I'm serious as a heartbeat
History channel shows Hannibal as a Black man. Whites go crazy cry revisionism.
- Thread starter Dr. Truth
- Start date
You agree with that statement
Wow I even gave you more credit than that
It's official team slowtron is forming.
OK gotta get ready for the gym
You retards wipe the drool of each other's chin
Yeah that's what's scary
If you wanna stay dumb then that's your choice.
Damn checkmate from someone who just walked in the room and you haven't even finished putting your pieces back on the board lol. Don't go to the gym. Read a book.
Yo ricky retardo
This wasn't even close to chess.
Debating you is not even fuckin tic tac toe
Lol
I guess you like being dumb. I can tell you don't mind it at all.
dude you have delusions of grandeur....
you dont know what your talkin about...
black pussy is the best pussy...
drake is NOT your cousin...
and fric and frac dont need you buddin in
making matters worse for them...
how could anyone take you seriously about anything when you think drakes your cousin..
it obvious you are on medication,
you are not a bad guy and I have no beef with
you
but you are definitly on some kind of hallucinogen!!
You wrote all this non sense which further tells me you are slow. I got some business meetings to get ready for I gotta go now, You dudes on here swear you know so much about people's lives, what are you psychics
I don't have time to debate your ignorant self anymore.You wrote all this non sense which further tells me you are slow. I got some business meetings to get ready for I gotta go now, You dudes on here swear you know so much about people's lives, what are you psychics
dude braids are an african traditional hairstyle..
ok..
hang it up....while folks just think you are delusional...
Here is something called a map I quickly found.
As you can see, it shows West Asia. Note the location of Israel(which some people also want to claim as black) within West Asia. Note my links that I have posted showing Neanderthals have been there for 10s of thousands of years. Note that humans out of Africa and Neanderthals mate. Note that you have referred to Neanderthals as cacs. Why are you trying to jack the 'mutt' part of the equation? The West Asian? We are discussing a language family, with languages in both Africa and West Asia. Since it spans two continents, it is called Afro-Asiatic.
The people we see in these regions(sand cac looking) have been there since before these languages were created and HELPED with their creation. Cats like you have put so much stake in the area of Africa right next to Asia and Europe that you continually have to bend reality to support your revisionist narratives.
Here is something called a map I quickly found.
As you can see, it shows West Asia. Note the location of Israel(which some people also want to claim as black) within West Asia. Note my links that I have posted showing Neanderthals have been there for 10s of thousands of years. Note that humans out of Africa and Neanderthals mate. Note that you have referred to Neanderthals as cacs. Why are you trying to jack the 'mutt' part of the equation? The West Asian? We are discussing a language family, with languages in both Africa and West Asia. Since it spans two continents, it is called Afro-Asiatic.
The people we see in these regions(sand cac looking) have been there since before these languages were created and HELPED with their creation. Cats like you have put so much stake in the area of Africa right next to Asia and Europe that you continually have to bend reality to support your revisionist narratives.
youre insane,
aint no way in hell a fuckin animal like the neanderthal is just gonna come out of the cave creating languges...
but Africans with the knowledge to built structures that are still standing today... such as the great pyramid and the sphinx,
would have the capabilities to do so....
Africans civilized the world get over it...
if it wasnt for Africans cacs would still be pickin fleas out their asses and eating each other in caves.... FACTS,,,
I aint even hit you with the europeans savage history on being a gotdam disgusting filth slob who took a bath maybe once a year and thier history of cannibalism... their true nature.. minus their history revision...
but obviously you aint ready...
again there is NO way a savage who had no language is
just just going to create one out of thin air...
you wrote all that blabbery for what?
lol
There is no evidence that Africans civilized the world. There's no evidence that any group of humans civilized the world. Colonizing doesn't mean civilizing.
Why do you keep saying 'no way,' to simple things? How do you explain humans going from not having effective land transportation for thousands and thousands of years to all of a sudden having locomotives and cars? What about planes? One could argue that they shouldn't just pop up after 10s of thousands of years of basically nothing.
How long did a trip to current location of cali take from current new York for ANY civilization prior to the 19th century? What about machine language? Shit, what about the machines? You keep arguing 'no way' over the most basic shit. The most productive period in human history is arguably the last 150 or so years, and it appeared virtually out of nowhere in reference to recorded human history.
Life expectancy has risen by decades. People can travel thousands of miles in hours. Distance used to be measured in days. Humans have been in space. Instant communication. All within the last 150 years. Now that needs some fucking explaining.
So you arguing that people of the world couldn't teach themselves basic shit like language, making up myths for nature, and other shit doesn't sound right. The most primitive of people today have all those things. You're saying other races didn't have languages but don't account for proto and extinct languages.
There is no evidence that Africans civilized the world. There's no evidence that any group of humans civilized the world. Colonizing doesn't mean civilizing.
Why do you keep saying 'no way,' to simple things? How do you explain humans going from not having effective land transportation for thousands and thousands of years to all of a sudden having locomotives and cars? What about planes? One could argue that they shouldn't just pop up after 10s of thousands of years of basically nothing.
How long did a trip to current location of cali take from current new York for ANY civilization prior to the 19th century? What about machine language? Shit, what about the machines? You keep arguing 'no way' over the most basic shit. The most productive period in human history is arguably the last 150 or so years, and it appeared virtually out of nowhere in reference to recorded human history.
Life expectancy has risen by decades. People can travel thousands of miles in hours. Distance used to be measured in days. Humans have been in space. Instant communication. All within the last 150 years. Now that needs some fucking explaining.
So you arguing that people of the world couldn't teach themselves basic shit like language, making up myths for nature, and other shit doesn't sound right. The most primitive of people today have all those things. You're saying other races didn't have languages but don't account for proto and extinct languages.
there is no evidence for those who are incapable of
incorporating simple logic and deductive reasoning...
dont even get me started on longevity.. and how if it wasnt for
black genetics crackers wouldnt live past forty...
you simply aint ready for truth...
so just wallow in your cac revisionist history, its obviously your security blanket...
so just forget everything I stated and go back under that rock....
where its safe from reality..
there is no way the savage european was going to civilize himself...
Im not going to even get into how interacting with europeans shorten our life span but expanded theirs...
you simply aint ready..
but some of us understand the secret to longevity..
and it aint listening to cac doctors and their conventional medicine..
using us as lab rats and shit..
go back under that rock where you are safe from reality..
Your problem is you just don't claim the incompetence of Europeans. You claim that every group including west Asians, other Asians, and Native Americans are too incompetent to achieve anything on their own. History -- both recent and ancient -- has proven otherwise.
dude I say nothing of incompetence there you go with your spin..
Im saying the frist asians were africans, not just me but a chinese professor who most likely has more creditentials than you...
and proving the first asians were africans should crush any notion that Hannibal wasnt black because he spoke in semetic tongue or whatever your previouis non point was...
black africans created afro asiatic languages,
Hannibal was a black man...
europeans owe everthing to the africans that civilized them...
every race of people come from the african,
except the european, he is an animal species that evolved from
a primate...
just check his evolution chart.. he tells you himself where he came from..
you never see an african at the end of their evolution chart....
because we were always here...
ALWAYS!!!!!
There is no evidence that Africans civilized the world. There's no evidence that any group of humans civilized the world. Colonizing doesn't mean civilizing.
Why do you keep saying 'no way,' to simple things? How do you explain humans going from not having effective land transportation for thousands and thousands of years to all of a sudden having locomotives and cars? What about planes? One could argue that they shouldn't just pop up after 10s of thousands of years of basically nothing.
How long did a trip to current location of cali take from current new York for ANY civilization prior to the 19th century? What about machine language? Shit, what about the machines? You keep arguing 'no way' over the most basic shit. The most productive period in human history is arguably the last 150 or so years, and it appeared virtually out of nowhere in reference to recorded human history.
Life expectancy has risen by decades. People can travel thousands of miles in hours. Distance used to be measured in days. Humans have been in space. Instant communication. All within the last 150 years. Now that needs some fucking explaining.
So you arguing that people of the world couldn't teach themselves basic shit like language, making up myths for nature, and other shit doesn't sound right. The most primitive of people today have all those things. You're saying other races didn't have languages but don't account for proto and extinct languages.
Africans had zero reason to travel, they had food all over the place, water, beautiful weather, so beautiful they didnt even need clothes...
the european had every reason to travel, his ass was cold, hungry and dirty...
but the truth is, the world cannot go on like this forever.. you could only have so much pollution, dump so much toxic waste in the oceans,
put so many holes in the spheres..
before nature pushs back....
you see a people that been here forever understands you have to be one with nature..
a savage mindset thinks you can destroy nature and expect to be around forever..
which is why nature is killing off the european, what else could be causing his birth rate to be so low...?
Us Africans are not waging biological warfare on them..
but something is....
We agree on that, but you say the first CHINESE were Africans. That's false.
And you're using a chart like the beer ad. You don't even get what you are arguing.
You keep making arguments against yourself. You keep confusing Europeans with other cacs. Cacs in the middle-east. The darker ones.
As for Europe, how hard is it there? If a person is in NYC, how do they survive from say October to April? Same as those in Europe right? So you saying that the people who figured out how to survive in brutal environments couldn't figure out communication and culture? You make no sense. So people who don't need clothing and have food everywhere have a need to invent farming?!?!?!
Wait, where did farming coming from? 
Birth rates? Not sure if you are serious. The places with the highest birthrates can't even sustain themselves. Humans aren't arachnids.
Also, nature has pushed back numerous times without the modern tech of the last 150 years. Check the number of extinctions. Check the number of recorded natural disasters.
You just lose man. All humans have the ability to create and have done so.
We agree on that, but you say the first CHINESE were Africans. That's false.
And you're using a chart like the beer ad. You don't even get what you are arguing.
You keep making arguments against yourself. You keep confusing Europeans with other cacs. Cacs in the middle-east. The darker ones.
As for Europe, how hard is it there? If a person is in NYC, how do they survive from say October to April? Same as those in Europe right? So you saying that the people who figured out how to survive in brutal environments couldn't figure out communication and culture? You make no sense. So people who don't need clothing and have food everywhere have a need to invent farming?!?!?!
Birth rates? Not sure if you are serious. The places with the highest birthrates can't even sustain themselves. Humans aren't arachnids.
Also, nature has pushed back numerous times without the modern tech of the last 150 years. Check the number of extinctions. Check the number of recorded natural disasters.
You just lose man. All humans have the ability to create and have done so.
show me any evolution chart, and isnt the theory of evolution a euro scientific fact..
when I say euro Im not speaking of the original african europeans...
and his off spring..
Im speaking of the germanic savage...
no silly,
Im saying a savage isnt just going to civilize himself...
an non reading, non speaking barbarian, isnt just going to get up one day, and create a written and spoken language...
its just retarded to think such a thought..
it would take a third party to attempt to civilize the savage beast.
and foolishly that third party was african..not realizing he was unleashing the beast not civilizing it...
dude if you dont get it now, you are just never gonna get it...
which means you aint even ready for chapter two......
so you are comparing todays new york and europe to the caucas mountains six thousand years ago..?
LOL ok gene..
Last edited:
If you think that then you have been taught wrong.
put your money where your mouth is,
I bet you five hundred dollars braids is a traditional african hair style and the olmec heads had braids...
either put the fuck up or shut the fuck up!!!
My knowledge is worth more than money can buy. I know I'm right, I've done so much research about early life, and I learned that people were doing braids way before it became a so called African culture thing. Africans learned it from the people before them. It was people before Africans in Africa, but I guess you didn't know that.
What about Africans and other groups who don't have written languages? Why do they get a pass from you? How does one unleash a beast? If the beast is so intellectually inferior, how does it come up with advancements to what was supposedly shown to it?!?!??!
Why is having no technology and living primitive cool with one group, but not another? Why do you selectively cherry pick out of groups? It's obvious that while some groups in non-black areas lived primitive others did not. The very same can be said about Africa.Who is going to bet you when your very own sources always contradict what you are arguing? Mind you, I'm not saying you are wrong with what your point is with that poster, but folks been trying to get you to post timelines for pages. How the hell are you even going to prove your argument about braids?
Argument by assertion?
Yeah cause you have a very small mind, so I'm not surprised that you feel that way about me.I keep forgetting how delusional you are.
What about Africans and other groups who don't have written languages? Why do they get a pass from you? How does one unleash a beast? If the beast is so intellectually inferior, how does it come up with advancements to what was supposedly shown to it?!?!??!
Who is going to bet you when your very own sources always contradict what you are arguing? Mind you, I'm not saying you are wrong with what your point is with that poster, but folks been trying to get you to post timelines for pages. How the hell are you even going to prove your argument about braids?
Argument by assertion?
what about africans who dont have a written languange..is what you are askin??. whats your point..
do you have any idea how many various cultures are in africa??
The fact remains Math and Languages were created by africans..
you comparing the crackers of today, they till this day cannot build anything that last a hundred years without falling apart and needing to be restored...
name on thing they built that lasted thousands of years thats still standing,
you foolishly mentioned stone henge, do you realize those are remains of what is left?
and you want to compare that to the sphinx...
do you understand what kind of engineering it takes to construct something that withstands the test of time for thousands of years...
I cant get too deep because you simply aint ready for it, but what I can tell you is,
europeans came from animals, and africans civilized the savage beast.. the most he can be civilized..
and now I cant take you seriously because you are siding with this entrenegro delusional dude who thinks drake is his cousin...
for the thousand time, you dont need a time line, if you are capable of simple logic and deductive reasoning...
and its evident you fall short...
Afroasiatic languages created in Africa by Africans..
Hannibal was a Black African from what is now Tunisia.
I guess you just cant handle the facts...
and
Braiding hair is an African Tradition...
the Olmec Head had braids...
that fool said ther
e were people in Africa before black africans..and you are siding with that...
says a lot about you mayne...
Last edited:
You almost have to respect his tenacity. It's like somebody who continues to get knocked down but gets back up, even though he's more dazed than before.And you wonder why we keep asking you for a timeline. Hannibal Barca lived from 247 BC to circa 181 BC. The Moors (were they black?) reigned from circa 800 AD to circa 1492 AD. So do you care to explain your above statement?
So "Afro" refers to a people with a land, and "Afri" only means a land?
And you wonder why we keep asking you for a timeline. Hannibal Barca lived from 247 BC to circa 181 BC. The Moors (were they black?) reigned from circa 800 AD to circa 1492 AD. So do you care to explain your above statement?
So "Afro" refers to a people with a land, and "Afri" only means a land?
gotdam
Yall tryin to swarm on a knigga...
What the fuck is up with yall and this timeline..???
Look call him what you want, moor, phoenician, whatever
at the end of the day
he was AFRICAN...
not german, not english.. not swedish..
AFRICAN....
and yes AFRO means person wtf??
since when does type hair refer to land???
lawd have mercy!
gotdam
Yall tryin to swarm on a knigga...
What the fuck is up with yall and this timeline..???
Look call him what you want, moor, phoenician, whatever
at the end of the day
he was AFRICAN...
not german, not english.. not swedish..
AFRICAN....
and yes AFRO means person wtf??
since when does type hair refer to land???
lawd have mercy!
You made a direct statement. You said "Hannibal was a black african from North Africa Tunisia when black afrucan maurs/moors reigned." There hasn't been any dispute that he was "African", i.e. that he lived on the African continent. The dispute has been whether he was "black" as in "of sub-Saharan African descent."
Second of all, and the reason we keep asking for a timeline, is that your statement means that the Moors reigned during the time of Hannibal (and Rome). For the record, is this what you are saying?
And "Afro" can refer to the African continent (i.e. the "land"), the people of or from Africa, or something cultural associated with the people of or from Africa. Hence, the "Afro" is a hairstyle associated with people of black African descent.
You speak as if "Afro" and "Afri" are two entirely different terms. For the most part, they can be used interchangeably.
But I want to you to address the other question. I will post it again so you can't ignore it. Do you believe that Hannibal and the Moors reigned at the same time????
Yes but my people went by other names as well such as the berbers.
Are you saying afro refers to land and not a characteristic such as hairstyke?
Since when has Africa been called afroca
The point is afro asiatic clearly denotes the type of people who created the language
Black with spiraly aka wooly aka nappy hair.
You are kinda reaching hard there my friend.
so yes he Hannibal was a moor/berber..
And you do know African Americans are descended from ancient berbers rigbt?
But yall ain't ready
Whenever. Cacs claim something is a mystery
Or they don't know like hannibals race it's a cover up.
So beber maurs moor yes Hannibal was!
Are you saying afro refers to land and not a characteristic such as hairstyke?
Since when has Africa been called afroca
The point is afro asiatic clearly denotes the type of people who created the language
Black with spiraly aka wooly aka nappy hair.
You are kinda reaching hard there my friend.
so yes he Hannibal was a moor/berber..
And you do know African Americans are descended from ancient berbers rigbt?
But yall ain't ready
Whenever. Cacs claim something is a mystery
Or they don't know like hannibals race it's a cover up.
So beber maurs moor yes Hannibal was!
Last edited:
I am saying that "afro" and "afri" can basically be used interchangeably. And sometimes even "Afrasian" is used instead of "Afro-Asiatic." Point is, the terms are used because this language family primarily spans North and Eastern Africa, as well as a large swath of Southwest Asia. If, as either gene cisco or exiledking has already pointed out, "afro" was used to denote the type of people who created the language, then why aren't other languages spoken in Africa, like the Bantu languages, also incorporated in the Afro-Asiatic language family?
Thanks for answering the question! So you say Hannibal was a Moor. Yet, the Moors were a Muslim group that reigned from 800 AD to 1492 AD, yet Hannibal lived from 247 BC to 181 BC. So, Hannibal lived a 1,000 years before the Moorish reign!!! And damn near 1,000 years prior to Islam!
So how the FUCK was Hannibal a Moor?!?!
what about africans who dont have a written languange..is what you are askin??. whats your point..
do you have any idea how many various cultures are in africa??
The fact remains Math and Languages were created by africans..
you comparing the crackers of today, they till this day cannot build anything that last a hundred years without falling apart and needing to be restored...
name on thing they built that lasted thousands of years thats still standing,
you foolishly mentioned stone henge, do you realize those are remains of what is left?
and you want to compare that to the sphinx...
do you understand what kind of engineering it takes to construct something that withstands the test of time for thousands of years...
I cant get too deep because you simply aint ready for it, but what I can tell you is,
europeans came from animals, and africans civilized the savage beast.. the most he can be civilized..
and now I cant take you seriously because you are siding with this entrenegro delusional dude who thinks drake is his cousin...
for the thousand time, you dont need a time line, if you are capable of simple logic and deductive reasoning...
and its evident you fall short...
Afroasiatic languages created in Africa by Africans..
Hannibal was a Black African from what is now Tunisia.
I guess you just cant handle the facts...
and
Braiding hair is an African Tradition...
the Olmec Head had braids...
that fool said ther
and you are siding with that...
says a lot about you mayne...
Wait. A quick question. Simple yes or no.
1. Are you saying Africans are the only group who didn't evolve from lower-level primates?
I mention written language because lack of it contradicts what you say. Why teach Europeans how to write and use technology and neglect their own? You aren't making sense. You want to highlight certain regions and certain groups, but neglect what would be considered by many to be primitive people on the continent.
And in other places, you want to play up the 'primitive' groups and take credit for any of the 'civilized' ones. When I pointed out there were 2-story homes in Europe 5,000 years ago, your tried to claim them. Wow. It's complete bullshit and cherry picking.
And it just so happens that all the good shit takes place where Africa, Europe, and Asia meet.
Still haven't explained that one.
A ton of these flea market book readers make that same mistake. They have no clue they're jumping all over the timeline talking about Hannibal and the Moors at the same time lol.
And clearly this guy doesn't even know why Africa is named Africa. He really thinks it's the hairstyle lol
He could've totally googled Hannibal and the Moors before he answered that shit so totally wrong and exposed himself for the final count. It's truly bad.
Yeah, he bodied himself this time! He's been doing it the entire thread, but I'm glad I caught him directly on this one. Watch him try to come back with that "Moor is a nationality" bullshit or some other deflection!
On another note, here is an interesting article: http://www.businessinsider.com/a-de...chinese-civilization-were-not-chinese-2016-10
I want to say "don't let Mrfreddygoodbud read it" because it will only confuse him more. But I know he won't really read it anyway!
Similar threads
