2015-2016 NBA playoff edition: Finals - Cavs vs Warriors - Cavs win 4-3

Who's you going with Cavs or Warriors!!!


  • Total voters
    83
  • Poll closed .
Boston with the 7 point first quarter... And Memphis with the 11 pt first quarter... Man its sooooo many teams at home with the nick young face... Lmao Memphis without Conley and Marc Gasol... Just not the same mane... It hurts to see them go down like this. They normally love being a terror in the first round!!!
 
Boston with the 7 point first quarter... And Memphis with the 11 pt first quarter... Man its sooooo many teams at home with the nick young face... Lmao Memphis without Conley and Marc Gasol... Just not the same mane... It hurts to see them go down like this. They normally love being a terror in the first round!!!


That opening round games was the most lopsided victories in the history of the nba
 
Nahhh.... Because we've never seen bias before?!?! Steve Nash (Kobe snubbed).... Derrick Rose (Lebron snubbed).... Come on mane... They've gotten it wrong before....the fact that they were this close to getting this wrong is alarming bro. I think that is all that's being said... Look up the stats... The numbers speak for themselves bruh...most his numbers are down this year on a team who's numbers were off the chart this year... So you have other players that statistically are better... And actually played more actual games.... Have more points scored... And are ranked higher in player efficiency... It implies that the judges like many of you....only watched the GSW games this year.... And didn't really see the impact of these other players...
Yes bias does exist and yes they've gotten it wrong plenty of times,not disputing that..but sometimes importance or impact doesn't always show up in numbers..also if they were being bias for GS or just watched their games more than likely he woulda won..answer this though, as a 6th man would u rather have Crawford or iggy on your team?
 
Yes bias does exist and yes they've gotten it wrong plenty of times,not disputing that..but sometimes importance or impact doesn't always show up in numbers..also if they were being bias for GS or just watched their games more than likely he woulda won..answer this though, as a 6th man would u rather have Crawford or iggy on your team?

Obviously that would depend on the make up of my team.... But more times than not I'm taking Jamal Crawford (He's 36 and still giving these young boys the works!!)... I'm for damn sure taking Kanter...
 
Marcus Smart may end up being a bust

I m rooting for this kid but he's offensively challenged..shots bomb away 3s can't doesn't have the first step to creative seperation. But dude is a winner though plays hard and competes and does little things that don't show up in the stat book
 
Obviously that would depend on the make up of my team.... But more times than not I'm taking Jamal Crawford (He's 36 and still giving these young boys the works!!)... I'm for damn sure taking Kanter...
Kanter is solid but plays no defense; And I agree it depends on the makeup of the team as it relates to comparing Iggy with Kanter; But there is no way on this earth Im taking Crawford over Iggy; NO WAY!!!; Iggy will score when you need him; Can guard multiple positions(Crawford not guarding anything) and will do dirty work; plus he understands how to play and guys like playing with him; 2 things that cant be measured in numbers...
 
I m rooting for this kid but he's offensively challenged..shots bomb away 3s can't doesn't have the first step to creative seperation. But dude is a winner though plays hard and competes and does little things that don't show up in the stat book

His offensive game so trash
 
Kanter is solid but plays no defense; And I agree it depends on the makeup of the team as it relates to comparing Iggy with Kanter; But there is no way on this earth Im taking Crawford over Iggy; NO WAY!!!; Iggy will score when you need him; Can guard multiple positions(Crawford not guarding anything) and will do dirty work; plus he understands how to play and guys like playing with him; 2 things that cant be measured in numbers...

I'm just talking numbers this year... The ability for jamal Crawford at big moments to take over the game...and his deadly precision at the free throw line for tight game situations.... They both have their pros and con's... Looking at the measurable stats... Iggy wasn't that great this year mane... That's all I'm saying
 
LMAOOO!! :lol:

It's funny because I've been there before. And I'm not talking about actually having a chance to win either. I'm talk about knowing you about to get your ass kicked and you hype yourself up like, "Yeah, Imma do me tonight. We may lose by 40, but I'm going to have 30 tonight."
All just to give yourself something to talk shit about after the ass whipping! Been there. Dude stay clowning but you're like 'Yeah but you couldnt guard me tho Bruh!' :lol:
 
The first round is so weak this year it may not be any upsets except for the Pacers over the Raptors.
 
LeBron on what it means that he will pass Michael Jordan in career playoff games (180) tonight: "That he closed out series faster than me"

He couldve been a dick and said he was getting swept and whooped the first half of his career and my teams have gone farther at this point, but he was gracious. His brand has never been about overrating himself and minimizing his peers and pioneers to hawk ugly kicks. The numbers speak for themselves.
 
LeBron on what it means that he will pass Michael Jordan in career playoff games (180) tonight: "That he closed out series faster than me"

He couldve been a dick and said he was getting swept and whooped the first half of his career and my teams have gone farther at this point, but he was gracious. His brand has never been about overrating himself and minimizing his peers and pioneers to hawk ugly kicks. The numbers speak for themselves.

Haha, not to mention LeBron has never been a bad enough playoff performer to lose in the 1st round.
 
The first round is so weak this year it may not be any upsets except for the Pacers over the Raptors.

This one is going to 7...really having a star player you can count helps but the pacers are a bad match up if Paul George keeps playing well. Lowry has proven to be a regular season star but we will see.
 
11224291_1181313465234558_6739486476002695414_o.jpg


Damn man look at all them CACs. :smh: The league was half white 30 years ago. Weak ass comp. If you had a bunch of Kyle Korvers and Mike Dunleavy Jrs playing defense today cats would drop 80 easy, especially in a loss.
 
Damn man look at all them CACs. :smh: The league was half white 30 years ago. Weak ass comp. If you had a bunch of Kyle Korvers and Mike Dunleavy Jrs playing defense today cats would drop 80 easy, especially in a loss.

that's a good one t. not even being sarcastic or anything. that's a good way to turn those types of arguments on their head when people bring up the past greats.
kudos
 
Back
Top