So you are still deflecting away from the question I ask you with things I have not implied or stated. I understand.
Coon, deflecting from what?
i asked several questions that you purposely ignored
why...because u a coon!
So you are still deflecting away from the question I ask you with things I have not implied or stated. I understand.
how come this white kid wasnt killed
<iframe width="854" height="510" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/x7Gx73R3p1U" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Coon, deflecting from what?
i asked several questions that you purposely ignored
why...because u a coon!
Hey..I'll be a coon but you don't answer a question with questions.
that's the KKKs flag right there. I know all I need to know about a white person who rolls with THAT flag.
I tell black folks to stand up even when it aint my family. You must have missed my earlier post about my FB timeline. As far as what I have physically done as in acts of outright violence? Ok, FBI...You made this statement:
"If it was my loved one you can bet your ass I would have been on that camera telling people to stand up and up rise in whatever form they see fit."
You don't have to wait for the cameras to come to you. This is the 21 century.
Now what exatcly do you mean either or with me and my "ideology"?
I tell black folks to stand up even when it aint my family. You must have missed my earlier post about my FB timeline. As far as what I have physically done as in acts of outright violence? Ok, FBI...
Yes your ideology. We all have an ideology. You think your's is the only one that's valid. That's what I meant by either or. Either it's your way or the other way. Why can't it be all?
and we got dudes on here who say that flag is no big deal and they're cool with the flag.
its in his living room. not in a corner.. that's where the flat screen should be...
I'm asking you what you believe my ideology to be.
from your posts you seem to believe that the person giving the orders is not as responsible as the person following the orders. The funny thing is that the person following the orders is an interchangeable piece. They can be replaced tomorrow with another stooge. The one who is giving orders and creating a climate to allows this type of shit to go on should be equally responsible.
man you cant explain the obvious to a fucking coon
save yourself the keystrokes
this cooning mofo is the gate keeper of white supremacy
from your posts you seem to believe that the person giving the orders is not as responsible as the person following the orders. The funny thing is that the person following the orders is an interchangeable piece. They can be replaced tomorrow with another stooge. The one who is giving orders and creating a climate to allows this type of shit to go on should be equally responsible.
Spared from what exactly? I gave clarification of identity. Nothing more, nothing less.
They also have his wife's facebook posts stating black folx are feral, and a pic of his son with a confederate flag in the background.
That is not my position. My position is that the shooter is still the shooter. The person that must be held responsible for his actions. So for someone to say they are one in the same and that getting the chief would be even better is nonsense. It takes away from the shooters actions. The reason why alex will not anser my question is because he knows he would not be satisfied with just the chief being held responsible.
Which would nullify his position that they are one in the same. No where in any of my post do I imply or state that the chief should not be held responsible. That's selective reading.
The chief's wife and kid, or the shooters?
The chief. The man who write the policies and set's the tone of the department.
Are you saying that you would be "comfortable" with the chief and the cop meeting "justice"? Is that what I'm understanding?
The chief. The man who write the policies and set's the tone of the department.
I am saying hold them both responsible for their individual actions. Instead of being satisfied with just getting one for both of their actions.
Anonymous post screen shots of the wife's racist shit?
I am saying hold them both responsible for their individual actions. Instead of being satisfied with just getting one for both of their actions.
i agree with this<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>My interview with <a href="https://twitter.com/CNN">@CNN</a> today. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Ferguson?src=hash">#Ferguson</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/MikeBrown?src=hash">#MikeBrown</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/STL?src=hash">#STL</a>
<a href="http://t.co/lxj2T7qJ5t">http://t.co/lxj2T7qJ5t</a></p>— Antonio French (@AntonioFrench) <a href="https://twitter.com/AntonioFrench/statuses/499076780373065728">August 12, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Regarding Robin Williams...Y'all need to chill. People can process more than one thing at a time. They have memories of him going back to childhood. If Mandela had died the same time as this tragedy, would that have negated Mike Brown's death, or would Mike's have negated Mandela's? Can only one be discussed at a time? Is BGOL supposed to stop posting porn and only focus on this? I know emotions are running high, but attacking each other is not going to help. Also, sometimes you need break from all the tragedy. I had a migraine from looking at all the Ferguson media. Let people decompress in their own way.
Y'all voted for that nigga![]()
thats what im saying tho.