Hong Kong ex-wife gets $154,000,000 US ($1.2B HK) in divorce

Hotlantan

Beep beep. Who's got the keys to the Jeep? VROOM!
OG Investor
Divide HKD by 7.75 to get USD: 1.2 Billion HKD = 154 Million USD
Hong Kong Man Ordered To Pay Wife $154 MILLION In Divorce Settlement

A billionaire property tycoon has been ordered to cough up HK$1.2 billion to his ex-wife - further sealing Hong Kong's reputation as Asia's divorce capital.

It is believed to be the highest award given in open court in Hong Kong.

High Court Justice John Saunders ruled yesterday that Samathur Li Kin- kan, the son of billionaire Samuel Tak Lee, pay Florence Tsang Chiu-wing HK$1.22 billion - which represents 20 percent of the couple's assets when applying the "sharing principle."

Li and Tsang, a 38-year-old solicitor, who were married in 2000 and separated in 2008, lived "a lifestyle which was best described as just below that of a US- dollar billionaire," said the judge in his ruling.

Tsang's lawyer had suggested she should have 55 percent of the matrimonial assets and that a one-off payment of US$26 million (HK$202.8 million) offered by Li and his father was inadequate.

The court ordered the US$26 million be paid immediately, with the balance of HK$1.02 billion to bear interest if not paid within 90 days.

Saunders said: "The contributions of the husband and wife to the marriage partnership were equal."

The father had the right to recover gifts - including US$50 million he made to his son - as a factor in applying the sharing principle, the judge said.

The wife's "needs" include a HK$250 million Hong Kong property, a 2.5 million (HK$30.53 million) London property, HK$2.5 million to buy two cars, HK$5 million to buy a yacht and HK$4.6 million to join clubs in Hong Kong and England. She was given HK$215 million as a "Duxbury award" - a fixed sum for life.

As of March this year, Li was worth HK$6.42 billion, while his wife was worth HK$79 million. A separate fund of HK$26 million will be set up for their daughter, now three years old. The court ordered that Li and his father pay Tsang's court costs.

"To confine a non-working wife's award to the sum needed to meet her 'reasonable requirements' and to permit the husband to keep the remaining assets is patently unfair and discriminatory," the judges ruled.

http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=12&art_id=117633&sid=34650467&con_type=1

5_2011120205441254473wife.jpg
datgia.jpg
 
she used her pussy and came up....that's what you get for marrying when you got money...I'm going the Oprah, I ain't getting married, don't care what anyone thinks
 
So?

I'm not against marriage - but if you get married, have substantial wealth, don't protect it, and THIS happens...

...what am I supposed to say?

You played the game and took an "L".

Dumb ass. :lol: :lol: :lol:
 
Can someone explain the legal rationale for decisions like this? :confused:

How is it considered "reasonable" to even part with half of the wealth you've acquired through your own efforts.... let alone more than half (55% in this case)?

I'm not a woman hater or someone who objects to sharing with a divorced partner in principle but I really don't understand this stuff. BGOL Lawyers help a dude understand please.
 
Can someone explain the legal rationale for decisions like this? :confused:

How is it considered "reasonable" to even part with half of the wealth you've acquired through your own efforts.... let alone more than half (55% in this case)?

I'm not a woman hater or someone who objects to sharing with a divorced partner in principle but I really don't understand this stuff. BGOL Lawyers help a dude understand please.

The irony in all of this is, these laws were not written by women.
 
Marriage has no benefit for men. Over 50% of the Population is single and ppl still getting married due to outdated ideals

Sent from my MegaDroid
 
Can someone explain the legal rationale for decisions like this? :confused:

How is it considered "reasonable" to even part with half of the wealth you've acquired through your own efforts.... let alone more than half (55% in this case)?

I'm not a woman hater or someone who objects to sharing with a divorced partner in principle but I really don't understand this stuff. BGOL Lawyers help a dude understand please.

Simplify it. Don't think of it in dollar amounts. Think of it as percentages. If you and i got married and you made 1000 dollars. While we were married. It's viewed as you made that while we were together so everything should be shared. We share in the highs just as we'd share the lows. If you lost a 1000 i'd have to suffer through that loss.
 
If i have money i never understand why get married??

For What? If i had a girlfriend she would be my girl for the rest of my life.

Once you sign on the dotted line you cannot escape the rape. :lol::lol:
 
Simplify it. Don't think of it in dollar amounts. Think of it as percentages. If you and i got married and you made 1000 dollars. While we were married. It's viewed as you made that while we were together so everything should be shared. We share in the highs just as we'd share the lows. If you lost a 1000 i'd have to suffer through that loss.

I agree with that logic but the problem is that the total amount gets split in these cases, not just the amount made after marriage.
 
Simplify it. Don't think of it in dollar amounts. Think of it as percentages. If you and i got married and you made 1000 dollars.

While we were married.

It's viewed as you made that while we were together so everything should be shared.

We share in the highs just as we'd share the lows. If you lost a 1000 i'd have to suffer through that loss.



Lot of you and we.



Where is the "me" part?



:confused::confused::confused:
 
meeeh 20% ain't bad she was going to walk away with something after 7-8 years, he keeps 80% of his assets that's a win win if i'm in his shoes.

She is 38 with a three year old kid so yeah this this make sense at least it ain't half like she wanted
 
Simplify it. Don't think of it in dollar amounts. Think of it as percentages. If you and i got married and you made 1000 dollars. While we were married. It's viewed as you made that while we were together so everything should be shared. We share in the highs just as we'd share the lows. If you lost a 1000 i'd have to suffer through that loss.

I suppose this makes sense when considered carefully along those lines. The mathematics of it seem a bit absurd though.... if someone acquires the bulk of their wealth prior to marriage giving up half upon divorce seems dumb. I understand the need to maintain the "lifestyle the spouse is accustomed to" (to an extent) but once we're talking in the multiples of millions this argument comes across as juvenile. How many millions do you need really?

And I agree with the above poster 20% isn't bad at all.... I skimmed the article initially and mistook the 55% asking price (which is retarded) for the actual decision.
 
Marriage is just use as a form of structure like a corporation. There are benefits for family structure and it is need our community but the problem with marriage is that the institution needs to be updated, reflective with the current times. Ironclad Prenupital Agreement should be a requirement for all marriage so the everybody knows what are the financial consequences ahead of time.
 
I agree with that logic but the problem is that the total amount gets split in these cases, not just the amount made after marriage.

Was their a prenup? In my view, i'm not sure how it is in HK. If i married you, this is me. Everything i have is now yours. That's how some states view it as well in america. And a few other countries too. So everything you had prior is fair game. I don't know what to tell ya. That's just how it goes.

I'm not in favor of marriage in this day and age. Hell since the 90's. I can't imagine why anyone who thinks of marriage in modern terms would get married. It just doesn't make ANY SENSE to me. None.

I suppose this makes sense when considered carefully along those lines. The mathematics of it seem a bit absurd though.... if someone acquires the bulk of their wealth prior to marriage giving up half upon divorce seems dumb. I understand the need to maintain the "lifestyle the spouse is accustomed to" (to an extent) but once we're talking in the multiples of millions this argument comes across as juvenile. How many millions do you need really?

And I agree with the above poster 20% isn't bad at all.... I skimmed the article initially and mistook the 55% asking price (which is retarded) for the actual decision.

I'm not going to argue the whole maintain the lifestyle stuff. I really am not because i despise that saying. I heard it a LOT when i worked in Miami. Chick been married to this guy for 5 years and now she's accustomed to a lifestyle...she was a stripper before she met him!!! Yes i hate that whole idea. There's a difference though between 5 years and i've been with you and rich for 30 years.



Lot of you and we.



Where is the "me" part?



:confused::confused::confused:

I don't know what you are talking about.
 
Was their a prenup? In my view, i'm not sure how it is in HK. If i married you, this is me. Everything i have is now yours. That's how some states view it as well in america. And a few other countries too. So everything you had prior is fair game. I don't know what to tell ya. That's just how it goes.

I'm not in favor of marriage in this day and age. Hell since the 90's. I can't imagine why anyone who thinks of marriage in modern terms would get married. It just doesn't make ANY SENSE to me. None.



I'm not going to argue the whole maintain the lifestyle stuff. I really am not because i despise that saying. I heard it a LOT when i worked in Miami. Chick been married to this guy for 5 years and now she's accustomed to a lifestyle...she was a stripper before she met him!!! Yes i hate that whole idea. There's a difference though between 5 years and i've been with you and rich for 30 years.



I don't know what you are talking about.



You described marriage from the point of view of what a man brings to the "we".


How about what a woman brings to the "we" in marriage?



Curious to get a woman's perspective


:cool:
 
I understand the need to maintain the "lifestyle the spouse is accustomed to"


Don't let them brainwash you! If you had a great job making great money, with a company car, an expense account, computers and a clothing budget, what happens to all that when you leave that job? Do they give a damn about your "lifestyle"? Nope, they take all that shit back and you're back looking for another gig. I've never understood how women get over like this.

Not that they shouldn't get something, but maintenance of lifestyle WE had when we were together is no longer relevant when we are separated. What if dude is used to hittin that ass 5 times a week? Wasn't that his marital lifestyle? Not trying to be an ass, but for real!?
 
She probably deserve it,afterall she had to cook and clean you know.


wait........
 
Nothing wrong with marriage, its the way that marriages are ended that's the problem. Family court and divorce court law need major overhauls. Until then, congrats on the women who keep coming up.
 
This bitch ever experience black dick? :D

just like how some niggas fall under the power of the pussy... the power of dick can have twice as much power. lemme go to china and find this hoe... dick her down, marry, and take HALF of that bitch money! :lol: then move back to the states :dance:
 
I understand the need to maintain the "lifestyle the spouse is accustomed to"


Don't let them brainwash you! If you had a great job making great money, with a company car, an expense account, computers and a clothing budget, what happens to all that when you leave that job? Do they give a damn about your "lifestyle"? Nope, they take all that shit back and you're back looking for another gig. I've never understood how women get over like this.

Wife does not equal employee though. If you think of her as an employee well...then she's entitled to severance package. And if she is an employee...you think of wives as whores?

Not that they shouldn't get something, but maintenance of lifestyle WE had when we were together is no longer relevant when we are separated. What if dude is used to hittin that ass 5 times a week? Wasn't that his marital lifestyle? Not trying to be an ass, but for real!?

THIS

IS

WHERE

YOU GUYS

MESS UP.

Because as soon as you begin into the thinking that she deserves SOMETHING. Then you're getting into the danger zone of how do you judge it? How do you make what she contributes to the marriage a monetary value. And then you're in trouble. SO i say, GIVE HER NOTHING. ZIP. ZILCH. NADA. Believe it or not in this day and age, i'm much more in line of thinking with what you were speaking of in the beginning of this post. Treat all women like whores. If you take 1 up, she should be grateful that you did so. But when you fire her? She should get nothing. And you keep all assets. i.e. the kids she bore.

That's how i think it should be done in today's age.
 
Back
Top