Seinfeld chick was under the age of 18Him, Seinfeld, Cook, are all suspect. Legal or not.
She can do that because the powers that be wanted young boys to be men and go to war for their government.
They also wanted to fuck little girls so they made the age 18 "legal"
I know you're not this remedial, and I know to put you on the list of child molesters who feel it's okay for grown men to fuck teens.
Folk don't have the context on Jehovah's witnesses...
They are SUPPOSED to abstain from sex before marriage or risk being caught and subsequently disfellowshipped (kicked out of the organization) and shunned (ignored by your witness friends and family).
If the rules are being followed, getting married young is the norm for witnesses due to the consequences of human nature being a young adult...
While there are obviously exceptions, chicks who grow up in that organization are more likely to submit to their husband as the head of household.
If they are happy, good for them.
When I was 26 I fucked this 47-year-old chick. It was cool, but she ended it because I was either a year younger or a year older than her son.meanwhile....back at the ranch....
45y/o Dane Cook dating 19y/o kelsi taylor...when he was 25 she was STILL in nutsville..lol
that thread went 4 pages and not nearly as critical about the age gap......is there a double standard happening here???
![]()
fucking. not everyone comes home to have conversations with their woman. be available when i want to hit and shut the fuck up. come home and talk about struggles and pop culture is for working class people. rich people since the beginning of time, such as kings and emperors, in every culture, always had young wives. this isn't even an issue in other countries. this is how women get put on. but here, we woman shame, so men have to get a partner around their age. you got 22 year olds wanting six figure men and then woman shaming the older man that get with women around their age. Makes no damn sense. It takes time to get resources to take care of a woman. If not, work together and you can be the same age.20 years is a huge gap especially if one partner is just 19 and the other 39 (almost 40). Organically and chronologically your at different stages in your life. Your perspective and outlook on life is gonna be different when the age gap is that huge.
What could he possible have in common?
Funny how these rules always seem to only apply to underage girls.Folk don't have the context on Jehovah's witnesses...
They are SUPPOSED to abstain from sex before marriage or risk being caught and subsequently disfellowshipped (kicked out of the organization) and shunned (ignored by your witness friends and family).
If the rules are being followed, getting married young is the norm for witnesses due to the consequences of human nature being a young adult...
While there are obviously exceptions, chicks who grow up in that organization are more likely to submit to their husband as the head of household.
If they are happy, good for them.
And my stance on this subject is still the same. (Regardless of who's involved)meanwhile....back at the ranch....
45y/o Dane Cook dating 19y/o kelsi taylor...when he was 25 she was STILL in nutsville..lol
that thread went 4 pages and not nearly as critical about the age gap......is there a double standard happening here???
![]()
Yet if she was 17 last week she would be a child but if she turns 18 today she is magically an adult.And my stance on this subject is still the same. (Regardless of who's involved)
He's an adult.
She's an adult.
This matters to anyone... because?![]()
I'm confused. I thought the BGOL philosophy was to not get married young and not to marry low value women with miles on them. Theoretically she's young, compliant and controllable. So what's the problem again?
#1. In NYS 17 is the legal age of consent.Yet if she was 17 last week she would be a child but if she turns 18 today she is magically an adult.
#1. In NYS 17 is the legal age of consent.
#2. She would then still be an adult when she turned 18.
#3. Now, with those factors in place. Again, I ask; "This should matter to anyone... because?"![]()
No.It doesn't "Matter" to any of us. We're just giving our opinion on what's in the news or presented to us.
Trump getting indicted doesn't "Matter" to us, but it's a story that will get commented on and cause reactions.
No.
Trump getting indicted doesn't matter to you.
These two things are not the same...![]()
Hmmm.And what Trump did with his money and dick matters to you why?![]()
Hmmm.
Let me see...
Oh, wait.
A known racist and White Nationalist who insighted a violent insurrection to overturn the LEGAL presidential election in the last days of his presidency is now being charged with 34 felony charges of falsifying business records in the first degree which stem from (and include) him paying a porn star "hush money" and lying about it.
Now; if you have no problem with the President (presidential candidates, elected officials and public figures) committing state and federal crimes, then by all means, continue to compare legally married couples to corrupt elected politicians...![]()
Hey.He’s not being indicted for being racist, falsely trying to overturn an election or for inciting a violent insurrection.
Him falsifying his business records to pay off a porn star does affect any of us in our lives and neither does him not paying any taxes.
Don’s a piece of shit and we always knew that he was a piece of shit. Him being indicted for paying hush money is small on the scale of the bullshit that he’s done and that he’s caused.
Bur we’re talking about nothing so I digress.
Hey.
YOU bought Trump into this.
- Not me.
I'm just explaining why his indictment IS NOT the same as talking about a legally married couple.
So; once again, in regards to the topic of this thread I reiterate my original post:
He's an adult.
She's an adult.
This matters to anyone... because?![]()
Then that's what you should've said in the 1st place, bub...But we still give our opinion on it, because we want to.![]()
Then that's what you should've said in the 1st place, bub...![]()
Niggas in here hating
Hmmm.
Let me see...
Oh, wait.
A known racist and White Nationalist who writes the laws WHICH GOVERN YOUR ENTIRE LIFE, who insighted a violent insurrection to overturn the LEGAL presidential election in the last days of his presidency is now being charged with 34 felony charges of falsifying business records in the first degree which stem from (and include) him paying a porn star "hush money" and lying about it.
Now; if you have no problem with the President (presidential candidates, elected officials and public figures) committing state and federal crimes, then by all means, continue to compare legally married couples to corrupt elected politicians...![]()