A question that will cause hotep anti-Christians cognitive dissonance

Ill say this again like so many hoteps do....

When did horus die on the cross?
When did horus have 12 disciples?

Let me be more specific, give me a primary source where horus is described like jesus.

You picked up a book and read something without checking their sources. There is no proof whatsoever to suggest this. This why the hotep have to just copy paste and run. You can tell they dont know what is in the books they copy and paste.

This has been proven to be false by simple logic.

Where are the prophecies in Egypt?

If the bible was stolen from egypt and dam near half the book is books about prophecies.....then i should find some prophecies in egypt. But no.

What hoteps do, is find as many parallels they can between the bible and ancient egypt then say "plagiarize"

But when you examine the primary sources you find

Horus did not have 12 disciples
He did not died on the cross
Was not born dec 25th neither was Yahawashi ironically

They just repeat a lot of stuff they heard from polight​

You do know the Ancient Egyptians birthed the attributes of Jesus with their sun god Horus.

It never really happened on earth.
It was all made up to worship the sun.

Of course Horus never had 12 disciples.
The sun has 12 constellations.

Of course Horus didn’t really die on a cross.
It’s the Southern Crux that’s being referenced.

Maybe you’ve seen this vid before.
It’s from the original Zeitgeist:

 
You do know the Ancient Egyptians birthed the attributes of Jesus with their sun god Horus.

It never really happened on earth.
It was all made up to worship the sun.

Of course Horus never had 12 disciples.
The sun has 12 constellations.

Of course Horus didn’t really die on a cross.
It’s the Southern Crux that’s being referenced.

Maybe you’ve seen this vid before.
It’s from the original Zeitgeist:


This is it. Now watch this. Name the egyptian document that describea horus having those qualities.

Well ill save you some time but, it aint 1. Not 1 document in Egypt that says what you said or what zeitgeist claim.

But there is document called The Papyrus Chester Beatty

Which talks about horus being a homosexual
 
This is it. Now watch this. Name the egyptian document that describea horus having those qualities.

Well ill save you some time but, it aint 1. Not 1 document in Egypt that says what you said or what zeitgeist claim.

But there is document called The Papyrus Chester Beatty

Which talks about horus being a homosexual​

Can you combat he rest of the gods with the same attributes?!
Attis?!
Krishna?!
Etc?!​
 
Nigga please go back to prison or wherever the fuck you was that gave us peace from these bullshit threads.
Aye i remember yo salty bitch ass
Can you combat he rest of the gods with the same attributes?!
Attis?!
Krishna?!
Etc?!​
Yes :yes:

It had been a min since i was an atheist so i would have to dig up again. But when i was an atheist i was never one of those atheist you could not ask questions and i would get emotional. Far as i was concerned that book was stolen, it was given to us during slavery and it was the white man book.

Im fact i tried and set out to disprove the bible.

And ya know the more i tried to disprove it, the more i found it hard to deny.

Only difference i see in myself in most atheist and myself when i was an atheist is that i understood the importance of primary sources and i needed to see them.

So if someone told me horus is like jesus fine ill consider it but show me. And i didnt want to see a author's narrative of what the texts says, i want to see the name of the actual texts aka primary source.

Whats the name of this papyrus. :laptop:

If i could not find it, then i would look harder. Then when i finally do find primary sources i read them and said.....wait. :puzzled:

This dont say what the secondary source said it said.

There are primary sources that speak on Krishna i forgot the name of them (Bhagavad Gita pdf)

. But when you read it. Nothing even close.

I mean a simple word seach on the pdf file of you dont want to read the entire book proves no similarities. None.

I been there before.

But still i said....ok maybe that aint true. But still dont mean the bible is real.

When i realized there was something to this bible is when i asked myself "if this bible is fake, then what historical events pertains to the land of israel"

I mean after all the bible supposed to be fake but this land mass called israel clearly exists. So someone was living in that land aka Lavant by the ancient egyptians. So what was going on in that land a area that was heavily populated by black people. When i sought to find out that is when i knew there was something to this bible thing.
 
Aye i remember yo salty bitch ass

Yes :yes:

It had been a min since i was an atheist so i would have to dig up again. But when i was an atheist i was never one of those atheist you could not ask questions and i would get emotional. Far as i was concerned that book was stolen, it was given to us during slavery and it was the white man book.

Im fact i tried and set out to disprove the bible.

And ya know the more i tried to disprove it, the more i found it hard to deny.

Only difference i see in myself in most atheist and myself when i was an atheist is that i understood the importance of primary sources and i needed to see them.

So if someone told me horus is like jesus fine ill consider it but show me. And i didnt want to see a author's narrative of what the texts says, i want to see the name of the actual texts aka primary source.

Whats the name of this papyrus. :laptop:

If i could not find it, then i would look harder. Then when i finally do find primary sources i read them and said.....wait. :puzzled:

This dont say what the secondary source said it said.

There are primary sources that speak on Krishna i forgot the name of them (Bhagavad Gita pdf)

. But when you read it. Nothing even close.

I mean a simple word seach on the pdf file of you dont want to read the entire book proves no similarities. None.

I been there before.

But still i said....ok maybe that aint true. But still dont mean the bible is real.

When i realized there was something to this bible is when i asked myself "if this bible is fake, then what historical events pertains to the land of israel"

I mean after all the bible supposed to be fake but this land mass called israel clearly exists. So someone was living in that land aka Lavant by the ancient egyptians. So what was going on in that land a area that was heavily populated by black people. When i sought to find out that is when i knew there was something to this bible thing.​

What does that have to do with the numerous gods with the same attributes?!
Born on December 25th
Born of a virgin (Virgo)
Died on the cross
Dead for 3 days and resurrected.
 
What does that have to do with the numerous gods with the same attributes?!
Born on December 25th
Born of a virgin (Virgo)
Died on the cross
Dead for 3 days and resurrected.
This what im saying. There arent any.

There is no primary source document to prove any of these gods died on the cross. Or dead for 3 days and resurrected. I can say this, and no one on this earth can prove me wrong.

No one can provide a primary source proving this.

While im not against secondary sources i dont think they are evil. But when a secondary source does not name a primary source in which they got it from i cant and wont believe it.
 
This what im saying. There arent any.

There is no primary source document to prove any of these gods died on the cross. Or dead for 3 days and resurrected. I can say this, and no one on this earth can prove me wrong.

No one can provide a primary source proving this.

While im not against secondary sources i dont think they are evil. But when a secondary source does not name a primary source in which they got it from i cant and wont believe it.​

Dwight Mann has been working overtime for over 100 years to hide this info.
It’s easy to give up when you don’t find it in your local library or Wikipedia.

Why is it that ancient Egyptians are the only ancient people whose history is a science?
It’s a science because the information coming out to the public needs to be controlled.
When everyone wakes up to the Egyptians inventing modern day christianity every CACs head will explode!​
 
Now while not all hoteps believe this but some do. They think the white man gave us the bible in slavery and put white jesus infront of us, thus making it a white man religion.

They also think whites were the first people to introduce the bible to the continent of africa when they came in 1611. :beat:


But they dont know or dont want to know (aka willful ignorance) that black people and the bible go back before slavery. :ssshhh:


That the first popes were black. :guitar02:


Jesus is described as being a black man in the bible in revelation chapter 1.

That white skin is inferior in Lev 13.



The question:
:idea:If the first popes were black, how is the bible then a white man's book? :idea:




Dont worry about others...seek your own understanding and accept it
 
Dont worry about others...seek your own understanding and accept it
Not worried. Worried that im troubled.

Im a teacher. I teach. Some people will get it others wont and teachers accept this. Teachers also learn stumbling blocks that their students often face.

Im not going to stop teaching. While i believe your advice comes from a place of sincerity i also know it is terrible advice
 
Do you know what the word holy means? Holy simply means seperate. And yes it is.

The prophecies make it divine. You can't get around them. This what makes this book holy/seperate from others. Whatever book you reading about dont have prophecies in it.

Okay then, prove it! Tell me the accurate prophecies made in the bible.

Also explain how it is more divine than The Simpsons. A TV show that has also made accurate predictions about the future.
 
Okay then, prove it! Tell me the accurate prophecies made in the bible.

Also explain how it is more divine than The Simpsons. A TV show that has also made accurate predictions about the future.
Certainly. :cheers:


Now this is the part where usually people get upset/tell me they not watching it.

Again if you refuse to review evidence you asked for that is willful ignorance. Cuz it ain't like i gave you a 4 hour video or some big thick book with 899 pages. Nope simple video.

So now prove me right
 
Not worried. Worried that im troubled.

Im a teacher. I teach. Some people will get it others wont and teachers accept this. Teachers also learn stumbling blocks that their students often face.

Im not going to stop teaching. While i believe your advice comes from a place of sincerity i also know it is terrible advice

When the student is ready the Master shall appear.

That is very sincere however you wil look at it diff sunce you would consider yourself the master because you just gave yourself the teacher title but at the same time said others will get it and others wont.

The real teachers that taught me and others never seen a student they felt couldnt learn.

You have more growing and understanding to do within yourself just as we all have and will continue to do. Try to step out of yourself long enough to listen and improve your human experience.
 
When the student is ready the Master shall appear.

That is very sincere however you wil look at it diff sunce you would consider yourself the master because you just gave yourself the teacher title but at the same time said others will get it and others wont.

The real teachers that taught me and others never seen a student they felt couldnt learn.

You have more growing and understanding to do within yourself just as we all have and will continue to do. Try to step out of yourself long enough to listen and improve your human experience.
You right but wrong. Only because you dont know my intentions.

You think im teaching people so they will get it and understand it. Im not. This is the least of my priorities actually.

Eze 2:7
"You must speak my words to them, whether they listen or fail to listen, for they are rebellious."

So rather people want to get it or not i dont care.

Because....


Matthew 24:14

“And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the end come.”
King James Version (KJV)

So this has to be preached. Shit Yahawashi spoke in parables so people would not understand him.

So dont think im trying to convert people just cause im teaching them. It is simply a warning less their blood be on my hands.

Jonah when he was swallowed by the whale....he was swallowed because he was told to preach to the ninevites. And he went to tarshish. Cause he didnt want to deal with his own stuborn people. He didnt want to teach them. Yet it was God's will that he do it. So as a punishment he was swallowed up and brought back so he would preach. He did it, did he want to do it? No. But he did it. I truly dont care if i convert a soul. If i did i would take a more liberal approach.
 
Back
Top