Damn Man A Nigga Can't Watch Shit Anymore

This what I did.

I haven't watched any of the shows mentioned in this thread, some of them I've never heard of.

I haven't had regular TV or cable in 9 years.

I have chromecast & fireTV stick. 90% of the time its on YouTube.

I recently watched The Brave Ones on Netflix. It's set in South Africa, all black. I like it. And I watched "How to ruin Christmas" also set in South Africa. All black cast, has one fruit in it, but I can overlook it because its minor and we all have a gay person in the fam.
Gonna check out the Brave Ones...enjoyed How to Ruin Christmas...sadly, the star appears to have been murdered back around June
 
Yea, so back to the point.. it has been an increasing constant in media for the past 50 years, of which we're seeing the present adverse effects of...

The demise & destruction of the Black nuclear family. Its not only about representation, while that is important, it is also about conveying to the masses what is attainable
You're blaming the "demise & destruction of the Black nuclear family" on gays in the media?

OK... Have fun with that.
 
And when it's interracial it's almost always a white man and black woman.
One of them drug commercials (I think it's for an HIV drug) is just over-the-top gay with niggas kissing and shit. :smh:
Interesting how black people have trouble getting roles in Hollywood except when it comes to portraying gay characters in TV shows/movies/commercials.
Glad I'm not the only one who sees this. But the kicker is in how in all of those hiv drug commercials a Black face is put out first.
 
You're blaming the "demise & destruction of the Black nuclear family" on gays in the media?

OK... Have fun with that.
If everything were equal, your point would be valid, but the fact that they are going out of their way to eliminate the traditional black nuclear family while keeping intact the white traditional family and at the same time promoting the gay family and gay lifestyle, makes you wonder if that shit isn't being done intentionally. At the very least we should be able to ask the powers that be the question and we should be free to demand that they do not dictate our narrative, especially when so many blacks are against that bullshit.
 
I have this discussion with my wife all the time. I ask her why she continues to watch low frequency television
I ask her"which part of this do you want/desire/entertained by" or want to switch with?
I let her know that television is part of her mental diet whether she realizes it or not
 
we should be free to demand that they do not dictate our narrative
Right. We have to do this on our own..
By cutting their shit OFF, and being rigid with what we accept and support in the media.

We're what... 13.7% of the U.S. population? Let's round that to 15% and say that we ain't watching SHIT that don't have a 15% cast AND production crew.


I did this around 2015. Cut out a lot of fuckery being fed to my eyes. Netflix wasn't nearly as diverse back then, I watched damn near every B-list movie.
 
If everything were equal, your point would be valid, but the fact that they are going out of their way to eliminate the traditional black nuclear family while keeping intact the white traditional family and at the same time promoting the gay family and gay lifestyle, makes you wonder if that shit isn't being done intentionally. At the very least we should be able to ask the powers that be the question and we should be free to demand that they do not dictate our narrative, especially when so many blacks are against that bullshit.
So, the Great Society programs under LBJ, where the father couldn't be in the home if the household needed assistance, isn't to blame for the breakup of the Black nuclear family anymore?

I remember that used to be what every expert and amateur social scientist used to blame for the problem. Now it seems everyone is jumping on the blame Hollywood bandwagon.
 

black suicide is now measure-able after 50 years of cac writers suiciding us on tv

:cool:
And you're arguing that's the only factor or the biggest factor in increasing Black suicide rates? Nothing else in society could be a bigger contributor for Black suicide -- racism, lack of unemployment, or substance abuse caused by racism and unemployment? It's CAC writers?
 
So, the Great Society programs under LBJ, where the father couldn't be in the home if the household needed assistance, isn't to blame for the breakup of the Black nuclear family anymore?

I remember that used to be what every expert and amateur social scientist used to blame for the problem. Now it seems everyone is jumping on the blame Hollywood bandwagon.
Let's just say it wasn't just one single thing alone but after Malcolm and Dr. King were assassinated and TV became readily available for us blacks, the aggressive advertising towards blacks was ramped up, this is when name brands in fashion and even malt liquor and cigarettes started being pushed in the black community.
 
Let's just say it wasn't just one single thing alone but after Malcolm and Dr. King were assassinated and TV became readily available for us blacks, the aggressive advertising towards blacks was ramped up, this is when name brands in fashion and even malt liquor and cigarettes started being pushed in the black community.
That's called capitalism. Black folk had capital -- still do but this was particularly true before manufacturing in this country tanked -- and capitalists wanted it. They'll push anything they believe people will pay for, regardless of the consequences, because capitalists are basically amoral. Their not necessarily malicious but they don't care either way.
 
If everything were equal, your point would be valid, but the fact that they are going out of their way to eliminate the traditional black nuclear family while keeping intact the white traditional family and at the same time promoting the gay family and gay lifestyle, makes you wonder if that shit isn't being done intentionally. At the very least we should be able to ask the powers that be the question and we should be free to demand that they do not dictate our narrative, especially when so many blacks are against that bullshit.

PREACH!!
 
That's called capitalism. Black folk had capital -- still do but this was particularly true before manufacturing in this country tanked -- and capitalists wanted it. They'll push anything they believe people will pay for, regardless of the consequences, because capitalists are basically amoral. Their not necessarily malicious but they don't care either way.
Yes, and the root definition of capitalism is to capitalize and the capitalist used very aggressive techniques using our weaknesses to not only sell us products we cannot afford but to also keep us in poverty while making us feel shamed for wanting to break out the cycle. Often the shaming came in songs by attractive women (our queens or king, depending on who you talk to) saying that they don't want no broke ass man. Now if you can show me one other race that goes out of the way degrading men who are poor while keeping in mind how we got so poor (due to slavery) then the dots should begin to connect itself.
 
So, the Great Society programs under LBJ, where the father couldn't be in the home if the household needed assistance, isn't to blame for the breakup of the Black nuclear family anymore?

I remember that used to be what every expert and amateur social scientist used to blame for the problem. Now it seems everyone is jumping on the blame Hollywood bandwagon.

He's talking about what is naturally considered as man, wife, and child/children. Why you gotta have so much estrogen in your argument. If you can't see what he's talking about then it points directly to you being able to rationalize and understand what nature's order is for family. Why can't the black family be discussed as a 'family' and not denigrated to sexual acts or actions that goes not only against God but nature itself.

I am under the belief that for some reason...lolol...you will never understand the other side of the argument and the reasoning for it. Yes the Democrats were responsible for the degregration of the black family. So why do we have to sit back and allow other 'groups that define themselves by their sexual nature' to tell us...black men mad by Yahweh himself... on what we MUST accept...which poisons your family...kids...etc.
 
That's called capitalism. Black folk had capital -- still do but this was particularly true before manufacturing in this country tanked -- and capitalists wanted it. They'll push anything they believe people will pay for, regardless of the consequences, because capitalists are basically amoral. Their not necessarily malicious but they don't care either way.

Capitalism as defined by the country does not have color...just $$$$. We as black people understand that this is not true. BUT YOUR ARGUMENT ON THE BLACK NUCLEAR FAMILY specifically speaks to a defense of a 'small' group of people that solely define themselves by their sexual preferences...not their black identity. This is what destroys the black nuclear family. Most gay black men don't even understand that they are acting as "AGENTS" for the white and gay system by poisoning and not reproducing BLACK CHILDREN.
 
Yes, and the root definition of capitalism is to capitalize and the capitalist used very aggressive techniques using our weaknesses to not only sell us products we cannot afford but to also keep us in poverty while making us feel shamed for wanting to break out the cycle. Often the shaming came in songs by attractive women (our queens or king, depending on who you talk to) saying that they don't want no broke ass man. Now if you can show me one other race that goes out of the way degrading men who are poor while keeping in mind how we got so poor (due to slavery) then the dots should begin to connect itself.
I don't disagree but what does that have to do with tge original topic of this thread? What you seem to be saying is that consumerism is unhealthy. Like I said, I agree with that. I've been on an anti-consumerist kick since my late teens. How do you propose to change that?
 
I don't disagree but what does that have to do with tge original topic of this thread? What you seem to be saying is that consumerism is unhealthy. Like I said, I agree with that. I've been on an anti-consumerist kick since my late teens. How do you propose to change that?
I never said consumerism is unhealthy, what I said is that there is a monetary incentive towards breaking up the traditional black nuclear in favor of one that is run by women and gays (statistically speaking the most aggressive overspenders in the country).
 
So why do we have to sit back and allow other 'groups that define themselves by their sexual nature' to tell us...black men mad by Yahweh himself... on what we MUST accept...which poisons your family...kids...etc.
You don't. If you don't believe a program is healthy for your family, turn it off.

I went to a religious private school between the 4th and 11th grades. The kids who attended were generally upper-middle class. I was shocked my first year over how many of those kids either didn't have a TV or just wasn't allowed to watch certain programs on it. I wanted to talk about stuff like WWE and MadTV and most of these kids hadn't even seen it.

My point -- it's your choice what your family consumes.
 
Capitalism as defined by the country does not have color...just $$$$. We as black people understand that this is not true. BUT YOUR ARGUMENT ON THE BLACK NUCLEAR FAMILY specifically speaks to a defense of a 'small' group of people that solely define themselves by their sexual preferences...not their black identity. This is what destroys the black nuclear family. Most gay black men don't even understand that they are acting as "AGENTS" for the white and gay system by poisoning and not reproducing BLACK CHILDREN.
There are straight Black men who don't reproduce. I'm related to more than one and know a few others very well. I'm talking men 30+ years old, myself included. Are we all "agents" because we haven't reproduced Black children?
 
I never said consumerism is unhealthy, what I said is that there is a monetary incentive towards breaking up the traditional black nuclear in favor of one that is run by women and gays (statistically speaking the most aggressive overspenders in the country).
Consumerism is unhealthy. Why is there any monetary incentive to break up families? Who does it benefit to have broken Black families exactly?
 
It’s been out of hand. It’s often forced too. The character Omar on The Wire was based on a real dude who wasn’t gay. All of that explicit gay shit was wrote on and counter to the real character. The lesbian scene at the end of Wakanda Forever was forced too.
 
There are straight Black men who don't reproduce. I'm related to more than one and know a few others very well. I'm talking men 30+ years old, myself included. Are we all "agents" because we haven't reproduced Black children?

Still dont get IT and you probably never will. Why do you think black people in Africa...US...Dominican Republic... continue to do the same thing..act the same way... for generations. Is there a flaw in black people. No, its not. It has been an 'indoctrination' for decades. Gay people..especially black gay people are part of the new 'agents' that provides the destruction of the nuclear family. Nature takes it course in every species of animals. The reason that gayness is not allowed in Africa or the Middle East has nothing to do with your religion. Its that they recognize the way these 'gay agents' are being used to poison all things reproductive sexually for the black family. You still don't get it.

You talk about you not producing and you know many other people not producing. You have that choice. But the gay 'movement' got its "RIGHTS" by watching the Jews and other groups MASTER the technique of attaching everything to civil rights. By nature there is not anything from any society that is deemed appropriate outside of the man and woman procreating. Your bible or your faith talks of procreation. This is a NATURAL occurance in ALL societies since the beginning of time. Man and woman....nothing else.

Remember this for the rest of your life: Civil Rights......******....then Jew...then fag...then gay...then trans. All of them have one thing in common. They all mastered the technique of NOT BEING ABLE TO BE SAID BY ANYONE NOT PART OF YOUR GROUP. Hence they all learned how to master the practice of keeping people quiet and allowing them to become an agent of the same group of people they used to get where they are: black people. You can call someone a ******...but you cant call a fag a fag or a Jew a Jew...etc. Hope you finally get it.
 
Last edited:
Consumerism is unhealthy. Why is there any monetary incentive to break up families? Who does it benefit to have broken Black families exactly?
Out-of-control consumerism is unhealthy. But to answer your question, most black men 30 years ago would agree to spoil their children by overspending money on their clothes, but if you remove them from their homes, put them on child support then roll out an aggressive marking campaign directed at single mothers, to spend on them, then not only does it become easier for them to get them to buy, but when the kids grow up they will become indoctrinated in the same system passing it off black culture.
 
And you're arguing that's the only factor or the biggest factor in increasing Black suicide rates?
Nothing else in society could be a bigger contributor for Black suicide -- racism,
lack of unemployment, or substance abuse caused by racism and unemployment?
It's CAC writers?
all those factors have existed for centuries and black folk never gave an inch

then the government got black women to kick men out of the home and leave our children defenseless to indoctrination

now there are more non heteros than ever and more black suicides

neither is a coincidence

:cool:
 
Consumerism is unhealthy. Why is there any monetary incentive to break up families? Who does it benefit to have broken Black families exactly?
Here is another example of successful aggressive marketing toward women, and it was so successful that you could show a woman this video, and yet the programming is so strong that she would most likely delete it from her brain rather than consider that she was brainwashed by a marketing campaign. The same reaction most young people would have if you challenge them on their belief in name-brand clothing.

 
The truth to the matter, women and feminine-minded men think differently, this is why you seldom if ever will see two random women playing chess, or two flamboyant gays playing it, its the same reason why women are more likely to be religious or join a cult (look at how many women were in Jim Jones cult drinking the Kool-Aid), or why there are so many laws against pimping because the thought is that predatory men can trick women into being a hoe, or so many rules against men using their position or prestige to get sex from women. Now ask yourself how come Lizzo or gay men cannot trick straight men who are not into them?
The ad companies studied us for hundreds of years and know our women better than we know them while knowing how the black man's mind thinks. This is why they know the importance of taking the black man out of the household and how to pimp their brains.
 
Out-of-control consumerism is unhealthy. But to answer your question, most black men 30 years ago would agree to spoil their children by overspending money on their clothes, but if you remove them from their homes, put them on child support then roll out an aggressive marking campaign directed at single mothers, to spend on them, then not only does it become easier for them to get them to buy, but when the kids grow up they will become indoctrinated in the same system passing it off black culture.
But, again, that's capitalism. Those are capitalist interests who are benefiting from this. Like I said, I haven't cared about consumer products for a minute. Other than passing on your values to your family how else can fix that problem?
 
Here is another example of successful aggressive marketing toward women, and it was so successful that you could show a woman this video, and yet the programming is so strong that she would most likely delete it from her brain rather than consider that she was brainwashed by a marketing campaign. The same reaction most young people would have if you challenge them on their belief in name-brand clothing.


I get what you're saying but I personally cant relate. My mother didn't even wear jewelry when I was growing up apart from some cheap earrings from a Dollar General store but that's it. How do propise to fix this problem?
 
But, again, that's capitalism. Those are capitalist interests who are benefiting from this. Like I said, I haven't cared about consumer products for a minute. Other than passing on your values to your family how else can fix that problem?
The problem is a very complicated problem to fix, and the only way I see it is either women have to wake up to the bullshit, by admitting park ave is selling them a bunch of empty promises of happiness, or we are going to have to crash and burn by hitting rock bottom and hopefully we would have enough resolve to bounce back. But if things continue going the way it is, our race will have a hard time, and only the educated ones will have a puncher's shot at making it to the next level.
 
I get what you're saying but I personally cant relate. My mother didn't even wear jewelry when I was growing up apart from some cheap earrings from a Dollar General store but that's it. How do propise to fix this problem?
We may actually be past the point of trying to save everyone, my advice is to keep your family in order and stay strong.
 
Back
Top