Re: The Official " Breaking Bad Season 5 " thread
insubordination is not illegal.
and there is nothing illegal about casual surveillance of dan wachsberger.
fair and plausible. but as LSN pointed out, surprisingly out of character (lazy writing) for mike to hitch his wagon to an incompetent professional.
even if we skip over attorney dan wachsberger waiving his 5th amendment rights,
even if we skip over attorney dan wachsberger waiving his 6th amendment rights,
even if we skip over the admissibility of statements dan wachsberger may have made (interview v. arrest), a prior leap in logic is required.
specifically, what subject did SA steven gomez have to "sweat" dan wachsberger about?
I think the purpose of showing the discussion between Hank and his superior, and the following conversation between Hank and Gomez was to show the illegal nature of the tail and subsequent arrest of the attorney.
insubordination is not illegal.
and there is nothing illegal about casual surveillance of dan wachsberger.
the dialogue of Saul chastising Mike for using that attorney and calling him a hack was to communicate to the viewer that the attorney was incompetent and his arrest should have and could have been avoided.
fair and plausible. but as LSN pointed out, surprisingly out of character (lazy writing) for mike to hitch his wagon to an incompetent professional.
you will hear Gomez say "I sweated the guy for 14hours..."
Its main purpose is to instill fear into a suspect and illicit an admission of guilt or confession. They even laugh about it. This was yet another way for the writers to communicate to the viewer that this arrest was less about legitimate procedure and more about an overzealous cop and an incompetent suspect (which coincidentally is about as real as it gets in criminal law).
even if we skip over attorney dan wachsberger waiving his 5th amendment rights,
even if we skip over attorney dan wachsberger waiving his 6th amendment rights,
even if we skip over the admissibility of statements dan wachsberger may have made (interview v. arrest), a prior leap in logic is required.
specifically, what subject did SA steven gomez have to "sweat" dan wachsberger about?