History channel shows Hannibal as a Black man. Whites go crazy cry revisionism.

so in your first paragraph you are saying Im right, just say it.. Im right...glad to see you start to come to your senses..

I dont understand your point about neanderthals being from west asia..

we simply do not share those same savage genetics..

we are a different species altogether, we are much more humane.....

we been in existence way before the savage european, and we never ever wiped out, whole races of people,

whereever we went we tried to make them better..

whereever the savage european went, he tried to wipe them out...

facts....

but my people have to take some of the blame as well..

nobody told us to go up there and try to civilize the beast.

that was our decision and our fault.. we broke a lot of laws doing that shit...

and thats why we are payin the price now. a gluttonous savage is just going to do what he knows to do for his survival.... and since this species is not going to be around forever..it has to find means to survive... by the way that bio technology is not going to work...fuckin head transplants....lol

so euro savages are not to fully blame...we need to go back to our natural laws..

once that happens the savage will fade into oblivion.
 
Read the damn source.

As I said, a copy-and-pasted message board post is NOT A LEGITIMATE SOURCE. And I will return to this after I address your other points.

On top of that, I have documents in my house that has the info need. I don't have time to dig that shit up.

You can find out the names of these works, if they're legitimate.

Dude, everybody was black at one time. Distance from the source and environment created lighter skinned people. Also, we created them through genetic malfunction, those at beginning of this thing anyhow, albinoism. Theory, we had albino babies, we believed that it was against God, so instead of killing them we put them out of our cities. After time and the procreation, a new group arose, the white man. So, these angry motherfuckers (albinos) that came out of the hills had better weapons. They mixed with the people who they conquered.

And I will ask again. When did this occur (what period of history) and what is your source for this information?

If you read the sources sir, the source said that the Caananites, who are the Phoenicians, were black.

Once again, I ask, what is the source? Are you referring to the Gabriel Audis quote?

Phoenician is a greek word that describe what the Greeks saw, which were black people.

I'm sounding like a broken record, but what is your source for this?? Even that long-ass comment section you quoted as a "source" doesn't say this, so where are you getting it from?

White modern historians say that it is a reference to the color of the purple red dye they used to make there clothing with. Meaning, anything to say that they are not black. :hmm: So, I know what Im talking about.

No you don't. That is the main problem.

I have been in the history game for 27 years. Frankly, you did not read the sources. The white people of their time said that those people were black (Herodotus, etc).

The parts of your "source" were talking about the Ancient Egyptians, not Phoenicians or Carthaginians. Ironically, your "source" also says this: "Hannibal possessed extraordinary courage, cunning, resourcefulness, great intellect, all of which made him a difficult opponent against the Romans. His charismatic influence as an orator, politician, and military commander enabled him to solidify an army made up of Phoenicians, Greeks, Estrucans, Africans from the many nations of Africa, Iberians from Spain, nomads of the African Coast, Gauls, Libyans, and Numidians, making him therefore the first commander in charge of a multi-cultural, multi-ethnic, and multi-racial military force."

Further, the authors of the websites used Clark and Diop, two of the most trusted African historians in our history, even though one is without portfolio, he is still par excellent at the history game. Diop is without question, one of the greatest historian and scientist in the history of the world. He has two Phd's. He used modern science to prove that the Egyptians were black. He and Professor Obenga told the world, in 1974 that the Egyptians were black and the builders of the pyramids. They also issued that the people who built the megaliths were not slaves.

This is the only verifiable thing you have written, but it doesn't address the relevant questions, since we're not talking about Ancient Egypt. And people like you and Mrfreddygoodbud do a disservice to a true scholar like Diop when you cannot cite nor properly source and explain the information you want to convey. African-centered scholarship is a legitimate field, and people like you make a mockery of it (hoteps, et. al.). I asked you one simple question, which is how you are coming to the conclusion that the word "Phoenician" means "black." You claim the Greeks called them that, even though "Phoenician" isn't rooted in any Greek word for "black." Why wouldn't the Greeks have used "Aithiops" instead, which is the general work they used for dark-skinned people?

Sir, I am game tight when it comes to history. I have copious years of training and the shit you are talking about, I am damn passionate about.

If you were passionate about it, you would respect scholastic methodology. I'm sure Diop did, since he had two Ph.Ds.
 
You getting a headache. Because you and simple logic are not friends.


It's simple

Six thousand years ago the caucasion didn't exist.

Caucasions are mutated from the neanderthal.

Africans tried to civilize the war mongering

Caucasion from 700 ad to about 1400.

But the Savage caucasion was disease ridden and this disease wiped out millions of the Africans that civilized their Savage ass.

And thus the Savage european and the mutt Arab was able to expel. The moors from places like England Spain and ireland.

Thus starting the Atlantic slave trade.

Gotdam educating you smart dumb muthafuckas is a full time fucking job

Shout out to vahusla gene cisco and his alter ego exiled king

We're gonna beginning constructing your historical timeline. Please complete, add to, rearrange, or correct the information as needed. So let's go...

First human beings appeared -----???????

First neanderthals ------- ???????

Ancient Egypt --- ?????????

Ancient Greece --- ???????

Ancient Rome ----- ???????

Cacs/Caucasians/Whites appear ------ ???????

Age of the Moor ----- 700 A.D. to 1400 A.D. (These were Black Africans who were eventually expelled by the "Savage European" and "mutt Arab?"

caliph_gif.jpg


African slave trade begins ------ 1400s to ??????????
 
Here's the thing. Neanderthals were in West Asia(http://www.seeker.com/first-neanderthal-human-love-child-from-israel-1769467646.html). Yes, they have been found in caves in Israel. As soon as humans left Africa, they ran into Neanderthals and mixing happened. That's why even North Africans carry Neanderthal DNA. The only people they say don't come from sub-saharan Africa.

You cats want it both ways. You talk about Neanderthals, but ignore the fact that they were in West Asia first and that North Africans carry that DNA just like West Asians, Europeans, Asians, Australians, and Native Americans.

It's funny. Neanderthals native to areas some of you cats try to claim. Some say West Asia is really Africa, so I guess Neanderthals are native Africans. :eek:First mixing took place there 50,000 to 60,000 years ago, so that means cacs been there. And remember, this type of cac isn't new:

niBq5Dfr_400x400.jpeg


The blue-eyed, paler one is the new one. The one pictured above has been in the area since forever.

How the fuck the sand cacs invade Africa in the late 600s and you talking about Africans who couldn't hold off sand cacs educated cacs in Europe? On what planet does riding with the invading force make a group winners? How do you spin an invasion in Africa into winning? The sand cacs brought all the 'knowledge' you claiming Africans brought to Europe from 700 to 1400. They the ones who brought the paper for the libraries into Timbuktu. What language is most the stuff written in? So it looks like the sand cacs brought everyone up to speed. :lol: How you going to claim their shit man? You know how embarrassing it is to claim invaders shit? :smh: Have some pride. :smh:


Man, I tried having a "discussion" with a Trump supporter today, and now I'm reading this thread again. It's truly amazing how, since people "believe" something, that makes it so, regardless of the lack of facts and proof and the abundance of non-sequiturs.
 
We're gonna beginning constructing your historical timeline. Please complete, add to, rearrange, or correct the information as needed. So let's go...

First human beings appeared -----???????

First neanderthals ------- ???????

Ancient Egypt --- ?????????

Ancient Greece --- ???????

Ancient Rome ----- ???????

Cacs/Caucasians/Whites appear ------ ???????

Age of the Moor ----- 700 A.D. to 1400 A.D. (These were Black Africans who were eventually expelled by the "Savage European" and "mutt Arab?"

caliph_gif.jpg


African slave trade begins ------ 1400s to ??????????

No problem..

first pay your tuition..

Fees for this semester is..


a hundred dollars a timeline.


a thousand dollars a one hour course....

eight thousand dollars a semester.

twenty thousand if you need room and board...
 
so in your first paragraph you are saying Im right, just say it.. Im right...glad to see you start to come to your senses..

I dont understand your point about neanderthals being from west asia..

we simply do not share those same savage genetics..

we are a different species altogether, we are much more humane.....

we been in existence way before the savage european, and we never ever wiped out, whole races of people,

whereever we went we tried to make them better..

whereever the savage european went, he tried to wipe them out...

facts....

but my people have to take some of the blame as well..

nobody told us to go up there and try to civilize the beast.

that was our decision and our fault.. we broke a lot of laws doing that shit...

and thats why we are payin the price now. a gluttonous savage is just going to do what he knows to do for his survival.... and since this species is not going to be around forever..it has to find means to survive... by the way that bio technology is not going to work...fuckin head transplants....lol

so euro savages are not to fully blame...we need to go back to our natural laws..

once that happens the savage will fade into oblivion.

First off, where are all the other humanoids humans encountered after leaving Africa. They don't exist right(some of their DNA survives, but as a group). So what happened to them? Humans pushed out humanoids who had existed for hundreds of thousands of years. They were doing fine before humans showed up, so explain that. I'm sure they didn't ask for humans to come to their lands and fuck with them.

But guess what happens when humanoids with superior technology encounter ones who don't? The ones who don't have it lose. Happens every fucking time. You say people coming out of Africa never wiped out entire races of people, yet there is evidence to suggest otherwise when humans first encountered other humanoids.

Furthermore, in recorded history, there is no evidence of Africans having enough of a technological advantage to travel the globe and wipe out other humans(but it's funny how Egypt raided Nubia for slaves and cattle, guess that isn't savage). What empire in Africa had a navy AND weapons that were capable enough? Don't show me the boat in the tomb, you need an entire fucking Navy, logistics, and weapons. West Asians are the ones who introduced the chariot to Africa.

Do you know what the boats that the Mali empire used to go in to the ocean in the 13th century looked like? You wouldn't row out into Lake Erie in those things. And they didn't have guns or cannons. The first empires truly capable of global expansion didn't come about until the 14th century and they weren't African. China was the first. They had the best Navy that the world had ever seen and command of gun powder. Internal beef was their downfall, and that didn't happen to Europeans.

If a group never had an opportunity to do something, you can't say they wouldn't have done it. :eek:
 
First off, where are all the other humanoids humans encountered after leaving Africa. They don't exist right(some of their DNA survives, but as a group). So what happened to them? Humans pushed out humanoids who had existed for hundreds of thousands of years. They were doing fine before humans showed up, so explain that. I'm sure they didn't ask for humans to come to their lands and fuck with them.

But guess what happens when humanoids with superior technology encounter ones who don't? The ones who don't have it lose. Happens every fucking time. You say people coming out of Africa never wiped out entire races of people, yet there is evidence to suggest otherwise when humans first encountered other humanoids.

Furthermore, in recorded history, there is no evidence of Africans having enough of a technological advantage to travel the globe and wipe out other humans(but it's funny how Egypt raided Nubia for slaves and cattle, guess that isn't savage). What empire in Africa had a navy AND weapons that were capable enough? Don't show me the boat in the tomb, you need an entire fucking Navy, logistics, and weapons. West Asians are the ones who introduced the chariot to Africa.

Do you know what the boats that the Mali empire used to go in to the ocean in the 13th century looked like? You wouldn't row out into Lake Erie in those things. And they didn't have guns or cannons. The first empires truly capable of global expansion didn't come about until the 14th century and they weren't African. China was the first. They had the best Navy that the world had ever seen and command of gun powder. Internal beef was their downfall, and that didn't happen to Europeans.

If a group never had an opportunity to do something, you can't say they wouldn't have done it. :eek:


ok...

Im kinda lost in all that jibber jabber but..

ok..
 
Man, I tried having a "discussion" with a Trump supporter today, and now I'm reading this thread again. It's truly amazing how, since people "believe" something, that makes it so, regardless of the lack of facts and proof and the abundance of non-sequiturs.

It's crazy. I love how folks selectively use sources. Didn't Herodotus report Cyclops and Griffins?
 
No problem..

first pay your tuition..

Fees for this semester is..


a hundred dollars a timeline.


a thousand dollars a one hour course....

eight thousand dollars a semester.

twenty thousand if you need room and board...

Man, I'd go to Trump University before getting any kind of "learnin' " from you! But I am curious. Do you have any post-high school education? I mean, from an accredited college or university?





First off, where are all the other humanoids humans encountered after leaving Africa. They don't exist right(some of their DNA survives, but as a group). So what happened to them? Humans pushed out humanoids who had existed for hundreds of thousands of years. They were doing fine before humans showed up, so explain that. I'm sure they didn't ask for humans to come to their lands and fuck with them.

But guess what happens when humanoids with superior technology encounter ones who don't? The ones who don't have it lose. Happens every fucking time. You say people coming out of Africa never wiped out entire races of people, yet there is evidence to suggest otherwise when humans first encountered other humanoids.

Furthermore, in recorded history, there is no evidence of Africans having enough of a technological advantage to travel the globe and wipe out other humans(but it's funny how Egypt raided Nubia for slaves and cattle, guess that isn't savage). What empire in Africa had a navy AND weapons that were capable enough? Don't show me the boat in the tomb, you need an entire fucking Navy, logistics, and weapons. West Asians are the ones who introduced the chariot to Africa.

Do you know what the boats that the Mali empire used to go in to the ocean in the 13th century looked like? You wouldn't row out into Lake Erie in those things. And they didn't have guns or cannons. The first empires truly capable of global expansion didn't come about until the 14th century and they weren't African. China was the first. They had the best Navy that the world had ever seen and command of gun powder. Internal beef was their downfall, and that didn't happen to Europeans.

If a group never had an opportunity to do something, you can't say they wouldn't have done it. :eek:

He's openly admitted twice that you have gone over his head twice!
 
Man, I'd go to Trump University before getting any kind of "learnin' " from you! But I am curious. Do you have any post-high school education? I mean, from an accredited college or university?







He's openly admitted twice that you have gone over his head twice!


lol,

either pay up or shut up....

giving me homework assignments on a fuckin porn board, are you fuckin kidding me..bwhahhahahahahaaaaaa

and now you pulling shit out your ass.....

nobody is going over my head, Im just too lazy to disect that psycho talk..

just get over the fact that the only true history of europeans is that of savages...

vandals and goths....

see now thats a part of your history that has nothing to do with africans...
 
It's funny that we basically agree on everything else on this board but the subject of history. lol. You're wild on this subject man...

lol,

nothing wrong with that, I dont think there are two honest men on this planet that agree on everything...

I just see through european revisionist history...

a history that till this day, is teaching children columbus discovered america

but yet their was a native population here for thousands of years....

and still to arrogant to admit that is bullshit..


what else historically are these white historic revisionist too arrogant to admit is bullshit??
 
First off, where are all the other humanoids humans encountered after leaving Africa. They don't exist right(some of their DNA survives, but as a group). So what happened to them? Humans pushed out humanoids who had existed for hundreds of thousands of years. They were doing fine before humans showed up, so explain that. I'm sure they didn't ask for humans to come to their lands and fuck with them.

But guess what happens when humanoids with superior technology encounter ones who don't? The ones who don't have it lose. Happens every fucking time. You say people coming out of Africa never wiped out entire races of people, yet there is evidence to suggest otherwise when humans first encountered other humanoids.

Furthermore, in recorded history, there is no evidence of Africans having enough of a technological advantage to travel the globe and wipe out other humans(but it's funny how Egypt raided Nubia for slaves and cattle, guess that isn't savage). What empire in Africa had a navy AND weapons that were capable enough? Don't show me the boat in the tomb, you need an entire fucking Navy, logistics, and weapons. West Asians are the ones who introduced the chariot to Africa.

Do you know what the boats that the Mali empire used to go in to the ocean in the 13th century looked like? You wouldn't row out into Lake Erie in those things. And they didn't have guns or cannons. The first empires truly capable of global expansion didn't come about until the 14th century and they weren't African. China was the first. They had the best Navy that the world had ever seen and command of gun powder. Internal beef was their downfall, and that didn't happen to Europeans.

If a group never had an opportunity to do something, you can't say they wouldn't have done it. :eek:

oh and as far as the humanoids go, you didnt see that thread about the indian lady and that furry baby she had born with a tail...

indians are the original aryans you know...

so those humanoids are still being born till this day....
 
lol,

either pay up or shut up....

giving me homework assignments on a fuckin porn board, are you fuckin kidding me..bwhahhahahahahaaaaaa

and now you pulling shit out your ass.....

nobody is going over my head, Im just too lazy to disect that psycho talk..

just get over the fact that the only true history of europeans is that of savages...

vandals and goths....

see now thats a part of your history that has nothing to do with africans...

You can't fill out simple dates because the "history" you speak of makes no chronological sense. You can't dissect simple points, such as Neanderthals being in West Asia, because you lack the ability to critically think.

And yes, the Vandals and Goths destroyed the Roman Empire. When did this occur? Who were the Romans? Was the before or after the "civilization process" of the Africans?

I know you won't respond to these basic questions because they will simply confuse you.
 
You can't fill out simple dates because the "history" you speak of makes no chronological sense. You can't dissect simple points, such as Neanderthals being in West Asia, because you lack the ability to critically think.

And yes, the Vandals and Goths destroyed the Roman Empire. When did this occur? Who were the Romans? Was the before or after the "civilization process" of the Africans?

I know you won't respond to these basic questions because they will simply confuse you.

ok now we are getting somewhere,

the vandals and goths presence destroyed rome, but the africans presence

had the opposite effect and lifted rome/spain to world powers..


dude anyone can google for time lines, BORING.

lets discuss hidden history... shit thats covered up, but with only

an ounce of common sense and a dash of deductive reasoning it can be uncovered...


but it takes a bit of logic to do this and you are more of a google guy so I understand your short comings...
 
ok now we are getting somewhere,

the vandals and goths presence destroyed rome, but the africans presence

had the opposite effect and lifted rome/spain to world powers..


dude anyone can google for time lines, BORING.

lets discuss hidden history... shit thats covered up, but with only

an ounce of common sense and a dash of deductive reasoning it can be uncovered...


but it takes a bit of logic to do this and you are more of a google guy so I understand your short comings...

It's not boring. Apparently anyone can google for timelines except you. So who built the Roman Empire in the first place? And when?
 
It's not boring. Apparently anyone can google for timelines except you. So who built the Roman Empire in the first place? And when?

dude you simply are not ready for uncovered, hidden history...

so you just stick to your time lines and euro revisionist crap....

Did christopher columbus discover america??
 
dude you simply are not ready for uncovered, hidden history...

so you just stick to your time lines and euro revisionist crap....

Did christopher columbus discover america??

I'm far more ready and aware for "uncovered, hidden history" than you ever will be. Let me explain how this works. First, you master whatever the "mainstream" or "Eurocentric" historical narrative is. And then you go back and identify the holes, discrepancies, and biases in that narrative. You know nothing about the initial narrative or the scholastic process, and you don't respect it.

I can't tell if you're simply anti-intellectual or lazy, but, as I said to scullydog, people like you do a serious disservice to true black and African scholars who seek to knowledge and truth. You're why "hotep niggas" get laughed at. Now go spend some money on another Hidden Colors DVD so Tariq Nasheed can take another exotic trip while he deconstructs white supremacy on an iTunes podcast.
 
I'm far more ready and aware for "uncovered, hidden history" than you ever will be. Let me explain how this works. First, you master whatever the "mainstream" or "Eurocentric" historical narrative is. And then you go back and identify the holes, discrepancies, and biases in that narrative. You know nothing about the initial narrative or the scholastic process, and you don't respect it.

I can't tell if you're simply anti-intellectual or lazy, but, as I said to scullydog, people like you do a serious disservice to true black and African scholars who seek to knowledge and truth. You're why "hotep niggas" get laughed at. Now go spend some money on another Hidden Colors DVD so Tariq Nasheed can take another exotic trip while he deconstructs white supremacy on an iTunes podcast.


damn I aint know I was that important... I do a disservice to fuckin SCHOLARS

Im why "hotep" kniggas get laughed at...

damn my post are THAT popular..

you sure reaching at your feeble attempts to debunk anything I stated..

never the less...

Who discovered america??

was it christopher columbus....??
 
damn. This dude still trollin. His buddy Scuzzy dog just dropped that bullshit and broke out, but he still here, swinging blindly lol.

This might be one of the most clear ownages I've seen on the board in a while.


But seriously. None of us just blindly agree with EVERYTHING- even established scholars dont. My interest in this type history started AS one of these hoteps. I hate even using be word because I know a ton of these people and I know they generally mean well and are reacting to the basic bullshit we gotta deal with because of the gaps in our history that we are still trying to fill in.

But there are methods to determine what is most likely to be true and staunch belief isn't one of em. I'm glad to see some more people who get that.
 
You guys would feel so much better about yourselves if you fall back on the denial


Africans civilized europeans its ok

Take a deep breath count to ten and breathe.


It's OK if your ancestors were barbaric Savage war mongering cannibals...

It's only a slight reflection on you.
 
You guys would feel so much better about yourselves if you fall back on the denial


Africans civilized europeans its ok

Take a deep breath count to ten and breathe.


It's OK if your ancestors were barbaric Savage war mongering cannibals...

It's only a slight reflection on you.
I really feel bad for you. You literally tapped out when he hit you with that timeline TWICE lol.
 
oh and as far as the humanoids go, you didnt see that thread about the indian lady and that furry baby she had born with a tail...

indians are the original aryans you know...

so those humanoids are still being born till this day....

So you are just going to concentrate on weird births in India? You do know India has been dabbling with nuclear technology for decades. There currently aren't any nuclear-capable powers in Africa. Could nuclear waste have something to do with India?
 
Cmon son

What's with the homwork

You trying to be a schoolteacher

Wit yo

Ol Mrs Crabtree lookin ass
homework?

LOL how is it homework for you to give a clear timeline of YOUR VIEW of how this went?


You already gave the general story HUNDREDS of times in this thread, and you seem confident about it.

This isn't even much deeper, and he gave you some incidents that if you just gave an approximate CENTURY, we could all get a better view on what your're saying. Since you know what they're teaching in schools is so off,just break it down right quick.
 
We're gonna beginning constructing your historical timeline. Please complete, add to, rearrange, or correct the information as needed. So let's go...

First human beings appeared -----???????

First neanderthals ------- ???????

Ancient Egypt --- ?????????

Ancient Greece --- ???????

Ancient Rome ----- ???????

Cacs/Caucasians/Whites appear ------ ???????

Age of the Moor ----- 700 A.D. to 1400 A.D. (These were Black Africans who were eventually expelled by the "Savage European" and "mutt Arab?"

caliph_gif.jpg


African slave trade begins ------ 1400s to ??????????

Yeah, we can set a timeline, but the African slave trade begins with the invasion in the 600s. At least the brutal slave trades, because slavery was different in Africa. I mean there are degrees to owning people. :eek: Being buried alive with your master isn't that bad.
 
homework?

LOL how is it homework for you to give a clear timeline of YOUR VIEW of how this went?


You already gave the general story HUNDREDS of times in this thread, and you seem confident about it.

This isn't even much deeper, and he gave you some incidents that if you just gave an approximate CENTURY, we could all get a better view on what your're saying. Since you know what they're teaching in schools is so off,just break it down right quick.

I just know any educational system that is trying to convince me some Savage blood thirsty gold hungry Savage like Columbus discovered America with people already here. Is telling me all I need to know about this eurocentric education that's shoved down our throats...


They still to this day teaching that bullshit.

The more you uncover theater more you see what these europeans are trying to hide


And one of the main things is " black". Folk were here already.

And been in the Americas for thousands of years.
 
I just know any educational system that is trying to convince me some Savage blood thirsty gold hungry Savage like Columbus discovered America with people already here. Is telling me all I need to know about this eurocentric education that's shoved down our throats...


They still to this day teaching that bullshit.

The more you uncover theater more you see what these europeans are trying to hide


And one of the main things is " black". Folk were here already.

And been in the Americas for thousands of years.
Let's quit talking about the many things that THEY think. We already know you feel it's completely wrong.


Let's see the timeline that YOU believe is the real thing. In the form of a timeline.
 
Let's quit talking about the many things that THEY think. We already know you feel it's completely wrong.


Let's see the timeline that YOU believe is the real thing. In the form of a timeline.


The only line I'm doing is the soul train line

Next month at a Halloween party....



Just know there is no way the neanderthal aka the european Savage is going to come out the caves speaking ooga boogaese.

Teaching himself languages

All languages from Latin to Greek were

Developed by the original indigenous melanin rich egyptians

Just more facts you need to get over and face reality...

The euro Savage have done an excellent job hiding their non culture history. And claiming others as their own.

A fucking excellent job.
 
The only line I'm doing is the soul train line

Next month at a Halloween party....



Just know there is no way the neanderthal aka the european Savage is going to come out the caves speaking ooga boogaese.

Teaching himself languages

All languages from Latin to Greek were

Developed by the original indigenous melanin rich egyptians

Just more facts you need to get over and face reality...

The euro Savage have done an excellent job hiding their non culture history. And claiming others as their own.

A fucking excellent job.
See, all the.lines you just wrote trying to school me, you couldve jotted that timeline homey.
 
Last edited:
any day bruh. Every time you reply without it, you look weaker and weaker

Yea ok,

everytime you request it, it makes you look like a descendent of a neanderthal,

that cant live with the truth...about his past....

its ok son... dont run from facts... embrace your savage, barbaric past...

its nothing to be ashamed of... ok now Im lying..
 
Back
Top