Men should pay 100% of the bills in a relationship and be providers. Woman goes on how men used to be providers but aren’t anymore

What percent of the bills do you expect a live in girl/wife to pay?

  • 0%

    Votes: 3 7.9%
  • 10%

    Votes: 1 2.6%
  • 25%

    Votes: 2 5.3%
  • 50%

    Votes: 28 73.7%
  • 60%

    Votes: 2 5.3%
  • 75%

    Votes: 1 2.6%
  • 80%

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 100%

    Votes: 1 2.6%

  • Total voters
    38
Status
Not open for further replies.
Never have, never will. And when I do get married or officially partner we will pay equal parts unless she agrees to give me access to half her pension and 401k and property.

What I’m noticing currently is the more women make the less they feel like they have to take care of the basics (looks, nurture, food ,sexuality).


Co-sign
 
Never have, never will. And when I do get married or officially partner we will pay equal parts unless she agrees to give me access to half her pension and 401k and property.

What I’m noticing currently is the more women make the less they feel like they have to take care of the basics (looks, nurture, food ,sexuality).

So what are the basics part that men need to take care of?

I say 0% of her bills paid for unless you're someone that expects her to cook, clean, and all of the traditional woman roles. If you're demanding that, then you need to take on the provider role of the equation.

Cats trying to hold women to their end of the "traditional roles" equation while moonwalking out of their end.
 
So what are the basics part that men need to take care of?

I say 0% of her bills paid for unless you're someone that expects her to cook, clean, and all of the traditional woman roles. If you're demanding that, then you need to take on the provider role of the equation.

Cats trying to hold women to their end of the "traditional roles" equation while moonwalking out of their end.

I take on 100% of all bills right now, partnering up would put me/us in the top 1% and I would do it in a heartbeat for a woman that made decent money that would invest her money in upkeep of herself and our retirement. I’ll pay 80% of everything, but we will live modest ………is it worth me potentially dealing with an obese woman that wants a Range Rover or Gwagon that refuse to workout barely cooks and doesn’t want to suck dick like her life depends on it ?
 
I take on 100% of all bills right now, partnering up would put me/us in the top 1% and I would do it in a heartbeat for a woman that made decent money that would invest her money in upkeep of herself and our retirement. I’ll pay 80% of everything, but we will live modest ………is it worth me potentially dealing with an obese woman that wants a Range Rover or Gwagon that refuse to workout barely cooks and doesn’t want to suck dick like her life depends on it ?
You shouldn't put up with that from a woman, no matter the situation. And you are looking at it as a partnership. A lot of these cats want a woman to work as much as they do, make as much (if not more) than they do, do all the cooking, cleaning, fuck on demand, while they watch sports and play PS5. That's not realistic.
 
75k isn’t enough this is why so many women want 6 figure earning men. Or men with the aspirations to earn 6 figures or better. 75k is not a lot of money by any means at all

100k-75k =25k.

25k salary difference determines whether a man is dateable?

Fuck outta here.

If 75k PLUS HER INCOME ain't enough for her to be satisfied she won't be satisfied at 100k either.

Whatever the man makes she just wants to spend his money up. The mentality is the problem, not the man's income.

If she changes her mentality to a saver/investor, they would be HAPPY if he made 50k a year.
 
In a time when we discuss the role of men as providers, it is necessary to reflect on the role of women as well. Many women today ask for the man to be the sole provider, to carry 100% of the financial responsibility — and that’s fine, I don’t disagree. But the question we must ask is, are today’s women prepared to fulfill their end of the partnership as women of old once did?"

"In the past, when a man brought home his earnings, the woman knew how to stretch that dollar, how to turn modest means into nutritious meals that fed the family. She knew how to cultivate a household, not just with food, but with wisdom, discipline, and love. Today, many have lost these essential skills. They don’t know how to provide a healthy meal for their children, often trading nourishment for convenience and fast food."

"Furthermore, a good woman of old was a steward of money, prioritizing needs over wants. But too many modern women are distracted by a culture of consumerism — chasing the fleeting image of celebrity, spending on appearances rather than building a foundation for the future. How can a man be a provider when his provisions are squandered?"

"We see some women struggling to nurture the next generation. They carry the wounds of past relationships and pass those wounds onto their children, creating an imbalance. They favor their sons, making them into little kings who never learn responsibility, while their daughters are neglected, learning bitterness instead of balance."

"Yes, the man should provide, but the woman must support that provision. A partnership is a two-way street, and we cannot demand that men uphold their traditional roles if we, as a people, have abandoned our traditional values. Men and women must both rise to the occasion, balancing responsibility, skill, and respect. Only then can the home, the family, and ultimately the community, be strong once again.
 
You shouldn't put up with that from a woman, no matter the situation. And you are looking at it as a partnership. A lot of these cats want a woman to work as much as they do, make as much (if not more) than they do, do all the cooking, cleaning, fuck on demand, while they watch sports and play PS5. That's not realistic.
I cook and clean better the a. 9/10 of the women I’ve dated my adult life. My main issue right now with someone I’m seeing is she can NOT manage her money and she makes more than I do. Totally disorganized house and always runs late to shit. I don’t give her shit about her weight because she goes to the gym at times eats healthy but it needs work too.
 
In a time when we discuss the role of men as providers, it is necessary to reflect on the role of women as well. Many women today ask for the man to be the sole provider, to carry 100% of the financial responsibility — and that’s fine, I don’t disagree. But the question we must ask is, are today’s women prepared to fulfill their end of the partnership as women of old once did?"

"In the past, when a man brought home his earnings, the woman knew how to stretch that dollar, how to turn modest means into nutritious meals that fed the family. She knew how to cultivate a household, not just with food, but with wisdom, discipline, and love. Today, many have lost these essential skills. They don’t know how to provide a healthy meal for their children, often trading nourishment for convenience and fast food."

"Furthermore, a good woman of old was a steward of money, prioritizing needs over wants. But too many modern women are distracted by a culture of consumerism — chasing the fleeting image of celebrity, spending on appearances rather than building a foundation for the future. How can a man be a provider when his provisions are squandered?"

"We see some women struggling to nurture the next generation. They carry the wounds of past relationships and pass those wounds onto their children, creating an imbalance. They favor their sons, making them into little kings who never learn responsibility, while their daughters are neglected, learning bitterness instead of balance."

"Yes, the man should provide, but the woman must support that provision. A partnership is a two-way street, and we cannot demand that men uphold their traditional roles if we, as a people, have abandoned our traditional values. Men and women must both rise to the occasion, balancing responsibility, skill, and respect. Only then can the home, the family, and ultimately the community, be strong once again.
Yes they are prepared. When you put a ring on it. Never do wife duties as a girlfriend


 
Yes they are prepared. When you put a ring on it. Never do wife duties as a girlfriend




He who finds a wife is blessed, not he who finds a sometimey ass woman… If have no access to your WIFE skills we go 100 and 100 on everything. Selfish ass women want to have access to my assets and resources and bring nothing but used pussy and an open hand. I’ll pass
 
I take on 100% of all bills right now, partnering up would put me/us in the top 1% and I would do it in a heartbeat for a woman that made decent money that would invest her money in upkeep of herself and our retirement. I’ll pay 80% of everything, but we will live modest ………is it worth me potentially dealing with an obese woman that wants a Range Rover or Gwagon that refuse to workout barely cooks and doesn’t want to suck dick like her life depends on it ?


Same here. I owned my homes before her. My bills were my bills before her. When she came in the picture I didn't ask her for anything, I was already handling the shit by myself anyway.
She takes care of my kids, cleans, shops, all that shit has been taken off my plate, so it's well worth it to me. She can't cook, but my kitchen is spotless.
Since she started working, she will buy groceries,fill the cars with gas, get needed things for the kids or the house and I am satisfied with that, I don't ask and she does it because she knows I been holding it down, and I see she is doing her part.
The way I see it without her I would be paying, so what's really the difference ?
 
The men were providers days were back in the 50s and prior.. females hated it so much they had a women’s rights movement.. why cause they got tired of getting raped by their husbands, smacked around by their significant other for whatever reason, hated they coul vote, hated that society denied them over 90 percent of jobs and the jobs that did pay gave them shit wages especially compared to men, they were second class citizens, treated a lil above black people but still way beneath white men… you know why buying drinks at bars existed cause broads didn’t have money to afford their own drinks cause they were jobless with pretty much no opportunity.. these the things people tend to forget to mention about the old days.. they act like everyone was the beavers and it was so jolly and happy nah it was pure hell for white women in amerikkka and that’s why they went out and protested
These bitches still get slapped around bruh. Single moms are much more likely to associate with a dusty nigga.

Do you really think there less domestic violence now. You must not know your average lesbian relationship is more violent than traditional.

Black women aren't married to ANYONE and are financially suffering for it.

Kids least educated, women most evicted, and least married.

Moving constantly and not being married are two factors in not being able to accumulate wealth.

Explain how that is financially sane and projects success to other people?
 
Same here. I owned my homes before her. My bills were my bills before her. When she came in the picture I didn't ask her for anything, I was already handling the shit by myself anyway.
She takes care of my kids, cleans, shops, all that shit has been taken off my plate, so it's well worth it to me. She can't cook, but my kitchen is spotless.
Since she started working, she will buy groceries,fill the cars with gas, get needed things for the kids or the house and I am satisfied with that, I don't ask and she does it because she knows I been holding it down, and I see she is doing her part.
The way I see it without her I would be paying, so what's really the difference ?
Yes they do. It’s just men want a woman to do wife duties as a girlfriend. And if a woman does wat is the point of marrying?
 
You actually comparing rape to men fullfilling their traditional roles in society? Wow. Rape was never a role. Men are now slacking and women are becoming the bread winners in Their house hold.


Women fought and earned their freedom and liberation so why would women trade something they fought for? That’s like saying would you as a black man trade your freedom for racial discrimination in the work force?
To be fair, rape was not a role because the laws at the time specifically did not acknowledge spousal rape. Spousal rape only became a thing in more recent times.
 
I always laugh when women bring up this topic. Because women SUBMITTING to their man was the other part of that tradition.

Telling women to submit to their provider is seen as a hot take today.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top