For the flat Earth people!

...again, what does any of this have to do with solving racism, etc.? And how does this one thread stop you from enjoying the porn aspect of BGOL? Just hit the back button and choose another thread.
The point is what are you or anyone else trying to solve/prove by "helping" to see the earth is flat???
 
Oh, I can make a VERY solid point. I've made very solid points.

Y'all actually think you gradually start floating once you get high enough (yeah ur getting high for sure) above the earth as if the "vacuum" of space is a gradient with "gravity". All of this is within the supposed Van Allen Belts, btw. Yet putting a man in a tiny amount of vacuum damn near killed him.

Cacs got ya confused brethren....Cacs gotcha confused.
Face palm. My palm, your face.
 
First ain't nobody every seen anybody rise for the got damn grave.

Second even the small number of people that claimed that he rose for the got damn grave didn't recognize him.
Third there have been more Tupac and Elvis sightings in our time than Jesus sightings back then. Tupac being alive is far more credible.
Fourth it would make more sense that Jesus was taken off the tree alive while appearing to be dead. But yall folks have to make him Supernatural.

Fifth don't you realize that your gullible as hell if you believe and have faith in something or someone that you can't understand and have no proof that it is real.

Lastly, I can go and dig into the ground and find large fossilized bones. I cant go anywhere to find evidence of your Dead God.

You don't know history. You can go find proof Jesus existed. And he's not god but the son. There are many historical writings that mention him. To me it's obvious there's a higher power. The world and the universe has too much order. It's scientifically impossible for the universe to operate without rules. Your thinking is very limited if you only believe what you see. I'm not sure what fossils are. We have no way to tell how order they are. Carbon dating can't go back that far. And I don't buy the white man's theory of what they are, when our ancient text make no mention of them. They're just bones.
 
soooooo..

this :

holy-bible.png
image.jpg

19244672441462428272.jpg



is mathematically more probable than this?:


fc0f4b7d315547e868afc7e378356b3a.jpg
triceratops.jpg
Bronto720.jpg



ok


f8dc39efcbed3e908a87280895c1ae5e41ee3b3b8499de89a4660966a1a0e4f3.jpg

Everything you posted is fake. Those white people and those statues.
 
You don't know history. You can go find proof Jesus existed. And he's not god but the son. There are many historical writings that mention him. To me it's obvious there's a higher power. The world and the universe has too much order. It's scientifically impossible for the universe to operate without rules. Your thinking is very limited if you only believe what you see. I'm not sure what fossils are. We have no way to tell how order they are. Carbon dating can't go back that far. And I don't buy the white man's theory of what they are, when our ancient text make no mention of them. They're just bones.

There can be a higher power.
There is no proof that your Jesus has any more association with the higher power than you or Ghandi or Hitler or an atheist.

The Universe operated before there was a man or a microbe.
Your Jesus tales doesn't tell us anything about the Universe.

People all over the world write to Santa and take photos with Santa and dedicate much attention in his namesake. Does this mean he really exists?

You doubt what fossils are and the age of fossils. You can see and touch and exam a fossil.

You can 't see or touch or exam your Jesus. Yet you believe.

Well not really. Because if you did you wouldn't be lusting after random chicks on a porn site.
 
There can be a higher power.
There is no proof that your Jesus has any more association with the higher power than you or Ghandi or Hitler or an atheist.

The Universe operated before there was a man or a microbe.
Your Jesus tales doesn't tell us anything about the Universe.

People all over the world write to Santa and take photos with Santa and dedicate much attention in his namesake. Does this mean he really exists?

You doubt what fossils are and the age of fossils. You can see and touch and exam a fossil.

You can 't see or touch or exam your Jesus. Yet you believe.

Well not really. Because if you did you wouldn't be lusting after random chicks on a porn site.

Your arguments aren't logical homie. I can't touch my great great grand father either. Silly you comparing letters to Santa with historical documents. If you doubt Jesus was the son of god so be it but you saying he didn't exist is just dumb. That debate has long been over. I don't lust over chicks on a porn board. I post the chicks you lust over.
 
a horizon is an optical illusion for flat earth
please show the math - for how high you would need to be in NYC to see LA in flat earth

every horizon calculator is based on round surface
horiz.gif

http://www.ringbell.co.uk/info/hdist.htm

horizon.gif


http://members.home.nl/7seas/radcalc.htm
http://www.boatsafe.com/tools/horizon.htm

even better why not use line of sight calculator for uhf and vhf
in flat earth with enough power you should be able to broadcast a uhf, am or fm signal from NYC to LA
http://www.qsl.net/w4sat/horizon.htm

same for microwave- so why doesn't anyone do that? why the need for short wave and then latter satellite?

What they gon do now? It's all fucked up now!



Hoes!! Prepare yourselves.

When I get back from work it's on.

:hellyea:

raw


Jrj5lUR.gif


ross-handrub-o.gif


Mvix7vG.jpg


ZYuvaE.gif


tumblr_m8f5rqiqvd1qe19guo1_500.gif


giphy.gif


raw



 
Last edited:
I don't know if this point was made but the sheer idiocy of this movement can be debunked with one uncomplicated fact. Pilots who travel across the globe have to descend to keep from flying into the stratosphere. If the Earth was flat you could fly in a straight line to every destination no matter how far. People have actually flown around the world in different directions and returned to the same point whether they go east or west. If the Earth was flat you'd never be able to get back to your starting point without doubling back the way you came. Why is this even a question? Has common sense truly become a such a rare commodity?

I want to thank you in advance for this post. I'm just bookmarking it for now so I won't have to look for it later.

:cheers:
 
Cracker Ass Cracker speak.

Cashwhisper please stop quoting CACs as proof of anything you profess.

Your faith is apparently only supported by the thoughts and ramblings of CACs.

Where is your non CAC support?


How do you get mountains on a flat earth? How come I saw an eclipse in Africa and you couldn't see it in America?


The net in general. Gives every jackass an equal platform.

That confuses the simple, and you get 90 page threads on the earth being flat.

a telescope extends the distance of convergence exponentially
so, show the math

how high? 1500' 5k' 10k' above NYC- on a flat surface- to view LA?

Face palm. My palm, your face.

And just so I'm absolutely, positively clear, this is the model y'all believe in right?

A simple yes or no will suffice, thanks.



:happy:
 
And just so I'm absolutely, positively clear, this is the model y'all believe in right?

A simple yes or no will suffice, thanks.



:happy:


The movement is correct, but vortex and comet? his head is in his ass.

Watch Vsauce as he explains it the correct way:


Also, watch this Vsauce video as he kills the flat Earth society and the fucktard dickless neanderthals that promote it.



Please find another city college dropout to debunk this. Youtube is full of them.
 


This debunks your Van Allen nonsense.



Here are pictures of the Apollo moon landings.

You fucking fail.


The movement is correct, but vortex and comet? his head is in his ass.

Watch Vsauce as he explains it the correct way:


Also, watch this Vsauce video as he kills the flat Earth society and the fucktard dickless neanderthals that promote it.



Please find another city college dropout to debunk this. Youtube is full of them.


Okay thanks.....


:happy:

kn.gif
 
Here we go!!


We live on a sphere, that's what you guys say....



Not this....

G%C3%A9ode_V_3_1_duale.gif


But this....

300px-SphereAda.png


I'm sure will you agree with that.


The earth is 24,901 miles in circumference.

This means the earth curves at 8" per mile.

So let's look at a clean sphere...no mountains, no obstructions, everything at sea-level.

300px-SphereAda.png



According to this Earth Curve Calculator,
https:// dizzib.github.io/earth/curve-calc/?d0=30&h0=10&unit=imperial
, at a height of 6ft , the horizon will be 2.9995471525609774 miles away, or we'll just round up to 3 miles.

Based on a sphere-earth model, I also assume you would all agree.


tumblr_ojjgo748sv1vi1t85o1_1280.png





This illustration is from the EC calculator site I just posted. The flaw with this illustration is that if h0 is a person and h1 is a building, the person is leaning towards the horizon looking downward while the building is also leaning in the opposite direction towards the horizon. Looks like this.....





tumblr_ojjhuayQWQ1vi1t85o1_1280.png




h0 (the person) is leaning forward and looking downward (dashed line).

t6asj4dla0vxewt7mqmm.jpg


If gravity keeps you stuck to a sphere, then no matter where you stand on the sphere, you are on top of the sphere from your perspective. From whatever point you’re standing, the ground will curve downwards in any direction.

@blackras9 said:

I don't know if this point was made but the sheer idiocy of this movement can be debunked with one uncomplicated fact.
Pilots who travel across the globe have to descend to keep from flying into the stratosphere.

Yes, using this logic and as illustrated above, h0 at 6ft would ALSO have to look downward to keep from looking into the stratosphere.




tumblr_ojjjxfXREP1vi1t85o1_1280.png




h0 = 6ft.


If you're 6ft tall looking straight ahead, you are indeed looking into the stratosphere as illustrated by the horizontal red line above.

As stated before, the earth curves at 8" per mile. This means that if the distance to the horizon is 3 miles and the earth curves at 8" per mile, the horizon would be 2ft below the h0. This is what the slanted, dashed line represents.


Next, lets take a look at things from the building's perspective......




tumblr_ojjkqiwARp1vi1t85o1_1280.png




Okay, so that's the Leaning Tower of Pisa.....And that building is 486 feet tall, based off the EC calculator.

leaning-tower-of-pisa2.jpg


Remember, if gravity keeps the building stuck to a sphere, then no matter where the building stands on the sphere, it is on top of the sphere from it's perspective. From whatever point on the sphere it's standing, the ground will curve downwards in any direction.

Likewise, if I straighten up the building and stand on the roof, the horizon will be 27 miles away. At 8" per mile of curvature, the horizon would be 18ft below the ground level of the building.



big-hallway-ideas.jpg




So I would use this hallway for my next point, especially in illustrating how the sun behaves, but I know y'all hate hallways.....



13_Tracks.jpg


So I'll use railroad tracks.

This is what we actually see when looking to a horizon at 6ft tall.

As above so below, the lines converge to a vanishing point which SHOULD BE 3 miles away. The thickness of the atmosphere makes the mountains less visible, but the key is that the picture is not looking down at a horizon. The horizon is eye level.

As I've stated before, no matter how high you go,
the horizon stays at eye level.

img_9950.jpeg



At the h0 (height) of 35,000 ft on a commercial flight, according to the EC calculator the distance to the horizon is 229 miles. At 8" per mile of curvature, the horizon would be 35,152ft below the air plane and you would have to look down to see it because the higher you are on a round earth, the lower the horizon.

tumblr_ojjoy3RntW1vi1t85o1_1280.png


This is the math for the sphere model:

calc-method.png



I do not yet have a formula to determine the distance to the horizon on a flat plane, because unlike the sphere model, there is no radius. So I'm working on that. It comes down to measuring it physically in my opinion, which you can do using railroad tracks in place that's really flat with no hills, valleys or mountains. (http://www.theatlantic.com/technolo...by-florida-are-flatter-than-a-pancake/284348/) You have to measure the distance to the vanishing point at various heights to see how much the horizon extends, because it definitely does extend the higher you go.

But what I do believe I've proven,

is that the earth is definitely NOT a sphere, it is flat.

I'm going to supplement this presentation with a video.



Alright!

I'm gonna give y'all a quiz on Friday. Be prepared, study in groups.

:cool:


 
Last edited:
Here we go!!


We live on a sphere, that's what you guys say....



Not this....

G%C3%A9ode_V_3_1_duale.gif


But this....

300px-SphereAda.png


I'm sure will you agree with that.


The earth is 24,901 miles in circumference.

This means the earth curves at 8" per mile.

So let's look at a clean sphere...no mountains, no obstructions, everything at sea-level.

300px-SphereAda.png



According to this Earth Curve Calculator, , at a height of 6ft , the horizon will be 2.9995471525609774 miles away, or we'll just round up to 3 miles.

Based on a sphere-earth model, I also assume you would all agree.


tumblr_ojjgo748sv1vi1t85o1_1280.png





This illustration is from the EC calculator site I just posted. The flaw with this illustration is that if h0 is a person and h1 is a building, the person is leaning towards the horizon looking downward while the building is also leaning in the opposite direction towards the horizon. Looks like this.....





tumblr_ojjhuayQWQ1vi1t85o1_1280.png




h0 (the person) is leaning forward and looking downward (dashed line).

If gravity keeps you stuck to a sphere, then no matter where you stand on the sphere, you are on top of the sphere from your perspective. From whatever point you’re standing, the ground will curve downwards in any direction.

@blackras9 said:



Yes, using this logic and as illustrated above, h0 at 6ft would ALSO have to look downward to keep from looking into the stratosphere.




tumblr_ojjjxfXREP1vi1t85o1_1280.png




h0 = 6ft.


If you're 6ft tall looking straight ahead, you are indeed looking into the stratosphere as illustrated by the horizontal red line above.

As stated before, the earth curves at 8" per mile. This means that if the distance to the horizon is 3 miles and the earth curves at 8" per mile, the horizon would be 2ft below the h0. This is what the slanted, dashed line represents.


Next, lets take a look at things from the building's perspective......




tumblr_ojjkqiwARp1vi1t85o1_1280.png




Okay, so that's the Leaning Tower of Pisa.....And that building is 486 feet tall, based off the EC calculator.

Remember, if gravity keeps the building stuck to a sphere, then no matter where the building stands on the sphere, it is on top of the sphere from it's perspective. From whatever point on the sphere it's standing, the ground will curve downwards in any direction.

Likewise, if I straighten up the building and stand on the roof, the horizon will be 27 miles away. At 8" per mile of curvature, the horizon would be 18ft below the ground level of the building.



big-hallway-ideas.jpg




So I would use this hallway for my next point, especially in illustrating how the sun behaves, but I know y'all hate hallways.....



13_Tracks.jpg


So I'll use railroad tracks.

This is what we actually see when looking to a horizon at 6ft tall.

As above so below, the lines converge to a vanishing point which SHOULD BE 3 miles away. The thickness of the atmosphere makes the mountains less visible, but the key is that the picture is not looking down at a horizon. The horizon is eye level.

As I've stated before, no matter how high you go,
the horizon stays at eye level.

img_9950.jpeg



At the h0 (height) of 35,000 ft on a commercial flight, according to the EC calculator the distance to the horizon is 229 miles. At 8" per mile of curvature, the horizon would be 35,152ft below the air plane and you would have to look down to see it because the higher you are on a round earth, the lower the horizon.

tumblr_ojjoy3RntW1vi1t85o1_1280.png


This is the math for the sphere model:

calc-method.png



I do not yet have a formula to determine the distance to the horizon on a flat plane, because unlike the sphere model, there is no radius. So I'm working on that. It comes down to measuring it physically in my opinion, which you can do using railroad tracks in place that's really flat with no hills, valleys or mountains. (http://www.theatlantic.com/technolo...by-florida-are-flatter-than-a-pancake/284348/) You have to measure the distance to the vanishing point at various heights to see how much the horizon extends, because it definitely does extend the higher you go.

But what I do believe I've proven,

is that the earth is definitely NOT a sphere, it is flat.

I'm going to supplement this presentation with a video.



Alright!

I'm gonna give y'all a quiz on Friday. Be prepared, study in groups.

:cool:


I'm TOTALLY sure that you don't understand all the shit you copied and pasted, which is hilarious. But you pulled shit from a reddit post in which the very 'math' you're citing was proven wrong.

And therein lies your problem. You're going hard for shit you don't even understand. You just wanna believe so bad that you're willing to pretend that you get what you're talking about just to make the point. And it's glaring as fuck to folks who get it how wrong you are. But every word you post is someone else's. It's painfully obvious you don't understand math, fam-o.
 
Sorry if I missed it, but did anybody explain what's at the edge of a flat earth? Do you fall off the planet? Is there a youtuber with a go pro that showed us what's the deal?
 
I'm TOTALLY sure that you don't understand all the shit you copied and pasted, which is hilarious. But you pulled shit from a reddit post in which the very 'math' you're citing was proven wrong.

And therein lies your problem. You're going hard for shit you don't even understand. You just wanna believe so bad that you're willing to pretend that you get what you're talking about just to make the point. And it's glaring as fuck to folks who get it how wrong you are. But every word you post is someone else's. It's painfully obvious you don't understand math, fam-o.

Sorry,

1) copy and paste what I typed and see if you can find it in google.
2) give me ONE part of this that's incorrect.

Put up, or shut the FUCK up.
 
I do not yet have a formula to determine the distance to the horizon on a flat plane, because unlike the sphere model, there is no radius. So I'm working on that. It comes down to measuring it physically in my opinion, which you can do using railroad tracks in place that's really flat with no hills, valleys or mountains. (http://www.theatlantic.com/technolo...by-florida-are-flatter-than-a-pancake/284348/) You have to measure the distance to the vanishing point at various heights to see how much the horizon extends, because it definitely does extend the higher you go.
it should be simple geometry - should be even easier than a globe - just x vs y

26622305-The-phrase-Show-Me-the-Math-typed-on-a-piece-of-graph-paper-and-pinned-to-a-cork-notice-board-A-conc-Stock-Photo.jpg
 
Last edited:
Back
Top