Nicca you making up shit about me. . But you actually posting trannys. Real life
You would have been banned on the old bgol. Bgol must be woke now or something allowing that’s shit. Straight moist
UPDATE: Tariq Nasheed pushed for $7Mil for Hidden History Museum; Professor James Smalls get cast out of FBA cult
- Thread starter Mr. Met
- Start date
You would have been banned on the old bgol. Bgol must be woke now or something allowing that’s shit. Straight moist
First you post trannys and now your using the word ate like biaaatch. wtf.
@ "museum built""tetters"???? You're lucky to only have received a warning for now, as you have violated the site rule numerous times, even after the site rule was established on 12/14/24. Perhaps the MODS need a reminder.
Last edited:
people are building countries , global infrastructure, banking systems, cross continental trade networks,u talking about tax prep hookah lounge masquerading a s a museum which has nothing but PanAfrican figures... what a joke ! $5million to "lease rent the space?
which Africans are "working for the government against black americans" ? name the organizations,
which law or statutes have they championed,
which bank loans have Africans collectively denied u ? housing ?education? healthcare ? jobs?
but I can show u black Americans who have literally worked for the USgovt against Africa
214 PAGES & NOT 1 SINGLE PAGE DEDICATED TO ORGANIZING HOW TO GET REPARATIONS ...
ISNT THAT WHAT THEY SAID THIS WHOLE THING WAS ABOUT ?
BUT EVERY PAGE IS ANOTHER PAGE OF SOME RANDOM POST ABOUT SOME RANDOM AFRICANS EVEN THE ONES NOT HERE IN AMERICA ..
U'D ALMOST THINK THE MOVEMENT WAS ABOUT REPARATIONS AND NOT FINDING REASONS TO HATE AFRICA/AFRICANS
ISNT THAT WHAT THEY SAID THIS WHOLE THING WAS ABOUT ?
BUT EVERY PAGE IS ANOTHER PAGE OF SOME RANDOM POST ABOUT SOME RANDOM AFRICANS EVEN THE ONES NOT HERE IN AMERICA ..
U'D ALMOST THINK THE MOVEMENT WAS ABOUT REPARATIONS AND NOT FINDING REASONS TO HATE AFRICA/AFRICANS
Last edited:
"tetters"???? You're lucky to only have received a warning for now, as you have violated the site rule numerous times, even after the site rule was established on 12/14/24. Perhaps the MODS need a reminder.
Last edited:
@11:30 mark to 15:30
“French African” says
Burkino Faso is also a fraud being used by Russia intelligence against America.
The scamming doesn’t stopMic drop
Nicca said “how can he re negotiate contracts for mines and only been in power for a few months “
In getting tired of beating yal up. This ain’t fair
Last edited:
@11:30 mark to 15:30
“French African” says
Burkino Faso is also a fraud being used by Russia intelligence against America.
Mic drop
Nicca said “how can he re negotiate contracts for mines and only been in power for a few months “
In getting tired of beating yal up. This ain’t fair
The subject of Geopolitics is CLEARLY NOT your strong suit. Stop embarrassing yourself.
The nation of Burkino Faso, under the leadership of Ibrahim Traoré, kicked out the French colonialists, French troops, French Embassy, eliminated foreign debt, and is doing something called NATION-BUILDING. That includes rebuilding it's infrastructure, building more schools (in contrast to the clown show Administration's efforts to defund the Department of Education), new roads, enhancing it's military, and making business deals with BRICS member nations, for starters.
Speaking of Russia, what African nation have they colonized? Let that sing in.
Historically, America and France have been nothing but cancers, stifling the growth of African nations such as Burkino Faso, but those days are clearly ending across the continent. So of course, the U.S. and France, two colonizers, would take issue with a nation (that has dejected the colonial nations) doing what's in it's own best interests, including an actual business relationship with non-colonial nations in lieu of a colonial relationship, where their nation would otherwise receive pennies for valuable resources.
Last edited:
Went from a "Reparations Movement" to a "Delineation Movement"
You would think congress told them, yeah you'll get reparations if you shit on your people.
Yep, "reparations movement" to "delineation movement" to MAGA TURDS, echoing their talking points, such as disparaging African nations kicking out colonialists for necessary nation-building, which is a foreign concept to self-appointed bots of a shitty grift that changes with the wind.
Last edited:
I just wanted return and provide some backing to my statement with evidence.
Video is timestamped to start where he says, "it's a whole new vibe" and him mentioning that there is a Delineation Movement (@23m33s)
Where one can interpret the "old vibe" was the Reparations Movement.
At this point we can conclude lineage, as the agenda, has taken the front seat for Tariq and FBA.
Video is timestamped to start where he says, "it's a whole new vibe" and him mentioning that there is a Delineation Movement (@23m33s)
Where one can interpret the "old vibe" was the Reparations Movement.
At this point we can conclude lineage, as the agenda, has taken the front seat for Tariq and FBA.
Nicca I didn’t make the statement. This is what Africans who have boots in the ground are sayjng.
Are you in Africa? Because they are. Sounds like your just watching the show
"Nicca I didn’t make the statement."
How old are you? 10?
"This is what Africans who have boots in the ground are sayjng."
Again, you're CLEARLY out of your depth with the subject current of current events concerning Burkina Faso, much less which specific nations you are talking about because you mindlessly regurgitate with NO thought, like a drone or a BOT.
"Are you in Africa?"
Full cope, when sonned on display here
You post #7,464 was not the FLEX you thought it would be.
I'm neither a fan nor follower. Did you honestly think I would waste about an hour of my time listening to you boy babble?
Last edited:
"Nicca I didn’t make the statement."
How old are you? 10?
"This is what Africans who have boots in the ground are sayjng."
Again, you're CLEARLY out of your depth with the subject current of current events concerning Burkina Faso, much less which specific nations you are talking about because you mindlessly regurgitate with NO thought, like a drone or a BOT.
"Are you in Africa?"
Full cope when sonned display here
You post #7,464 was not the FLEX you thought it would be.
Dude is arguing in favor of white supremacy and colonization.
When called out for posting that White Nationalist / Pro-Colonist TURD content, his dumb ass retort is:
"I didn’t make the statement."
"This is what Africans who have their boots IN the ground are saying."
Like confused ass toddler
Out of his depth, like a motherfucker
No but I knew would make a post to get this to 300 pages"Nicca I didn’t make the statement."
How old are you? 10?
"This is what Africans who have boots in the ground are sayjng."
Again, you're CLEARLY out of your depth with the subject current of current events concerning Burkina Faso, much less which specific nations you are talking about because you mindlessly regurgitate with NO thought, like a drone or a BOT.
"Are you in Africa?"
Full cope when sonned display here
You post #7,464 was not the FLEX you thought it would be.
I'm neither a fan nor follower. Did you honestly think I would waste about an hour of my time listening to you boy babble?
Let’s take me out of it."Nicca I didn’t make the statement."
How old are you? 10?
"This is what Africans who have boots in the ground are sayjng."
Again, you're CLEARLY out of your depth with the subject current of current events concerning Burkina Faso, much less which specific nations you are talking about because you mindlessly regurgitate with NO thought, like a drone or a BOT.
"Are you in Africa?"
Full cope when sonned display here
You post #7,464 was not the FLEX you thought it would be.
I'm neither a fan nor follower. Did you honestly think I would waste about an hour of my time listening to you boy babble?
So your saying frank ZANU is clueless and you know more about it than they do.
Ok. I’ll take your word for it.
1)So how long does it take to cancel contracts and then find new bidders to make new contracts for the mines.
2) where did they get the money from to pay off their debt?
Floors yours
Damn, they did a number on you, earlier
After the previous mining companies were kicked out, there was some, as Migos put it, "Straightenin" of mining contract terms in Burkina Faso before new contracts were awarded between June and September to four new contracts with Nordgold, Perenti, West African Resources, and Oman.
Key changes to mining contracts:
- Increased state equity: The new mining code, adopted in August 2024, mandates a 15% free-carried equity stake for the state in new projects. This means Burkina Faso gains a larger share of profits without investing any capital.
- Potential for more state ownership: The new code also includes provisions for the state to acquire up to a 30-35% paid equity stake, potentially bringing total state ownership to 45-50%.
- Nationalization of assets: The government has nationalized five gold mining assets previously owned by foreign companies like Endeavour Mining, bringing them under the control of the state-owned SOPAMIB
- Increased government revenue: The changes are intended to increase the benefits Burkina Faso receives from its natural resources, especially amidst an economic downturn caused by insecurity.
- Shift away from Western influence: The move towards closer ties with Russia and other partners like Oman is seen as a strategic pivot away from traditional Western allies.
- Investor concerns: These changes have raised concerns among some international investors regarding contract stability and risk in the country's mining sector.
Decoding Ibrahim Traore in the context of Imperialism
Understanding the ideological background of Ibrahim Traore, the Head of Burkina Faso, the African Country and his policies
Thursday September 11, 2025 10:10 PM, Pon Chandran
What is the ideological background of Ibrahim Traore, the Head of Burkina Faso, the African Country?
Ibrahim Traoré’s ideological background is characterized by a mix of nationalism, pan-Africanism, and anti-imperialist views. He is a strong verbal opponent of neocolonialism and Western domination, and has worked to increase Burkina Faso’s economic self-sufficiency, notably through the nationalization of gold mines.
During his time as a student at the University of Ouagadougou, he was a member of the Marxist National Association of Students of Burkina Faso (ANEB). He is often compared to Thomas Sankara, a former revolutionary leader of the country, due to his similar anti-imperialist stance, military background, and focus on national self-determination.
What are the policies which he implemented since he assumed the Power?
Since assuming power, Ibrahim Traoré has implemented a number of policies that reflect his nationalist, anti-imperialist, and pan-Africanist ideology. These policies can be broadly categorized into economic, foreign, and domestic/security initiatives.
Economic Policies
- Economic Self-Reliance: Traoré’s government has focused on achieving economic independence and reducing reliance on foreign aid and institutions. This includes rejecting loans from organizations like the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank.
- Natiolnalization of Gold Mines: A cornerstone of his economic policy has been the nationalization of gold mines.The government has taken control of the country’s gold mining industry, which is a key economic sector. This move is aimed at ensuring that the profits from Burkina Faso’s natural resources benefit its own people and are used to fund national development projects, such as infrastructure, education, and healthcare.
- Debt Repayment: Traoré’s government has announced that it has cleared Burkina Faso’s external debt, attributing this to sound financial management and increased earnings from resources like gold.
- Agricultural Development: The government has prioritized agricultural sovereignty, with efforts to boost production through the distribution of tractors, farming equipment, and improved seeds. This has reportedly led to increased yields in crops like tomatoes, millet, and rice.
- Industrialization: Traoré has also supported the development of local industries, including the establishment of new processing plants for tomatoes and cotton.
Foreign and Diplomatic Policies
- Distancing from France and the West: Traoré has taken a strong stance against former colonial power France. His government has expelled French troops and ended military cooperation agreements with France. French media outlets have also been suspended. This is a clear move to break away from what he and his supporters view as neocolonial influence.
- Strengthening Ties with Russia and Other Nations: In line with his anti-Western position, Traoré has cultivated closer relationships with other countries, particularly Russia. He has referred to Russia as a “strategic ally” and has sought arms and military training from Moscow to assist in the fight against insurgents. He has also explored diplomatic contacts with other countries like Iran and Venezuela.
- Alliance of Sahel States (AES): Burkina Faso, along with neighboring Mali and Niger (both also under military rule), has formed the Alliance of Sahel States (AES). This alliance is a “collective defense and mutual assistance” pact aimed at addressing security challenges in the region and countering pressure from the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS).
Domestic and Security Policies
- Security Focus: Traoré came to power on the promise of improving the security situation and fighting a persistent jihadist insurgency. His government has adopted a military-first approach, rejecting negotiations with militants.
- “Homeland Defense Volunteers” (VDP): The government has massively expanded the recruitment of state-backed civilian militias known as the Volunteers for the Defense of the Homeland (VDP) to assist the military in counter-insurgency operations.
- Authoritarian Consolidation: Critics have noted an increase in pro-government propaganda and a crackdown on dissent. Traoré’s government has been accused of human rights abuses and has taken steps to consolidate power, including extending his mandate for an additional five years, while also allowing him to contest the next presidential elections.
- Anti-LGBTQ+ Legislation: The government has introduced a law that criminalizes homosexuality, with punishments including prison sentences and fines. This move is presented as a measure to protect “cultural values.”
The comparison of Ibrahim Traoré to Che Guevara is a powerful and popular one, particularly among young people in Africa and the African diaspora. It’s a symbolic title that reflects a certain set of beliefs and aspirations. However, its appropriateness is a complex issue, with both strong arguments in its favor and significant counter-arguments.
Arguments for the Comparison
Those who refer to Traoré as the “Che of Africa” often point to a series of parallels and shared ideological ground:- Anti-Imperialist and Anti-Neocolonial Stance: Like Guevara, who fought against U.S. imperialism in Latin America, Traoré has positioned himself as a fierce opponent of Western, and particularly French, influence in Africa. He has expelled French troops, suspended French media outlets, and openly criticized neocolonial systems, a stance that resonates deeply across the continent.
- Nationalism and Self-Reliance: Guevara was a key figure in the Cuban Revolution’s push for self-sufficiency and socialist development. Similarly, Traoré’s policies—such as the nationalization of gold mines, rejection of IMF loans, and focus on agricultural and industrial self-reliance—are seen as direct and practical steps to reclaim national sovereignty and economic destiny.
- Youthful, Charismatic, and Revolutionary Image: Both figures came to power at a young age and cultivated a charismatic image. Traoré’s simple military attire and direct, unscripted speeches project an image of an authentic, no-nonsense leader dedicated to his people, much like the iconic image of Guevara. This populist appeal has made him a hero for many young Africans who are disillusioned with traditional, often corrupt, political elites.
- Emphasis on Military Action and Counter-Insurgency: Both Guevara and Traoré are military leaders who rose through the ranks in armed conflict. Traoré’s main stated goal is to defeat the jihadist insurgency in Burkina Faso, a fight he has framed as a revolutionary struggle for the nation’s survival and a rejection of Western military partnerships that he sees as ineffective.
Counter-Arguments and Criticisms
While the “Che” label has powerful symbolic resonance, critics argue that it is an oversimplification and, in some ways, misleading:- Authoritarianism and Human Rights Concerns: A significant criticism is that the comparison overlooks Traoré’s authoritarian methods. Critics, including human rights organizations, point to a crackdown on dissent, suppression of free speech, and alleged human rights abuses by his forces, including extrajudicial killings. Guevara’s own record on human rights during the Cuban Revolution is also a subject of historical debate and criticism.
- Lack of a Clear, Developed Ideology: While Traoré has a clear anti-Western stance, his ideology is not as comprehensively defined or as deeply rooted in a specific political philosophy as Guevara’s Marxism. Traoré’s policies are often described as more pragmatic and nationalist than strictly socialist or communist, and his alliances with countries like Russia are seen by some as a shift from one foreign power to another, rather than a true break from external influence.
- Fragile Security Situation: The most significant and concrete criticism is that Traoré’s government has so far failed to deliver on its primary promise: to improve security. Despite his military background and a massive recruitment of civilian militias, the jihadist insurgency has reportedly worsened in some areas since he took power.The government controls less than half of the country, and the number of internally displaced people continues to grow. This stands in contrast to the relative success of the Cuban Revolution in consolidating power.
- Consolidation of Power, Not Revolution: Some observers argue that Traoré’s actions, such as extending his mandate for five years without elections, are less about a popular revolution and more about the consolidation of personal power. The focus on a single, charismatic leader can undermine the development of strong, democratic institutions, a pattern that has often led to instability in post-colonial Africa.
However, from a critical standpoint, the comparison is problematic because it glosses over his authoritarian tendencies, the worsening security situation, and the potential for his government to become another in a long line of military regimes that have failed to bring lasting stability and democracy to the continent.
Being an ardent Muslim himself, what are his visions about the Polity of the Islamic world?
Ibrahim Traoré’s vision and policies regarding the Islamic world and the broader polity are not defined by a narrow, religious-centric agenda, but are instead deeply integrated into his overarching nationalist and pan-Africanist ideology. While he is a Muslim himself, his public statements and actions suggest that his priority is the unity and sovereignty of Burkina Faso and Africa, rather than the promotion of a specific Islamic political project.
Here are some key aspects of his approach:
- Religious Unity as a National Security Imperative: Traoré has consistently emphasized the importance of inter-religious harmony, particularly between Muslims and Christians, who make up the two largest religious groups in Burkina Faso. He has publicly warned that religious division is a tool of “the West” and colonial powers to weaken and destabilize African nations. He has made it clear that those who try to sow discord along religious lines will face harsh punishment. This stance is a direct response to the jihadist insurgency, which often targets Christians and seeks to incite religious conflict.
- Rejection of Foreign Religious Influence: A notable example of his policy is his government’s rejection of a proposal from Saudi Arabia to fund the construction of 200 mosques in Burkina Faso. Traoré stated that the country already had a sufficient number of mosques and that the funds would be better spent on education, healthcare, and infrastructure. This decision highlights his focus on national development and self-reliance over accepting foreign aid, even if it comes in a religious context. It also suggests a resistance to the influence of specific strains of Islam that may be promoted by foreign powers.
- Pragmatic Alliances over Ideological ones: While he has cultivated closer ties with Russia, Iran, and other nations, his alliances appear to be based on pragmatic interests, primarily for security and economic assistance, rather than a shared Islamic vision. His public remarks and diplomatic engagements focus on strategic cooperation and mutual benefit, not on building a “Muslim bloc.”
- Anti-Imperialism as a Core Principle: His anti-imperialist stance is the central pillar of his foreign policy, which he sees as a shared struggle for all African nations, regardless of their religious makeup. He views the fight against Western exploitation and the quest for African sovereignty as a common cause that transcends religious boundaries. This is evident in his efforts to build the Alliance of Sahel States with Mali and Niger, both of which are also under military rule and share his anti-Western outlook.
- Focus on Internal Stability and Counter-Terrorism: The primary goal of Traoré’s government is to defeat the jihadist insurgency, which is composed of extremist groups that claim to be acting in the name of Islam but are widely condemned by Burkinabé society. His policies, such as the recruitment of civilian militias and a no-negotiation policy with militants, are driven by a security-first agenda to restore state control over the country.
It is rumoured that Ibrahim Traore would face the fate of Gadafi of Lebanon or Saddam Hussain of Iraq very soon by the Western Powers?
The rumors and speculation that Ibrahim Traoré could face a fate similar to Muammar Gaddafi or Saddam Hussein are part of a broader discourse surrounding his rise to power and his strong anti-Western stance. This perspective is not based on concrete, verified plans by Western powers, but rather on a historical pattern of Western intervention in countries whose leaders challenge their interests.
Here’s a breakdown of the arguments and context surrounding this rumor:
The Basis for the Rumors
- Anti-Western Rhetoric and Actions: Traoré has been highly vocal in his criticism of France and other Western powers. He has expelled French military forces, ended a key military pact with France, and has actively sought new partners, most notably Russia. This public and decisive break from a traditional Western ally is seen as a direct challenge to the geopolitical order in the Sahel, a region of significant strategic interest for countries like France and the United States.
- Nationalization of Resources: Like Gaddafi and Saddam Hussein, Traoré has taken steps to assert national control over key resources, particularly the gold mining industry. This policy of “resource nationalism” is often viewed by Western powers and multinational corporations as a threat to their economic interests. The nationalization of assets can create a direct conflict with powerful business and political lobbies.
- Parallels to Gaddafi: The comparison to Gaddafi is particularly potent. Gaddafi was a pan-Africanist who also sought to create a unified African currency (the gold dinar) and challenged the Western-dominated financial system.He was ultimately overthrown and killed in a NATO-backed intervention. Supporters of Traoré see his actions as a modern-day continuation of this pan-Africanist struggle, and they fear that the West will not tolerate a similar challenge to its influence.
- The “Saddam Hussein” Analogy: The comparison to Saddam Hussein is more about the pretext for intervention. Saddam was demonized by the West and his regime was ultimately toppled based on controversial claims of possessing weapons of mass destruction. The argument is that if the West felt it necessary to intervene in a country based on a flimsy pretext, they could find a way to justify an intervention in Burkina Faso if Traoré’s government proves to be too disruptive.
- Coups and Instability: Traoré himself has claimed to have foiled multiple coup attempts, and his government has accused neighboring countries like Côte d’Ivoire of backing these plots. While these claims are difficult to verify independently, they highlight the intense internal and external pressures facing his regime. Critics of the West often interpret these coup attempts as being covertly supported by foreign powers to destabilize governments that are not aligned with their interests.
Counterpoints and Reality Check
While these rumors are widespread, it is important to consider the differences between Traoré’s situation and that of Gaddafi or Saddam Hussein:- Scale and Geopolitical Significance: Burkina Faso, while strategically important in the Sahel, does not have the same global significance as Libya (a major oil producer) or Iraq (a key player in Middle Eastern oil politics). A full-scale Western military intervention in Burkina Faso is far less likely than it was in those countries.
- Western Priorities: The primary Western concern in the Sahel has been the fight against jihadist insurgency. While Western powers are wary of Traoré’s pro-Russian alignment, their immediate goal is often to prevent the region from becoming a safe haven for terrorist groups. A military intervention to remove Traoré could potentially worsen the security situation and create further instability.
- Shift in Global Dynamics: The geopolitical landscape has changed since the interventions in Libya and Iraq. The global community is now more fractured, with a rising China and a resurgent Russia. A direct Western military intervention would be far more controversial and would likely face significant opposition from countries aligned with Russia and China, as well as from the African Union.
- Focus on Subtler Influence: Rather than a direct military intervention, Western powers are more likely to use other tools to exert pressure. These include economic sanctions, diplomatic isolation, support for opposition groups (both civilian and military), and public relations campaigns to delegitimize the regime. The constant rumors of foiled coups may be a part of this psychological and political warfare.
Can Ibrahim Traore be described as a Nationalist or a National Socialist?
Based on the available information, Ibrahim Traoré can be described as a Nationalist and a Pan-Africanist. The term “National Socialist” is not used in the provided context to describe his ideology.
His political views and actions are consistently characterized by:
- Nationalism: He is described as a nationalist who advocates for the protection of national interests against external interference and emphasizes self-determination. His policies, such as the nationalization of gold mines, are seen as attempts to reclaim national sovereignty and economic destiny.
- Anti-Imperialism/Anti-Westernism: A central tenet of his ideology is a strong opposition to neocolonialism and Western influence, particularly from France. His government has expelled French troops and suspended French media outlets, and he has spoken out against what he calls “imperialistic pressure.”
- Pan-Africanism: Traoré’s actions and rhetoric have been seen to resonate with and inspire a broader Pan-African movement. He has formed an alliance with neighboring countries Mali and Niger and is seen by some as a symbol of African dignity and resistance against foreign domination.
- Other Influences: He was a member of the Marxist National Association of Students of Burkina Faso (ANEB) during his university years, and some commentators see his policies as influenced by Marxism and pan-Africanism.However, his ideology is also described as pragmatic and a blend of military pragmatism with a focus on stability.
Whether Traore’s friendly stance with Russia and China trigger the Opposition from the West?
Yes, Ibrahim Traoré’s friendly stance with Russia and China has triggered significant opposition and concern from Western powers. This is a central element of the current geopolitical tension surrounding Burkina Faso and the Sahel region.
Here’s why and how this opposition is manifesting:
Why the West is Opposed
- Geopolitical Competition: Western nations, particularly France and the United States, see the growing influence of Russia and China in Africa as a direct challenge to their own strategic interests. The Sahel, in particular, is a key front in this new geopolitical competition. Russia, through military and security partnerships, is seen as using anti-Western sentiment to expand its influence and destabilize a region vital to Europe’s southern flank. China’s growing economic footprint, often through loans and infrastructure projects under the Belt and Road Initiative, is also viewed with suspicion as a form of “debt-trap diplomacy.”
- Security Concerns: Western governments argue that Russia’s presence, particularly through military contractors like the Wagner Group (now rebranded and under direct Kremlin control), is a destabilizing force. They claim that these groups exploit natural resources, commit human rights abuses, and undermine democratic institutions. The West has long been involved in counter-terrorism efforts in the Sahel, and they view a pro-Russian military government as a threat to these operations and regional stability.
- Undermining Democracy: The military coups in Burkina Faso, Mali, and Niger have all been followed by a pivot away from the West and toward Russia. Western powers often frame these coups as an attack on democratic governance. They argue that Russia provides military and political support to authoritarian regimes, thereby undermining the rule of law and human rights in the region.
- Loss of Influence: Traoré’s government has been explicit in its rejection of France’s traditional role in the country. This includes expelling French troops, ending military cooperation agreements, and even suspending French media. This loss of influence, both militarily and diplomatically, is a major source of frustration for France and its allies.
How the West’s Opposition is Manifesting
- Diplomatic Condemnation and Isolation: The U.S. and the European Union have repeatedly condemned the military coup that brought Traoré to power and have called for a swift return to a civilian-led, constitutional government. They have also expressed concern over Burkina Faso’s military and security partnerships with Russia.
- Sanctions and Aid Cuts: While there are no comprehensive U.S. sanctions specifically on Burkina Faso, the country has been suspended from various Western-led initiatives. For example, the U.S. has cut some of its security and development assistance.
- Information Warfare: There is a well-documented information war being waged in the region, with pro-Russian and pro-Traoré narratives often spreading on social media. Western governments and think tanks have pointed to a significant increase in Russian-linked disinformation campaigns aimed at stirring up anti-French and anti-Western sentiment in Burkina Faso and other Sahel nations.
- Supporting Regional Pressure: The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), a regional bloc, has taken a hard line against the military governments in Burkina Faso, Mali, and Niger. While the Western powers are not directly involved in ECOWAS’s actions, they have generally supported the bloc’s efforts to pressure the juntas.
- Shifting Alliances: The West is attempting to counter Russia and China’s influence by building new, more “equal” partnerships with other African nations and by focusing on long-term development and trade as an alternative to military support.
Decoding Ibrahim Traore in the context of Imperialism
Understanding the ideological background of Ibrahim Traore, the Head of Burkina Faso, the African Country and his policies
Last edited:
Damn, they did a number on you, earlier
Lmao @ that retard.
Thread is on page 214, his dumbass talking bout he made a post to push the thread to 300. He's basically admitting to in his mind "keeping the thread alive". Everyone but him knows the thread been striving before and without him.
Only number they did was the amount of money they owed me from me betting anyone I’d get you clowns to whine for 100 pages. Started at 30 pagesDamn, they did a number on you, earlier
I’ve out done myself
Only number they did was the amount of money they owed me from me betting anyone I’d get you clowns to whine for 100 pages. Started at 30 pages
I’ve out done myself
More like you posting 180+ pages of evidence that you unconditionally love tariq.
A self-appointed bot of a shitty grift, attempting to imply he's some puppet master. The projection is hilarious though
@11:30 mark to 15:30
“French African” says
Burkino Faso is also a fraud being used by Russia intelligence against America.
Mic drop
Nicca said “how can he re negotiate contracts for mines and only been in power for a few months “
In getting tired of beating yal up. This ain’t fair
an fba hatecultist thinks his opinions on the success or shortcoming of Africans who have actually built things like nations, countries , banks, global trade infrastructure, government, roads, housing, mining, etc etc & fought successful revolutions carries any weight
so now its on to spew ur dumb opinions and talk about Traore, a man in his own country 10k miles away from anything that has to do with FBA..
how does one argue an opinion?
do u know what a revolution is ?
have u ever fought an fba revolution ?
okay, talking about revolutions..
can u show me one single fba revolution u have successfully fought that has freed u from the chains of ur white supremacist american masters?
the words of an uneducated child who has a lot of opinions for somebody that belongs to an fba hatecult that has never built one single fba country in all human history,
u have no fba language ,
u have no fba industries,
u no fba president, no fba currency
u no fba banks
u no fba global infrastucture
u no fba healthcare system,
u have no fba diplomat or fab president at the meeting of global leaders,
u have no fba army
like arguing about basketball when u've never played basketball!,
literally a whole zero whose whole existence is sustained by being hitched onto the nutsack of a parasitic white supremacist American government but think u know geoplitics or how a country functions when uve never built ,ran or controlled one fba country in all human history
come back and spew that dumb fba ytsupremacist critic of any African country on earth when u have fought for an independent fba country successfully , kicked out ur white masters, built an fba country with its fba currency & fba president & govt, developed & built roads, bridges, factories, provide jobs to millions , then u can come discuss the success or shortcomings of any African country
Last edited:
how can u expect an fba ppl who have never ran, owned, control or even managed an fba country in all human history to know how countries work? they can only speak from their ignorance especially since most of them are a brain dead high school dropouts who failed at life & needed someone to blame for their failures of a life?
they have a lot of braindeaduncultured , uneducated & untraveled opinions & mostly rightwing opinions at that, rightwing opinions that fixates on shittin on Africa in search of an ego boost & justification for their hate
imagine thinking he wants to flex on any shortcoming in Africa but cant show u one fba country theyve built but want to compare it to USA (his white master's country) a non fba country
@11:30 mark to 15:30
“French African” says
Burkino Faso is also a fraud being used by Russia intelligence against America.
Mic drop
Nicca said “how can he re negotiate contracts for mines and only been in power for a few months “
In getting tired of beating yal up. This ain’t fair
u didn't answer the question u posted a reply to
this is what I asked u, but u somehow conveniently ignored it, so I will repeat it for u
which Africans are "working for the government against black americans" ? name the organizations,
which law or statutes have they championed?
which bank loans have Africans collectively denied u ? housing ?education? healthcare ? jobs?
literally and thinks he ate with these post
I didn’t make any false claims. You did.
Word to the wise. Never use ate or tea. You sounding like a biaaatch
Unless you’re female
Similar threads
