President Trump on Sunday claimed that a “dividend of at least $2000 a person” will be paid to all Americans except for “high-income people,”

MASTERBAKER

DEMOTED MOD
BGOL Investor

ABC News

30m ·

President Trump on Sunday claimed that a “dividend of at least $2000 a person” will be paid to all Americans except for “high-income people,” saying the country is now wealthy as a result of his tariff policies.

579652957_1251672890152922_8422890394185441224_n.jpg


 

Trump says he'll issue $2,000 tariff dividend to all except 'high-income people'​

The president says the country is now wealthy because of his tariff policies.
ByIsabella Murray
November 9, 2025, 1:38 PM





10:29

‘The real goal of the tariffs is to rebalance trade and make it more fair’: BessentGeorge Stephanopoulos interviews Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on “This Week.”


President Donald Trump on Sunday claimed that a “dividend of at least $2000 a person” will be paid to all Americans except for “high-income people,” saying the country is now wealthy as a result of his tariff policies.

“People that are against Tariffs are FOOLS! We are now the Richest, Most Respected Country In the World, With Almost No Inflation, and A Record Stock Market Price. 401k’s are Highest EVER,” the president wrote.

“A dividend of at least $2000 a person (not including high income people!) will be paid to everyone,” he added.


Bessent says no formal White House health care proposal as shutdown drags on​



In an interview on ABC News' "This Week" on Sunday, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said that he had not spoken with Trump about the proposed dividend.

donald-trump-14-gty-gmh-251106_1762458159908_hpMain.jpg

President Donald Trump speaks during an event about drug prices, Nov. 6, 2025, in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington.
Andrew Harnik/Getty Images
Calling opponents to tariffs "fools," Trump claimed "A dividend of at least $2000 a person (not including high income people!) will be paid to everyone."


"The $2,000 dividend could come in lots of forms, in lots of ways, George," Bessent told anchor George Stephanopoulos. "You know, it could be just the tax decreases that we are seeing on the president's agenda -- you know, no tax on tips, no tax on overtime, no tax on Social Security, deductibility of auto loans."

This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.
 
I have some many questions about this bullshit.

I think people would believe this more if you just paid down the deficit, sent SNAP benefits out and opened the government back up.

That said, is it a dividend or a stimulus?
 
I asked chatgpt, it said

Who Would Likely Receive the $2,000

  • If Trump excludes the top 10%, that means about 237 million adults(263 M – 26 M) could qualify.
    • Cost: 237 M × $2,000 = $474 billion.
  • If he only excludes the top 5%, ~250 M adults could qualify → $500 billion.
  • If only the top 1% are excluded → about 260 M adults$520 billion.

  • Current U.S. gross national debt (most recent Treasury / news snapshot used here): ~$38.02 trillion (Oct 2025). I’ll show how the payment would change that if it were fully added to the debt. Al Jazeera+1



Step 1 — Estimated total cost (three exclusion scenarios)​

Because “top earners excluded” is vague, earlier we looked at three plausible exclusion cutoffs and corresponding total cost (these are the same totals used before):
  • Exclude top 10%~$474 billion total cost.
  • Exclude top 5%~$500 billion total cost.
  • Exclude top 1%~$520 billion total cost.

(These are scenario totals used to bound the likely cost; news analyses have estimated a similar wide range — roughly hundreds of billions up to ≈$513B depending on who is excluded). The Guardian




Step 2 — Cost​


Divide each total cost by the 144.8 million individual tax returns (filers) figure:
  • $474 billion ÷ 144.8M filers = ≈ $3,273 per filer.
  • $500 billion ÷ 144.8M filers = ≈ $3,453 per filer.
  • $520 billion ÷ 144.8M filers = ≈ $3,591 per filer.

So: roughly $3.3k–$3.6k per taxpayer, depending on how many “top earners” are excluded. (That’s the cost burden per filer if you spread the program’s total cost evenly across all individual tax filers.)
 
Trump says he will give 2k to everyone but “high income earners” and yall find some way to make it negative.
Spiderhonkey been waiting for his stimmy. lol

I think it's the fact that they play in our face and tell us they can't afford healthcare, but somehow we have money for this one time stimmy. Naw homey I want my healthcare all year round not 2k. What does that 2k do for me if I don't have health insurance or it's 5k more next year.

We can afford a 300million dollar ballroom 40 billion to argentina. 1 trillion in defense spending. And a trump stimmy just to up his approval ratings. LOL But healthcare or food for kids we ain't got it.
 
Me:
Interesting chatgpt, thank you.
So basically a 2 grand giveaway could end up costing a tax payer 3 grand?

Chatgpt:
Exactly — and your takeaway is spot-on.

Here’s the simple logic behind that:
  1. Almost everyone gets the $2,000 — but the government must fund the total $450–$520 billion somehow.
  2. If it’s borrowed, that adds to the national debt. Every taxpayer shares that debt through:
    • Future taxes to pay interest
    • Inflation or reduced government spending elsewhere
  3. When you spread $500 billion of new debt across ~145 million taxpayers, it’s ≈$3,400 each in added federal liability — more than the $2,000 check you’d personally get.
  4. So while each individual might receive $2,000 now, their long-term share of the cost (via taxes or inflation) could exceed that.


⚖️


It’s like the government saying:

“Here’s $2,000 now — we’ll put $3,000 on your tab for later.”
 
Me:
Interesting chatgpt, thank you.
So basically a 2 grand giveaway could end up costing a tax payer 3 grand?

Chatgpt:
Exactly — and your takeaway is spot-on.

Here’s the simple logic behind that:
  1. Almost everyone gets the $2,000 — but the government must fund the total $450–$520 billion somehow.
  2. If it’s borrowed, that adds to the national debt. Every taxpayer shares that debt through:
    • Future taxes to pay interest
    • Inflation or reduced government spending elsewhere
  3. When you spread $500 billion of new debt across ~145 million taxpayers, it’s ≈$3,400 each in added federal liability — more than the $2,000 check you’d personally get.
  4. So while each individual might receive $2,000 now, their long-term share of the cost (via taxes or inflation) could exceed that.


⚖️


It’s like the government saying:

If he doesn't have to give the tariff money back he may get it from there. But we are missing an important fact. Trump is not in charge of the budget. He can't decide where money goes without an act of congress. There is no stimmy with a government shutdown. So this dummy has to negotiate a stimmy with the democrats but he don't wanna. lol
 
If he doesn't have to give the tariff money back he may get it from there. But we are missing an important fact. Trump is not in charge of the budget. He can't decide where money goes without an act of congress. There is no stimmy with a government shutdown. So this dummy has to negotiate a stimmy with the democrats but he don't wanna. lol

To anyone believing such BS from him...... I'm a Nigerian prince with a bridge to sell..... there are 350 million people here..... even subtracting the rich people and any others not qualifying..... the number in total would be well north of $600,000,000,000...... when they don't even, allegedly, have $9,000,000,000 in SNAP money

008.gif

005.gif

010CHARLTON-HESTON-LOL.gif








003.jpg
 
Last edited:
Trump says he will give 2k to everyone but “high income earners” and yall find some way to make it negative.
Timeō Danaōs et dōna ferentēs, ...... you fucking dummy.
paraphrased in English as "I fear the Greeks even when bearing gifts"
In modern English, the sentence is used as a proverb to warn against trusting an enemy or adversary, even when they appear to make an enticing offer.
A Yale Budget Lab report estimates the average household will spend around $2,400 this year due to tariffs.
Shut your dumb ass up
 
Donald Trump boards Air Force One






Trump tariffs

Trump weighs giving Americans $2,000 from tariff revenues in bid for support​

Congressional approval would likely be required for plan to take effect, an idea Trump has floated before

Marina Dunbar
Sun 9 Nov 2025 14.50 EST
Share


Donald Trump on Sunday mused about giving most Americans $2,000 funded by tariff revenues collected by the president’s administration – an evident bid to rally public support on the issue.

“A dividend of at least $2000 a person (not including high income people!) will be paid to everyone,” Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform on Sunday.



The post also made it a point to call people against tariffs “FOOLS!”

For such a plan to take effect, congressional approval would likely be required. Earlier this year, Republican senator Josh Hawley of Missouri introduced a bill proposing $600 in tariff rebates for nearly all Americans and their dependent children.

“Americans deserve a tax rebate after four years of [Joe] Biden [White House] policies that have devastated families’ savings and livelihoods,” Hawley said at the time. He said the legislation would “allow hard-working Americans to benefit from the wealth that Trump’s tariffs are returning to this country”.

However, US treasury secretary, Scott Bessent, said in August that the administration’s main focus remains reducing the national debt, which stands at $38.12tn, using funds from tariff collections. He said the money would be used first to start paying down the federal debt – not to give rebate checks to Americans.

According to the treasury department’s September report, $195bn in customs duties were collected during the first three quarters of the year.


Though, it appears that the cost of giving out $2,000 checks could easily surpass the amount actually collected from the tariffs. According to calculations, these payments would cost close to if not more than double the amount that has reportedly been generated so far.

“If the cutoff is $100,000, 150M adults would qualify, for a cost near $300 billion,” wrote Erica York, vice-president of federal tax policy at the Tax Foundation, on social media. “If kids qualify, that grows.”

“The math gets worse accounting for the full budgetary impact of tariffs”, York added. “Adjusting for that, tariffs have raised $90 billion of net revenues compared to Trump’s proposed $300 billion rebate.”

John Arnold, co-chair of Arnold Ventures, estimated that the dividend payments could cost as much as $513bn.

As of October, consumers were paying an average effective tariff rate of nearly 18%, the highest since 1934, according to data from the Yale Budget Lab. Since the president introduced widespread tariffs on global trading partners in April, companies have passed part of those costs on to consumers.


This isn’t the first time Trump has floated the idea of giving Americans stimulus checks based on revenue from his tariffs. In October, he said that he was considering offering Americans checks from the revenue, worth somewhere between $1,000 and $2,000. In July, the president again suggested that the government might consider tariff rebate checks.

In February, he and tech mogul Elon Musk, who at the time was still advising the White House, said they were considering the idea of a $5,000 “dividend” check based on savings generated by the so-called department of government efficiency (Doge). These payments never came to be as the national deficit actually increased under Doge, and the amount cut from federal spending was significantly exaggerated.

The US supreme court heard arguments on Wednesday on Trump’s sweeping global tariffs and appeared skeptical of their legality.
Explore more on these topics
 
Timeō Danaōs et dōna ferentēs, ...... you fucking dummy.
paraphrased in English as "I fear the Greeks even when bearing gifts"
In modern English, the sentence is used as a proverb to warn against trusting an enemy or adversary, even when they appear to make an enticing offer.
A Yale Budget Lab report estimates the average household will spend around $2,400 this year due to tariffs.
Shut your dumb ass up

The motivation and stated purpose for tariffs wasn’t solely to give people $2000.
 
Last edited:
If we took your advice on this day. We would have lost 99.84% of our money today.
as a real estate agent i must admit that i would much rather have a white client than a black one... because you niggas in't never got no dmn money saved up and your credit is always fucked up... and i'll be god damned if you ain't wanting to buy a 5400sq. ft house for 110k...dumb ass black people making offers 50k below what the comps in the area are... now white people are always schooled and have always done thier research ahead of time and all of them have A-1 credit and at lest 20% saved up for a down payment..butter baby..30 days from offer to close...gotta love them white folks...especially the old jewish ones...:dance:

Shut your dumb ass up


One thing about this site is that we don’t know each other. Here I am getting called “dumb” by a coonish realtor in Memphis Tennessee with horrible investment advice. If you only knew….
 
If we took your advice on this day. We would have lost 99.84% of our money today.





One thing about this site is that we don’t know each other. Here I am getting called “dumb” by a coonish realtor in Memphis Tennessee with horrible investment advice. If you only knew….
If we took your advice on this day. We would have lost 99.84% of our money today.





One thing about this site is that we don’t know each other. Here I am getting called “dumb” by a coonish realtor in Memphis Tennessee with horrible investment advice. If you only knew….
i do know....you are dumb.
If we took your advice on this day. We would have lost 99.84% of our money today.





One thing about this site is that we don’t know each other. Here I am getting called “dumb” by a coonish realtor in Memphis Tennessee with horrible investment advice. If you only knew….
Market Summary > OpGen Inc
4.75
USD+3.15 (196.87%)past year.... probably best you just stay on the sidelnes and wait on your $2000 that Trump is going to "give" you. edit: dummy
 
Last edited:

i do know....you are dumb.

Market Summary > OpGen Inc
4.75
USD+3.15 (196.87%)past year.... probably best you just stay on the sidelnes and wait on your $2000 that Trump is going to "give" you. edit: dummy

Ok, so you are either a liar or an idiot. You told us to hurry and buy OPGN in 2021, not the “past year”.
Since your suggestion the stock price plummeted and OBGN had multiple reverse splits to remain solvent. Today (even after the return in the “past year”) we would have lost over 92% of our investment if we listened to you smart guy. Not including inflation these past 4 and a half years. FYI, I don’t qualify for the 2K, don’t need it and not asking for it. I made good decisions financially (didn’t invest in OPGN in 2020).



ChatGPT:

Invest US$1,000 in March 2020 at ~$2.55 ⇒ you buy ~392 old shares (1,000 ÷ 2.55 ≈ 392).
  • After reverse split you hold ~39.2 new shares (392 × 0.10 = 39.2).
  • At current ~US$1.96 per share ⇒ your holding is worth ≈ 39.2 × 1.96 = US$76.83.
  • That implies a loss of about US$923 on the initial US$1,000 investment — i.e., about -92.3% return.
 
Ok, so you are either a liar or an idiot. You told us to hurry and buy OPGN in 2021, not the “past year”.
Since your suggestion the stock price plummeted and OBGN had multiple reverse splits to remain solvent. Today (even after the return in the “past year”) we would have lost over 92% of our investment if we listened to you smart guy. Not including inflation these past 4 and a half years. FYI, I don’t qualify for the 2K, don’t need it and not asking for it. I made good decisions financially (didn’t invest in OPGN in 2020).



ChatGPT:

Invest US$1,000 in March 2020 at ~$2.55 ⇒ you buy ~392 old shares (1,000 ÷ 2.55 ≈ 392).
  • After reverse split you hold ~39.2 new shares (392 × 0.10 = 39.2).
  • At current ~US$1.96 per share ⇒ your holding is worth ≈ 39.2 × 1.96 = US$76.83.
  • That implies a loss of about US$923 on the initial US$1,000 investment — i.e., about -92.3% return.
Fool.... it was a trade...not an investment. we've long since moved on. Stay on the sideline.you'll just end up as a bag holder. dummy. My point is that you think that donald trump lying to you annd telling you that "He" is going to give you $2000 dollars of your own money back should be celebrated. Stop letting that white man glaze you son. It's a Trojan Horse fool.
 

Fool.... it was a trade...not an investment. we've long since moved on. Stay on the sideline.you'll just end up as a bag holder. dummy. My point is that you think that donald trump lying to you annd telling you that "He" is going to give you $2000 dollars of your own money back should be celebrated. Stop letting that white man glaze you son. It's a Trojan Horse fool.


Ok, you are both an idiot and a liar.

Quote your post urging people to sell the OPGN stock that you advised them to buy.

You then follow up with creating a straw man argument for me. I never said we should celebrate that people are given $2000. I’m pointing out that you are complaining about it. The stated motivation of tariffs is much more that $2000. You are both too hardheaded and stupid to understand this. Stick to complaining about your black clients while living off commission from cheap real estate in Memphis. Your job is getting replaced by AI so get the lil bit of money you can get while it lasts.
 
Ok, you are both an idiot and a liar.

Quote your post urging people to sell the OPGN stock that you advised them to buy.

You then follow up with creating a straw man argument for me. I never said we should celebrate that people are given $2000. I’m pointing out that you are complaining about it. The stated motivation of tariffs is much more that $2000. You are both too hardheaded and stupid to understand this. Stick to complaining about your black clients while living off commission from cheap real estate in Memphis. Your job is getting replaced by AI so get the lil bit of money you can get while it lasts.
Damn... forgot about this... Look dummy, it was a "Trade". Did you get in,get up and get out? Too bad , you missed out on a little pocket change. Straw man? You don't even know what that phrase means do you ? Lol.
Black MAGA' have got to be some of the dumbest people on earth. Rumors are starting to see surface that the pedo has stole some, if not all of that tariff money...watch. dummy.
 
Damn... forgot about this... Look dummy, it was a "Trade". Did you get in,get up and get out? Too bad , you missed out on a little pocket change. Straw man? You don't even know what that phrase means do you ? Lol.
Black MAGA' have got to be some of the dumbest people on earth. Rumors are starting to see surface that the pedo has stole some, if not all of that tariff money...watch. dummy.

I quoted your post where you urged us to buy the stock. Quote the post where you even mention selling the stock.
 
Back
Top