post it-
Please post your source on this
where does it say that a jet can't reach better than 500 knots at sea level ?
What Actually Happens When A Plane Is Crashed On Purpose
- Thread starter ViCiouS
- Start date
Please post your source on this
where does it say that a jet can't reach better than 500 knots at sea level ?
Wrong
Not enough for me bruh. Planes don't completely disintegrate because of those factors.
They had thousands of pounds of fuel left.They couldn't approach it immediately because the engines were still running.
What in the fuck?....
Lol.....
Nope. This is a weak ass argument point fam.......here is why:
125+ metal seats, exceptionally larger air-frame, Steel engines(2) , what speed was this test crash?, luggage, tail section, impact zone vs expected damage for that size zone, etc.
Don't be an asshole and deny obvious FACTUAL information.
I base my point of view on two things.
1. What are observable, empirical facts. (Large commercial passenger airplane crashes in empty field impacting at a a diagonal angle. NO HUMAN REMAINS, AND VERY LITTLE EVIDENCE OF THE PLANE PASSENGERS OR LUGGAGE)
2. What are the known or historical examples of outcomes of these observable facts. (In the history of modern aviation, has this ever happened?) MH370 Crashed in the ocean and they have more parts then this.
Hey bitch, calm ya little homotional ass down. Damn, I posted that as a reference to the planes that hit the building. Sorry if I offended you...carry on Negro.Nope. This is a weak ass argument point fam.......here is why:
125+ metal seats, exceptionally larger air-frame, Steel engines(2) , what speed was this test crash?, luggage, tail section, impact zone vs expected damage for that size zone, etc.
Don't be an asshole and deny obvious FACTUAL information.
I base my point of view on two things.
1. What are observable, empirical facts. (Large commercial passenger airplane crashes in empty field impacting at a a diagonal angle. NO HUMAN REMAINS, AND VERY LITTLE EVIDENCE OF THE PLANE PASSENGERS OR LUGGAGE)
2. What are the known or historical examples of outcomes of these observable facts. (In the history of modern aviation, has this ever happened?) MH370 Crashed in the ocean and they have more parts then this.
I'm emotional but you react with immature name calling? I never once called you anything. So why are you offended enough to write that kind of response which is considerably more bitter than mine. You posted a video that had no relevance to the thread with no explanation.
Never been a bitch a day in my life also. I swear to GOD I'm in Denver Colorado and would meet you or anybody else who wants to question my manhood.
Peace.
Nope. This is a weak ass argument point fam.......here is why:
125+ metal seats, exceptionally larger air-frame, Steel engines(2) , what speed was this test crash?, luggage, tail section, impact zone vs expected damage for that size zone, etc.
Don't be an asshole and deny obvious FACTUAL information.
I base my point of view on two things.
1. What are observable, empirical facts. (Large commercial passenger airplane crashes in empty field impacting at a a diagonal angle. NO HUMAN REMAINS, AND VERY LITTLE EVIDENCE OF THE PLANE PASSENGERS OR LUGGAGE)
2. What are the known or historical examples of outcomes of these observable facts. (In the history of modern aviation, has this ever happened?) MH370 Crashed in the ocean and they have more parts then this.
My theory on that flight is it was shot down.... The govt doesn't want to say it shot down a passenger jet
So if true it broke up explosivly at altitude.... With fire.... This crash site is probably just engines.... Rest spread out for miles covered up by the military
Check out wreckage of twa flight 800 - it was shot down (covered up) at less than 5000 feet over the ocean with what I believe was a shoulder mounted missile
Imagine a more powerful air to air missile strike 2 hellfire or 2 sidewinders
At 25k feet..... I think the breakup would have smaller pieces spread around and a lot of fire damage
Last edited:
The impact area would NEVER look like that if that plane was shot down. There would be debris scattered for a square mile if shot down at 25k feet. Bodies and parts, seats, luggage, all kinds of shit.
yeah based on the Ukrain shoot down, you are right- but I think it was multiple strikes 2 or 3
I think the debris field there was huge but covered up... the way the military and feds mobilized in the area it wouldn't have been too difficult to keep a net on it
Would it be easier, logistically, to just fake it? Consider the history of the US.
But when it comes to the US...............I wouldn't put anything past 'em.
But when it comes to the US...............I wouldn't put anything past 'em.
Shut up bitch.
Similar threads
