A Top 3 defensive team is just ok on defense? You don't see how a Top 3 defensive team could disrupt a good offensive team?
So maybe they don't have one guy who's a defensive juggernaut. TEAM defense is just as disruptive.
You see they had to double team Rose to take him out the first half. Held us to 13 pts in the 1st, 7 TOs in the first half.
All I'm saying is - don't discredit the Bucks' defense. The Bucks could've won, probably should've won for their defense in the first half alone.
It's just that they don't have that offense to capitalize on the opportunity.
Plus, they can't double Rose and then have single coverage on Butler because they don't have anyone who could cover Jimmy one on one. They gotta pick their poison. They're probably going to try doubling Jimmy in Game 3.