It's just a bunch of low level media types trying to get attention and followers.
I don't blame them really cause that's how they eat, but just not listening to their bullshit.
Like you said, most don't even know what they are talking about.
Israel Declares War After Hamas Attacks. UPDATE: Israel Ends Ceasefire, Begins Bombing Gaza
- Thread starter Knuckles666
- Start date
I don't blame them really cause that's how they eat, but just not listening to their bullshit.
Like you said, most don't even know what they are talking about.
Bitch ass nigga still finds a way to trash Black people with the “nigga baby” shit. He sounds like a fucking clown ass coon I don’t care if he does it for clicks
Obama got no love for his trouble in terms of trying to do something on the issue. He took a lot of political damage for efforts to help the Palestinians directly and got no love domestically or abroad.The wild thing is that we had W. Bush, the man who single-handedly set back progress in the middle east by generations, in part because of the Muslim vote in 2000. He got something like 70-90% + of their vote depending on the poll.
Remember Grover Norquist? He was big behind trying to bring Muslims into the GOP and said this after the 2000 election: “George W. Bush was elected president of the United States of America because of the Muslim vote." Why was this his cause when he was only influential at that time for being the anti-tax warrior? His wife is Palestinian and was later a Trump political appointee... 
Egypt warned Israel three days before Hamas attack: senior US lawmaker
WASHINGTON: Israel got a warning from Egypt of potential violence three days before Hamas caught Israeli forces off-guard in a large-scale attack, the chairman of the powerful US House Foreign Affairs Committee said Wednesday. “We know that Egypt has warned the Israelis three days prior that an...
www.arabnews.com
Hamas didn't do themselves or the Palestinian people any favors by starting this shit, killing innocent women and children and if any of this is true what they are reporting about these babies, then they can burn in hell.
You’re going to rile up the Sand Cac lovers for showing sympathy to both sides . These niggas can’t differentiate between the regular people and their terrorists. Hamas are terrorists, The Israeli Military are also not civilians. Any regular non combat people on either side getting slaughtered is bad.
Hamas like Isis also hides amongst civilians causing mass casualties of civilians. They also went into random peoples houses and just murdered them.
Yup. He knew he fucked up and reconciled quick. Man flew Air Force One himself to Israel inna heartbeat lol
The wild thing is that we had W. Bush, the man who single-handedly set back progress in the middle east by generations, in part because of the Muslim vote in 2000. He got something like 70-90% + of their vote depending on the poll.
Grover was instrumental in that Muslim push back then. I remember them calling Dubya, “America’s First Muslim President…” kinda how we called Clinton America First Black President in 94 lol.
The grand irony came a year later during 9/11, when the very people that put him in office, became Americas biggest scapegoats for the next 2 decades.
It’s a dirty DIRTY game.
Last edited:
I hear you bruh, Hamas are terrorists just like ISIS and Al-Qaeda, they crazy! I can't and will never defend them fools, decapitating babies heads, no way in hell I would defend that shit.
U.S. ain’t no different
This sounds like CNN lol
Hamas didn't do themselves or the Palestinian people any favors by starting this shit, killing innocent women and children and if any of this is true what they are reporting about these babies, then they can burn in hell.
Propaganda. Be aware of who reports
I hear you bruh, Hamas are terrorists just like ISIS and Al-Qaeda, they crazy! I can't and will never defend them fools, decapitating babies heads, no way in hell I would defend that shit.
Gaza is literally an open air prison but many of the "leadership" for Hamas actually live in Qatar/Turkey etc. Many of them are worth hundreds of millions and in some instances, billions.
It is also not a political party or organization like we have here. They are the government meaning that every aspect of life goes through them. This is from last year about a lot of the youth who are dying trying to escape and get to Europe. Shit is a fucked up situation with a lot different groups playing a role. 
At mass funeral, furious Gazans blame Hamas for drowning of migrants
Mother of Palestinian who died at sea trying to reach Europe slams terror group's leaders for living luxuriously while youth make risky journey to flee hardship in Strip
www.timesofisrael.com
So you’re saying Hamas aren’t terrorists who use their own people as shields? Is that what you’re saying? You’re acting like they are an innocent revolutionary group fighting for equality. You have nothing bad to say about them just like you ignore Republikkklan bullshit. Israels government ain’t shit either , they fake propaganda to gain sympathy just like Hamas. They both trash and innocent people get caught up in their garbage.
This is the outcome of the Trump Administration.... this idiot with his wife violated/ desiccated the teaching and traditions of touching the Jerusalem wall.
Yes we are to provide help and assistance countries in need of help... but to get involved in their internal affairs is a NO NO,,,,,
What is the problem between Israel and Palestine?
Settlements: Most countries deem Jewish settlements built on land Israel occupied in 1967 as illegal. Israel disputes this and cites historical and Biblical ties to the land. Their continued expansion is among the most contentious issues between Israel, the Palestinians and the international community.
What is the issue between Hamas and Israel?
Hamas officials cited long-simmering tensions, including a dispute over the sensitive Al-Aqsa Mosque sacred to both Muslims and Jews. Competing claims over the site, known to Jews as the Temple Mount, have spilled into violence before, including a bloody 11-day war between Israel and Hamas in 2021.
We are ambassadors of Peace not decision makers for other countries.. they can make their own decisions......
This is not the end of the world.. but a step closer to creating narcissist fanaticism... just like Trump a Malignant Narcissist.. who ran the United States with no true leadership.... AS THE OLD SAYING GOES>>> NOTHING POSITIVE EVER COMES OUT OF A NARCISSIST...
And let me not talk about
www.aljazeera.com
Yes we are to provide help and assistance countries in need of help... but to get involved in their internal affairs is a NO NO,,,,,
What is the problem between Israel and Palestine?
Settlements: Most countries deem Jewish settlements built on land Israel occupied in 1967 as illegal. Israel disputes this and cites historical and Biblical ties to the land. Their continued expansion is among the most contentious issues between Israel, the Palestinians and the international community.
What is the issue between Hamas and Israel?
Hamas officials cited long-simmering tensions, including a dispute over the sensitive Al-Aqsa Mosque sacred to both Muslims and Jews. Competing claims over the site, known to Jews as the Temple Mount, have spilled into violence before, including a bloody 11-day war between Israel and Hamas in 2021.
We are ambassadors of Peace not decision makers for other countries.. they can make their own decisions......
This is not the end of the world.. but a step closer to creating narcissist fanaticism... just like Trump a Malignant Narcissist.. who ran the United States with no true leadership.... AS THE OLD SAYING GOES>>> NOTHING POSITIVE EVER COMES OUT OF A NARCISSIST...
And let me not talk about
Benjamin Netanyahu
Is Netanyahu good for the Palestinians?
Netanyahu’s narcissist fanaticism, and the anarchy and alienation it is producing, may prove useful to the Palestinians
Is Netanyahu good for the Palestinians?
Bibi is dragging Israel towards the abyss, but it may not be all bad news for the Palestinians – if they play their cards right.
NYU LAW STUDENT JOB OFFER IS WITHDRAWN FOR SUPPORT OF PALESTINE Black folk need only to discuss this among the like minded...200K plus salary gone just like that
www.dailymail.co.uk
NYU Bar Association's president says Hamas' slaughter was NECESSARY
Ryna Workman, 24, a non-binary student at NYU's School of Law sent a weekly newsletter saying the murder of innocent Israeli citizens this past week was is Israel's 'full responsibility.'
EVIL Vs GOOD....Netanyahu = narcissist fanaticism so
Always remember England’s role in all this. Israeli/Jews might be the rabid pitbull at the moment, but the UK are the ones who took them off the leash:
(Excerpts)
In 1915 we promised the Arabs independence; and the promise was unqualified, except in respect of certain territorial reservations. In 1918 the promise was by implication repeated; for no other interpretation can, I think, be placed by any unbiased reader on the phrases in the declaration about a ‘National Government’ and ‘an Administration deriving its authority from the initiative and free choice of the native population’.
[…]
“Now where the covenant of 1919 is in contradiction with the Agreement of 1916 [Sykes-Picot] it is presumably the Covenant which must be held to represent our policy. We are seemingly committed, therefore, to the view that the whole area we are considering already consists of an independent nation or nations; and that all we have to do, after having got rid of the Turk, is to supply every independent nation with one, but not more than one, suitable mandatory.
Without further considering whether the political picture drawn by the Covenant correponds with anything to be found in the realms of fact, let us ask on what principle these mandatories are to be selected by the Allied and Associated Powers.
On this point the Covenant speaks as follows:
“The wishes of these communities (i.e. the independent nations) must be a principal consideration in the selection of a mandatory.”
The sentiment is unimpeachable; but how it is to be carried into effect ? To simplify the argument, let us assume that two of the ‘independent nations’ for which mandatories have to be provided are Syria and Palestine ? Take Syria first. Do we mean, in the case of Syria, to consult principally the wishes of the inhabitants ? We mean nothing of the kind. According to the universally accepted view there are only three possible mandatories – England, America, and France. Are we going ‘chiefly to consider the wishes of the inhabitants’ in deciding which of these is to be selected ? We are going to do nothing of the kind. England has refused. America will refuse. So that, whatever the inhabitants may wish, it is France they will certainly have. They may freely choose; but it is Hobson’s choice after all.
The contradiction between the letter of the Covenant and the policy of the Allies is even more flagrant in the case of the ‘independent nation’ of Palestine than in that of the ‘independent nation’ of Syria. For in Palestine we do not propose even to go through the form of consulting the wishes of the present inhabitants of the country, though the American Commission has been going through the form of asking what they are. The four Great Powers are committed to Zionism. And Zionism, be it right or wrong, good or bad, is rooted in age-lng traditions, in present needs, in future hopes, of far profounder import than the desires and prejudices of the 700,000 Arabs who now inhabit that ancient land.
In my opinion that is right.
[…]
If Zionism is to influence the Jewish problem throughout the world Palestine must be made available for the largest number of Jewish immigrants. It is therefore eminently desirable that it should obtain the command of the water-power which naturally belongs to it, whether by extending its borders to the north, or by treaty with the mandatory of Syria, to whom the southward flowing waters of Hamon could not in any event be of much value.
For the same reasons Palestine should extend into the lands lying east of the Jordan. It should not, however, be allowed to include the Hedjaz Railway, which is too distinctly bound up with exclusively Arab interests…
——————————————————————
They had no intention of an even split or considering the words of the Declrarion. The mindset of British global imperialism was crystal clear:
Divide and mothafucking conquer.
Memorandum by Lord Balfour Respecting Syria, Palestine and Mesopotamia, 1919
(Excerpts)
In 1915 we promised the Arabs independence; and the promise was unqualified, except in respect of certain territorial reservations. In 1918 the promise was by implication repeated; for no other interpretation can, I think, be placed by any unbiased reader on the phrases in the declaration about a ‘National Government’ and ‘an Administration deriving its authority from the initiative and free choice of the native population’.
[…]
“Now where the covenant of 1919 is in contradiction with the Agreement of 1916 [Sykes-Picot] it is presumably the Covenant which must be held to represent our policy. We are seemingly committed, therefore, to the view that the whole area we are considering already consists of an independent nation or nations; and that all we have to do, after having got rid of the Turk, is to supply every independent nation with one, but not more than one, suitable mandatory.
Without further considering whether the political picture drawn by the Covenant correponds with anything to be found in the realms of fact, let us ask on what principle these mandatories are to be selected by the Allied and Associated Powers.
On this point the Covenant speaks as follows:
“The wishes of these communities (i.e. the independent nations) must be a principal consideration in the selection of a mandatory.”
The sentiment is unimpeachable; but how it is to be carried into effect ? To simplify the argument, let us assume that two of the ‘independent nations’ for which mandatories have to be provided are Syria and Palestine ? Take Syria first. Do we mean, in the case of Syria, to consult principally the wishes of the inhabitants ? We mean nothing of the kind. According to the universally accepted view there are only three possible mandatories – England, America, and France. Are we going ‘chiefly to consider the wishes of the inhabitants’ in deciding which of these is to be selected ? We are going to do nothing of the kind. England has refused. America will refuse. So that, whatever the inhabitants may wish, it is France they will certainly have. They may freely choose; but it is Hobson’s choice after all.
The contradiction between the letter of the Covenant and the policy of the Allies is even more flagrant in the case of the ‘independent nation’ of Palestine than in that of the ‘independent nation’ of Syria. For in Palestine we do not propose even to go through the form of consulting the wishes of the present inhabitants of the country, though the American Commission has been going through the form of asking what they are. The four Great Powers are committed to Zionism. And Zionism, be it right or wrong, good or bad, is rooted in age-lng traditions, in present needs, in future hopes, of far profounder import than the desires and prejudices of the 700,000 Arabs who now inhabit that ancient land.
In my opinion that is right.
[…]
If Zionism is to influence the Jewish problem throughout the world Palestine must be made available for the largest number of Jewish immigrants. It is therefore eminently desirable that it should obtain the command of the water-power which naturally belongs to it, whether by extending its borders to the north, or by treaty with the mandatory of Syria, to whom the southward flowing waters of Hamon could not in any event be of much value.
For the same reasons Palestine should extend into the lands lying east of the Jordan. It should not, however, be allowed to include the Hedjaz Railway, which is too distinctly bound up with exclusively Arab interests…
——————————————————————
They had no intention of an even split or considering the words of the Declrarion. The mindset of British global imperialism was crystal clear:
Divide and mothafucking conquer.
Free Ebooks for a Free Palestine!
Publishing books on the struggle for justice in Palestine has been a central part of Haymarket’s mission since we published our first book, The Struggle for Palestine, in 2001. Now as ever, we recognize the root cause and ongoing perpetrator of violence in Palestine to be Israeli...
www.haymarketbooks.org
Free Ebooks for a Free Palestine!
Publishing books on the struggle for justice in Palestine has been a central part of Haymarket’s mission since we published our first book, The Struggle for Palestine, in 2001. Now as ever, we recognize the root cause and ongoing perpetrator of violence in Palestine to be Israeli...
Free Ebooks for a Free Palestine!
By Haymarket Books / October 11 2023Publishing books on the struggle for justice in Palestine has been a central part of Haymarket’s mission since we published our first book, The Struggle for Palestine, in 2001. Now as ever, we recognize the root cause and ongoing perpetrator of violence in Palestine to be Israeli settler-colonialism and apartheid, and we stand in solidarity with Palestinians in their struggle for freedom.
We also believe that books, as tools for education, analysis, combatting misinformation, and inspiration, have a vital role to play in the global Palestine solidarity movement. In that spirit, we’ve made three crucial books free to download:
Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions
The Global Struggle for Palestinian Rights
by Omar Barghouti
Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions
As international awareness of the apartheid nature of Israel grows, Omar Barghouti offers a manifesto for winning Palestinian civil rights.
I have been to Palestine where I’ve witnessed the racially segregated housing and the humiliation of Palestinians at military roadblocks. I can’t help but remember the conditions we experienced in South Africa under apartheid. We could not have achieved our freedom without the help of people around the world using the nonviolent means of boycotts and divestment to compel governments and institutions to withdraw their support for the apartheid regime. Omar Barghouti’s lucid and morally compelling book is perfectly timed to make a major contribution to this urgently needed global campaign for justice, freedom and peace.”Archbishop Desmond Tutu
THIRTY YEARS ago, an international movement utilizing boycott, divestment, and sanction (BDS) tactics rose in solidarity with those suffering under the brutal apartheid regime of South Africa. The historic acts of BDS activists from around the world isolated South Africa as a pariah state and heralded the end of apartheid.
Now, as awareness of the apartheid nature of the State of Israel continues to grow, Omar Barghouti, founding member of the Palestinian Civil Society Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) campaign against Israel, presents a renewed call to action. Aimed at forcing the State of Israel to uphold international law and universal human rights for the Palestinian people, here is a manifesto for change.
No one has done more to build the intellectual, legal and moral case for BDS than Omar Barghouti. The global Palestinian solidarity movement has been transformed and is on the cusp of major new breakthroughs.”
Naomi Klein, author of The Shock Doctrine and No Logo
"There is no more comprehensive and persuasive case than his for boycott, divestment, and sanctions to end the Israeli occupation and establish the ethical claim of Palestinian rights.”
Judith Butler, University of California at Berkeley
Light in Gaza: Writings Born of Fire
Edited by Jehad Abusalim, Jennifer Bing, and Mike Merryman-Lotze
Imagining the future of Gaza beyond the cruelties of occupation and Apartheid, Light in Gaza is a powerful contribution to understanding Palestinian experience.
Gaza, home to two million people, continues to face suffocating conditions imposed by Israel. This distinctive anthology imagines what the future of Gaza could be, while reaffirming the critical role of Gaza in Palestinian identity, history, and struggle for liberation.
Light in Gaza is a seminal, moving and wide-ranging anthology of Palestinian writers and artists. It constitutes a collective effort to organize and center Palestinian voices in the ongoing struggle. As political discourse shifts toward futurism as a means of reimagining a better way of living, beyond the violence and limitations of colonialism, Light in Gaza is an urgent and powerful intervention into an important political moment.
Palestine: A Socialist Introduction
Edited by Sumaya Awad and Brian Bean
Palestine: A Socialist Introduction
This edited volume makes an impassioned and informed case for the central place of Palestine in socialist organizing and of socialism in the struggle to free Palestine.
Palestine: A Socialist Introduction systematically tackles a number of important aspects of the Palestinian struggle for liberation, contextualizing it in an increasingly polarized world and offering a socialist perspective on how full liberation can be won.
Through an internationalist, anti-imperialist lens, this book explores the links between the struggle for freedom in the United States and that in Palestine, and beyond. It examines both the historical and contemporary trajectory of the Palestine solidarity movement in order to glean lessons for today’s organizers, and compellingly lays out the argument that, in order to achieve justice in Palestine, the movement has to take up the question of socialism regionally and internationally.
Contributors include: Jehad Abusalim, Shireen Akram-Boshar, Omar Barghouti, Nada Elia, Toufic Haddad, Remi Kanazi, Annie Levin, Mostafa Omar, Khury Petersen-Smith, and Daphna Thier.
Some real game of thrones shit with this as the Arabs were fighting the Ottomans with the understanding that there was British support for something would be essentially an Arab state but, obviously, that never materialized. Equally as wild, one of the motivations for this was the pretty cynical idea that zionist in Russia/US would keep both countries engaged in the war effort because they "controlled" the governments. Even crazier, think about the world today where you have pro Palestinian protests in the US and a Russia that backs a state hostile to Israel and tacitly supports groups hostile to Israel. Life is always stranger than fiction...
The narratives written throughout human history have been amazing. It’s everyone playing everyone, like Lord Rothschild himself, devaluing the British stock market to make England dump its capital then buying it back for mere shekels on the pound. Fortune amassed. By American standards, the SEC would’ve jailed him for tax manipulation, stock fraud, insider trading, the whole nine. Later they found out he had a considerable hand in helping build Jewish villages and settlements in Palestine. So imagine bankrupting a nation and amassing ungodly wealth, then using that very nation to help legally mandate your own home in the Middle East..
It’s like playing 4D chess lol..
Seems like the tricksters and swindlers always prosper.
I'd at least have been trying to run some of them over..figure if i'm going out,they coming with me
The narratives written throughout human history have been amazing. It’s everyone playing everyone, like Lord Rothschild himself, devaluing the British stock market to make England dump its capital then buying it back for mere shekels on the pound. Fortune amassed. By American standards, the SEC would’ve jailed him for tax manipulation, stock fraud, insider trading, the whole nine. Later they found out he had a considerable hand in helping build Jewish villages and settlements in Palestine. So imagine bankrupting a nation and amassing ungodly wealth, then using that very nation to help legally mandate your own home in the Middle East..
It’s like playing 4D chess lol..
Seems like the tricksters and swindlers always prosper.
You can't mention the name Rothschild in a thread on MENA or the real crazies will come out.
You can't mention the name Rothschild in a thread on MENA or the real crazies will come out.
The narratives written throughout human history have been amazing. It’s everyone playing everyone, like Lord Rothschild himself, devaluing the British stock market to make England dump its capital then buying it back for mere shekels on the pound. Fortune amassed. By American standards, the SEC would’ve jailed him for tax manipulation, stock fraud, insider trading, the whole nine. Later they found out he had a considerable hand in helping build Jewish villages and settlements in Palestine. So imagine bankrupting a nation and amassing ungodly wealth, then using that very nation to help legally mandate your own home in the Middle East..
It’s like playing 4D chess lol..
Seems like the tricksters and swindlers always prosper.
@COINTELPRO
Lolz
I talked to my co-worker who has family over there, and he told me it ain't as massive and bad as the media is making it out to be. He said his relatives aren't even concerned, that's how small scale he said it was. He said to them, this "war" is equivalent to 2 street gangs fighting.
