Substitute elementary teacher arrested on 20 counts of child molestation
- Thread starter ThaBurgerPimp
- Start date
Yes, I still believe a charge of molestation without touching anyone is a stretch. If I'm on a city bus with my children and a guy pulls out his junk and starts playing with himself, I would be angry and offended but would I leave thinking me and my children have just been molested? No.
Wtf?
I don't understand what's so hard to believe, in my opinion, indecent exposure is not molestation.
In your opinion, if you witnessed what I described, you would feel like you were molested?
Soooooo….. Filthy Joe whip it out you just gon cover the kids eyes and..
“
Kids, this ain’t a crime. He just needs help.”
When did I say that? I said in my opinion, indecent exposure isn't molestation. Indecent exposure is a crime. You have to comprehend what you're reading before you reply.
“
As an adults, I would agree with your mindset on some level. You are not necessarily molesting an adult by just being nude or playing with yourself. However, kids are different especially in a direct position of power like a teacher.
For me, I look at it as a form of grooming the kid, hoping that the kid will be interested enough to replicate the behavior in front of the adult or the kid will physically engage believing it was a form of play.im going to make the assumption you wouldn't be cool with your kid performing sexual acts in front of their teacher.
Would you be ok with an adult showing your child porn? To me, I'd also consider it a form of grooming the child.
I agree, which is why I said in an earlier post that while I wouldn't consider it molestation, when children are involved, you never know what a jury may think.
.
I think an adult one on one with a child watching porn is much more serious, than what the teacher did, because even if they didn't do anything then, it's coming.
Do you know the legal definition of the word molest?
What is the legal definition of the word "molest?"
The crime of sexual acts with minors, including touching of private parts, exposure of genitalia, taking of pornographic pictures, rape, inducement of sexual acts with the molester or with other children, and variations of these acts.
The crime of sexual acts with minors, including touching of private parts, exposure of genitalia, taking of pornographic pictures, rape, inducement of sexual acts with the molester or with other children, and variations of these acts.
Every state may have slightly different definitions of the law, but more than a few would consider playing with yourself in front of kids as a form of sexual abuse. Molestation doesn't need to involve actually touching the kid. That is why I mentioned grooming. Assuming the story is legit, a jury should have no issue with convicting the person.
I do. If your ten year old son was playing with matches and started a fire in his room, you may give him a few whacks with a belt as punishment, well legally, that's child abuse but I'd bet you wouldn't think so. I understand anyone who believes that what the teacher did what sexual abuse, I happen to believe that exposing yourself without touching isn't molestation.
White women are a threat to American children
What's false? I'm making a point about legal definitions.
Last edited:
Similar threads
