NDT is the same man that said UFO's aren't real, then the US and Mexican governments provided evidence of UAPs.
NDT then preceded to pivot and proposed the question "how do you know what you are seeing are aliens". Alien to this planet or Alien to human knowledge? He sounded like a dude getting caught cheating on his wife answering question with a question.
Physicists also tend to ridicule what they don't understand unless they have evidence that is quantified with the tools at their disposal.
I haven't really dove into the beliefs of Terrence Howard because I always felt his connection to Hollywood could leave him to spread misinformation.
I also see that the YouTuber debunkers are also going in on Billy Carson. I've watched some of his videos and he seems to have the same type of alternative beliefs Terrence does.
Billy has his own issues but I think he and Terrence may have SOME brilliance in what they are saying. People like Leonardo Di Vinci and Telsa had LOTS of failures and are mostly remembered for the things they got correct.
Einstein was correct about relativity when it comes to the energy/mass relationship but struggled with the concepts of black holes and singularities.
I think its important to figure out what TH and BC got correct instead of discounting them and discarding all the information.
Are they YouTube hustling for views, prolly. I still don't get the 1x1=2 shit. Sounds like some shit my dyslexic cousin would try to hustle on me when I was 12. Then I would try to show him a MAFF book and I had to realize I was the dumbass because I tried show someone something they were gonna get fucking mixed up anyways. Duh!!!
What I will say that it is very important to have a third observation or second opinion when debunking things. In this situation I think having a non human observation such as AI programmed by AI, non human earth species, or Alien species would give us a proper understanding.
Reality is always real to the local observation until is not. Perception isn't always what think it is.
Back to NDT. NDT is probably the best source out of all three to explain the physical universe. But he's also a lying bastard because he just the type of person the experts bring in to explain the unexplainable.
To make it short, he's probably been paid good money not to say shit. He's not going to lie but he's going to be very aloof when it comes to certain questions. If there's a nuggets of truth that will lead to anything that's a breakthrough NDT may or may not disclose what he knows.
NDT does deserve credit for trying to give TH credit in some aspects of his work. He never said THs work was a complete failure but he did say a lot of what TH is trying to convey is hogwash.
I'm just wondering why both are being attacked at the same time. Maybe it's debunking the black guy week. I've seen a lot of white dudes try to call bullshit on people who are getting a lot of views, but most ain't experts at jack or shit.
How you a fuckin expert when you are barley 30?