House nigga juror on bitch ass zimmerman trial!

Shes a scumbag because she admits to doing something that in her heart she knows wasn't the right thing to do. And instead of holding herself accountable, she does what a lot of zealots do and uses her God as a scapegoat. If she held to her beliefs and principals she would have found him guilty...she clearly feels and says he was guilty. Instead, she allowed herself to be swayed/pressured/manipulated and now passes on her moral and legal responsibility to "God". That's horrendous on her part brother.

Based on what she said, im almost certain she was the juror who wanted clarification on manslaughter but when asked to clarify her request changed her mind and went with the majority who wanted to acquit. Thats deplorable. And then she wants to tell us she "fought to the end". No you didn't. That's not fighting under anyones definition. The only one who fought to the end was that innocent boy who was murdered. Fuck this lady. And the pain she is pretending to be experiencing now will pale in comparison to the pain she will feel if one of her 8 litter happen to meet the same fate at the hands of bigotry as Trayvon Martin.

A little.



So true.

But having heard the instructions and compared them to jury instructions prior to passing SYG laws, they came to the legally, but not morally, correct decision and it's interesting to see them come out as they are to explain themselves.

She should dead that talk of being as hurt as Sybrina Fulton. Not possible unless you've lost your child in such a senseless manner.

My question for you and Amajorfucup:

If you agree that the decision was legally correct (and, Amajor, I realize you did not make such a statement so I don't mean to put words in your mouth) are you saying that the morally correct thing would have been to disregard the law?

I can respect that if that's your position, just trying to understand the logic. It might be what I would have done-- the more I think about it, I probably would have; I just won't go beyond "might" because I did not actually watch the bulk of the trial-- and a hung jury would've been the very best case scenario in my view. I think, either way, Zimmerman eventually goes free.
 
My question for you and Amajorfucup:

If you agree that the decision was legally correct (and, Amajor, I realize you did not make such a statement so I don't mean to put words in your mouth) are you saying that the morally correct thing would have been to disregard the law?

I can respect that if that's your position, just trying to understand the logic. It might be what I would have done-- the more I think about it, I probably would have; I just won't go beyond "might" because I did not actually watch the bulk of the trial-- and a hung jury would've been the very best case scenario in my view. I think, either way, Zimmerman eventually goes free.
I think manslaughter was the legally correct charge and conviction (and so does she). I think if she entered and left the trial thinking that the defendant was guilty (as she says) then it is both her legal and moral responsibility to vote accordingly. She did just the opposite. To pass her failures on to God is atrocious.

And its even more despicable and laughable that she never seems to consider that maybe her God put her on that jury to do "His" work... Instead, she failed Him, took the easy way out and laid the duty back at "His" feet. That's a weak (minded) bitch all around. People waiting for their pie in the sky magical savior to do the right thing instead of doing it themselves is one of the reasons society hasn't progressed as far as it should have by now. Shame on this lady.
 
My question for you and Amajorfucup:

If you agree that the decision was legally correct (and, Amajor, I realize you did not make such a statement so I don't mean to put words in your mouth) are you saying that the morally correct thing would have been to disregard the law?

I can respect that if that's your position, just trying to understand the logic. It might be what I would have done-- the more I think about it, I probably would have; I just won't go beyond "might" because I did not actually watch the bulk of the trial-- and a hung jury would've been the very best case scenario in my view. I think, either way, Zimmerman eventually goes free.

they should have also been instructed that Trayvon had a right to self defense especually after they made a point o instruct that following someone is not against the law.

they should have also been instructed on jury nullification.
 
Just like i said...got bullied but its no excuse.

Hang the jury fuck that shit. Hang the jury instead of giving in to them worthless bitches.

shameful shameful fucking shit man please don't show her face on tv anymore


and she got 8 kids? is she living in a fantasy world?

if one of those kids get popped same circumstance.. how is that gonna hit home for her? smfh

mentally weak

horrible shit man
 
I respect her and her comments make sense. When serving on a jury you have to do the right thing and not condemn someone based on personal feelings.
 
they should have also been instructed that Trayvon had a right to self defense especually after they made a point o instruct that following someone is not against the law.

they should have also been instructed on jury nullification.

Instead they were intructed by jury b37 to use the stand your ground law (which was not the case before them)
 
I think manslaughter was the legally correct charge and conviction (and so does she). I think if she entered and left the trial thinking that the defendant was guilty (as she says) then it is both her legal and moral responsibility to vote accordingly. She did just the opposite. To pass her failures on to God is atrocious.

And its even more despicable and laughable that she never seems to consider that maybe her God put her on that jury to do "His" work... Instead, she failed Him, took the easy way out and laid the duty back at "His" feet. That's a weak (minded) bitch all around. People waiting for their pie in the sky magical savior to do the right thing instead of doing it themselves is one of the reasons society hasn't progressed as far as it should have by now. Shame on this lady.

:itsawrap:

I respect her and her comments make sense. When serving on a jury you have to do the right thing and not condemn someone based on personal feelings.

Yet Blacks are never given that opportunity.
 
basically, what she's saying is that they knew he was guilty but that the prosecution sucked so bad that they had to find him, "not guilty."

NO EXCUSES FOR HER WEAK MIND, but again, the prosecution did nothing in this case...NOTHING!

from Max's Samsung G-Note
 
I respect her and her comments make sense. When serving on a jury you have to do the right thing and not condemn someone based on personal feelings.

Sounds good in a perfect world but blacks are convicted based off of skin color/looks. We are the only ones that want to be moral. While others use the system to be immoral.
 
Last edited:
My question for you and Amajorfucup:

If you agree that the decision was legally correct (and, Amajor, I realize you did not make such a statement so I don't mean to put words in your mouth) are you saying that the morally correct thing would have been to disregard the law?

I can respect that if that's your position, just trying to understand the logic. It might be what I would have done-- the more I think about it, I probably would have; I just won't go beyond "might" because I did not actually watch the bulk of the trial-- and a hung jury would've been the very best case scenario in my view. I think, either way, Zimmerman eventually goes free.

To me, there's no question of what Zimmerman did and the total innocence of Martin so yes, in her position, I might have disregarded the law. On one level, that makes me no different than other people who have done the same thing and convicted innocent people but there's a strong chance that's what I would have done (can't say absolutely because I wasn't there).


I think manslaughter was the legally correct charge and conviction (and so does she). I think if she entered and left the trial thinking that the defendant was guilty (as she says) then it is both her legal and moral responsibility to vote accordingly. She did just the opposite. To pass her failures on to God is atrocious.

And its even more despicable and laughable that she never seems to consider that maybe her God put her on that jury to do "His" work... Instead, she failed Him, took the easy way out and laid the duty back at "His" feet. That's a weak (minded) bitch all around. People waiting for their pie in the sky magical savior to do the right thing instead of doing it themselves is one of the reasons society hasn't progressed as far as it should have by now. Shame on this lady.

Right. If you think he's guilty, of manslaughter or whatever, how do you vote otherwise? I don't mean think he did something wrong but actually guilty of at least one of the charges, how does he skate? How do you not stand by your convictions on that?

they should have also been instructed that Trayvon had a right to self defense especually after they made a point o instruct that following someone is not against the law.

they should have also been instructed on jury nullification.

The judge can't give those kinds of instructions, the prosecution should have went in that direction from the beginning.
 
Its stuff like this that has to sit in your gut, raw, undigested, and rotting as a hard lesson you don't EVER let whites get the jump on you, charge you, judge you, or have any control over you whatsoever.

The vicious scum.
 
basically, what she's saying is that they knew he was guilty but that the prosecution sucked so bad that they had to find him, "not guilty."

NO EXCUSES FOR HER WEAK MIND, but again, the prosecution did nothing in this case...NOTHING!

from Max's Samsung G-Note

:smh:

C'mon Max, Perry Mason, Matlock, & Jack McCoy could've prosecuted this case and that jury wasn't finding dude guilty.
 
To me, there's no question of what Zimmerman did and the total innocence of Martin so yes, in her position, I might have disregarded the law. On one level, that makes me no different than other people who have done the same thing and convicted innocent people but there's a strong chance that's what I would have done (can't say absolutely because I wasn't there).
Actually it doesn't Dave. It makes you just the opposite of them. Because unlike them, you would be voting to convict a person you sincerely thought was guilty. That's well within your rights as a juror, both legally and morally.
 
:smh:

C'mon Max, Perry Mason, Matlock, & Jack McCoy could've prosecuted this case and that jury wasn't finding dude guilty.

brothers in here...on bgol presented a better case than the prosecution! !

they did nothing...and reasonable doubt was easy. the prosecution witnesses did MORE for the defense than the prosecution. :smh:

this shit was pitiful.

from Max's Samsung G-Note
 
brothers in here...on bgol presented a better case than the prosecution! !

they did nothing...and reasonable doubt was easy. the prosecution witnesses did MORE for the defense than the prosecution. :smh:

this shit was pitiful.

no doubt, but they weren't finding dude guilty.
 
Actually it doesn't Dave. It makes you just the opposite of them. Because unlike them, you would be voting to convict a person you sincerely thought was guilty. That's well within your rights as a juror, both legally and morally.

Yeah but a lot of them think they're doing "the right thing", like "if he didn't do this, he did something so fuck the law, I'm going in". Look how they talk about Trayvon Martin and he was the victim. So while the specifics might be different, the result is the same.
 
She let those white women sway her vote. :angry:


I can't see how she can say the evidence didn't prove it but now saying he got away with murder. This hoe is dumb.
 
Instead they were intructed by jury b37 to use the stand your ground law (which was not the case before them)

all this talk about the syg law i keep hearing it was in play and some people say it wasn't on the same programs.

which was it? was it in play or not in play during the trial.
 
I hate religious black people.
God gonna do this.Jesus gonna do that.Just shut tha fuck up and die already.
No sense of responsibility having ass niggaz.
 
all this talk about the syg law i keep hearing it was in play and some people say it wasn't on the same programs.

which was it? was it in play or not in play during the trial.

Zimmerman attorneys decide to skip the syg trial (which puts more weight on the defendant) to prove his/her innocence. They instead went for a self denfense trial (which puts more weight on the prosecution) to provide guilt. So it was a self defense case with syg leading the minds of the jury.
 
Instead they were intructed by jury b37 to use the stand your ground law (which was not the case before them)

Exactly. .......people talking bout this verdict maked killing black people okay. .....but the law is what makes it okay. It's the whole reason they passed it...

But the uninvolved didn't do a thing to stop it and now are upset


Just like talking bout marissa after she been locked up for three years..

Reactionaries

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
 
brothers in here...on bgol presented a better case than the prosecution! !

they did nothing...and reasonable doubt was easy. the prosecution witnesses did MORE for the defense than the prosecution. :smh:

this shit was pitiful.

from Max's Samsung G-Note

Brothers here on BGOL also had information the judge disallowed in the trial

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
 
Reactionaries

I hate when people say this. The black experience in America is all about "reaction". The Civil Rights Movement was a "reaction" to Jim Crow. The underground railroad was a "reaction" to Slavery. Rap music was a "reaction" to Reaganomics. Black people cant help it if white people are constantly PROACTIVELY doing things to undermine us. We have to "react" to their bullshit. Even if blacks PROACTIVELY stopped SYG legislation before it passed, CACs would just come up with something else. This war is constant.

And oh yeah, fuck this bitch and her "moral guilt". Coons always on some "I must be fair" shit. CACs will rob, steal, kill, lie for theirs and their preservation.
 
It was in the instructions the judge read, the defense didn't introduce it.

Zimmerman attorneys decide to skip the syg trial (which puts more weight on the defendant) to prove his/her innocence. They instead went for a self denfense trial (which puts more weight on the prosecution) to provide guilt. So it was a self defense case with syg leading the minds of the jury.

wait wait wait.


so

it wasn't officially a stand your ground case it was a self defense case.

however in the jury room they believed it was stand your ground and that was what they let him go based on something that wasn't even in play?

cause self defense if that was just the case, that was out the window once she instigated the entire incident.. i keep hearing people say its the stand your ground... did the jury believe that as well?

this is kind of stinking more and more the more i dig deeper into this
 
Re: House nigga juror on bitch ass zimmerman trail!

Quite obvious.

According to the first juror, they started out 50% of them said not guilty, while the other 50% wanted to charge him with something.

How that turned around in 16 hours and they changed their minds is beyond me.

I'll would have preferred a hung jury :smh:

This bitch is 36, with 8 children :hmm:

She's Hispanic
 
:yes:
The judge didn't use the words "Stand Your Ground" but her instructions as far as self defense was based on the statute.

She did include the phrase:

If George Zimmerman was not engaged in an unlawful activity and was attacked in anyplace where he had a right to be, he had no duty to retreat and had the right to stand his ground and meet force with force, including deadly force if he reasonably believed that it wasnecessary to do so to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or another or to preventthe commission of a forcible felony.

:smh:
 
I hate when people say this. The black experience in America is all about "reaction". The Civil Rights Movement was a "reaction" to Jim Crow. The underground railroad was a "reaction" to Slavery. Rap music was a "reaction" to Reaganomics. Black people cant help it if white people are constantly PROACTIVELY doing things to undermine us. We have to "react" to their bullshit. Even if blacks PROACTIVELY stopped SYG legislation before it passed, CACs would just come up with something else. This war is constant.

And oh yeah, fuck this bitch and her "moral guilt". Coons always on some "I must be fair" shit. CACs will rob, steal, kill, lie for theirs and their preservation.

That's why we have to be proactive, instead of reactionary. Which leave of off our toes, and comfortable. Us showing up in force to vote has these white folk so uncomfortable. That are saying, and doing racist shit without filters. They are scared of the possibility of black folk.
 
Re: House nigga juror on bitch ass zimmerman trail!

Im not giving her a pass but i do realize most people cannot handle pressure and are mentally weak

The reality is that it takes a special kid of person to fight 5 other ppl and not give in. This is also a woman, and we are mostly men.

I am that kind of person. But most ppl lack the courage to take an unpopular position. Ninjas be scared to dress differently than the pack, but want to blame this woman for not being angela davis on an all white jury. Its not that simple.
 
crakas just love this shit. only thing they'd like better is a return to public lynchings of black people
oh, wait...isn't this really the same thing?
 
Back
Top