"You two?" You're correct in saying that within a western style debate, the objective isn't to spew facts, but to 'prove' an argument. Even though Tariq didn't follow the standard format of presenting an argument in a western style debate, He did prove his position. Because even though whites are 8% of the population, they control at least 60% of the worlds resources. Now, what the white boys wanted to prove was that 'there is no such thing as white supremacy' which they didn't. They formed the contradiction to the premise by circular reasoning (a logical fallacy) But did not disprove the argument. Say, prove that although whites are 8% of the population, they 'do not' control directly, or indirectly the distribution of resources. So Tariq won the argument. Understand this, 'YOU' don't understand how to debate white supremacy, because if you entered such on the grounds to not account for an obvious fact (that whites rule even in small numbers) you would be committing the logical fallacy of exclusion of facts, thus your argument couldn't sustain it's conclusion. That whites 'aren't ' in a superior position on any account. And that's what makes the coon. A Black person that posits an argument, doesn't engage in critical analysis of that argument, then spews it out against a fellow Black person who practiced the courage to face white supremacy, just for an innate desire to feel validated by vacuous opinion. Which is thinking like a white person.[/QUOTE
Not even worth the time...Whatever his reality is he'a entitled to it..He isn't dealing with facts he has his on point of view and feelings