Thuddy? Is that slang for "thirty," because I Googled the word and came across some OTHER types of shit!!!!
Stop acting lame and petty bruh.
Listen Child Support is REAL and you BETTER TAKE HEED........
- Thread starter ArsenalCannon357
- Start date
Stop acting lame and petty bruh.
What the fuck does "thuddy" mean?
Bruh. You acting real lame right now. Stop it.
You used the term "thuddy" and didn't clarify what it meant. So I googled it and this is what I found. No offense if that's how you get down.
Big Black Butt Bruiser - BDSM Thuddy Impact Toy MATURE
This thuddy toy makes for a bruising impact. If you like heavy, deep muscle play, this is the toy for you. A 12 inch delrin rod with a comfortable EVA foam handle and a 2 inch industrial neoprene rubber ball (55A shore hardness) on the end allows for deep muscle massage and deep muscle bruising. This toy builds pain slowly, but leaves a lasting impression for several days, even with short play.
We have also found that this toy feels good when used lightly on the upper back and shoulders, thighs, buttocks...anywhere that you have muscle. As always, stay away from joints and bones.
Our Butt Bruisers are hand made in our shop like all of our toys. We hand cut threads into the rubber ball and the delrin rod to ensure that once assembled, the toy will not come apart during intended use.
Product Qualities:
~Threaded balls and rods offer security during light to heavy impact
~Made with industrial strength neoprene balls
~EVA Foam handles for comfortable grip
~Dishwasher safe and easy to clean
~Thuddy and deep muscle impact
~Delrin rods offer nearly unbreakable strength
~Under 13" to fit easily into most toy bags
This listing is for a single item. If you would like a pair, please contact us at: sporkwood [!at] yahoo.com
Cleaning is simple with a Lysol wipe, or hot soapy water, allow to air dry before returning to your toy bag. This toy is dishwasher safe!
As with all of our toys, these are made only for play between consenting adults. Please always observe rules of safe play.
All of our products are shipped in discreet packaging.
All dimensions are approximate.
As far as this story is concerned, it is totally fucked up. Dude should be able to sue her for any damages accrued + some punitive damages. When he wins, that would be the 1st step in changing the system. Holding these women responsible would deter their asses from crying wolf.
On the "side bar"argument; use a rubber, get clipped, or both. Cause if you're putting your financial faith in a bitch & a pill; that is your fault. I control my wallet's destiny, not a judge.
On the "side bar"argument; use a rubber, get clipped, or both. Cause if you're putting your financial faith in a bitch & a pill; that is your fault. I control my wallet's destiny, not a judge.
The point is, males have thee choices, abstinence, vasectomy and condoms and they all suck and a invasive.. While women have all these choices and none of them takes away from her experience...
Fucked up bitches use this as leverage to trap a man.. Like I said before if they ever come out with a male contraceptive pill you will never see guys fucking up and accidentally having mistake pregnancies... If men had one none invasive choice, let alone 16 all the fuckery will end!!!!
Women's birth control choices are even more invasive. Pills disrupt their hormones and cause weight gain and shit; IUDs, sponges, diaphragms and shit like that are directly invasive.
Niggas wanna casually fuck without the consequences, and it doesn't work like that!
Fuck you talking about? Don't let those hood rats fool you!! Most models (yeah they fuck and never have children) all take the pill and none of them are as fat and nasty as the dumb bitches that be talking that dumb shit!! Like having babies don't fuck up their hormones and aren't invasive...
Shit down and think before you talk!!!
Smh @ greggyfam
Caught clipping again
Caught clipping again
Sad as fuck.
Judge Orders Detroit Man to Pay $30,000 in Back Child Support for Child Who Isn’t His
Carnell Alexander has been fighting for some time to clear his name, but on Tuesday he was dealt a harsh blow when a judge demanded that he pay $30,000 in back child support for a child whom the courts now know is not his.
BY: STEPHEN A. CROCKETT JR.
Posted: Feb. 19 2015 9:50 AM
Carnell Alexander
ABC 7
Carnell Alexander of Detroit has been fighting for some time to clear his name, but on Tuesday he was dealt a harsh blow when a judge ruled that he must still pay $30,000 in back child support for a child whom the courts now know is not his, ABC 7 reports.
The story starts back in the the late 1980s, when an ex-girlfriend needed a name to put down as the father of her child so that she could receive welfare. She used Alexander's name knowing that he was not the father. Alexander says he didn't learn of this until years later when he was stopped for a traffic violation and was told that he was being arrested for back child support.
Alexander claims that after his release he tried to find the ex-girlfriend so that he could get a DNA test to prove that he was not the father, but she was not at the address the courts had given him. He claims that he searched for the woman for years but had no luck finding her. He didn't have the funds for a private investigator, so he was left to do the work himself. Alexander says that he finally came across a mutual friend who knew of the woman's whereabouts.
He found her in 2013, they talked, and she told him the story of the welfare papers and apologized for causing him such grief, Alexander claims. He got the DNA test and went back to the courts; the only problem was that the court was hinging his responsibility on a document that a server claimed they'd delivered to him years ago. The server notes that Alexander received the letter making him aware of the fact that he was being identified as the child's father. Alexander claims that the server lied and he has a foolproof alibi: The day the server claims Alexander signed for the letter, he was in prison—and the news station confirms this.
Speeding up the story to more recent events, a lawyer hears of the case and agrees to take Alexander on pro bono so that she can help clear up this mess. But on Tuesday Alexander and his lawyer, Cherika Harris, were shocked when a judge decided that because it had taken Alexander some 20 years to rectify this situation, he was responsible for the back payment.
That's right: The judge is demanding that Alexander pay the $30,000 in back child support even though the courts, Alexander, the child's mother and the now-adult child all agree that he is not the father. The real father is also involved in the child's life, the news station reports.
"I am outraged that Mr. Alexander for two-and-a-half decades failed to take this matter seriously," said Michigan Circuit Judge Kathleen McCarthy, ABC 7 reports.
The judge didn't stop there; she also condemned the news station for bringing his story to light. "I am outraged at the media for the willful misrepresentations of the facts of this case," said McCarthy, according to ABC 7, "casting this court in a negative light."
According to the judge, Alexander had three years to file a motion with the court.
"That motion must be filed within three years after the child's birth, or within one year after the order of filiation is entered. The defendant has failed to timely file this motion setting aside the acknowledgment of parentage," said McCarthy, according to ABC 7.
"Somebody should have helped him," his attorney, Harris, told ABC 7. "To continue to harass and burden him to pay for a child that is not his, when they know who the real father is now, I don't understand this." Harris told the news station that her next action is to try and get the amount reduced.
A stunned Alexander was still having trouble wrapping his head around the judge's decision. "How can you start a case with a lie?" he asked ABC 7. "The mom lied. The process server lied. Now I have to pay for it."
Carnell Alexander has been fighting for some time to clear his name, but on Tuesday he was dealt a harsh blow when a judge demanded that he pay $30,000 in back child support for a child whom the courts now know is not his.
BY: STEPHEN A. CROCKETT JR.
Posted: Feb. 19 2015 9:50 AM
Carnell Alexander
ABC 7
Carnell Alexander of Detroit has been fighting for some time to clear his name, but on Tuesday he was dealt a harsh blow when a judge ruled that he must still pay $30,000 in back child support for a child whom the courts now know is not his, ABC 7 reports.
The story starts back in the the late 1980s, when an ex-girlfriend needed a name to put down as the father of her child so that she could receive welfare. She used Alexander's name knowing that he was not the father. Alexander says he didn't learn of this until years later when he was stopped for a traffic violation and was told that he was being arrested for back child support.
Alexander claims that after his release he tried to find the ex-girlfriend so that he could get a DNA test to prove that he was not the father, but she was not at the address the courts had given him. He claims that he searched for the woman for years but had no luck finding her. He didn't have the funds for a private investigator, so he was left to do the work himself. Alexander says that he finally came across a mutual friend who knew of the woman's whereabouts.
He found her in 2013, they talked, and she told him the story of the welfare papers and apologized for causing him such grief, Alexander claims. He got the DNA test and went back to the courts; the only problem was that the court was hinging his responsibility on a document that a server claimed they'd delivered to him years ago. The server notes that Alexander received the letter making him aware of the fact that he was being identified as the child's father. Alexander claims that the server lied and he has a foolproof alibi: The day the server claims Alexander signed for the letter, he was in prison—and the news station confirms this.
Speeding up the story to more recent events, a lawyer hears of the case and agrees to take Alexander on pro bono so that she can help clear up this mess. But on Tuesday Alexander and his lawyer, Cherika Harris, were shocked when a judge decided that because it had taken Alexander some 20 years to rectify this situation, he was responsible for the back payment.
That's right: The judge is demanding that Alexander pay the $30,000 in back child support even though the courts, Alexander, the child's mother and the now-adult child all agree that he is not the father. The real father is also involved in the child's life, the news station reports.
"I am outraged that Mr. Alexander for two-and-a-half decades failed to take this matter seriously," said Michigan Circuit Judge Kathleen McCarthy, ABC 7 reports.
The judge didn't stop there; she also condemned the news station for bringing his story to light. "I am outraged at the media for the willful misrepresentations of the facts of this case," said McCarthy, according to ABC 7, "casting this court in a negative light."
According to the judge, Alexander had three years to file a motion with the court.
"That motion must be filed within three years after the child's birth, or within one year after the order of filiation is entered. The defendant has failed to timely file this motion setting aside the acknowledgment of parentage," said McCarthy, according to ABC 7.
"Somebody should have helped him," his attorney, Harris, told ABC 7. "To continue to harass and burden him to pay for a child that is not his, when they know who the real father is now, I don't understand this." Harris told the news station that her next action is to try and get the amount reduced.
A stunned Alexander was still having trouble wrapping his head around the judge's decision. "How can you start a case with a lie?" he asked ABC 7. "The mom lied. The process server lied. Now I have to pay for it."
And cancer. Increased chance of stroke heart attack. Migraines. High blood pressure. Gall bladder disease and tumors. Make your titties hurt. Acne. Emotion imbalance... Nausea...irregular bleeding. Decreased bone density. Yeast overgrowth. And blood clotting. But the larger population of men think we're not at risk for anything. And don't forget the things that can happen TO US while giving birth.
Even being pregnant can be a danger to us.
I'm going to stop you there fam any shot or pill directly effects a females chemistry...now how exactly it depends women to women...now does that mean you get on the pill and should eat like it's going out of style or not workout....no but some women can do all that and still get bigger
lol you can't assume every female is like this. if you are going to have a kid, make sure you pick a quality woman and that YOU want to be with her long term. Then raise the child as partners
Most women get bigger when they get pregnant, so why are they ok having kids and being fat as fuck meanwhile all the women I know who don't have kids and are on the pill tend to be smaller and stay in better shape...
Last edited:
Well yeah women get bigger when they get pregnant
But after they drop the kid they have to go back to work and when they get home they don't exactly get to say OK baby be content while I work out...if they have energy from working all day...and that's if they get help from the father, not Making excuses, because you either bout that life or not...but it's not easy to snap back into a routine with a child present
Yo don't fall for the bullshit, I know a lot of bad chicks who are on the pill and they look good as fuck, however the women I know who be having babies, mostly look all fucked up, those are the one that have the fucked up lady stashes and beards, big looking like the mother fucker Popeye used to fuck up...
I hear you fam...but I'm talking what I learned in physiology class...but that is truuuuu
Similar threads
- Poll
