That's the whole point bro. For years the Spurs have been able to keep their core and add pieces around them. Now, that core is old as hell, and they are becoming a liability. The Spurs are still a top 5 team, but matchup wise they can't keep up offensively. Leonard masks a lot of their defensive liabilities which works against a one demensional team like the Cavs where LeBron is the focal point, but against a team like GS or by extension OKC they will have a problem when the team is so offensively dynamic. For all of the Spurs accolades, they are a weak offensive team and Aldridge is going to kill them.
RoadRage explain this my nigga.
Dude always have excuses when they lose. He does this shit every time. Dude was fucking lurking in the thread but he will say he was busy. Like Dude We Can See YOU
Funny how this dude is on here for hours sometimes with pages full of post with his pseudo intelligent banter but when it blows up in his face that fools name changes to Casper!
<Either>This is proof that there are some ignorant motherfuckers on BGOL, because unless you can show me one post where I said that the half court set will beat the Warriors, you are one dumb mother fucker!!!
Oh that either is really for your dumb ass!!!
Here is the thing, if the Warriors hit like they are hitting they will beat any team... Just like the Lakers with the Celtics, but the Spurs are very crafty, like the Celtics and know that its a war not a battle..So Road Rage, did the Spurs get the meal they were licking their chops for last night? Also, please offer your analysis on how those match up advantages you shared with the board so vehemently worked out for the Spurs last night?
I said match up well not will always beat them.... Look at it this way, if you have a team in the NFL that likes to pass the team that matches up well against them is a team that has a strong ground game... Conversely enough, the team that matches up well vs a team with a strong ground game is a team that can spread things up with the passing attack..Ok so let me get this straight; you said the spurs and cavs match up well against the GS, correct?? But when GS has played both of them, its been a blood bath; But the reason why that occurred is because GS was hitting their shots?? So the match ups that the Cavs and Spurs have against the GS didnt work?? GS dominated both teams like they have done every team in the league, why is that??? Im curious to hear your responses
You are wrong, other than that last blow out game, the Cavs have played the Warriors very well....
Well the half court set tends to get ugly, and thats what you want the game tempo to be... The problem with playing that way is that if you let them jump out to a big lead, you are going to have to speed up the tempo thus risking a blow out...
Naw bruh this excuse and trying to dodge the question is not going to work. You did not answer the question. You stated with your so called basketball IQ that the Cavs and Spurs had the formula to beat the Warriors. Explanation yourself
That's an understatement. I haven't seen anything like this since the 72-win Bulls. Curry is top five in scoring if you just take the first 3 quarters. He is having arguably the best season any player has ever had. Green is a beast that should be starting in the all-star game. Still can't believe TT compared himself to Green.
They do in terms of what it takes to beat the Warriors, but you do understand that just like when they say you can lose up to 100 pound, it does not mean they will beat the Warriors...
