Kavanaugh accuser breaks silence about sexual misconduct allegations, UPDATE 9/26 5th ACCUSER & MORE

[ViCiouS]

Didn't know White House dictated questions? Is there a source for that?

If that's true, I stand corrected. Also, what about the best friend? Were her questions limited? You can easily get to the bottom of this with her. Teenage girl best friends at the party and one don't remember shit as her girl left her alone and ran out the house?

there was reporting over the weekend about how tightly the scope was being controlled by the White House down to what questions should be asked and followed up on - I'll post it when I find it but here Huffpost has a general summary on the process

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entr...be-christine-ford_us_5bb50115e4b01470d04de18f
The FBI background investigation into Kavanaugh isn’t a criminal probe, so it’s not necessarily improper for the White House to direct the bureau’s actions. The White House is, essentially, the bureau’s client.

Frank Figliuzzi, a former FBI assistant director for counterintelligence, told reporters on Wednesday that the background check process is unlike anything else the FBI does.

“Everything else the FBI does ... the client is the American people. In background investigations ... the client is the White House,” Figliuzzi said. “There’s a flaw there because it’s essentially like hiring a private detective agency to follow your cheating spouse. You work for your client, you do what they want, and they shape the outcome.”

One more thing before I go to sleep.

 

[ViCiouS]

 

[gene cisco]

there was reporting over the weekend about how tightly the scope was being controlled by the White House down to what questions should be asked and followed up on - I'll post it when I find it but here Huffpost has a general summary on the process

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entr...be-christine-ford_us_5bb50115e4b01470d04de18f
The FBI background investigation into Kavanaugh isn’t a criminal probe, so it’s not necessarily improper for the White House to direct the bureau’s actions. The White House is, essentially, the bureau’s client.

Frank Figliuzzi, a former FBI assistant director for counterintelligence, told reporters on Wednesday that the background check process is unlike anything else the FBI does.

“Everything else the FBI does ... the client is the American people. In background investigations ... the client is the White House,” Figliuzzi said. “There’s a flaw there because it’s essentially like hiring a private detective agency to follow your cheating spouse. You work for your client, you do what they want, and they shape the outcome.”

All due respect, that's a huffpost link. Might not be popular opinion around here, but I put huffpost into foxnews category.

Yeah, when you can find the other info from another source, please post it. I couldn't find it.

I have no problem admitting I'm wrong when I'm wrong. I've done it before on here.

 

[ViCiouS]

All due respect, that's a huffpost link. Might not be popular opinion around here, but I put huffpost into foxnews category.

Yeah, when you can find the other info from another source, please post it. I couldn't find it.

I have no problem admitting I'm wrong when I'm wrong. I've done it before on here.

ok - here's Bloomberg
FBI Lacks White House Approval to Talk to Kavanaugh and Ford...
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...hite-house-approval-to-talk-to-kavanaugh-ford

 

[Camille]

ok - here's Bloomberg
FBI Lacks White House Approval to Talk to Kavanaugh and Ford...
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...hite-house-approval-to-talk-to-kavanaugh-ford

The reporting I saw, the WH was trying to put it on the senate and said the senate decided who to question and what questions to ask. Regardless, they didn't get free rein, even after it was reported the first time and the WH said the WH counsel changed the instructions to the FBI.

 

[gene cisco]

ok - here's Bloomberg
FBI Lacks White House Approval to Talk to Kavanaugh and Ford...
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...hite-house-approval-to-talk-to-kavanaugh-ford

We know they haven't been talked to. It's established.

I just want to know about what you stated about the limited scope of questions of those who were talked to. I haven't seen anything showing that. Seems like Judge, Leland, PJ, and others had to answer the tough shit.

Where is it stated that white house listed questions that could be asked? Also, is that why the republicans would want to hide the report? Wouldn't it come out in the report that questions(not people) were limited?

 

[ViCiouS]

The reporting I saw, the WH was trying to put it on the senate and said the senate decided who to question and what questions to ask. Regardless, they didn't get free reign, even after it was reported the first time and the WH said the WH counsel changed the instructions to the FBI.

compare last night's reporting to reports from Monday morning,

 

[ViCiouS]

We know they haven't been talked to. It's established.

I just want to know about what you stated about the limited scope of questions of those who were talked to. I haven't seen anything showing that. Seems like Judge, Leland, PJ, and others had to answer the tough shit.

Where is it stated that white house listed questions that could be asked? Also, is that why the republicans would want to hide the report? Wouldn't it come out in the report that questions(not people) were limited?

Its standard practice to keep the report private - but the single hard copy shared between 100 senators and staff is bullshit

we don't know what questions they were asked all we know is those 4 were interviewed over the weekend

as for the limit in questions I can't find the report I read earlier this week.

 

[ViCiouS]

This Is No ‘Standard’ FBI Background Investigation
https://www.theatlantic.com/politic...litical-football-with-kavanaugh-probe/571975/

 

[ballscout1]

If people can’t take themselves to vote against Republicans who steal children, back pedofiles, lie with every breath, mock sexual assault victims, about to confirm the biggest dirtbag to the SC, rob the poor to give to the filthy rich, commit treason then fuck it. Nothing will energize non republicans.

When it comes to obtaining power and holding it no one does it better than republican white people. They are like the Spartans in 300 holding the line.

@gene cisco @ballscout1 @Soul On Ice should we vote out Trump yet?

You are as bad as they are with the talking points..

Dumb ass talking about 2020 in 2018..

How about focusing on congress and the state houses that are up for grabs.

You see the moves California us making right?

If the house and or the Senate aren't taken the WH really means nothing in 2020.

You see how easy it has been to reverse anything done governing by executive order...

Thanks Harry Reid for being the weak fukkn you were and leaving those 100 bench seats for republicans to fill

 

[HeathCliff]

You see the moves California us making right?

What moves?

 

[Watcher]

You are as bad as they are with the talking points..

Dumb ass talking about 2020 in 2018..

How about focusing on congress and the state houses that are up for grabs.

You see the moves California us making right?

If the house and or the Senate aren't taken the WH really means nothing in 2020.

You see how easy it has been to reverse anything done governing by executive order...

Thanks Harry Reid for being the weak fukkn you were and leaving those 100 bench seats for republicans to fill

One of the canaries still alive

Republicans win midterms

 

[Watcher]

All due respect, that's a huffpost link. Might not be popular opinion around here, but I put huffpost into foxnews category.

Yeah, when you can find the other info from another source, please post it. I couldn't find it.

I have no problem admitting I'm wrong when I'm wrong. I've done it before on here.

Huffingpost as bad as fox news..

republican talking point to justify their acceptance of fox news

 

[Slowhands]

 

[TEN]

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1047680814824247298.html

IMPORTANT. YOU NEED TO TAKE A SECOND TO READ THIS. UNDERSTAND WHY THE GOP ARE RUSHING #KAVANAUGH INTO THE SUPREME COURT. ITS NOT ABOUT ROE VS WADE. ITS NOT ABOUT KAVANAUGH’S INTEGRITY.

IT ALL GOES BACK TO RUSSIA AND THE MUELLER INVESTIGATION. OF COURSE IT DOES. (THREAD)

On next month’s Supreme Court docket is ‘Gamble vs. the United States’ #17-646. At stake is the “separate sovereigns” exception to double jeopardy.

Essentially this case will decide whether people who’ve been given presidential pardons for federal crimes can still be tried for that crime at the state level.

Of course the GOP would love to have ‘Roe vs Wade’ overturned. They’d love to go back to a ‘traditional form of marriage’ and overturn gay marriage. But this...this is why they need a 5-4 vote.

At the end of the day, Trump can pardon all his cronies, his associates, his subordinates...and they wouldn’t be able to face justice on the state level for the crimes presented against them on the federal level. They won’t be able to fear state lawyers ready to do their jobs.

Effectively any investigation against Trump or his associates would be null and void. The Mueller investigation will be null and void.

All crimes committed by the Trump circle will be legalized and there will be nothing we can do to stop it.

Please take a chance and retweet the first tweet in this thread. Make sure everyone knows the bigger picture.

Stopping #Kavanaugh is about saving our democracy. /end

(Want more information on the case the GOP want a ruling on? Here’s the link: theusconstitution.org/litigation/gam…)

This isn’t fake news. This is a threat.

 

[BigDaddyBuk]

@BDR

White "Christians" are suddenly finding some backbone, huh?

 

[BDR]

Joe Scar is back in his bullshit again...

 

[thismybgolname]

 

[ballscout1]

One of the canaries still alive

Republicans win midterms

If they do 2020 won't matter.

 

[ballscout1]

What moves?

Their Protection of Net Neutrality for one.

and

http://time.com/4725971/california-resisting-trump-administration/

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/05/us/politics/trump-california-lawsuits.html

 

[easy_b]

If this report supposed to clear him why are they doing this....somethings wrong

 

[sheppettybone]

Well fam the fix is in, these weak ass Democrats fought a good fight. Hopefully they will start winning shit to decompress and unseat all these corrupt Rethugs.

The rape culture do not apply to the cacs. These fuckers are untouchable when you have the Untouchables vouching for them. This is why that privileged bigotted president sleeps well at night.

 

[Spectrum]

Collins just said the FBI probe "appears very thorough" . she has the cover she needs.

 

[BlkStrength]

Game over...

On the bright side...maybe..just maybe white wimmens will grow a backbone and vote their interests in the midterms. I don't have much faith in that tho...

 

[Spectrum]

Game over...
..

Yeah. I think it's over. Collins came out and said she had enough cover to vote yet. Flake was always going to vote yes..he voted it out of committee and said he wanted to vote for Kavanaugh but he wanted the Dems to be satisfied with the process.

 

[Spectrum]

Flake: "No additional corroborating information"

fix is in

 

[fonzerrillii]

He is about to be confirmed...


It's just going to happen... This is the craziest shit that I've seen.

They are about to confirm a Biased Judge on the Bench..

Good luck to my fellow Liberal Attorneys... Shit is fucked. SMH

 

[4 Dimensional]

Game over...

On the bright side...maybe..just maybe white wimmens will grow a backbone and vote their interests in the midterms. I don't have much faith in that tho...

I don’t trust white wimmen.

 

[Dark19]

#not surprised....#this is amerikkka

 

[LSN]

Game over...

On the bright side...maybe..just maybe white wimmens will grow a backbone and vote their interests in the midterms. I don't have much faith in that tho...

backing white men is in their best interest and they know that shit even tho they front otherwise

 

[Spectrum]

backing white men is in their best interest and they know that shit even tho they front otherwise

Yep. The mistake that people make is thinking they're voting against their best interest. If you value White Patriarchy above all else, you're voting in your best interest by supporting people like Kavanaugh and Trump.

 

[streetdreamer]

Yep. The mistake that people make is thinking they're voting against their best interest. If you value White Patriarchy above all else, you're voting in your best interest by supporting people like Kavanaugh and Trump.

Yeah, generally I refer to it as a "white aristocracy". I've said it a long time ago. There are no countries filled with masses of starving, diseased, poor white people in this world, or better yet, people who are considered white. There is a commitment to feed and elevate them knowing full well they can't get out in the sun and do agriculture for more than an hour. The only way to stay white is to preach superiority while living off the backs of minorities.

 

[ViCiouS]

 

[Slowhands]

Like I said above Trump really put Republicans in a very tight spot and he did not help their matters when he mock dr ford last night

 

[Slowhands]

Like I said above Trump really put Republicans in a very tight spot and he did not help their matters when he mock dr ford last night