If Scotland votes "Yes" who in Africa is going to follow their lead.
-Northern Nigeria
As I understand it, Southern Nigeria wants Northern Nigeria to go.
Northern Nigeria does not want to go as it would be left with only
goats and desert. The northerners claim to be 60% of the population
which means that they cannot removed by electoral means.
Boko Haram who want to convert all of Nigeria muslim, something the
northern Nigerians do not see as necessarily wrong, even if they
do not always agree with the tactics of Boko..
The same Muslim-everyone dislocation point that is evident all
over Africa. Julius Nyerere's clever invoking of Swahili as the
national language did a lot to not only discourage tribalism, but
to placate the tendency of Zanzibaris to secede, since they
consider Swahili as their language....Also, there is an unspoken
agreement to alternate presidents between the mainland and
Zanzibar, and for agreeing to share power in this way, you have
to commend the Tanzanians
Why is Angola holding on to Cabinda? The province is on
the other side Zaire and does not want to be part of Angola.
Angola has enough oil, and it needs to let Cabinda go.
Having said that, if Cabinda were allowed to secede, then
you would have to deal with the Ovimbundu of Jonas Savimbi
who waged a guerrilla war against the mulatto MPLA government
in Luanda. They say the government is not as mulatto as
before, but with 1 million maimed from (American supplied)
land mines, as a constant reminder of the war, it would not
take much for the Ovimbundu hinterland to agitate for secession
from a corrupt government that does not give a fuck about
them.
-English speaking part of Cameroon
This is a very sore issue that goes back
to the 1 World War, after which the Germany
colony of Cameroon was chopped between
England and France. These parts were later
mistakenly reintegrated, and we have a Cameroon
that is divided along that line. Western Cameroon
should have the right to hold a referendum.
All of Mali is Muslim. The divide is along racial
lines as the Touaregs in the North want to take
1/3 of the country and make it their own. The
problem is that you have many Baambara and
Dogon who live up there as well, and if the
division were on such ethnic lines, what would
happen to them. The solution might be to right
size the area that would be given to the Touaregs.
Give them a small corner in the desert and let
the get the fuck on with their lives.
This an extremely sore issue. You have people
here in Texas very much divided on this fault
line, and the problem is exacerbated by the
fact that Mobutu did nothing for the country, and
as such, there is little loyalty to it anywhere. The
mentality is that if the national government is so
useless, why care for it? Put faith in the more
accountable government and go from there. Of
all the places where secession would be the most
meaningful, and least damaging, Katanga (and
Eastern Congo) is the place...
Ethiopia will split. The example of the Eritrean
secession always looms as an example to people
like the Oromos of what is possible with determination.
The Oromo claim to be the majority, and resent the
domination of the country by the Amahara. Ethiopia
would be too weak to survive a violent insurrection by
any ethnic group, especially since it no longer has the
Russian support it did during the war with Eritrea.
They need to go. Why is Morocco being allowed to keep
another African country as its colony?
-Casamance region of Senegal
-
It should be allowed to go. It could join Gambia where
the Mandinka are 40% of the country and make a majority
Mandinka country. It would also rationalise the border of
Senengal and remove that penis called Gambia that is
fucking it ....
We (the rest of Africa) are going to have to go to war with Muslims;
it is that simple. Because if we give them a country, they will come
back demanding the rest of Africa. Their religion teaches them
to not rest until they conquer. It is a dangerous if not suicidal,
illusion to imagine a peaceful coexistence with these people.