Police just executed an unarmed 17 yr old brotha (shot 10 times)

News Outlets Are Suing To Try To Get Michael Brown’s Juvenile Records


CLAYTON, Mo. (AP) — Lingering questions about Michael Brown could be answered Wednesday when a judge considers two media requests to release any possible juvenile records of the unarmed 18-year-old who was killed by a Missouri police officer last month.

Juvenile records are confidential in Missouri, so it’s not known if Brown was arrested before he legally became an adult. Police have said Brown had no adult criminal record. The family’s attorney, Benjamin Crump, has refused to discuss whether Brown had a juvenile record.

The St. Louis Post-Dispatch and a California online journalist asked St. Louis County Family Court to determine whether Brown had past legal trouble. Both cite an overriding public right to know Brown’s background after his shooting death by Ferguson officer Darren Wilson sparked more than a week of sometimes-violent protests and drew international scrutiny.

But the efforts to obtain Brown’s juvenile records – if there are any records – have been criticized by some who say his past is irrelevant to the question of whether Wilson responded with excessive force.

The basic legal argument boils down to the question of whether Brown’s privacy rights extend beyond the grave.
The lawsuit by Charles C. Johnson of Fresno, California, cites a 1984 Missouri Court of Appeals ruling in which the juvenile records of an 18-year-old who was killed by a security guard while shoplifting at a supermarket in 1979 were released in a wrongful death lawsuit.

That man’s mother challenged a trial court’s decision to release the records to defendants who were hoping to determine the 18-year-old’s lost earning capacity.

“It certainly is not much of a stretch to go from the case law that exists right now to that theory,” said Jean Maneke, who is counsel to the Missouri Press Association.

But Washington University law professor Mae Quinn, director of the school’s juvenile law clinic, called the case cited by Johnson, editor-in-chief of the website GotNews.com, “completely irrelevant,” since he does not have a vested legal interest in the Brown case.

“The biggest distinction is they were real parties to a real suit,” she said, referring to the grocery store owners’ successful challenge for the juvenile records. “There was a real dispute. That’s a major distinction.”

“The cited case in no way deals with release of records, much less release to a member of the general public,” she added.
A grand jury in another Clayton courtroom is also scheduled to meet Wednesday to consider that issue, and the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division is investigating the shooting.


http://newsone.com/3050089/news-out...chael-browns-juvenile-records/?omcamp=sf_N1FB



:smh::smh::smh::smh::smh:
 

The lawsuit by Charles C. Johnson of Fresno, California, cites a 1984 Missouri Court of Appeals ruling in which the juvenile records of an 18-year-old who was killed by a security guard while shoplifting at a supermarket in 1979 were released in a wrongful death lawsuit.



Tried to warn y'all about that cracker last week:




'Preciate ya, Sammy....

I'm just trying to keep the facts out there. I knew about that rumor a LONG time ago, but because it was unconfirmed I didn't bother posting it.

The first person I saw reporting it was this guy:

a2Oer_nC_reasonably_small.jpeg

Charles C. Johnson


He's really full of himself. He will quickly remind you that he's an award winning journalist, even tho he once used a fake 24 year old publication as fact to trash someone

(http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2...ke_princeton_newspaper_to_attack_the_nyt.html)

He also posted this today:

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p><a href="https://twitter.com/ofstardust">@ofstardust</a> No, because many of the rich black kids at school got into better schools with worse grades. I would be further if I were black</p>— Charles C. Johnson (@ChuckCJohnson) <a href="https://twitter.com/ChuckCJohnson/statuses/505589388437237761">August 30, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

:smh:

I’m just out here working hard every single day, just trying to be the best poster I can be....



I’m just out here working hard every single day, just trying to be the best poster I can be....
 
The UN Calls United States Out On Its Racism



If you asked the average Black person about the state of racism in America, you’ll likely be greeted with boos, hisses, eye rolls, and four-letter words due to the disproportionate number of Black men and women in jail, attacks on our right to vote, widening economic disparities between the races, and rampant police brutality. All of this is under an the administration of the first Black president of the United States. Oh, White supremacy, you sure do know how to put people in their place. And contrary to what the likes of Bill O’Reilly believe, the problems facing Blacks in this country are not rooted in our purported cultural mores…or Beyoncé.


Yet, despite the clear signs of turmoil within our own home, this country continues to operate as if it is morally superior to the rest of the world.

Other countries across the globe have pointed out America’s hypocrisy, but thanks the United Nations, there is a more thorough and fact-based assessment of it. Recently, the United Nations’ Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination concluded its 85th Session, and among their seven state reports, one focused on the United States.

Among the aforementioned problems, the report also criticized the United States for racial segregation in education; racial profiling; unequal access to legal aide; criminalizing the homeless, who are disproportionally minority; Stand Your Ground laws, which disproportionally affects racial and ethnic minorities; and discrimination in housing.

And on and on the list went, including a noted “lack of a national human rights institution” and “absence of a national action plan to combat racial discrimination.”

That’s not surprising given so many elected officials are more interested in enacting legislation that perpetuates racial discrimination as opposed to combating it. GOP, are you with me?
In a press conference focused on the report, CERD committee Vice Chairman Noureddine Amir also touched on the death of Michael Brown to address the problem of how discrimination affects select populations of this country.

Amir said:

“The excessive use of force by law enforcement officials against racial and ethnic minorities is an ongoing issue of concern and particularly in light of the shooting of Michael Brown. This is not an isolated event and illustrates a bigger problem in the United States, such as racial bias among law enforcement officials, the lack of proper implementation of rules and regulations governing the use of force, and the inadequacy of training and law enforcement officials.”

Meanwhile, Jamil Dakwar of the American Civil Liberties Union said in the wake of the report:

“When it comes to human rights, the United States must practice at home what it preaches abroad.”

It would be nice if “must” were a option. Unfortunately, the United States only pays mind to the UN when a given position aligns with their point of view and fuels their agenda. Still, it does say something when a UN report highlights how problematic racism continues to be in this country. I’m not hopeful about this report meaning anything in terms of a great shift in the grand scheme of things, though I do hope the chorus of America’s critics grow louder. If we are to truly be the great representer of Democracy, it’s about time this country leads by example in far more sincere fashion.

http://newsone.com/3049930/un-committee-racial-discrimination/
 
Justice Department to Investigate Ferguson, Missouri, Police
COLLAPSE STORY
BY PETE WILLIAMS
The Justice Department intends to launch a civil rights investigation of the entire Ferguson, Missouri, Police Department, according to administration officials.

An announcement of the investigation is planned for Thursday.

With the help of the FBI, the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division has been investigating last month's fatal shooting of an unarmed teenager, Michael Brown, who was wounded several times by a Ferguson police officer. The shooting touched off several days of sometimes violent protest.

But this new investigation would be much broader, looking at the conduct of the entire Ferguson Police Department over the past several years.

The Justice Department will also look at the practices of the county police department, but that will be a more cooperative investigation, an administration official said.

Since 1994, the Justice Department has had the legal authority to investigate whether a law enforcement organization is engaging in a "pattern or practice" of civil rights violations. Some investigations end with agreements to improve conduct. Others end up in federal court for a resolution.

In the past five years, the department has launched 20 investigations of police departments nationwide — more than twice as many as were opened in the preceding five years.

Police officers in Ferguson have been the subject of a handful of lawsuits filed in recent years claiming that excessive force was used. In one case, four police officers were accused of beating a man, then charging him with damaging government property — by getting blood on their uniforms.

Many black residents of Ferguson have accused their city's police department of failing to represent the racial diversity of the St. Louis suburb. While Ferguson is about 65 percent black, roughly eleven percent of the city's police officers are black.
 
National Security
Justice Dept. to probe Ferguson police force
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterMore Options
Resize Text Print Article Comments

453905056.jpg

Under Attorney General Eric Holder, the Justice Department has initiated reviews of police departments for possible constitutional violations at a rate twice that of any of his predecessors. (Alex Wong/Getty Images)
By Sari Horwitz, Carol D. Leonnig and Kimberly Kindy September 3 at 7:59 PM
Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. this week will launch a broad civil rights investigation into the Ferguson, Mo., Police Department, according to two federal law enforcement officials.

The investigation, which could be announced as early as Thursday afternoon, will be conducted by the Justice Department’s civil rights division and follow a process similar to that used to investigate complaints of profiling and the use of excessive force in other police departments across the country, the officials said.

The move follows the shooting last month of Michael Brown, an 18-year-old African American, by a white Ferguson police officer who claimed he acted in self-defense. Brown, who was unarmed, was shot at least six times on the afternoon of Aug. 9.

Holder’s decision will represent the Obama administration’s most aggressive step to address the Ferguson shooting, which set off days of often-violent clashes between police and demonstrators in the streets of the St. Louis suburb.

The federal officials said the probe will look not only at Ferguson but also at other police departments in St. Louis County. Some, like Ferguson, are predominantly white departments serving majority-African-American communities, and at least one department invited the Justice Department to look at its practices. The officials spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the pending inquiry.

The investigation is in addition to a Justice Department probe into whether Officer Darren Wilson, who fired the fatal shots, violated Brown’s civil rights. The new probe will look more broadly at whether the department employed policies and practices that resulted in a pattern of civil rights violations.

The Washington Post reported Saturday that five current and one former member of the Ferguson police force face pending federal lawsuits claiming they used excessive force. The lawsuits, as well as more than a half-dozen internal investigations, include claims that individual officers separately hog-tied a 12-year-old boy who was checking his family mailbox, pistol-whipped children and used a stun gun on a mentally ill man who died as a result.


In addition to the investigations, a St. Louis County grand jury is hearing evidence that could lead to charges against Wilson.

The number of police department reviews the Justice Department has initiated under Holder for possible constitutional violations is twice that of any of his predecessors. At least 34 other departments are under investigation for alleged civil rights violations.

In April, for example, the Justice Department issued a scathing report concluding that the Albuquerque Police Department had repeatedly used deadly and excessive force in violation of citizens’ constitutional rights when there was no imminent threat to them or the community. The assistant attorney general with the department’s civil rights division said at the time that the Albuquerque department suffered from “inadequate oversight, inadequate investigation of incidents of force, inadequate training of officers to ensure they understand what is permissible or not.”

In certain cases, such as with the New Orleans and Seattle police departments, the Justice Department under Holder has conducted a civil rights investigation parallel with a criminal investigation.

A 1994 federal law gave the civil rights division the authority to probe whether police departments are engaging in a “pattern or practice” of violating constitutional rights or federal rights. The law was enacted after the videotaped beating of African American motorist Rodney King by Los Angeles police officers.

The investigations can be collaborative arrangements, with police chiefs encouraging the thorough reviews, training recommendations and reform ideas the civil rights division proposes. One of the earliest investigations came when then-D.C. Police Chief Charles Ramsey invited the Justice Department to help him in the wake of a Washington Post investigation that found his officers shot and killed more people in the 1990s than any other large police department in the country.

Federal investigators look at patterns of excessive force, complaints against officers, and department training to help officers avoid racial profiling and unnecessary use of force.


An investigation often ends up in a lawsuit brought by the Justice Department against a local police department. Justice Department officials could also reach a settlement with the police department, which includes a consent decree and federal monitoring, as was the case with police forces in New Orleans and San Juan, Puerto Rico.

Brown was stopped by Wilson in Ferguson as he walked down the middle of a neighborhood street with a friend. Wilson has told investigators that Brown reached for his gun while they had a scuffle at his car, law enforcement authorities have told The Post.

Community witnesses say Brown was assassinated in the street. They say he had run from the officer after an argument at the policeman’s car, then turned around to surrender after being shot at and being frightened. The six shots in his body all appeared to enter his body from the front, including two in his head, according to an independent autopsy.

Justice Department spokesman Brian Fallon could not be reached for comment. Calls to Ferguson Mayor James Knowles were not immediately returned Wednesday. E-mails to the Ferguson Police Department’s public-relations firm were not immediately returned.

News of the expanded probe comes as community leaders in Ferguson say the Brown case has brought scores of new allegations of local police brutality to their attention.

“I’ve literally had to pull my staff from Jefferson City and put them in Ferguson because of the number of people who are saying they’ve had past issues with the police,” said state Sen. Maria Chappelle-Nadal (D), whose district includes Ferguson. She said she is “fully supportive” of an expanded probe into the department.

“Because of the Michael Brown situation, I have been getting other e-mails and phone calls and tweets about other individuals who have allegations of police brutality,” Chappelle-Nadal said. “The expansion of an investigation is by all means a great thing. I absolutely welcome this.”

Julie Tate, Wesley Lowery and Alice Crites contributed to this report.


Sari Horwitz covers the Justice Department, after 30 years at the paper where she has been an investigative reporter and covered federal law enforcement, crime, education and social services.
Kimberly Kindy is a government accountability reporter at The Washington Post.
 
@pari_passu:Goodnight. Remember: D. Wilson is still on paid vacation & whites are sending him money. #MikeBrown is still dead & #Ferguson still weeps.
7:15pm - 3 Sep 14
 
Check this comment(typical)



@Jeffwm: @pari_passu so I would support a police officer who put his life on the line than some punk thug who robbed a store and attacked a officer
8:13pm - 3 Sep 14
 
The UN Calls United States Out On Its Racism



If you asked the average Black person about the state of racism in America, you’ll likely be greeted with boos, hisses, eye rolls, and four-letter words due to the disproportionate number of Black men and women in jail, attacks on our right to vote, widening economic disparities between the races, and rampant police brutality. All of this is under an the administration of the first Black president of the United States. Oh, White supremacy, you sure do know how to put people in their place. And contrary to what the likes of Bill O’Reilly believe, the problems facing Blacks in this country are not rooted in our purported cultural mores…or Beyoncé.


Yet, despite the clear signs of turmoil within our own home, this country continues to operate as if it is morally superior to the rest of the world.

Other countries across the globe have pointed out America’s hypocrisy, but thanks the United Nations, there is a more thorough and fact-based assessment of it. Recently, the United Nations’ Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination concluded its 85th Session, and among their seven state reports, one focused on the United States.

Among the aforementioned problems, the report also criticized the United States for racial segregation in education; racial profiling; unequal access to legal aide; criminalizing the homeless, who are disproportionally minority; Stand Your Ground laws, which disproportionally affects racial and ethnic minorities; and discrimination in housing.

And on and on the list went, including a noted “lack of a national human rights institution” and “absence of a national action plan to combat racial discrimination.”

That’s not surprising given so many elected officials are more interested in enacting legislation that perpetuates racial discrimination as opposed to combating it. GOP, are you with me?
In a press conference focused on the report, CERD committee Vice Chairman Noureddine Amir also touched on the death of Michael Brown to address the problem of how discrimination affects select populations of this country.

Amir said:

“The excessive use of force by law enforcement officials against racial and ethnic minorities is an ongoing issue of concern and particularly in light of the shooting of Michael Brown. This is not an isolated event and illustrates a bigger problem in the United States, such as racial bias among law enforcement officials, the lack of proper implementation of rules and regulations governing the use of force, and the inadequacy of training and law enforcement officials.”

Meanwhile, Jamil Dakwar of the American Civil Liberties Union said in the wake of the report:

“When it comes to human rights, the United States must practice at home what it preaches abroad.”

It would be nice if “must” were a option. Unfortunately, the United States only pays mind to the UN when a given position aligns with their point of view and fuels their agenda. Still, it does say something when a UN report highlights how problematic racism continues to be in this country. I’m not hopeful about this report meaning anything in terms of a great shift in the grand scheme of things, though I do hope the chorus of America’s critics grow louder. If we are to truly be the great representer of Democracy, it’s about time this country leads by example in far more sincere fashion.

http://newsone.com/3049930/un-committee-racial-discrimination/


this is interesting.
for more than one reason
 
My wife is the daughter of Ronald Beasley one of the two gentleman murdered in 2001 here in St.Louis, The whole system here in St.Louis is a money and jail trap..... You wouldn't believe it if you didn't stay here. :smh::smh::smh:

Here is article on on the incident http://www.mtv.com/news/1426109/mary-j-blige-appears-at-police-shooting-protest/



Peace.

Do you live here?

I have not looked it up, it's not my thing. I would just ask?

I feel I should publicly apologize to you on this board for my reaction and how I felt, and how I threatened even a ban towards you.

No matter if you live here, no matter your race, I could have asked your motivations through PM.

I thought you were some hanger on who was trying to sensationalize the situation. But that is not justification.

When we could have be doing something stronger. That's on me.


I think I've been feeling that way about almost everyone who is not here in STL. Today it's the hot news, tomorrow it's forgotten.

Perhaps it is I who has forgotten that these things are happening everywhere, and injustice knows no face.
 
Michael Brown Never Charged With Serious Felony: Lawyer


Associated Press | By ALAN SCHER ZAGIER
Posted: 09/03/2014 6:41 pm EDT Updated: 09/03/2014 6:59 pm EDT


CLAYTON, Mo. (AP) — The 18-year-old fatally shot by a suburban St. Louis police officer didn't face any juvenile charges at the time of his death and never was charged with a serious felony such as murder, robbery or burglary, a juvenile court system lawyer said Wednesday.

Those details emerged at a hearing in which two media organizations sought the release of any possible juvenile records for Michael Brown.

Cynthia Harcourt, the St. Louis County juvenile office's attorney, offered the most specific public details on whether Brown faced legal trouble before his 18th birthday — a subject of intense speculation in a case that has garnered global attention. The 45-minute hearing before a St. Louis County family court judge didn't reveal whether Brown had ever been charged with lesser offenses as a juvenile.

Juvenile records are confidential in Missouri, but under state law, being charged with certain violent crimes removes those juvenile privacy protections. Police have said Brown had no adult criminal record.

Joe Martineau, an attorney for the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, cited an overriding public right to know Brown's history after his early August shooting death by Ferguson officer Darren Wilson sparked more than a week of sometimes-violent protests and drew international scrutiny.

"There is interest in knowing Michael Brown's background," Martineau said. "What we're asking for here is just verification, one way or the other ... We're acting in a vacuum here."

Harcourt that "simple curiosity" doesn't trump the state's legal interest in protecting minors accused of crimes.

"The court of public opinion does not require the release of juvenile records," she said.

Brown family attorney Anthony Gray attended the hearing and sat next to Harcourt but did not speak in court. Afterward, he called the requests by the St. Louis newspaper and a northern California online journalist "shameful."

"The true motivation for the request of the records is character assassination," he said.

Gray argued that even if Brown did have a brush with the juvenile court system — including for such low-level offenses as truancy — those details are irrelevant to the question of whether Wilson acted with excessive force.

"I don't know what would be the relevance of that ... after this young man was executed in broad daylight," he said.

The civil lawsuit by Charles C. Johnson of Fresno, California, cites a 1984 Missouri Court of Appeals ruling that allowed the release of the juvenile records of an 18-year-old who was killed by a security guard while shoplifting at a supermarket in 1979.

That man's mother challenged a trial court's decision to release the records to defendants who were hoping to determine the 18-year-old's lost earning capacity.

Johnson is editor-in-chief of the website GotNews.com. He also attended the hearing.

Judge Ellen Levy Siwack did not indicate how long she would take before releasing a ruling.

Also on Wednesday, a grand jury was scheduled to meet for the third time since Brown's death to consider evidence in a possible criminal case. The police shooting is also being investigated by the U.S. Justice Department's Civil Rights Division.

______________________________

so much for that bullshit.
 
:eek:

Watch this video you must!



:angry::angry::angry:

This is what we dealing with in Missouri, boys n girls! What in the entire FUCK?!?!!??!?!

I’m just out here working hard every single day, just trying to be the best poster I can be....
 
I doubt dude ever even had a source saying Brown was anything. he attention whored the shit into the mainstream media.

they don' even have to say truthful shit for them to get covered and shit man.
 
Remember where ya fav rapper entertainer or policitian was during this time.

Fuck em

They are living in the country of fear. Only caring concerning their bottom line.

Don't say a word, and it will be alright.

Even though the cause has been picked up by liberal hipsters, they can't go against their money masters.
 
I doubt dude ever even had a source saying Brown was anything. he attention whored the shit into the mainstream media.

they don' even have to say truthful shit for them to get covered and shit man.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>In the eyes of a racist, what a black man or woman saw with their own eyes is worth less than a faint rumor told by a white person.</p>— Shaun King (@ShaunKing) <a href="https://twitter.com/ShaunKing/status/502545033611194368">August 21, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Tweet from Shaun King.

Check out this collection of tweets on storify, "Psycopathy of Racism"

https://storify.com/moderndaydude/shaun-king-psychopathy-of-racism

I’m just out here working hard every single day, just trying to be the best poster I can be....
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>In the eyes of a racist, what a black man or woman saw with their own eyes is worth less than a faint rumor told by a white person.</p>— Shaun King (@ShaunKing) <a href="https://twitter.com/ShaunKing/status/502545033611194368">August 21, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Tweet from Shaun King.

Check out this collection of tweets on storify, "Psycopathy of Racism"

https://storify.com/moderndaydude/shaun-king-psychopathy-of-racism

I’m just out here working hard every single day, just trying to be the best poster I can be....

cool but still i hate that white people have to be spokespeople in order for media to cover the shit
 
Shaun King not white he just a litebrite

I’m just out here working hard every single day, just trying to be the best poster I can be....
 
Supposed Photo of Injured Darren Wilson Is Just Some White Guy

bvh8z9b09hbicje8gkfq.png


Weeks after the police shooting of Michael Brown, it's still unclear what injuries—if any—Brown's killer Darren Wilson sustained during the encounter, but that hasn't stopped the officer's defenders from finding the bogus "evidence" they need.

Last month, that meant Ann Coulter holding up a discredited stock X-ray as proof of Wilson's "fractured eye socket." Today, it means photos of a clearly different white dude racing through social media as an "injured Darren Wilson."

qsxv7cpljiwcinaderna.png


Taking even a cursory glance at previously released photos of Wilson, it's obvious that the above image is of someone else entirely, a person whose full list of similarities to the Ferguson police officer start and end with "is also a caucasian male."

hldtbvrxumizz3g1sbnz.png


In reality, the injured man is motocross rider Jim McNeil, who died in 2011. McNeil is seen here after a 2006 crash that broke bones in his "forehead, cheek, nose, jaw and eye socket."

The photo became associated with Wilson thanks to a misleading Facebook post bearing the title "Officer Darren Wilson of the Ferguson MO Police Department." By Thursday morning, that post been shared over 40,000 times.

bgqnifh726q7hkbrxzmk.png



Among those fooled was right-wing radio host Larry Elder, who posted the photo on his website. The page has since been taken down, but as everyone—even easily-fooled talk show hosts—should know by know, the Internet never forgets.

http://antiviral.gawker.com/suppose...lson-is-just-some-wh-1630576562/+laceydonohue
.


.
 
Some of this stuff is like a joke or cartoon. Their is serious disrespect for black males. I do realize that the world will not respect us if we are non productive. We got to move from being just consumers to producers of the things we use. Whites feel we are at their feet begging.
All the so called founding fathers, were white supremacist. And their goals and visions were not necessarily ours. They built a reality for themselves. Why do we desire that reality, knowing that it is not based on truth? How did we go from being ourselves to desiring to be carbon copies of devils?
These people lie as easy as they breath. If people like me do not come out of our long years of poverty. I am afraid we are all doomed. Only the cowards have any real money or power right now.

http://oneblacknation.webs.com/

http://blacknation.vpweb.com/default.html
 
I do realize that the world will not respect us if we are non productive. We got to move from being just consumers to producers of the things we use. Whites feel we are at their feet begging.
don't repeat these lines anymore bruh.

we built an entire country, literally died working while white people sat around drinking lemonade and terrorizing us.

them muthafuckas don't respect work, and don't let them fool you into entertaining that argument.

you can do all the working you want, if the system is against you all you gon do is die trying to get there. the SYSTEM is what needs to be fixed.
 
don't repeat these lines anymore bruh.

we built an entire country, literally died working while white people sat around drinking lemonade and terrorizing us.

them muthafuckas don't respect work, and don't let them fool you into entertaining that argument.

you can do all the working you want, if the system is against you all you gon do is die trying to get there. the SYSTEM is what needs to be fixed.

My fam was talking about this.

There is nothing crazier and yet more ironically incredibly moronically humorous than the thought pattern of the white race.

They can look straight at a black or brown person sweating a deluge, breaking their back, and without skipping a beat . . . " They're lazy ".
 
cool but still i hate that white people have to be spokespeople in order for media to cover the shit

Yeah Like spider said, he's not white. He's the one that I saw bring most of the attention to Wilson's gofund me. He was alerted by security that people in the white supremacist groups were targeting him. They were also posting pics of his kids and stuff online. I couldn't find the tweet but here is a link to it in bing image search: http://www.bing.com/images/search?q...95D658D96DCB054065073BF282C6E&selectedIndex=0

He's been putting in work. He was also the one behind that petition that I posted much earlier in this thread.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top