This is just my opinion but …how the hell did these girls win the case!?! These videos were like from 2016 with adult women not with underaged girls in 1996 when most of us didn’t even have or know about the internet. The setup was like any typical “casting” site. To me it was just regular porn with amateurs. Now I didn’t participate in the court case, but if they signed some sort of release what argument did they have? …and legalities aside, WHO THE FUCK WOULD BELIEVE THAT THEY WERE JUST FILMING FOR SOME OVERSEAS RICH GUY THAT HAD A KINK - AND APPARENTLY ENOUGH MONEY - TO PAY A CREW AND A CHICK TO FILM A PORNO - BUT NOT ENOUGH TO JUST FUCK THE GIRL HIMSELF?!…had to get that off my chest, please correct me if I’m wrong.![]()
61 GirlsDoPorn Victims Sue Pornhub’s Parent Aylo AVN
Aylo, the parent company of tube sites such as Pornhub and YouPorn, on Tuesday was sued by 61 women who were victimized by the GirlsDoPorn sex trafficking ring.avn.com
![]()
61 women sue PornHub's parent company for allegedly hosting videos posted by San Diego's GirlsDoPorn
A lawsuit was filed this week on behalf of 61 women against Pornhub’s parent company for hosting videos produced by former San Diego-based website GirlsDoPorn.com, the owners and operators of which were charged by federal prosecutors with sex trafficking.www.nbcsandiego.com
![]()
62 women sue PornHub in latest San Diego case involving GirlsDoPorn videos
More than 60 women who say they were forced, defrauded or coerced into making explicit films by San Diego-based GirlsDoPorn are suing the parent company of PornHub and other free adult video sites,…www.sandiegouniontribune.com