They are hearing straight from a chinese dude, and fric and frac
STILL in denial
I really wish I could make this shit up!!
History channel shows Hannibal as a Black man. Whites go crazy cry revisionism.
- Thread starter Dr. Truth
- Start date
They are hearing straight from a chinese dude, and fric and frac
STILL in denial
I really wish I could make this shit up!!
I found this:
http://www.whowerethephoenicians.com/wp-content/uploads/book/phenicos_new (2)_p215-p217.pdf
Mentions 'blood-red' and 'voice.'
Found this:
http://www.ancient.eu/phoenicia/
THE PURPLE PEOPLE
The purple dye manufactured and used in Tyre for the robes of Mesopotamian royalty gave Phoenicia the name by which we know it today (from the Greek Phoinikes for Tyranian Purple) and also accounts for the Phoenicians being known as 'purple people’ by the Greeks (as the Greek historian Herodotus tells us) because the dye would stain the skin of the workers. Herodotus cites Phoenicia as the birthplace of the alphabet, stating that it was brought to Greece by the Phoenician Kadmus (sometime before the 8th century BCE) and that, prior to that, the Greeks had no alphabet. The Phoenician alphabet is the basis for most western languages written today and their city of Gebal (called by the Greeks 'Byblos’) gave the Bible its name (from the Greek 'Ta Biblia’, the books) as Gebal was the great exporter of papyrus ('bublos’ to the Greeks) which was the paper used in writing in ancient Egypt and Greece. It is also thought that many of the gods of ancient Greece were imported from Phoenicia as there are certain indisputable similarities in some stories concerning the Phoenician gods Baal and Yamm and the Greek deities of Zeus and Poseidon. It is also notable that the battle between the Christian God and Satan as related in the biblical Book of Revelation seems a much later version of the same conflict, with many of the same details, one finds in the Phoenician myth of Baal and Yamm.
So where are cats getting that name means black?And why are cats trying to claim the Phoenicians anyway? Because of their alphabet?
Because the refutation of the "Hannibal was black" argument is the "Hannibal was of Phoenician descent so he couldn't be black" argument, so now there is the "Phoenicians were black" argument.
He has no perception of time or history! How many times have I asked this guy to produce a timeline and he refuses to do so? He doesn't understand human evolutionary history so you know he damn sure has no understanding of linguistic history.
His best argument would have been that the Semitic languages are in the Afro-Asiatic family of languages -- that language family has it's origins in the area now known as Ethiopia, and nine out of 12 of those languages ares till spoken in Ethiopia. That is still a problematic argument since the spread of a language and the spread of a "race" of people aren't the same thing, but it would have been a start for him if he actually respected any form of scholarship.
No. He said EVERYONE on the planet migrated out of Africa. 200,000 years ago. No one was in China til 70,000 years ago after GENERATIONS of POPULATIONS migrated from region to region. You can't be out of Africa for 30000 years and still be considered African.
Why do you think they don't call people who live in Arabia even NOW Africans? Cuz they're not.
Because the refutation of the "Hannibal was black" argument is the "Hannibal was of Phoenician descent so he couldn't be black" argument, so now there is the "Phoenicians were black" argument.
He has no perception of time or history! How many times have I asked this guy to produce a timeline and he refuses to do so? He doesn't understand human evolutionary history so you know he damn sure has no understanding of linguistic history.
His best argument would have been that the Semitic languages are in the Afro-Asiatic family of languages -- that language family has it's origins in the area now known as Ethiopia, and nine out of 12 of those languages ares till spoken in Ethiopia. That is still a problematic argument since the spread of a language and the spread of a "race" of people aren't the same thing, but it would have been a start for him if he actually respected any form of scholarship.
no you silly clown,
the fact is in the language..
they spoke semetic languages aka
AFROASIATIC languages..
you spin doctors mayne
the wheels are spinning but the hamster is DEAD!!!
I don't disagree with him. About time he came around. He is now 100 percent correct. What your problem is that you keep skipping 10s of thousands of years.
You speak English, what's that make you? You an Englishman? Tea and crumpets?
Even if the language originated in Africa(which means we go back to proto), you still have DNA evidence supporting that there were people in West Asia/North Africa that weren't black. You can't win this one.
So much in Africa to claim, let others have their shit. You're acting Eurocentric. Jacking shit from people.
Lol what about the Bantu laNguages? In Africa but somehow the hairstyle name isn't included. What do you do with that?
I don't disagree with him. About time he came around. He is now 100 percent correct. What your problem is that you keep skipping 10s of thousands of years.
You speak English, what's that make you? You an Englishman? Tea and crumpets?
Even if the language originated in Africa(which means we go back to proto), you still have DNA evidence supporting that there were people in West Asia/North Africa that weren't black. You can't win this one.
So much in Africa to claim, let others have their shit. You're acting Eurocentric. Jacking shit from people.
So much on the GLOBE to claim
foh!!!
fric...
exiled king of denial...
why are you ignoring the fact the first Asians were African..
and created Afroasiatic languages..??
I know why..
because you hate facts thats why!!
foh
frac!!
See. That's a leap of 10s of thousands of years. Fuck does 60-100 bc have to do with 4000 bc(around the time for semetic language).....
Languages die all the time, but you say the language of AT LEAST 60,000 years ago is Semitic. Wow..
See. That's a leap of 10s of thousands of years. Fuck does 60-100 bc have to do with 4000 bc(around the time for semetic language).....
Languages die all the time, but you say the language of AT LEAST 60,000 years ago is Semitic. Wow..
no you lil spaced out spin doctor..
if the original asians were were african, who do you think created afroasiatic languages...??
gotdam
wtf??
If the original New Yorkers were Native American, who built all that shit that is currently NYC?
Construct a timeline for us from 'original' to when the semitic language was created.
Here's where he runs. He can tell ya what ain't but he runs when ya ask him what is.If the original New Yorkers were Native American, who built all that shit that is currently NYC?
Construct a timeline for us from 'original' to when the semitic language was created.
If the original New Yorkers were Native American, who built all that shit that is currently NYC?
Construct a timeline for us from 'original' to when the semitic language was created.
savage people who have no idea how much they are destroying the land and earth with their anti nature lifestyle.. they have no idea what to do with all the toxic waste and garbarge their lifestyle produces..
but what does that have to do with Hannibal being African...
this muthafuck jumped from Asia to Times Square.. unfuckin believable...
you mustve went to school and majored in red herrings!!!
you and these fuckin timelines...
you cant even admit the first chinese were african...
so now you want to talk about who developed new york city...
native americans are NOT anti nature..
They are one with the land, they would never destroy it wiping out all types of animal and plant species
poisoning the water and the land...
creating all types of diseases in the interim..
you guys are just all over the fuckin place now..
Can you admit the first chinese were african??
Just showing you how crazy your 'first' and 'original' arguments are if you don't put them in proper context.
Again, humans migrated to the continent of Asia. Along the way, they ran into neanderthal(what you call cacs when it suits you) and mixed. The migration took a long time. Mutations happened. They get to Asia 10s of thousands of years ago. China isn't formed until relatively recently(I think 2000 bc with a name, but further back for neolithic).
Why do the Chinese have more Neanderthal DNA than Europeans but yet you say the first Chinese were African?
See how saying Asian continent and accounting for 10s of thousands of years can change things. You claiming mutants more mutant than Europeans. Wow.Just showing you how crazy your 'first' and 'original' arguments are if you don't put them in proper context.
Again, humans migrated to the continent of Asia. Along the way, they ran into neanderthal(what you call cacs when it suits you) and mixed. The migration took a long time. Mutations happened. They get to Asia 10s of thousands of years ago. China isn't formed until relatively recently(I think 2000 bc with a name, but further back for neolithic).
Why do the Chinese havefirst Chinese were African?
So you disagree with a chinese professor about the orgins of his own people?
I helped you with time and context. See below. Watch out for neanderthal.
http://www.nature.com/news/oldest-known-human-genome-sequenced-1.16194
The most intriguing clue about his origin is that about 2% of his genome comes from Neanderthals. This is roughly the same level that lurks in the genomes of all of today’s non-Africans, owing to ancient trysts between their ancestors and Neanderthals. The Ust’-Ishim man probably got his Neanderthal DNA from these same matings, which, past studies suggest, happened after the common ancestor of Europeans and Asians left Africa and encountered Neanderthals in the Middle East.
https://soapboxie.com/misc/Chinese-Scientist-Prove-The-First-Inhabitants-Of-China-Were-Black
Li’s team focused on a single genetic marker that appeared about 80,000 years ago in Africa. Anyone carrying that marker would have recent African ancestors and could not be descended from the more ancient Homo Erectus. Li and his team found that early humans belonged to different species but modern humans descended from the East Africans species.
Li Hui, a scientist on Li’s team, said, that 100,000 years ago groups of humans started leaving Africa moving through South and Southeast Asia into China, and that 65 branches of the Chinese groups studied carry similar DNA mutations as the people of Southeast Asia.
thanks youre so kind..
Now were africans the first inhabitants of Asia...?
can you answer this simple question once and for all...
See how you switched from China to Asia? Thanks for conceding without knowing it
..See how you switched from China to Asia? Thanks for conceding without knowing it
LOL
this is UN fucking REAL..
so where the fuck is china???
I cant make this shit up!!!
muthafucka IM stayin on topic.... you the one
that went from asia to fuckin wall street..
talkin bout...
if native americans were the first new yorkers who built the buildings...
dude I laughed so hard...
and laughed harder when your cheerleader frac thought you were sayin something..
The first asians were africans the first chinese were africans the first europeans were africans..
get over it!!!!
youre jedi mind tricks are weak son!!!
youre either in denial, in denial or did I mention in denial...
just get over the facts...
africans civilized the savage european.... Hannibal was African....
and crackers revised history to hide their barbaric culture before they were civilized
by africans..
it wont kill you to face facts you know...
I used an analogy because it fits.
The first Asians were technically a group that is now extinct. Did they create semitic language? The same group the Chinese scientist was trying to connect his people to were the ORIGINAL Asians. Stop with this original and first shit, because it's tired and makes your arguments pathetic.
You mistake first on continent with those who were on the continents when you wish to claim achievements. It's a fucking clownshow.
It's like you keep digging yourself a hole and don't know when to quit.
Again, don't underestimate the number of people who believe what he is saying. At least in these threads links are provided to open minds instead of going on with the
"it's true, it's true, they hid it" bullshit.
By your logic everyone on the planet is African RIGHT NOW.
YES
thats why its called AFROasiatic languages..
the only hole Im diggin is for you and your boy fric to jump
in and hide from your petty denial......
you are just wearing down because your jibber jabber and mindfuckery
dont work over here...
now go jump in the hole I dug for ya!!!
not the germanic savages they come from a different savage species....
but most of the brown and brownish world is yes...
ok fric an frac
Im gonna catch up on some luke cage,
you guys continue your little spin dance
and jibber jabber amongst yourselves...
Im gonna catch up on some luke cage,
you guys continue your little spin dance
and jibber jabber amongst yourselves...
You know Neanderthals originated out of Africa too right?
You spoiling my fun..Damn.. That's like the Derringer up the sleeve.
Lmao. He will find a way to bring his dumb ass back. None of the facts means shit to a troll
so did the silver back gorrilla....
which if you follow the crackers evolution chart
he shows you himself exactly where he came from..
you are really showing monkey traits now,
I told you facts are not your friend and how you despise them..
and now you are monkeying me....
dont be a chimp boy
I have the facts you and frac have the jibber jabber...
you said the neanderthal came out of africa..
lol so did the silver back....
and crackers admit they did by their chart of evolution...
aint no brother on that chart, but a cac sure is.....
if you call that weak attempt of debunking FUN,
then you need to get out more, hire a social activities
director...
Similar threads
