UPDATE : Jon Gruden RESIGNS as Raiders HC in the midst of 2011 racist email scandal


Bruce Allen emails include Adam Schefter seeking feedback on unpublished story
Posted by Mike Florio on October 13, 2021, 6:50 AM EDT


Getty Images
The NFL may never fully disclose all of the 650,000 emails generated by the Washington Football Team investigation. (It should.) Other information from those materials nevertheless may come to light.
Some already has come to light, even though it initially went unnoticed.
by Taboola
Promoted Links



Amazon Has Millions of Prime Subscribers — But Few Know About This Savings TrickCapital One Shopping






NFL sends internal message to employees regarding Jon Gruden email - ProFootballTalk







New Shaftless Stair Lifts takes Only Hours to Install - See How Much They CostStair Lifts | Search Ads






League likely would have kept leaking emails, until Jon Gruden was out - ProFootballTalk















Via Sam Farmer and Nathan Fenno of the Los Angeles Times, a June court filing in a fight between Washington owner Daniel Snyder and former team president Bruce Allen over whether Snyder would be permitted to secure discovery materials from Allen in the ongoing quest to prove a defamation case filed by Snyder in India over an article falsely linking him to Jeffrey Epstein (that’s quite a precursor) includes some of Allen’s emails.
Most notably, some of the Jon Gruden emails to Allen, the leaking of which caused Gruden to resign as coach of the Raiders, were included in the filing, with some (but not total) redaction of Gruden’s identity.
Another aspect of the emails produced in the Arizona dispute between Snyder and Allen has created a stir. In July 2011, Allen and ESPN’s Adam Schefter corresponded regarding a story related to the efforts to conclude the lockout. Schefter actually sent Allen the full draft of a story that Schefter planned to publish, for Allen’s review and approval.
“Please let me know if you see anything that should be added, changed, tweaked,” Schefter wrote. “Thanks, Mr. Editor, for that and the trust. Plan to file this to espn about 6 am. . . .”
Via Farmer and Fenno, ESPN released the following statement in response to that message: “Without sharing all the specifics of the reporter’s process for a story from 10 years ago during the NFL lockout, we believe that nothing is more important to Adam and ESPN than providing fans the most accurate, fair and complete story.”
The email became relevant to the dispute between Allen and Snyder because Allen had insisted in a sworn statement that he “maintained a low profile with respect to the media” and that he “never served as an anonymous source for any news or media reports.”
It’s a fascinating glimpse into the sausage-making process as it relates to NFL news. And it’s definitely not normal for reporters to send entire stories to a source for a review, a fact-check, a proofread, or whatever.
The email also provides a glimpse into how chummy these relationships can be, which is very normal in all forms of media when reporters and sources develop relationships. Frankly, this unexpected sliver of the Allen emails makes it all the more important to have all of the Allen/WFT emails released, so that Gruden’s comments can be fairly and properly compared to comments others made — whether employed by teams or media or whoever.
Only then can a full picture of the broader dynamics be developed.
 

NFL contends it released no Jon Gruden emails
Posted by Mike Florio on October 12, 2021, 7:35 PM EDT


Getty Images
Since Friday, it’s been presumed by many that the NFL specifically and deliberately released the emails sent by former Raiders coach Jon Gruden to former Washington executive Bruce Allen. The league had not pushed back on that theory until today.
In response to an email regarding a separate issue relating to the Washington emails, NFL spokesman Brian McCarthy told PFT that the NFL has released none of the Gruden emails to the media.









If that’s true, the NFL should be very alarmed. If that’s true, someone else with access to those emails (and not many people have access to those emails) leaked them without authorization and in direct violation of league policy. Indeed, and as the NFL informed USA Today on Tuesday, the NFL won’t be disclosing any emails due to the confidentiality of the broader process.
So if it’s all confidential and if someone violated that confidentiality by leaking just enough Gruden emails to prompt Gruden to resign, the NFL should be concerned. The NFL should be angry. The NFL should be investigating.
Replying to McCarthy’s email, PFT asked whether such an investigation has commenced. More than two hours later, McCarthy has not responded.
If the NFL didn’t leak the information from the highest levels of the organization, the failure of the highest levels of the organization to do or say something about it becomes, at some point, tacit approval of the leak.
Here’s the reality. Whoever leaked the Gruden emails surely had (and quite possibly still has) access to the other emails from the Washington Football Team investigation. If nothing will be done by the league to determine the leak and plug it, that same person has the ability to leak more emails, whether as to Gruden or Allen or others.
So either the league did it as to Gruden, or some shadowy and unknown force in the league office did it. Whoever did it has considerable power. If the league can’t or won’t plug the leak, the only fair conclusion is that the person has as much power as the Commissioner himself.
 


Plenty of people are nervous about the Bruce Allen emails
Posted by Mike Florio on October 12, 2021, 1:54 PM EDT


Getty Images
Many have said in the aftermath of Jon Gruden’s resignation that folks around the NFL are scrubbing their emails today. For some around the league, no amount of scrubbing will make a difference.
For those people, the damage is already done. For those people, the emails they sent to or received from former Washington executive Bruce Allen have become part of the 650,000 trove of documents that have been, but for a handful of Gruden emails, buried under a hundred yards of reinforced concrete.







The people who know Bruce Allen and who communicated with him during his time in Washington are nervous about what’s in there. About who else sent or received emails with racist, homophobic, transphobic, and/or misogynistic content. About whether they will be exposed, the same way Gruden was.
The right and fair outcome continues to be simple — release all of the Allen emails. Hell, release all 650,000 emails for full scrutiny. Selectively leaking (and the NFL definitely leaked selectively) the Gruden emails and then treating the rest of the emails like radioactive waste isn’t nearly good enough. Especially since, without current transparency, the NFL can simply dip into the cache of documents whenever it may choose in order to take action against someone who, for whatever reason, has landed on the NFL’s list of enemies or targets.
Look at what they did to Gruden. Leak one document, send “other materials” to the Raiders, and wait. Knowing what else was out there, Gruden foolishly (or stubbornly) didn’t quit. Knowing what else was out there, owner Mark Davis foolishly (or stubbornly) didn’t fire Gruden. So then the league leaked other documents, with the clear impression being that, if Gruden isn’t gone, still others will be leaked.
Others can find themselves in a similar predicament. Others may be approached about emails that haven’t yet been leaked, but with a request/suggestion that they quietly resign or retire or whatever now, or the emails will surface.
These emails become a powerful weapon, made even more powerful if they land in the wrong hands. The selective leaking of the emails proves that they’re already in the wrong hands. The only right thing to do, then, is to shine the light now. That brings out the truth, and it prevents the league from using the threat of disclosing the truth to manipulate others into doing whatever the league may want.
I know that’s a strong allegation. But, based on Gruden’s resignation and the circumstances surrounding it, it’s fair to conclude that the league already has done it once. If the emails aren’t released, nothing stops the league from doing it again.
 

League likely would have kept leaking emails, until Jon Gruden was out
Posted by Mike Florio on October 11, 2021, 9:27 PM EDT



Jon Gruden walked away on Monday night. There’s a good chance that, if he hadn’t, he would have been fired. There’s a better chance that this is exactly what the NFL wanted.

The obvious takeaway from Monday’s stunning leak of homophobic/transphobic/sexists emails following Friday’s stunning leak of one single racist email is that the NFL wanted Gruden out, and that the leaks were going to continue until he resigned or was fired.



The league wasn’t inclined to suspend Gruden. None of the emails released to date were sent when Gruden fell under the NFL’s jurisdiction. Even if he did (more on that below), there’s no specific provision of the Personal Conduct Policy that is directly violated by the contents of private communications.

Also, the league likely didn’t want to fight Gruden publicly over whether a suspension would have been appropriate. If Gruden had fought back, his lawyers would immediately have delved into the question of how, with more than 650,000 emails unearthed by the Washington Football Team investigation, only the emails Gruden sent to former Washington executive Bruce Allen have been released.

Then there’s the question of whether Gruden sent any inappropriate emails after he returned to the Raiders as head coach in early 2018. Allen remained with the Washington Football Team through the 2019 season. That’s two years of overlap. To date, the league has released no emails that Gruden sent to Allen in 2018 or 2019.

That could have been the next step, if Gruden hadn’t resigned tonight.

Then there’s this question — did Gruden ever make fun of Davis? It could be that those emails were being kept under wraps, with the not-so-subtle message to Davis being that, if Gruden stays, those emails will be leaked, too. And those emails, if they exist, surely would embarrass Davis.
If there are inappropriate emails sent by Gruden during his time as the Raiders coach, that would have made it easier to fire him for cause. With Gruden out and the incentive to keep leaking emails extinguished, we’ll likely never know.

Indeed, Gruden should demand that, in exchange for giving the league what it wants, the rest of the emails he sent will be treated like the rest of the 650,000 emails from the Washington investigation.
 
245492925_4406699816051628_8907724556836324635_n.jpg
 
@woodchuck @Quek9

Let's see if anything REAL comes of this



That would send a strong message to coons every where.
 
Raiders Hall of Famer Tim Brown defends Jon Gruden
Originally posted on Larry Brown Sports
By Steve DelVecchio | Last updated 10/11/21

Jon Gruden says he did not intend to be racist when he insulted DeMaurice Smith in an email 10 years ago, and Hall of Fame wide receiver Tim Brown believes his former coach.

Brown, who played for Gruden with the Raiders from 1998-2001, defended his longtime friend in a recent interview with SiriusXM Radio. Gruden has said he wrote in the 2011 email that Smith “has lips the size of michellin tires” as a way of calling the NFLPA executive director a liar. Brown said he has heard Gruden use the phrase “rubber lips” to describe people he believes are being untruthful.

“I’ve heard Jon use the term rubber lips before, meaning that this guy’s double-talking, or he’s doing whatever,” Brown said, as transcribed by the Las Vegas Review-Journal. “That’s just a term that he uses.”

Brown said he thinks so highly of Gruden that some people might think he’s talking about his father with the way he gushes over the coach. The Raiders legend added that he has never experienced anything in all his years of knowing Gruden that indicated Gruden is racist.



That meshes with the message Mike Tirico and Tony Dungy delivered during NBC’s “Sunday Night Football” broadcast. Both analysts defended Gruden’s character and said they felt his apology was sincere.

The Raiders condemned Gruden’s remark about Smith in a statement. It’s unclear if the 58-year-old will face disciplinary action from either the team or the NFL.
FUCK TIM BROWN THEM. COON ASS NIGGA!!! :angry::angry::angry::angry:

YlrC15.jpg
 
Last edited:

a must listen

@Quek9 @woodchuck @RAY V.

fuck Bomani Jones, nigga is try hard male feminist who purports to be some kind of smooth operator, saw that nigga years ago at the OutKast ATLast concert looking like a dork
 
Dumbest trade ever. You trade a once in a generation player picks in hopes that you can pick a once in a generation player.
To be fair, the Bears haven’t done shit since they got Mack, their defense has been ok, but not top of the league year on year…
 
All this shit because called somebody faggot. :lol: he should have kept it racial.

I know people around here hate Jason Whitlock, but that nigga murdered Randy Moss ether style on his show for crying in front of all them white folks, shit was hilarious…
 
Man I bet muthafuckas deleting emails like a muthafucka right now.
Just because u delete emails from your account, doesn't mean they are gone. Any IT professional can tell u......damn near every company has an exchange server. U can delete the emails from your account but they gonna still be on the server.
Email retention is a muthafucka. Gruden is just the tip of the ice berg. I want to see the email replies from the people that Gruden was sending that shit to. Let's see those responses. The NFL is reluctant to release those because they know it will implicate alot more other people than just Gruden.

if the NFL wants transparency and trust from the players and fans....then release all of the emails and let the chips fall where they may.
 
Just because u delete emails from your account, doesn't mean they are gone. Any IT professional can tell u......damn near every company has an exchange server. U can delete the emails from your account but they gonna still be on the server.
Email retention is a muthafucka. Gruden is just the tip of the ice berg. I want to see the email replies from the people that Gruden was sending that shit to. Let's see those responses. The NFL is reluctant to release those because they know it will implicate alot more other people than just Gruden.

if the NFL wants transparency and trust from the players and fans....then release all of the emails and let the chips fall where they may.

^^^

super facts
 
Back
Top