Uh-Oh - LA Pulls Out of Paul Trade!!!

:smh:

fukin stern.

stupid fuka :angry:

Man, he fucked this up. We could have had Paul, and made a run at Dwight. This fucks up NO more though. They would have gotten players back for CP instead of him just walking away from them. In addition to that, who the hell is gonna wanna deal with them while the league owns them now? If I was an owner or GM of another team, New Orleans would be toxic until they were bought by someone. There is no way in hell I'd want to trade anyone to them while Stern and the NBA are in charge. They set that team back with this stupid shit. :smh:
 
Man, he fucked this up. We could have had Paul, and made a run at Dwight. This fucks up NO more though. They would have gotten players back for CP instead of him just walking away from them. In addition to that, who the hell is gonna wanna deal with them while the league owns them now? If I was an owner or GM of another team, New Orleans would be toxic until they were bought by someone. There is no way in hell I'd want to trade anyone to them while Stern and the NBA are in charge. They set that team back with this stupid shit. :smh:

c/s 100%
 
Man, he fucked this up. We could have had Paul, and made a run at Dwight. This fucks up NO more though. They would have gotten players back for CP instead of him just walking away from them. In addition to that, who the hell is gonna wanna deal with them while the league owns them now? If I was an owner or GM of another team, New Orleans would be toxic until they were bought by someone. There is no way in hell I'd want to trade anyone to them while Stern and the NBA are in charge. They set that team back with this stupid shit. :smh:

The Knicks can sign Paul outright when he becomes a free agent due to the new CBA rule on contract restructuring. Hell we can trade for him now if melo, stat restructure their deals if the Knicks were so inclined.
 
Paul to Chicago for Rose.. The bulls would be way more effective hell even a champion team with the same pieces. Paul would make boozer look like a superstar
 
Everyone keeps talking about CP3 is going to the Knicks, what do N.Y have a stash of good players no one knows about, one of the reasons the first trade was nixed beside that bitch in Cleveland whining was that the league said the Hornets needed to get more young players in return and last I checked Knicks don't have nobody on the roster that the Hornets would want, besides didn't they just get Chandler, how much money are they willing to spend ????
 
Stop, odom going to dallas

Well looks like they may use that trade exception they just received for Odom to take on Turkagolu's contract in a trade for Howard. Or they are shedding salary.. but something is up... just not sure what it is right now.
 
they have no cap space

The rule states any player can restructure a contract by basically back loading the deal. So if the average salary is $15 million a year, they can do $10 mill one season $20 mill on the backend.

Major risk by the player because under new CBA deals aren't guaranteed 100% if waived.

So Amar'e, Chandler, Melo restructure creating cap space allows CP3 to join.
 
No, your horribly wrog :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol: Rose is more of a scorer than Rose and Chi doesn't have a second scorer. CP3 is the better PG tho.

So your saying you wouldn't take Paul for Rose right now? you admitted Paul is a better PG.. with the same pieces in chi right now with the addition of paul.. Chi will hands down win a chip this yr and next..
 
The rule states any player can restructure a contract by basically back loading the deal. So if the average salary is $15 million a year, they can do $10 mill one season $20 mill on the backend.

Major risk by the player because under new CBA deals aren't guaranteed 100% if waived.

So Amar'e, Chandler, Melo restructure creating cap space allows CP3 to join.

On top of that Landry and walker are free agents next year nd the Knicks can let them walk for additional savings. Lol from what I read the new Paul deal again failed to get approval that's y the lakers pulled out. Lololol... If the nba won't trade him the Knicks will sign him lol thank u stern for owning the hornets ahahahahahahahahahahaha.... But we will see shit changes
 
Paul to Chicago for Rose.. The bulls would be way more effective hell even a champion team with the same pieces. Paul would make boozer look like a superstar

2isxjdi.gif
 
I'm no Laker fan but Stern is a bitch for this. :smh:

Stupid fuck he let 2 small market owners turn him against the Lakers who are a fucking cash cow for the NBA.....They keep making this out to be like the heat forming voltron but those dudes had a plan and formed through free agency if you can build a "super team" by trading then I don't see a problem.....
 
Cause you signed a bum in chandler :lol::lol::lol: They have no more cap space
We needed a BIG to play with Stat and 'Melo
and Chauncy out :lol:

failure to the snicks :lol:
So getting a 7ft footer who rebounds and defends and isn't even 30 yet is worse than Chauncey right now. Y'all BUGGIN'... DID U SEE CHAUNCEY LAST YEAR... :smh:
New CBA allows for contracts to be redone. Reduce melo and stat to 12 mil add an extra yr or two and sign him. They do not need to trade for him if the league won't trade him to begin with just sign him outright

:ssshhh::ssshhh::ssshhh:
:hellyea::hellyea::hellyea:
 
So your saying you wouldn't take Paul for Rose right now? you admitted Paul is a better PG.. with the same pieces in chi right now with the addition of paul.. Chi will hands down win a chip this yr and next..

If you switch the two Hornets become the Bulls and the buls become hornets.....basically nothing more than ECF team. Shit imagine Bron guarding Paul? He stops all passing by Paul. Shuts down scoring
 
Back
Top