on. YET the information he has is relevant.
hot thread 
The bottom line is we need "black" scholars to do unbiased research on this matter. The "white" folks will always try to skew this information to say that it was "their" history. I saw this documentary in the early 90's and wondered what had become of that study.
Yeah I know, I'm up on that. Supposedly the civilization of man has fallen and then risen three times before this one.
At this point I'm looking for anyone who can provide unbiased research because anyone no matter the color can have agendas. But I have not seen many Black scholars tackling this specific issue.
Sure, just ask your boy Robert Schoch, because his original estimation of the water weathering erosion was only 5k-7,000 yrs old.
Not 10K, like Anthony West, who hired Schoch, attempts to twist Schoch's work and tell you.
So there you go . ..
Now why should I have to provide the information?
I was sure you were fully aware of Ian Lawton, the Sphinx debate of 2000, and salt crystal exfoliation or what not, before even having this discussion.
OR are you also willing, to have an idea, and then you go find information to back that idea, not considering any other information, only that which serves your purpose. Much like Anthony West.
Oh, and I gotta ask you something. Do you believe the Yonaguni structures are proof of a lost civilization. Just answer that one , yes or no, please!
this is just my opinion. i think the pyramids and the sphinx are even older than 10,000 years and the whites know this, but they also know that if we find out the real truth then alot of people are gonna be questioning the authenticity of the bible, and we know that the bible is key for the people in power to keep the sheep at sleep. also the egyptians had alot of technology and many books in the library of alexandria that the white crusaders looted and destroyed. again this is just my opinion.
DAMMIT! 
I go to cook myself something to eat, thinking I got something to watch... come back and the vids are "no longer available..."
FUCK YOUTUBE!!!!
I go to cook myself something to eat, thinking I got something to watch... come back and the vids are "no longer available..."
FUCK YOUTUBE!!!!
DAMMIT!
I go to cook myself something to eat, thinking I got something to watch... come back and the vids are "no longer available..."
FUCK YOUTUBE!!!!
They'll come back on, but smoke had another link here . . .
http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/2863/The_Truth_About_The_Sphinx___African_Origins/
By associating the Egyptians with Blacks rocks the Western world ideology of the world right to its racist core!
Firstly they would have you believe that all civilizations including Egypt, migrated from the middle east region, where the ancient Phoenicians, Babylon, the modern Iraq as and Lebanon is located!
Westerners for years have based their depiction of Moses, the forefather of the three major religions, as a man from the middle east area, ignoring any possible African connection.
The major problem is that Moses was born in Egypt," no matter how much thy try to manipulate the map, is located in Africa". and by all indications Moses had features that resemble Egyptian! After all how could they mistake him for one of their own?
So to keep Moses non African and their religions non black, the white man was faced with the daunting task of creating a linage model that depicted civilization flowing out of the middle east down to Egypt! A model that can explain how middle eastern men resided in Egypt, during the time of Moses.
It would stand to reason right? I mean Egypt is considered the middle east today, and many of the curent Egyptions look arabic!
But to belive the ancient Egyptians culture originated from the middle east area, the fist thing you have to do is find a civilization from that region which predates Egypt and then try to establish a corilation between the two regions.
With the middle east shown to have an influence on the Egyptians!
Thats were their problems begin, so they go out of their way to screw with the dates of the Egytian artifacts. This often involve destroying crucial evidence. But evidence such as ligunics have proven to be the opposite!
Next they have to show a flow that shows advance technology or culture eminating from the midle east flowing down towards Egypt.
To do this they used every trick in the book, including naming lower Egypt, the norther area and upper Egypt the Southern region. This way when people hear evidence that upper Egypt was superior, they are often inclined to think, due to the natural progression of technology moving from the nort to the south, that the north is where the Egyptian civiliztion originated!
However, in reality it was the opposite, being that upper Egypt was located in the south!
Next they had to explain Nubia and all the black looking faces, that we have come to become familiar with, if you have ever visited a musem with Egyptian artifacts.
Many people do not know that following the construction of Aswan High Dam in 1960 the land of Nubia between Aswan in Egypt and the 4th cataract in Sudan (main area of Nubians) was the subject of flooding and inundation. Nubians were displaced and relocated in other areas in both Sudan and Egypt. Great Nubian monuments and historical sites were drowned and lost for good.
Many people belive that benith the water lies evidence on how old the Egyptian kindoms really were, and with that a clearer picture on how the south was where the culture originated from.
We all know about the noses being shot off, the Egyptian artifacts, ever wonder why? What was the real significance for them to go out their way to deface thousands of artifacts from Egypt, and why only Egyptan artifacts? Even though there has never been a logical explanation giving to us, we blacks know the truth behind it and know that it involves racism and deep hate.
Now they are using computer rendered programs to depict the face of King Tut.
Well the origianal render had him looking like an typical black male.
However about time, Zahi Hawass and his cohorts got hand on the image, they had him looking quite white! Funny nobody even bothered to check with the original artist of Tut, the people who lived with him. For some reason they depicted him as being black also, guess they had a Afro centric agenda to blacken the ancient Egyptians. Or perhaps as Zahi would have you believe the original Egyptians were too dumb to know how they looked like!
I tell you these guys are the keepers of the "Great Western lie!" They would do anything to make a square look like a circle, if that what it took to keep Egypt white, but don't let them fool you!
They are liars!
Firstly they would have you believe that all civilizations including Egypt, migrated from the middle east region, where the ancient Phoenicians, Babylon, the modern Iraq as and Lebanon is located!
Westerners for years have based their depiction of Moses, the forefather of the three major religions, as a man from the middle east area, ignoring any possible African connection.
The major problem is that Moses was born in Egypt," no matter how much thy try to manipulate the map, is located in Africa". and by all indications Moses had features that resemble Egyptian! After all how could they mistake him for one of their own?
So to keep Moses non African and their religions non black, the white man was faced with the daunting task of creating a linage model that depicted civilization flowing out of the middle east down to Egypt! A model that can explain how middle eastern men resided in Egypt, during the time of Moses.
It would stand to reason right? I mean Egypt is considered the middle east today, and many of the curent Egyptions look arabic!
But to belive the ancient Egyptians culture originated from the middle east area, the fist thing you have to do is find a civilization from that region which predates Egypt and then try to establish a corilation between the two regions.
With the middle east shown to have an influence on the Egyptians!
Thats were their problems begin, so they go out of their way to screw with the dates of the Egytian artifacts. This often involve destroying crucial evidence. But evidence such as ligunics have proven to be the opposite!
Next they have to show a flow that shows advance technology or culture eminating from the midle east flowing down towards Egypt.
To do this they used every trick in the book, including naming lower Egypt, the norther area and upper Egypt the Southern region.
This way when people hear evidence that upper Egypt was superior, they are often inclined to think, due to the natural progression of technology moving from the nort to the south, that the north is where the Egyptian civiliztion originated! However, in reality it was the opposite, being that upper Egypt was located in the south!
Next they had to explain Nubia and all the black looking faces, that we have come to become familiar with, if you have ever visited a musem with Egyptian artifacts.
Many people do not know that following the construction of Aswan High Dam in 1960 the land of Nubia between Aswan in Egypt and the 4th cataract in Sudan (main area of Nubians) was the subject of flooding and inundation. Nubians were displaced and relocated in other areas in both Sudan and Egypt. Great Nubian monuments and historical sites were drowned and lost for good.
Many people belive that benith the water lies evidence on how old the Egyptian kindoms really were, and with that a clearer picture on how the south was where the culture originated from.
We all know about the noses being shot off, the Egyptian artifacts, ever wonder why? What was the real significance for them to go out their way to deface thousands of artifacts from Egypt, and why only Egyptan artifacts? Even though there has never been a logical explanation giving to us, we blacks know the truth behind it and know that it involves racism and deep hate.
Now they are using computer rendered programs to depict the face of King Tut.
Well the origianal render had him looking like an typical black male.
However about time, Zahi Hawass and his cohorts got hand on the image, they had him looking quite white! Funny nobody even bothered to check with the original artist of Tut, the people who lived with him. For some reason they depicted him as being black also, guess they had a Afro centric agenda to blacken the ancient Egyptians. Or perhaps as Zahi would have you believe the original Egyptians were too dumb to know how they looked like!
I tell you these guys are the keepers of the "Great Western lie!" They would do anything to make a square look like a circle, if that what it took to keep Egypt white, but don't let them fool you!
They are liars!
Egytians depiction of King Tut
The original computer rendered version of King Tut.
The computer version of Tut presented by Zahi Hawass
Links to info on Nubia
http://www.angelfire.com/oh/AncientKnowledge/NUBIA.html
http://lexicorient.com/e.o/nubians.htm
The original computer rendered version of King Tut.
The computer version of Tut presented by Zahi Hawass
Links to info on Nubia
http://www.angelfire.com/oh/AncientKnowledge/NUBIA.html
http://lexicorient.com/e.o/nubians.htm
there goes nothing
I don't feel Schoch is accurate even though I have no way of proving it (it is just a personal hunch). 9,000 - 11,000 sounds more accurate to me because other archaeologist like Graham Hancock estimate it around the 10,000 range as well.
shane said:Now why should I have to provide the information?
you're not providing me with anything that can change my mind.
shane said:
The salt crystal stress induced exfoliation theory sounds very plausible. And could very well have caused the erosion, but the water erosion theory also is plausible. It really could go either way, but the reason why I'm more behind the water erosion bandwagon is because of the geological records.
shane said:
Yes
By associating the Egyptians with Blacks rocks the Western world ideology of the world right to its racist core!
Firstly they would have you believe that all civilizations including Egypt, migrated from the middle east region, where the ancient Phoenicians, Babylon, the modern Iraq as and Lebanon is located!
Westerners for years have based their depiction of Moses, the forefather of the three major religions, as a man from the middle east area, ignoring any possible African connection.
The major problem is that Moses was born in Egypt," no matter how much thy try to manipulate the map, is located in Africa". and by all indications Moses had features that resemble Egyptian! After all how could they mistake him for one of their own?
So to keep Moses non African and their religions non black, the white man was faced with the daunting task of creating a linage model that depicted civilization flowing out of the middle east down to Egypt! A model that can explain how middle eastern men resided in Egypt, during the time of Moses.
It would stand to reason right? I mean Egypt is considered the middle east today, and many of the curent Egyptions look arabic!
But to belive the ancient Egyptians culture originated from the middle east area, the fist thing you have to do is find a civilization from that region which predates Egypt and then try to establish a corilation between the two regions.
With the middle east shown to have an influence on the Egyptians!
Thats were their problems begin, so they go out of their way to screw with the dates of the Egytian artifacts. This often involve destroying crucial evidence. But evidence such as ligunics have proven to be the opposite!
Next they have to show a flow that shows advance technology or culture eminating from the midle east flowing down towards Egypt.
To do this they used every trick in the book, including naming lower Egypt, the norther area and upper Egypt the Southern region.
However, in reality it was the opposite, being that upper Egypt was located in the south!
Next they had to explain Nubia and all the black looking faces, that we have come to become familiar with, if you have ever visited a musem with Egyptian artifacts.
Many people do not know that following the construction of Aswan High Dam in 1960 the land of Nubia between Aswan in Egypt and the 4th cataract in Sudan (main area of Nubians) was the subject of flooding and inundation. Nubians were displaced and relocated in other areas in both Sudan and Egypt. Great Nubian monuments and historical sites were drowned and lost for good.
Many people belive that benith the water lies evidence on how old the Egyptian kindoms really were, and with that a clearer picture on how the south was where the culture originated from.
We all know about the noses being shot off, the Egyptian artifacts, ever wonder why? What was the real significance for them to go out their way to deface thousands of artifacts from Egypt, and why only Egyptan artifacts? Even though there has never been a logical explanation giving to us, we blacks know the truth behind it and know that it involves racism and deep hate.
Now they are using computer rendered programs to depict the face of King Tut.
Well the origianal render had him looking like an typical black male.
However about time, Zahi Hawass and his cohorts got hand on the image, they had him looking quite white! Funny nobody even bothered to check with the original artist of Tut, the people who lived with him. For some reason they depicted him as being black also, guess they had a Afro centric agenda to blacken the ancient Egyptians. Or perhaps as Zahi would have you believe the original Egyptians were too dumb to know how they looked like!
I tell you these guys are the keepers of the "Great Western lie!" They would do anything to make a square look like a circle, if that what it took to keep Egypt white, but don't let them fool you!
They are liars!
Egytians depiction of King Tut
The original computer rendered version of King Tut.
The computer version of Tut presented by Zahi Hawass
Links to info on Nubia
http://www.angelfire.com/oh/AncientKnowledge/NUBIA.html
http://lexicorient.com/e.o/nubians.htm
good drop
I was about to Colin Powell you but you put a lot of work into this response.
If you have ever seen Black Athena, one of the Egyptologist in the doc say that the reason Egyptians made them self look Black was because of symbolism........
she went on to say it symbolized rebirth, not their complexion.
these motherfuckas
..................and speaking of Black Athena
Black Athena
Synopsis
Examines the claims of Professor Martin Bernal who questions the assumption of the "Europeaness" of our civilisation placing instead the "black" Egyptians and Phoenicians at the centre of the West's origins.
Part 1
[FLASH]http://www.youtube.com/v/o4maNtzhL9Q&rel/[/FLASH][/QUOTE]
Part 2
[FLASH]http://www.youtube.com/v/HRANNv__aNo&rel/[/FLASH][/QUOTE]
Part 3
[FLASH]http://www.youtube.com/v/iiOvSiY3yxM&rel/[/FLASH]
part 4
[FLASH]http://www.youtube.com/v/sarKVo5wVCU&rel/[/FLASH]
Part 5
[FLASH]http://www.youtube.com/v/rBPlENmnWiE&rel/[/FLASH]
part 6
[FLASH]http://www.youtube.com/v/sdPccoJnX90&rel/[/FLASH]
part 7
[FLASH]http://www.youtube.com/v/dBa4p62RkiM&rel/[/FLASH]
link to thread
http://www.bgol.us/board/showthread.php?t=208702&highlight=black+athena
Black Athena
Synopsis
Examines the claims of Professor Martin Bernal who questions the assumption of the "Europeaness" of our civilisation placing instead the "black" Egyptians and Phoenicians at the centre of the West's origins.
Part 1
[FLASH]http://www.youtube.com/v/o4maNtzhL9Q&rel/[/FLASH][/QUOTE]
Part 2
[FLASH]http://www.youtube.com/v/HRANNv__aNo&rel/[/FLASH][/QUOTE]
Part 3
[FLASH]http://www.youtube.com/v/iiOvSiY3yxM&rel/[/FLASH]
part 4
[FLASH]http://www.youtube.com/v/sarKVo5wVCU&rel/[/FLASH]
Part 5
[FLASH]http://www.youtube.com/v/rBPlENmnWiE&rel/[/FLASH]
part 6
[FLASH]http://www.youtube.com/v/sdPccoJnX90&rel/[/FLASH]
part 7
[FLASH]http://www.youtube.com/v/dBa4p62RkiM&rel/[/FLASH]
link to thread
http://www.bgol.us/board/showthread.php?t=208702&highlight=black+athena
That's because "we" haven't allocated the resources or funding to do such digs. It seems "we're" still brainwashed into believing the history the Caucasoid has given to people of color. Collectively "blacks" have the money, but "we're" to busy trying to live the lifestyles of the rich and shameless.
wait wait wait
You telling me Imhotep didn't look like this?
Dude you're pic didn't show.
Then go read Robert Schoch, on his Yonaguni Analysis, and support his creditability. But again, deal with the fact that West twisted even his findings.
An as far as Graham Hancock goes, he and Anthony West were in bed together anyway, they both worshiped Schwaller de Lubicz . . .
Now it's gonna get really interesting here Smoke, and your going to understand WHY I said know who your listening to . . .
. . . Now go find out on Schwaller, and the simple fact he was a Nazi, who lived in Egypt and wrote that, " There was no blacks in Pre and Early Dynastic Egypt ".
Now Anthony West's, " Serpent in the Sky " is basically Schwaller's work. Now when you get into what ELSE Schwaller was, oh your going to have fun, big time fun!!!
An again, you'll understand why it matters who your listening to, and why they are telling you, what they are!
See the pixels.
Sure he look like that
Also I fully under stand how people that looked like this
could mistaken a child for their own who looked something like this!
here is where it gets juicy
They made Moses 'Daddy' look like this in the movie
Wasn't the Muslim/greco roman stint in Egypt after Ramses II?
But what a perfect satanic set up.
See everyone in the world is told everyone in the bible looked like Euros.
So it's easy to say, why should we believe in the White man's religion, or the slave master's religion.
An then look. Once refuses a relationship of spiritual fulfillment with their creator. It's a great plan of propaganda!
See everyone in the world is told everyone in the bible looked like Euros.
So it's easy to say, why should we believe in the White man's religion, or the slave master's religion.
An then look. Once refuses a relationship of spiritual fulfillment with their creator. It's a great plan of propaganda!
Sure he look like that
Also I fully under stand how people that looked like this
could mistaken a child for their own who looked something like this!
wait wait wait
You telling me Imhotep didn't look like this?
I take it you're being facetious.
I'm not going by West findings though, like I have been saying I'm relying on the geological records.
shane said:
Refer to first response
I don't see how this holds relevance when West and Hancock acknowledges that the Pre and Early Dynastic Egyptians were Blacks.
shane said:
I never said it doesn't matter who you're listening too, I don't know where you're getting this. All I'm saying is that the overall bigger picture is much more important than the agendas being orchestrated. Everyone has an agenda, even the authors, scholars, and researchers you take a liking to. The main thing is to discern what YOU think is credible and disregard the ones you don't view in the same light. The Sphinx appears to predate the original estimate, we both agree on that so what's the problem?
Last edited:
eeeeeeh I was trying to be funny and it didn't work
eeeeeeh I was trying to be funny and it didn't work
Smoked ya gotta be lil' bit more bold with your humor on this board.
Good drop Shane!
here is where it gets juicy
They made Moses 'Daddy' look like this in the movie
Wasn't the Muslim/greco roman stint in Egypt after Ramses II?
Outside of the Portrayal of color in those films.. NOBODY can fuck with Yul ...
Similar threads
