Help me understand this logic......

(0_0)..l.. finger

A GOD
Certified Pussy Poster
Let me say that people should be mad no matter what race of people kill a black person, but it seems to me that black people get more upset, when a non black person kills a black person, than black on black crime. When Trayvon Martin was kill, I seen black people protecting on Tv making a stand as we should be, but when 20 people was shot and 2 people die in CHICAGO over the damn weekend, you heard nothing from us..




:smh:perfect example of what I'm talking about. I know its old, but history is repeating its self as you can see.....
http://gawker.com/5569299/chicagos-weekend-shooting-tally-10-dead-44-injured
 
It should make everyone mad when life is lost.....but the Chicago murders....most of the time the intended target was in that life.......

The trayvon martin case....that could have been any 17 year old boy.....only because Zimmerman only saw his race...
 
This is because black people always are looking for someone to blame. they need to be the victim of shit. It's a much better story when a white man kills some black kids vs the every day shit where black kids constantly kill other black kids.

The reality is this...Blacks are the ones killing blacks. The sad part is most black people are in denial....Then the minute some Treyvon Martin shit happens, Al Sharpton, and everyone else decides it's time for them to attention whore.

Where is the outrage at those savages in Chicago shooting up each other? Nooooooooo....We will wait for some cac to shoot one of us, then it will be page one here, and Sharpton, etc...

This is why we aren't taken seriously... We are doing over 90% of the killings of our own people and not one of these niggas here will admit it.... Everything is the white mans fault.
 
Trayvon Martin was an innocent kid...90% of that other black on black shit is the drug game and they put themselves in that situation
 
Black deaths are not covered in the media. I don't have the links, but I recall reading in the past where there have been protests, marches, gatherings trying to get justice for the loss of a black life, to no avail. The locals can't get print or tv reporters to cover it. Even with Trayvon, they couldn't get media attention right away. If it's not black on white or vice versa, the media doesn't cover it. Just like when black children go missing. It doesn't mean people aren't speaking out or trying to call attention to it. The only reason we probably heard about Trayvon nationwide is social media. If you can't get the story beyond local coverage, and sometimes we don't even get that, there is no way to get national attention.
 
Whenever I hear questions or comments like this it underscores a lack of critical thinking on the part of the person that makes the statement or asks the question. The simple and glaring answer is that when black people kill one another its a reaction to conditions we're subject to as the lowest member of society. If you look at any senseless black murder carefully you will find a poor person doing something to survive. The drug dealer defending territory. A gang member in the inner city reacting to a threat from another poor gang. A drug user trying to get money to get high. Someone stealing valuables to get money to eat. All of these are symptoms of one common malady. Poverty. You don't often hear about middle to upper class black people shooting each other senselessly in the streets because they don't have to do desperate, criminal things to survive. When a white person kills a black person senselessly the black community looks at as just another insult to injury. It wasn't enough to have us shut out and impoverished, now the cracka gotta exterminate us for reacting to the very conditions he created! That's the difference.
 
This is because black people always are looking for someone to blame. they need to be the victim of shit. It's a much better story when a white man kills some black kids vs the every day shit where black kids constantly kill other black kids.

The reality is this...Blacks are the ones killing blacks. The sad part is most black people are in denial....Then the minute some Treyvon Martin shit happens, Al Sharpton, and everyone else decides it's time for them to attention whore.

Where is the outrage at those savages in Chicago shooting up each other? Nooooooooo....We will wait for some cac to shoot one of us, then it will be page one here, and Sharpton, etc...

This is why we aren't taken seriously... We are doing over 90% of the killings of our own people and not one of these niggas here will admit it.... Everything is the white mans fault.

This is the only statement that made sense in your lawn jockey, Uncle Tom's rant...:hmm::hmm::hmm:
 
Whenever I hear questions or comments like this it underscores a lack of critical thinking on the part of the person that makes the statement or asks the question. The simple and glaring answer is that when black people kill one another its a reaction to conditions we're subject to as the lowest member of society. If you look at any senseless black murder carefully you will find a poor person doing something to survive. The drug dealer defending territory. A gang member in the inner city reacting to a threat from another poor gang. A drug user trying to get money to get high. Someone stealing valuables to get money to eat. All of these are symptoms of one common malady. Poverty. You don't often hear about middle to upper class black people shooting each other senselessly in the streets because they don't have to do desperate, criminal things to survive. When a white person kills a black person senselessly the black community looks at as just another insult to injury. It wasn't enough to have us shut out and impoverished, now the cracka gotta exterminate us for reacting to the very conditions he created! That's the difference.

Yep. People always point to the symptom, not the cause.
 
Really.....Then answer the op's question with anything that makes an ounce more sense than I made....I'll be waiting... wake me up please..:rolleyes:

You sound like one of those parents that wants to take all the credit when your child does good, but none of the blame when your kids fuck up. The white man is the de facto ruler of the modern world. Its a tough pill to swallow, but its the truth. We speak the cracka's language, base our society on his common law and practice a global economic system that he created. I don't think any one will dispute that. With that being said any failures to the system that the white man created have to be attributed to that same white man. You can't yell "rah rah!" when its all good, but call foul when shit messes up. The white man created the circumstance of the black people in America, period. The results of that experiment are his and his alone. Whether they are negative or positive.
 
Whenever I hear questions or comments like this it underscores a lack of critical thinking on the part of the person that makes the statement or asks the question. The simple and glaring answer is that when black people kill one another its a reaction to conditions we're subject to as the lowest member of society. If you look at any senseless black murder carefully you will find a poor person doing something to survive. The drug dealer defending territory. A gang member in the inner city reacting to a threat from another poor gang. A drug user trying to get money to get high. Someone stealing valuables to get money to eat. All of these are symptoms of one common malady. Poverty. You don't often hear about middle to upper class black people shooting each other senselessly in the streets because they don't have to do desperate, criminal things to survive. When a white person kills a black person senselessly the black community looks at as just another insult to injury. It wasn't enough to have us shut out and impoverished, now the cracka gotta exterminate us for reacting to the very conditions he created! That's the difference.

You still didn't answer my question. Where is the outrage on the same level as the Trayvon Martin and Rodney king case from black people??
 
Whenever I hear questions or comments like this it underscores a lack of critical thinking on the part of the person that makes the statement or asks the question. The simple and glaring answer is that when black people kill one another its a reaction to conditions we're subject to as the lowest member of society. If you look at any senseless black murder carefully you will find a poor person doing something to survive. The drug dealer defending territory. A gang member in the inner city reacting to a threat from another poor gang. A drug user trying to get money to get high. Someone stealing valuables to get money to eat. All of these are symptoms of one common malady. Poverty. You don't often hear about middle to upper class black people shooting each other senselessly in the streets because they don't have to do desperate, criminal things to survive. When a white person kills a black person senselessly the black community looks at as just another insult to injury. It wasn't enough to have us shut out and impoverished, now the cracka gotta exterminate us for reacting to the very conditions he created! That's the difference.

I was really hoping i wasn't going to have to be the 1 to say this.

THANK YOU.
 
He did answer the question. You're doing that bullshit thing your kind does

When people don't give them the answer they WANT that goes along with what they already think(aka WANT TO BELEIVE)
 
Daily Beast story about "black on black crime". It took 6 weeks to get the police to event think about bringing charges against zimmerman. Also talks about one un/under reported case Darryl Green. I recall they had done a petition on change.org as well.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...ing-and-the-myth-of-black-on-black-crime.html


I know folx won't read this, but I'll drop it here anyway. http://www.justicepolicy.org/uploads/justicepolicy/documents/off_balance.pdf


From 2008: anti-violence march, drew 20,000 folx. I didn't hear it reported:
http://mirroronamerica.blogspot.com/2008/06/st-louis-black-men-march-against.html

This was posted in 2011, not sure exactly when it took place, if it's the one above or not:




Anti gun rally in Harlem 2013:
http://amsterdamnews.com/news/2013/aug/12/public-will-come-out-promote-anti-gun-violence-and/


There was a news story around the time of the Trayvon coverage that mentioned 4-5 protests seeking justice for black folx who were killed that just couldn't get traction in the media because it was not interracial crime. I tried to find them but couldn't. I did come across a response to a question similar to yours that was posed:

I'm really sick of this dumb question about black on black crime.

1. Black criminals get arrested when they kill someone, unlike Zimmerman.

2. Most white crime is on white people so what is your point genius?

3. There have been multiple protests over black crime. Whites just never pay any attention to it since it doesn't involve them. Whites tend to be very self absorbed.

4. Whites are the ones who never talked about black on black crime until Zimmerman killed an umarmed black kid and got away with it at the hands of an incompetent and racist jury.

5. Now you want to discuss black crime to deflect from GZ. Sorry...it won't work.

6. White men kill their wives all the time and walk but whites only got pissed at OJ.

7. Well just like with OJ, we are not going to rest until GZ is brought to justice even if it takes another 20 years or more.

Regardless, I'm sure this silly question will come up again with racist white hate mongers. No shock. When whites know they are WRONG they use lies, deflection, and name calling.


Black folx get shut down at the local level when it comes to stuff like this. When children are missing and white, they were abducted. When they are missing and black, they are runaways. When we get killed, it was somehow "deserved", as we are all assumed to be criminal in some aspect anyway. Even the folx who are savvy enough to pull a protest or march together do not get the coverage. There are local movements, we just don't hear about them.
 
Daily Beast story about "black on black crime". It took 6 weeks to get the police to event think about bringing charges against zimmerman. Also talks about one un/under reported case Darryl Green. I recall they had done a petition on change.org as well.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...ing-and-the-myth-of-black-on-black-crime.html


I know folx won't read this, but I'll drop it here anyway. http://www.justicepolicy.org/uploads/justicepolicy/documents/off_balance.pdf


From 2008: anti-violence march, drew 20,000 folx. I didn't hear it reported:
http://mirroronamerica.blogspot.com/2008/06/st-louis-black-men-march-against.html

This was posted in 2011, not sure exactly when it took place, if it's the one above or not:




Anti gun rally in Harlem 2013:
http://amsterdamnews.com/news/2013/aug/12/public-will-come-out-promote-anti-gun-violence-and/


There was a news story around the time of the Trayvon coverage that mentioned 4-5 protests seeking justice for black folx who were killed that just couldn't get traction in the media because it was not interracial crime. I tried to find them but couldn't. I did come across a response to a question similar to yours that was posed:



Black folx get shut down at the local level when it comes to stuff like this. When children are missing and white, they were abducted. When they are missing and black, they are runaways. When we get killed, it was somehow "deserved", as we are all assumed to be criminal in some aspect anyway. Even the folx who are savvy enough to pull a protest or march together do not get the coverage. There are local movements, we just don't hear about them.


Thanks for answering my question, Camille. I guess we try to bring it to the public attention, but the media won't cover this issue...
 
Folks are more sad about the bystanders than folks in that life......

they do.....

I never said they wasn't sad about black bystanders. My issue was more about why we wasn't on the media and protesting as much as we did with the Trayvon Martin case, level wise. Camile, give me the answer that I was look for:cool:
 
I never said they wasn't sad about black bystanders. My issue was more about why we wasn't on the media and protesting as much as we did with the Trayvon Martin case, level wise. Camile, give me the answer that I was look for:cool:

The news isn't geared towards US. this is why we need our own news. No news station is, no matter how liberal you think it is. None have black people in mind when they report the news.

They will hire black talking heads to appease that small demographic or when relevant issues arise but as far as actually being geared toward informing us, with unbiased reporting? there isn't anywhere in america that does this.


Oakland had a black owned cable station call soulbeat, we watched the soulbeat news in our house because it spoke about what was really happening to US, not to everyone else.
 
This is because black people always are looking for someone to blame. they need to be the victim of shit. It's a much better story when a white man kills some black kids vs the every day shit where black kids constantly kill other black kids.

The reality is this...Blacks are the ones killing blacks. The sad part is most black people are in denial....Then the minute some Treyvon Martin shit happens, Al Sharpton, and everyone else decides it's time for them to attention whore.

Where is the outrage at those savages in Chicago shooting up each other? Nooooooooo....We will wait for some cac to shoot one of us, then it will be page one here, and Sharpton, etc...

This is why we aren't taken seriously... We are doing over 90% of the killings of our own people and not one of these niggas here will admit it.... Everything is the white mans fault.

So Trayvon's death wasn't a white man's fault?

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
 
A simple answer is because people want to see how justice will be served.

We all know how justice treats black-on-black crimes. It's not always the same on non-black on black crimes. We know this too well and as a result focus on these crimes more to see that justice is served fairly.
 
The news isn't geared towards US. this is why we need our own news. No news station is, no matter how liberal you think it is. None have black people in mind when they report the news.

They will hire black talking heads to appease that small demographic or when relevant issues arise but as far as actually being geared toward informing us, with unbiased reporting? there isn't anywhere in america that does this.


Oakland had a black owned cable station call soulbeat, we watched the soulbeat news in our house because it spoke about what was really happening to US, not to everyone else.

c/s...I never heard of soulbeat station:cool: I will look it up...
 
All the uncle tom dl cacs on display in here...u can always tell those without critical thinking abilities
 
You still didn't answer my question. Where is the outrage on the same level as the Trayvon Martin and Rodney king case from black people??

You won't see it on the same level because its a different kind of outrage. It's sort of like murder and manslaughter. When you murder someone your motives are clear and with malice. In a manslaughter case your intent was not to necessarily kill someone, but that's what happened based on the circumstances. In other words black people killing black people are a reaction that happened to lead to death. Trayvon Martin type murders are simply white people expressing their dislike for blacks as a whole. Those two acts are going to get you two different reactions in the black community. One says, we need to clean up our selves and find a common solution to a common problem: racism and poverty in America. The other says: damn! Its open season on black people and we can't find protection or justice anywhere! That's my answer to your question as to why there isn't the same outrage.
 
I dont understand either finger, Its almost like a " i can do as i want to my own as long as you dont do it to them" mentality.


Statistically I am more likely to be killed by another black man than any thing else in this world.

I dont carry a gun because I am scared of what a cracker is going to do to me, I carry a gun so I can hurt another black man before he hurts me. :smh:
 
If the media covers crime, folks will complain that the media is making us look bad. Media ignores the issue, folks will complain that the media doesn't care.

Some posters on BGOL don't want crime in the community discussed, but as soon as a white boy shoots something up, it's :dance:

Also, since interracial killings by non-police are rare, it's a much easier battle for 'activists' to target.

People are easily programmed. That's why there isn't any community outrage over black serial killers and all these missing black women and children. :smh: LE doesn't look for these victims. :smh: Media doesn't cover.

http://www.theroot.com/articles/culture/2010/07/of_course_there_are_black_serial_killers.html
 
The activism and protest were being mainly toward the INJUSTICE in the Trayvon's situation. ..

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
 
This is because black people always are looking for someone to blame. they need to be the victim of shit. It's a much better story when a white man kills some black kids vs the every day shit where black kids constantly kill other black kids.

The reality is this...Blacks are the ones killing blacks. The sad part is most black people are in denial....Then the minute some Treyvon Martin shit happens, Al Sharpton, and everyone else decides it's time for them to attention whore.

Where is the outrage at those savages in Chicago shooting up each other? Nooooooooo....We will wait for some cac to shoot one of us, then it will be page one here, and Sharpton, etc...

This is why we aren't taken seriously... We are doing over 90% of the killings of our own people and not one of these niggas here will admit it.... Everything is the white mans fault.

You stupid ass handkerchief headed coon.
 
I dont understand either finger, Its almost like a " i can do as i want to my own as long as you dont do it to them" mentality.


Statistically I am more likely to be killed by another black man than any thing else in this world.

I dont carry a gun because I am scared of what a cracker is going to do to me, I carry a gun so I can hurt another black man before he hurts me. :smh:

If the media covers crime, folks will complain that the media is making us look bad. Media ignores the issue, folks will complain that the media doesn't care.

Some posters on BGOL don't want crime in the community discussed, but as soon as a white boy shoots something up, it's :dance:

Also, since interracial killings by non-police are rare, it's a much easier battle for 'activists' to target.

People are easily programmed. That's why there isn't any community outrage over black serial killers and all these missing black women and children. :smh: LE doesn't look for these victims. :smh: Media doesn't cover.

http://www.theroot.com/articles/culture/2010/07/of_course_there_are_black_serial_killers.html

boom..........
 
Think of it like this. Black people are like a family, albeit a family that sometimes don't like each other but still family. We can fuck with us but you "Other Races" can't.
 
Good question and yes it's disturbing when it's black on black and gets little to no attention but it really goes deeper that even that. Question is why does the media give so much attention to black on white crime over all. Honestly I believe they are scaring white people into buying guns and arming themselves for a race war. They arn't saying it but everything points in that direction. Best be ready cause they are getting ready, believe me! :cool:
 
You stupid ass handkerchief headed coon.
Yeah, yeah , yeah...Call me names...But nothing I said suggested I was a coon. The op asked a question, and I'm the only one who presented an answer. How the fuck am I a coon? The op wants to know why when blacks kill blacks nobody cares, but when whites kill a black there is all kind of outrage... You're calling me a coon for answering the question? I swear to god you niggas here are some of the dumbest people on the planet.
 
Yeah, yeah , yeah...Call me names...But nothing I said suggested I was a coon. The op asked a question, and I'm the only one who presented an answer. How the fuck am I a coon? The op wants to know why when blacks kill blacks nobody cares, but when whites kill a black there is all kind of outrage... You're calling me a coon for answering the question? I swear to god you niggas here are some of the dumbest people on the planet.

No, I think it's the condescending manner In which you talk to us that gets you the coon label... you talk to us as if you're not one of us..... are you?

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
 
Yeah, yeah , yeah...Call me names...But nothing I said suggested I was a coon. The op asked a question, and I'm the only one who presented an answer. How the fuck am I a coon? The op wants to know why when blacks kill blacks nobody cares, but when whites kill a black there is all kind of outrage... You're calling me a coon for answering the question? I swear to god you niggas here are some of the dumbest people on the planet.

I think I more than adequately answered the OP's question. You must not have read my answer.
 
Back
Top