Voting does not matter....................
Elf Sessions says Sheriff's should be Anglo Americans...
- Thread starter BitchI'llKillYa
- Start date
Voting does not matter....................
well with russians involved and bullshit govt agenices and law enforcement like nsa, fbi, cia more worried about
a "black" messiah then actually protecting the country from outside threats..
it dont matter..
but I see your point tho...
What's lawyer talk?
Anglo American Law. It means Common law. Its a term like Niggardly it looks worse than the meaning.
Comming from sessions it was definitely intentional.
Smfh @ then badges
Fuck this bastard.
Umm...you said that the origins of the job (Sheriff) lie in white male slave patrols. As I stated the origins began in England and came to the new land byway of the Virginia settlement before the slave patrols began.
Look here man... The context of this thread is the term as it pertains to this continent and this incarnation. Anglo-American is used to specify this. We are NOT talking about the origins dating back in England.. Sheriff there was an entirely different concept and established for entirely set of purposes and operated under an entirely different set of rules and expectations. This thread and Sessions quote was directed specifically toward the job of Sherriff/LEO in THIS country. Again, hence the designation "Anglo-AMERICAN"!!!
What part of the Virginia settlement don't you get? The sheriff position in this country began before the slave patrols. So even if we are not talking about the original origins of the job. You are still wrong about the origins in this country.
None what so ever.
Sheriff is an elected position. Law enforcement in this reference would be i.e. city cops, etc...
I'm saying that sheriff position didn't form from the slave patrols. I'm also saying that slave patrols turned in town police departments (those folks are not elected but appointed).
The slave patrol were more like the minute men set up the border with Mexico.
You kinda talking outta both sides of your ass now. Your initial reply was to note that the position has its origins in England. When given a lesson on context and intent you redirect and state that it began pre slavery as to disprove my assertion that Sessions undertone was about race based law enforcement.
Look man, his point was clear. When you make it a point to use racial designations and historical context when talking to a group of LEO as the AG of the US, the point is clear. He is speaking about Sherriff in a law enforcement capacity in historical context. That aspect of policing absolutely has its roots in race based hatred and oppression. Period.
Umm. I stated that the origins began in England (which it did) but then you stated you were specifically talking about origins in this country. Ok well the origins of the sheriff position in this country (as I also stated) started in England settlement (Virginia). So how is that talking out of both side so my mouth?
What his point was and what you stated are two different things.
Yes he was using code words but you were wrong about the origins of the creation of the sheriff position.
There's a 70 year difference between the first sheriff position in this country and the start of slave patrols.
No muthafucka. I said SESSIONS was talking about this country. Hence the designation of Anglo-AMERICAN. Stay focused.
Because the position served different roles and purposes in each country. And more importantly. Sessions was referencing his comment in the context of white supremacy and LEO in this nation.
His current position as AG, history of being a segregationist and out right bigot, and message to an audience of mostly white LEO say otherwise.
There you go again talking out of both sides of your ass.. You cant say he was speaking in code and also say his point and mine were divergent. Saying he spoke in code underscores my entire point you dam fool!!
Yea, we established that already. And i told you in the given context , Sessions was speaking to LEO/Sherriff policing as currently constructed and that origin.
This is fact. His policies and practices are clear on this matter and where he stands in regards to the subject. His history speaks for itself and his intent is blatant.
Bruh you are the fool. Him talking in codes and you stating that the sheriff position started with the slave patrols are not intertwined
How could the sheriff position have it's origins in the slave patrol if the position sheriff in this country began 70 year before the creation of the slave patrol?
Hey shitstain... are you this stupid or are you pretending? What part of context and intent dont you comprehend?
Sheriff origins in this country were NOT about current day policing and law enforcement. Jeff was speaking in context of policing and law enforcement. Current day policing and law enforcement absolutely have their origin in slave patrolling.
Click on the got dam link and listen to his speech in its entirety you piece of shit. He specifically contextualizes it in law enforcement and policing terms. He further quantifies this by labeling it in race spefici jargon. Anglo-American. He also makes a point to use the words LAW ENFORCEMENT for effect over and over again. Stop arguing for the sake of arguing you silly bastard.
Again, you cant acknowledge that he is using code (blatant and transparent code at that), yet ignore his intent.
Ahh.. so emotional. You can try to switch your argument all you want but you misstated a fact or more like repeated something you heard/saw and just ran with it (without looking it up for yourself).
Always the first sign of the BGOL tap out... Call someone emotional and then punt. Foh nigga.
My argument has been consistent throughout the entire exchange. Yours however, has not. Every subsequent post of mine has been a restatement followed by a paint by numbers explanation that even a retard can understand. Feel free to re read the entire exchange until it sinks in dummy.
Check your blood pressure and your tampon dude...You have yet to explain how I was talking out of both sides of my mouth (that's because I didn't). I get it..you just don't want to be wrong. So I'll let you have it.
Similar threads
