History channel shows Hannibal as a Black man. Whites go crazy cry revisionism.

[Joe Money]

Let's quit talking about the many things that THEY think. We already know you feel it's completely wrong.

Let's see the timeline that YOU believe is the real thing. In the form of a timeline.

You will NEVER see that timeline, because he has no conception of time and really doesn't know what the fuck he is talking about. His "analysis" is totally reactionary; just the same old "savage cac Europeans were civilized by Africans" narrative. The only two dates he has given are that the European cac first appeared 6000 years ago (which would mean 4000 B.C.), and that Africans civilized Europeans from 700 A.D. to 1400 A.D.

Yeah, we can set a timeline, but the African slave trade begins with the invasion in the 600s. At least the brutal slave trades, because slavery was different in Africa. I mean there are degrees to owning people. Being buried alive with your master isn't that bad.

Let's return this thread back to people who know what the fuck they're talking about. First of all, how are you defining "African" in this context? Strictly Black African? Do you consider North Africans, Berbers, Christian Copts in Egypt, etc., to be "black," since the Arab Muslims primarily invaded North Africa.

 

[exiledking]

You will NEVER see that timeline, because he has no conception of time and really doesn't know what the fuck he is talking about. His "analysis" is totally reactionary; just the same old "savage cac Europeans were civilized by Africans" narrative. The only two dates he has given are that the European cac first appeared 6000 years ago (which would mean 4000 B.C.), and that Africans civilized Europeans from 700 A.D. to 1400 A.D.




Let's return this thread back to people who know what the fuck they're talking about. First of all, how are you defining "African" in this context? Strictly Black African? Do you consider North Africans, Berbers, Christian Copts in Egypt, etc., to be "black," since the Arab Muslims primarily invaded North Africa.

Yeah I have had to go back and read Cheikh Ante Diop's work again and even try to understand what he was a trying to get at. I think it had a lot to do with the time he was in.

Seems everyone was trying to run back and find a home base for this form of civilization. For white people it would be Greece or Rome, no matter if they are Nordic , Germanic, Gaelic , whatever. For east Asians, ancient China, no matter what. Southern Asians , Indus valley, and so on.


Cheikh went to Egypt for west Africans. I think the destruction of everything from.the Mali empire mustve been a devastating blow. I don't know if there's any discussion of that era from Diop. Seems like he would have access to a lot, being from Senegal. We were certainly up against a lot at that time and to see that francophones and Anglophones shared knowledge like that is awesome. The negritude movement being inspired by what was happening on this side and so on. I dont see as much of that nowadays.

And i think there's obviously a spread from Egypt that linked into other parts of Africa in some way, I'm just not sure how. But even if there weren't , that people don't get is just as Egypt and kush civilization sprang up from nothing before it , the same can happen anywhere else, and has. Provided the right conditions of course. Also the mindset.

 

[exiledking]

Let's return this thread back to people who know what the fuck they're talking about. First of all, how are you defining "African" in this context? Strictly Black African? Do you consider North Africans, Berbers, Christian Copts in Egypt, etc., to be "black," since the Arab Muslims primarily invaded North Africa.

What is considered "Black" is such a strange questioned that is only attempted nowadays because of the race thing that White people in the West have to take blame for. Race fucks up any attempts at understanding the cultural aspects of that time

 

[Joe Money]

Yeah I have had to go back and read Cheikh Ante Diop's work again and even try to understand what he was a trying to get at. I think it had a lot to do with the time he was in.

Seems everyone was trying to run back and find a home base for this form of civilization. For white people it would be Greece or Rome, no matter if they are Nordic , Germanic, Gaelic , whatever. For east Asians, ancient China, no matter what. Southern Asians , Indus valley, and so on.


Cheikh went to Egypt for west Africans. I think the destruction of everything from.the Mali empire mustve been a devastating blow. I don't know if there's any discussion of that era from Diop. Seems like he would have access to a lot, being from Senegal. We were certainly up against a lot at that time and to see that francophones and Anglophones shared knowledge like that is awesome. The negritude movement being inspired by what was happening on this side and so on. I dont see as much of that nowadays.

And i think there's obviously a spread from Egypt that linked into other parts of Africa in some way, I'm just not sure how. But even if there weren't , that people don't get is just as Egypt and kush civilization sprang up from nothing before it , the same can happen anywhere else, and has. Provided the right conditions of course. Also the mindset.

The search for a "home base" was simply about having access to food and a trade/transportation route. Egypt was the best, and perhaps only, area of Africa that provided that via the Nile River, Delta, and access to the Mediterranean. But I don't think Egypt and Kust sprang up from nothing; it developed over hundreds if not thousands of years.

What is considered "Black" is such a strange questioned that is only attempted nowadays because of the race thing that White people in the West have to take blame for. Race fucks up any attempts at understanding the cultural aspects of that time

It's really not even applicable to whites either, if you study it in a larger historical context. But racialists, whether black or white, fail to understand this.

 

[exiledking]

The search for a "home base" was simply about having access to food and a trade/transportation route. Egypt was the best, and perhaps only, area of Africa that provided that via the Nile River, Delta, and access to the Mediterranean. But I don't think Egypt and Kust sprang up from nothing; it developed over hundreds if not thousands of years.


.

what i mean by "home base" isnsome historical home base so you can have some cred for now long your group has been "civilized"


And of course kush and Egypt developed over centuries. What I mean is they didn't sit around thinking bout who did it before them as a reason they are great, if they thought about themselves as great at all. They were just living. We have labels for their periods of time now but it's not like they knew they were living on the middle period lol.

 

[exiledking]

It's really not even applicable to whites either, if you study it in a larger historical context. But racialists, whether black or white, fail to understand this.

of course not. We agree. That's why it just doesn't apply to that time period and even though I know what people mean when they're searching for it, I don't think it works. SOY Keita has addressed it at length and it only works in an academic sense, but it's much more complex than "was the ancient Egyptians Black or White?".

 

[gene cisco]

You will NEVER see that timeline, because he has no conception of time and really doesn't know what the fuck he is talking about. His "analysis" is totally reactionary; just the same old "savage cac Europeans were civilized by Africans" narrative. The only two dates he has given are that the European cac first appeared 6000 years ago (which would mean 4000 B.C.), and that Africans civilized Europeans from 700 A.D. to 1400 A.D.




Let's return this thread back to people who know what the fuck they're talking about. First of all, how are you defining "African" in this context? Strictly Black African? Do you consider North Africans, Berbers, Christian Copts in Egypt, etc., to be "black," since the Arab Muslims primarily invaded North Africa.

When I'm speaking of the slave trade the Arabs did, I mean black African. Although they technically enslaved all races, they primarily enslaved those from sub-saharan Africa. That's why it's called the Trans-Saharan slave trade. And yes, I know there is a movement to downplay the 'trade' part of both slave trades(transatlantic and trasnsaharan) since cacs bring up the fact that black Africans did trade other black Africans. It seems like some of us always have to be reactionary if the facts hurt.

The reason I mention the trade part of it is because it shows the Arabs didn't have to invade in order to get slaves. The desert was a great natural barrier that protected.

Also, a lot of people don't want to admit that North Africans can be native to the region and not black. Funny, that they're a stone throw from Europe and West Asia and folks act like there is some type of forcefield that would just magically make everyone in North Africa black. I guess it would be a crushing blow if certain North African civilizations were found to be mixed.

For some reason, some folks think all the racial mixing happened after the Arab invasion of North Africa. But we know the arabs castrated male slaves and would kill a lot of the children the harem women had. The Arab invasion doesn't explain the way people look and DNA tests show the populations are native to the area.

 

[gene cisco]

Yeah I have had to go back and read Cheikh Ante Diop's work again and even try to understand what he was a trying to get at. I think it had a lot to do with the time he was in.

Seems everyone was trying to run back and find a home base for this form of civilization. For white people it would be Greece or Rome, no matter if they are Nordic , Germanic, Gaelic , whatever. For east Asians, ancient China, no matter what. Southern Asians , Indus valley, and so on.


Cheikh went to Egypt for west Africans. I think the destruction of everything from.the Mali empire mustve been a devastating blow. I don't know if there's any discussion of that era from Diop. Seems like he would have access to a lot, being from Senegal. We were certainly up against a lot at that time and to see that francophones and Anglophones shared knowledge like that is awesome. The negritude movement being inspired by what was happening on this side and so on. I dont see as much of that nowadays.

And i think there's obviously a spread from Egypt that linked into other parts of Africa in some way, I'm just not sure how. But even if there weren't , that people don't get is just as Egypt and kush civilization sprang up from nothing before it , the same can happen anywhere else, and has. Provided the right conditions of course. Also the mindset.

Yeah, and that lead to a lot of bullshit. Whites were big on that shit in the 19th century. Then the black movement happened. And much like the white movement before it, the black movement to revise history was full of cherrypicking and some declarations that defy commonsense. Folks make fun of the Eurocentric bullshit that Columbus 'discovered' America, but spit shit equally as absurd.

One of the funniest things is to play on what words mean. Like if whites say something is dark, it's automatically used to mean that they were referring to black Africans. We know for a fact that words were used to describe darker people. Like how a Englishman will refer to an arab or indian. Shit, even a Greek. So 'dark' doesn't have to mean 'black'. But when you have an agenda with history, it does.

Eurocentric and Afrocentric based history are twisted siblings.

 

[exiledking]

All this to say, Hannibal was African fro sure but likely not in the way that damn Budweiser ad showed him lol. Not some white boy either. It was a different time. Who knows ?

 

[gene cisco]

All this to say, Hannibal was African fro sure but likely not in the way that damn Budweiser ad showed him lol. Not some white boy either. It was a different time. Who knows ?

Someone had that same thought...

http://www.nytimes.com/1991/08/10/opinion/l-about-hannibal-s-color-no-one-really-knows-714091.html


To the Editor:

Re "Hannibal of Carthage Was No More Black Than King David" by Sidney Halpern (letter, July 20):

Carthage may have been as Semitic as Jerusalem, but because Semites constitute a language group, not a race, that is irrelevant to Hannibal's skin color. Neither Professor Halpern nor anyone else knows Hannibal's full pedigree or King David's.

Like the Jews, the Carthaginians were polygamous. Privileged males such as Hannibal's father's fathers kept harems. We do not know the name of a single one of Hannibal's female ancestors. Presumably, some were Berbers, natives of North Africa, who moved into the flourishing metropolis established by Phoenician colonists in their midst. Berbers who controlled oases connecting North Africa and the Niger basin, then as now, like Copts, the ancestors of modern Egyptians, probably varied in skin hue, being descended from people south as well as north of the Sahara. In modern America, many of the darker ones would doubtless be classified as black.

Although we know that all of Cleopatra's ancestors were Macedonian, we can hardly say that Hannibal's were all Phoenician. Hannibal's father's fathers may have been in Carthage about six centuries if they arrived, as many aristocrats did, at its foundation. Incidentally, the Roman Emperor Septimius Severus (193-211), a Punic speaker from North Africa, may, like Philip the Arab, Emperor from 244 to 249, have had black ancestors. Some of St. Augustine's progenitors were doubtless Italian colonists, perhaps sent to Carthage when Julius Caesar refounded it in 46 B.C. If so, they were in North Africa more than 400 years and mingling with the natives, so that Augustine too may have been black.

As a freshman at Princeton, I learned there are yellow Jews from the Far East, as well as black Jews from Africa. Judaism refers to a religion or a culture, not a racial category. King David apparently had a black grandson if Solomon sired a boy on the Queen of Sheba, who hailed from Yemen or Ethiopia. Haile Selassi, the "Lion of Judah," claimed descent from that boy.

There has always been mingling of sub-Saharan and North African peoples via the Red Sea, the Nile and desert oases. We don't know the skin color of King David, any more than that of Nefertiti and her brother-husband Ikhnaton or of any other Pharaohs. Sigmund Freud claimed that Moses was half Egyptian, the grandson of Ikhnaton, sired by a Hebrew slave on the Pharaoh's daughter. However that may be, the motley crowd of slaves that Moses led into the Sinai, where he molded them into the nation of Israel, must have contained many not descended from Isaac, some perhaps of Nubian or Ethiopian ancestry.

It is as unreasonable to declare that Hannibal was not black as to claim that Cleopatra was. But the argument is of less importance than the fact that a gradual, irregular shading of skin colors occurs from North Cape, the top of Norway, where the lightest pigmentation is of the greatest advantage in absorbing vitamin D from the rare sunlight, to the Congo Basin along the equator, where the darkest skin helps protect against the blazing sun. WILLIAM A. PERCY Prof. of History, U. of Massachusetts Boston, July 23, 1991

 

[exiledking]

Someone had that same thought...

http://www.nytimes.com/1991/08/10/opinion/l-about-hannibal-s-color-no-one-really-knows-714091.html


To the Editor:

Re "Hannibal of Carthage Was No More Black Than King David" by Sidney Halpern (letter, July 20):

Carthage may have been as Semitic as Jerusalem, but because Semites constitute a language group, not a race, that is irrelevant to Hannibal's skin color. Neither Professor Halpern nor anyone else knows Hannibal's full pedigree or King David's.

Like the Jews, the Carthaginians were polygamous. Privileged males such as Hannibal's father's fathers kept harems. We do not know the name of a single one of Hannibal's female ancestors. Presumably, some were Berbers, natives of North Africa, who moved into the flourishing metropolis established by Phoenician colonists in their midst. Berbers who controlled oases connecting North Africa and the Niger basin, then as now, like Copts, the ancestors of modern Egyptians, probably varied in skin hue, being descended from people south as well as north of the Sahara. In modern America, many of the darker ones would doubtless be classified as black.

Although we know that all of Cleopatra's ancestors were Macedonian, we can hardly say that Hannibal's were all Phoenician. Hannibal's father's fathers may have been in Carthage about six centuries if they arrived, as many aristocrats did, at its foundation. Incidentally, the Roman Emperor Septimius Severus (193-211), a Punic speaker from North Africa, may, like Philip the Arab, Emperor from 244 to 249, have had black ancestors. Some of St. Augustine's progenitors were doubtless Italian colonists, perhaps sent to Carthage when Julius Caesar refounded it in 46 B.C. If so, they were in North Africa more than 400 years and mingling with the natives, so that Augustine too may have been black.

As a freshman at Princeton, I learned there are yellow Jews from the Far East, as well as black Jews from Africa. Judaism refers to a religion or a culture, not a racial category. King David apparently had a black grandson if Solomon sired a boy on the Queen of Sheba, who hailed from Yemen or Ethiopia. Haile Selassi, the "Lion of Judah," claimed descent from that boy.

There has always been mingling of sub-Saharan and North African peoples via the Red Sea, the Nile and desert oases. We don't know the skin color of King David, any more than that of Nefertiti and her brother-husband Ikhnaton or of any other Pharaohs. Sigmund Freud claimed that Moses was half Egyptian, the grandson of Ikhnaton, sired by a Hebrew slave on the Pharaoh's daughter. However that may be, the motley crowd of slaves that Moses led into the Sinai, where he molded them into the nation of Israel, must have contained many not descended from Isaac, some perhaps of Nubian or Ethiopian ancestry.

It is as unreasonable to declare that Hannibal was not black as to claim that Cleopatra was. But the argument is of less importance than the fact that a gradual, irregular shading of skin colors occurs from North Cape, the top of Norway, where the lightest pigmentation is of the greatest advantage in absorbing vitamin D from the rare sunlight, to the Congo Basin along the equator, where the darkest skin helps protect against the blazing sun. WILLIAM A. PERCY Prof. of History, U. of Massachusetts Boston, July 23, 1991

Now THAT is the most reasonable writing I've seen.on the topic and I've seen the same conditions exist today.


The term ARAB can refer to a guy who looks white and indeed in Arabia , is predominate, but as the arabized nations go, they hit all hues. Same with Berbers, tuaregs, all those near the Sahara on both shores.

The strong correlation of color and race seem to be recent inventions and don't deal very well with culture which is more important there. But the west being as influential as it has been for this long, and modern mass media, those ideas have travelled and some institute it.

I view my American Blackness as a cultural thing and look to understand other cultures, especially sub Saharan African groups who dealt with colonization and slavery as a pan African group from both sides of the Atlantic. There's a more recent approach to this actually labelled Atlantic history which kinda better links all this stuff together from West africa to congo to the Caribbean to the Americas to western Europe and that timeline. That stretch alone is a lifetime worth of shit to unravel.

 

[exiledking]

When you get finished with it. You can't debunk any of the stuff I said. I am still wanting on you to debunk it. Frankly, you look it up and find it. You are so damn smart, figure it out on your own. Still, when you do, come back and eat crow.

Aww damn he's back. And he's mad cuz the shit he didn't even read through before he posted it contradicted him lol.

 

[Joe Money]

Aww damn he's back. And he's mad cuz the shit he didn't even read through before he posted it contradicted him lol.

It's hilarious. I asked him a simple question; from where is he getting the idea that the word "Phoenician" means "black?" That's all I wanted an answer to. He answers by jacking a post from another message board that he barely read and that didn't even address the question I asked, then he tells me I need to debunk someone else's rambling post that didn't pertain to my original question! He and freddy are kings of logical fallacies.

 

[exiledking]

It's hilarious. I asked him a simple question; from where is he getting the idea that the word "Phoenician" means "black?" That's all I wanted an answer to. He answers by jacking a post from another message board that he barely read and that didn't even address the question I asked, then he tells me I need to debunk someone else's rambling post that didn't pertain to my original question! He and freddy are kings of logical fallacies.

Lol I've never seen anyone try to make a point by saying "oh you go find my sources. I ain't got time for that shit but I KNOW I'm right"


Wtf?

Why enter a debate with all that confidence then tuck tail and run at the first challenge?

 

[gene cisco]

It's hilarious. I asked him a simple question; from where is he getting the idea that the word "Phoenician" means "black?" That's all I wanted an answer to. He answers by jacking a post from another message board that he barely read and that didn't even address the question I asked, then he tells me I need to debunk someone else's rambling post that didn't pertain to my original question! He and freddy are kings of logical fallacies.

The problem is cats have flooded the Internet with all kinds of shit disguised as scholarship. I couldn't find anything saying Phoenician means black outside of the usual declarations without any fucking sources.

 

[exiledking]

The problem is cats have flooded the Internet with all kinds of shit disguised as scholarship. I couldn't find anything saying Phoenician means black outside of the usual declarations without any fucking sources.

That's a simple and extremely verifiable linguistic issue that can be found all over the place if it were true. But it's just not.

 

[gene cisco]

That's a simple and extremely verifiable linguistic issue that can be found all over the place if it were true. But it's just not.

I found this:

http://www.whowerethephoenicians.com/wp-content/uploads/book/phenicos_new (2)_p215-p217.pdf

Mentions 'blood-red' and 'voice.'

Found this:

http://www.ancient.eu/phoenicia/

THE PURPLE PEOPLE
The purple dye manufactured and used in Tyre for the robes of Mesopotamian royalty gave Phoenicia the name by which we know it today (from the Greek Phoinikes for Tyranian Purple) and also accounts for the Phoenicians being known as 'purple people’ by the Greeks (as the Greek historian Herodotus tells us) because the dye would stain the skin of the workers. Herodotus cites Phoenicia as the birthplace of the alphabet, stating that it was brought to Greece by the Phoenician Kadmus (sometime before the 8th century BCE) and that, prior to that, the Greeks had no alphabet. The Phoenician alphabet is the basis for most western languages written today and their city of Gebal (called by the Greeks 'Byblos’) gave the Bible its name (from the Greek 'Ta Biblia’, the books) as Gebal was the great exporter of papyrus ('bublos’ to the Greeks) which was the paper used in writing in ancient Egypt and Greece. It is also thought that many of the gods of ancient Greece were imported from Phoenicia as there are certain indisputable similarities in some stories concerning the Phoenician gods Baal and Yamm and the Greek deities of Zeus and Poseidon. It is also notable that the battle between the Christian God and Satan as related in the biblical Book of Revelation seems a much later version of the same conflict, with many of the same details, one finds in the Phoenician myth of Baal and Yamm.

So where are cats getting that name means black? And why are cats trying to claim the Phoenicians anyway? Because of their alphabet?

 

[exiledking]

I found this:

http://www.whowerethephoenicians.com/wp-content/uploads/book/phenicos_new (2)_p215-p217.pdf

Mentions 'blood-red' and 'voice.'

Found this:

http://www.ancient.eu/phoenicia/

THE PURPLE PEOPLE
The purple dye manufactured and used in Tyre for the robes of Mesopotamian royalty gave Phoenicia the name by which we know it today (from the Greek Phoinikes for Tyranian Purple) and also accounts for the Phoenicians being known as 'purple people’ by the Greeks (as the Greek historian Herodotus tells us) because the dye would stain the skin of the workers. Herodotus cites Phoenicia as the birthplace of the alphabet, stating that it was brought to Greece by the Phoenician Kadmus (sometime before the 8th century BCE) and that, prior to that, the Greeks had no alphabet. The Phoenician alphabet is the basis for most western languages written today and their city of Gebal (called by the Greeks 'Byblos’) gave the Bible its name (from the Greek 'Ta Biblia’, the books) as Gebal was the great exporter of papyrus ('bublos’ to the Greeks) which was the paper used in writing in ancient Egypt and Greece. It is also thought that many of the gods of ancient Greece were imported from Phoenicia as there are certain indisputable similarities in some stories concerning the Phoenician gods Baal and Yamm and the Greek deities of Zeus and Poseidon. It is also notable that the battle between the Christian God and Satan as related in the biblical Book of Revelation seems a much later version of the same conflict, with many of the same details, one finds in the Phoenician myth of Baal and Yamm.

So where are cats getting that name means black? And why are cats trying to claim the Phoenicians anyway? Because of their alphabet?

I guess if all white people wanna somehow be connected to the Greeks and Romans even though many of them are from other regions and in some cases were dominated assimilated by them, Black people wanna be linked to the ancient Egyptians or SOMEONE mentioned in the Bible. I dunno.

 

[Mrfreddygoodbud]

I found this:

http://www.whowerethephoenicians.com/wp-content/uploads/book/phenicos_new (2)_p215-p217.pdf

Mentions 'blood-red' and 'voice.'

Found this:

http://www.ancient.eu/phoenicia/

THE PURPLE PEOPLE
The purple dye manufactured and used in Tyre for the robes of Mesopotamian royalty gave Phoenicia the name by which we know it today (from the Greek Phoinikes for Tyranian Purple) and also accounts for the Phoenicians being known as 'purple people’ by the Greeks (as the Greek historian Herodotus tells us) because the dye would stain the skin of the workers. Herodotus cites Phoenicia as the birthplace of the alphabet, stating that it was brought to Greece by the Phoenician Kadmus (sometime before the 8th century BCE) and that, prior to that, the Greeks had no alphabet. The Phoenician alphabet is the basis for most western languages written today and their city of Gebal (called by the Greeks 'Byblos’) gave the Bible its name (from the Greek 'Ta Biblia’, the books) as Gebal was the great exporter of papyrus ('bublos’ to the Greeks) which was the paper used in writing in ancient Egypt and Greece. It is also thought that many of the gods of ancient Greece were imported from Phoenicia as there are certain indisputable similarities in some stories concerning the Phoenician gods Baal and Yamm and the Greek deities of Zeus and Poseidon. It is also notable that the battle between the Christian God and Satan as related in the biblical Book of Revelation seems a much later version of the same conflict, with many of the same details, one finds in the Phoenician myth of Baal and Yamm.

So where are cats getting that name means black? And why are cats trying to claim the Phoenicians anyway? Because of their alphabet?

what a load of cac revisionist crap!!!

so they called them purple people because of some dye in their clothing..

lol....

you just cant make this shit up!!!


here let me keep it real simple and fuck all that jibber jabber crap...

its such hard work educating the hopeless... big shout out to exiled king

and his crew of hope seekers...

Ok we know the phonecians were a semetic people, speaking a semetic language...

and guess what semetic languages are catergorized under...


let me help you out..

AFROasiatic languages..

now you gonna tell me, they called it afro asiatic languages because the people walked around with sheeps on their heads....

 

[exiledking]

what a load of cac revisionist crap!!!

so they called them purple people because of some dye in their clothing..

lol....

you just cant make this shit up!!!


here let me keep it real simple and fuck all that jibber jabber crap...

its such hard work educating the hopeless... big shout out to exiled king

and his crew of hope seekers...

Ok we know the phonecians were a semetic people, speaking a semetic language...

and guess what semetic languages are catergorized under...


let me help you out..

AFROasiatic languages..

now you gonna tell me, they called it afro asiatic languages because the people walked around with sheeps on their heads....

Bruh. An AFRO is a hairstyle. That name was inspired by AFRICAN , not the other way around.

Afro Asiatic is a language group named because of the region they are all clustered in. Africa and Asia

Now youre REALLY showing how stupid you are. You can't be on this conversation anymore. Just sit there and learn. Don't even attempt to talk anymore. Seriously. Please. Just stfu cuz you're embarrassing yourself with every word you type.

 

[Mrfreddygoodbud]

Bruh. An AFRO is a hairstyle. That name was inspired by AFRICAN , not the other way around.

Afro Asiatic is a language group named because of the region they are all clustered in. Africa and Asia

Now youre REALLY showing how stupid you are. You can't be on this conversation anymore. Just sit there and learn. Don't even attempt to talk anymore. Seriously. Please. Just stfu cuz you're embarrassing yourself with every word you type.

there is a region named AFRO..

LOL

you are really showing your clown make up now...

 

[gene cisco]

what a load of cac revisionist crap!!!

so they called them purple people because of some dye in their clothing..

lol....

you just cant make this shit up!!!


here let me keep it real simple and fuck all that jibber jabber crap...

its such hard work educating the hopeless... big shout out to exiled king

and his crew of hope seekers...

Ok we know the phonecians were a semetic people, speaking a semetic language...

and guess what semetic languages are catergorized under...


let me help you out..

AFROasiatic languages..

now you gonna tell me, they called it afro asiatic languages because the people walked around with sheeps on their heads....

Had to help you out there. You keep overlooking West Asia and that not all north Africans are black and that West Asians tend to be cacs of one type or another(remember, that's where you precious neanderthals lived). Sand cacs are Semitic speakers. Your language evidence is off. Try again. Stop claiming West Asians. Let them have their history man.

 

[exiledking]

there is a region named AFRO..

LOL

you are really showing your clown make up now...

God damn you're stupid. Right after the sentence you highlighted I named the two regions that make up the region where the afro Asiatic languages are grouped.

And even still the name AFRO as as a hairstyle is a recent thing. I can't be having a convo with someone I have to explain that to. You're clueless.

 

[gene cisco]

Bruh. An AFRO is a hairstyle. That name was inspired by AFRICAN , not the other way around.

Afro Asiatic is a language group named because of the region they are all clustered in. Africa and Asia

Now youre REALLY showing how stupid you are. You can't be on this conversation anymore. Just sit there and learn. Don't even attempt to talk anymore. Seriously. Please. Just stfu cuz you're embarrassing yourself with every word you type.

I'm looking at him just overlook the Asian part when we are talking about west Asians. This cat can't be serious.

 

[Mrfreddygoodbud]

Had to help you out there. You keep overlooking West Asia and that not all north Africans are black and that West Asians tend to be cacs of one type or another(remember, that's where you precious neanderthals lived). Sand cacs are Semitic speakers. Your language evidence is off. Try again. Stop claiming West Asians. Let them have their history man.

AFRO-asiatic...

son

AFRO asiatic..

there is NO babbling around that.....
The first Asians were African..

listen go to 1:40....

damn its time to put yall to sleep.. choke yall out...

lets here what a chinese specialist has to say about this...



you guys are so not worthy!!

AFRO ASIATICs son.. act like you know now!!!!

 

[Mrfreddygoodbud]

I'm looking at him just overlook the Asian part when we are talking about west Asians. This cat can't be serious.

wipe that smile off yo face boy check the post above....

 

[Mrfreddygoodbud]

I'm looking at him just overlook the Asian part when we are talking about west Asians. This cat can't be serious.

sooo

WHOOO are the original Asians straight from a chinese specialist mouth.....????

cmon admit it you summabytch!!!!!

 

[gene cisco]

AFRO-asiatic...

son

AFRO asiatic..

there is NO babbling around that.....
The first Asians were African..

listen go to 1:40....

damn its time to put yall to sleep.. choke yall out...

lets here what a chinese specialist has to say about this...



you guys are so not worthy!!

AFRO ASIATICs son.. act like you know now!!!!

Do you even view your own sources? They are talking about 60 to 100 thousand years ago. What in the world does that have to do with 5,000 years ago? We've already established that Asians have more Neanderthal DNA than cacs. You taking this 'first' shit waaaaaaaaay the fuck out of context. By the time West Asians started doing shit that you want so desperately to claim, they were no longer African.

See. That's the problem with some of you cats. You throw around the words 'first' and 'original' and put no fucking context around it. People who wish to believe what you say might just skip 60-80 thousand years, but I won't.

 

[Mrfreddygoodbud]

Do you even view your own sources? They are talking about 60 to 100 thousand years ago. What in the world does that have to do with 5,000 years ago? We've already established that Asians have more Neanderthal DNA than cacs. You taking this 'first' shit waaaaaaaaay the fuck out of context. By the time West Asians started doing shit that you want so desperately to claim, they were no longer African.

See. That's the problem with some of you cats. You throw around the words 'first' and 'original' and put no fucking context around it. People who wish to believe what you say might just skip 60-80 thousand years, but I won't.

were the first chinese african

YES

or

NO

 

[exiledking]

Do you even view your own sources? They are talking about 60 to 100 thousand years ago. What in the world does that have to do with 5,000 years ago? We've already established that Asians have more Neanderthal DNA than cacs. You taking this 'first' shit waaaaaaaaay the fuck out of context. By the time West Asians started doing shit that you want so desperately to claim, they were no longer African.

See. That's the problem with some of you cats. You throw around the words 'first' and 'original' and put no fucking context around it. People who wish to believe what you say might just skip 60-80 thousand years, but I won't.

Lol we deaded that shit at least 20 times whenever he's posted that guy. His videos NEVER support what he's saying.

 

[Mrfreddygoodbud]

Lol we deaded that shit at least 20 times whenever he's posted that guy. His videos NEVER support what he's saying.

oh boy here is frac the other half of fric..

the original chinese were african can you admit that?

jo fuckin slow....

can ya???

 

[gene cisco]

were the first chinese african

YES

or

NO

No, the first Chinese were 'mutated' neanderthal/African hybrids in Asia around 10,000 bc. Sorry to disappoint you. A lot of 'mutation' can happen in 10s of thousands of years. Get your timelines together. This is insane.

 

[exiledking]

were the first chinese african

YES

or

NO

No you dummy. If you look at human migration they wouldve had to migrate out of Africa then to Arabia and many other parts of Asia before arriving in China .And this is not one guy walking, it's a MIGRATION. They wouldve been in Arabia and numerous other regions for thousands of years before arriving in China and this is GENERATIONS of people. People evolve over generations and under different temperate zones and cultures. Those who migrated to China wouldve come from the region IN ASIA that is closest to it. Thus, they would be ASIAN.

I'm sure you won't get it but I wrote it anyway

 

[gene cisco]

Lol we deaded that shit at least 20 times whenever he's posted that guy. His videos NEVER support what he's saying.

Shit isn't even funny because more and more black folks running around online claiming false shit and looking like fucking fools. They just overlook gaps of 10s of thousands of years to claim first. People are looking like clowns to anyone who seriously studies history.

 

[Mrfreddygoodbud]

No, the first Chinese were 'mutated' neanderthal/African hybrids in Asia around 10,000 bc. Sorry to disappoint you. A lot of 'mutation' can happen in 10s of thousands of years. Get your timelines together. This is insane.

so you disagree with a chinese DNA specialist..

ok

this IS insane.....

your denial is insane..

your jibber jabber around facts is insane....