Make a Contribution to Remove NSFW Ads

who started the retlaw parody

HNIC said:
maybe I should have let that remain, I'm hearing it was harmless.
Just this one time, save the negative talk, I want to hit the brother up

HNIC
Click to expand...



Straight up HNIC, I NEVER get involved in board politics. Matter of fact, I think BGOL is a much larger phenomenon than most can appreciate(I suspect you're aware as well). Which in my mind makes the 'Blunt' exposure incident . . . a small thing in my mind. And NO, I don't agree with exposing home addresses, kids, etc. THERE ARE LIMITS.


I'll make 4 points, and appeal to your sense of reason and see where that leads us.

1. Trolls exist on every board and blog, and on those boards (for example http://www.bautforum.com/ they issue swift justice to these trolls, shit talkers and spammer as they have a damn near zero tolerance policy . . . over there).

HOWEVER, something ORIGINAL and unique emerged organically (in a social sense) on THIS very board that distinguishes it from all other boards, (related to shit talkers, spammers and trolls). Adults on this board policed themselves, and through a UNIQUE mixture of creativity, technical skill, and comedic genius extrapolated from various regions came up with 'OCKING'!!!

This emergent practice IS the VACCINE, and APPROPRIATE PRESCRIPTION MEDICINE against the awful practice of TROLLING.

In a world where folks are FREE to TROLL and FLAME with impunity, is it not reasonable to expect retaliation against such a heinous and sad practice? Shouldn't paying members expect from monitors and mods the REMEDY OF A BAN??

My point is simple. If you're NOT gonna ban trolling, spamming, and shit talking with a zero tolerance policy (especially since you've said that the board needs 'characters'); Why then unfairly target the counterpart to trolling, which is uncensored 'ocking'? ESPECIALLY for one person. And remember, you're the one who set up the Ocking HALL of FAME.


2. Censoring will create more unnecessary work for you and the mods. Especially since 'ocking' doesn't occur every day. As well, trolling has been tolerable BECAUSE there is a board SUPPORTED prescription for it. AND it makes the job of mods easier and more entertaining . . . I imagine.

3. THIS board is different from other boards BECAUSE of it's differences, not in spite of it. And ONE lone individual, male or female, regardless of race, should be not be allowed to troll with impunity, and be exempt from the consequences of THEIR actions.


4. You ALSO said that you weren't implementing any new changes/rules. By establishing a Ocking hall of fame, you sanctioned the practice. Moreover, 'ocking' doesn't even rise the the level of 'Online Bullying', (which is for children). So how come the overprotection for one ADULT member at the insult to many other contributing ADULT members?



Look, you got something cool and unique here.

But if the 'donations' didn't kill the board, CHOKING the board through censorship WILL. And you also made the argument that the majority of the board don't care about the 'Blunt' drama . . . But you also KNOW that it's a MINORITY of the board that keeps this joint hoppin' like jumpin' jacks.


MIA: high caliber contributors banned due to the regression of the board or unfair board policy.

lawnmowerman
makkonnen
dert bagg
heist
JD Walker

. . . To name a few


Food for thought.

JG
 
Tech said:
ebay.jpg


But I don't know
Click to expand...



Anyone else notice retlaw is spelt wrong?
 
Heist banned? Ok now, wtf HNIC you son of a bitch?! :angry:

I now know Blunt is in some way connected to the financial/development aspect of this board.

Time for the truth.
 
John_Gault said:
Straight up HNIC, I NEVER get involved in board politics. Matter of fact, I think BGOL is a much larger phenomenon than most can appreciate(I suspect you're aware as well). Which in my mind makes the 'Blunt' exposure incident . . . a small thing in my mind. And NO, I don't agree with exposing home addresses, kids, etc. THERE ARE LIMITS.


I'll make 4 points, and appeal to your sense of reason and see where that leads us.

1. Trolls exist on every board and blog, and on those boards (for example http://www.bautforum.com/ they issue swift justice to these trolls, shit talkers and spammer as they have a damn near zero tolerance policy . . . over there).

HOWEVER, something ORIGINAL and unique emerged organically (in a social sense) on THIS very board that distinguishes it from all other boards, (related to shit talkers, spammers and trolls). Adults on this board policed themselves, and through a UNIQUE mixture of creativity, technical skill, and comedic genius extrapolated from various regions came up with 'OCKING'!!!

This emergent practice IS the VACCINE, and APPROPRIATE PRESCRIPTION MEDICINE against the awful practice of TROLLING.

In a world where folks are FREE to TROLL and FLAME with impunity, is it not reasonable to expect retaliation against such a heinous and sad practice? Shouldn't paying members expect from monitors and mods the REMEDY OF A BAN??

My point is simple. If you're NOT gonna ban trolling, spamming, and shit talking with a zero tolerance policy (especially since you've said that the board needs 'characters'); Why then unfairly target the counterpart to trolling, which is uncensored 'ocking'? ESPECIALLY for one person. And remember, you're the one who set up the Ocking HALL of FAME.


2. Censoring will create more unnecessary work for you and the mods. Especially since 'ocking' doesn't occur every day. As well, trolling has been tolerable BECAUSE there is a board SUPPORTED prescription for it. AND it makes the job of mods easier and more entertaining . . . I imagine.

3. THIS board is different from other boards BECAUSE of it's differences, not in spite of it. And ONE lone individual, male or female, regardless of race, should be not be allowed to troll with impunity, and be exempt from the consequences of THEIR actions.


4. You ALSO said that you weren't implementing any new changes/rules. By establishing a Ocking hall of fame, you sanctioned the practice. Moreover, 'ocking' doesn't even rise the the level of 'Online Bullying', (which is for children). So how come the overprotection for one ADULT member at the insult to many other contributing ADULT members?



Look, you got something cool and unique here.

But if the 'donations' didn't kill the board, CHOKING the board through censorship WILL. And you also made the argument that the majority of the board don't care about the 'Blunt' drama . . . But you also KNOW that it's a MINORITY of the board that keeps this joint hoppin' like jumpin' jacks.


MIA: high caliber contributors banned due to the regression of the board or unfair board policy.

lawnmowerman
makkonnen
dert bagg
heist
JD Walker

. . . To name a few


Food for thought.

JG
Click to expand...

:idea:
 
John_Gault said:
Straight up HNIC, I NEVER get involved in board politics. Matter of fact, I think BGOL is a much larger phenomenon than most can appreciate(I suspect you're aware as well). Which in my mind makes the 'Blunt' exposure incident . . . a small thing in my mind. And NO, I don't agree with exposing home addresses, kids, etc. THERE ARE LIMITS.


I'll make 4 points, and appeal to your sense of reason and see where that leads us.

1. Trolls exist on every board and blog, and on those boards (for example http://www.bautforum.com/ they issue swift justice to these trolls, shit talkers and spammer as they have a damn near zero tolerance policy . . . over there).

HOWEVER, something ORIGINAL and unique emerged organically (in a social sense) on THIS very board that distinguishes it from all other boards, (related to shit talkers, spammers and trolls). Adults on this board policed themselves, and through a UNIQUE mixture of creativity, technical skill, and comedic genius extrapolated from various regions came up with 'OCKING'!!!

This emergent practice IS the VACCINE, and APPROPRIATE PRESCRIPTION MEDICINE against the awful practice of TROLLING.

In a world where folks are FREE to TROLL and FLAME with impunity, is it not reasonable to expect retaliation against such a heinous and sad practice? Shouldn't paying members expect from monitors and mods the REMEDY OF A BAN??

My point is simple. If you're NOT gonna ban trolling, spamming, and shit talking with a zero tolerance policy (especially since you've said that the board needs 'characters'); Why then unfairly target the counterpart to trolling, which is uncensored 'ocking'? ESPECIALLY for one person. And remember, you're the one who set up the Ocking HALL of FAME.


2. Censoring will create more unnecessary work for you and the mods. Especially since 'ocking' doesn't occur every day. As well, trolling has been tolerable BECAUSE there is a board SUPPORTED prescription for it. AND it makes the job of mods easier and more entertaining . . . I imagine.

3. THIS board is different from other boards BECAUSE of it's differences, not in spite of it. And ONE lone individual, male or female, regardless of race, should be not be allowed to troll with impunity, and be exempt from the consequences of THEIR actions.


4. You ALSO said that you weren't implementing any new changes/rules. By establishing a Ocking hall of fame, you sanctioned the practice. Moreover, 'ocking' doesn't even rise the the level of 'Online Bullying', (which is for children). So how come the overprotection for one ADULT member at the insult to many other contributing ADULT members?



Look, you got something cool and unique here.

But if the 'donations' didn't kill the board, CHOKING the board through censorship WILL. And you also made the argument that the majority of the board don't care about the 'Blunt' drama . . . But you also KNOW that it's a MINORITY of the board that keeps this joint hoppin' like jumpin' jacks.


MIA: high caliber contributors banned due to the regression of the board or unfair board policy.

lawnmowerman
makkonnen
dert bagg
heist
JD Walker

. . . To name a few


Food for thought.

JG
Click to expand...

This is what makes BGOL, BGOL. You could've deleted the addresses and last names and allowed the ocking to continue with no harm done, save Duece who had to be banned on prinicple. Blunt has been trolling for over a DECADE. Justice needed to be done. This really could've been handled better. Unless Blunt finances the board, the ocking should continue. It will be EPIC.
 
John_Gault said:
Straight up HNIC, I NEVER get involved in board politics. Matter of fact, I think BGOL is a much larger phenomenon than most can appreciate(I suspect you're aware as well). Which in my mind makes the 'Blunt' exposure incident . . . a small thing in my mind. And NO, I don't agree with exposing home addresses, kids, etc. THERE ARE LIMITS.


I'll make 4 points, and appeal to your sense of reason and see where that leads us.

1. Trolls exist on every board and blog, and on those boards (for example http://www.bautforum.com/ they issue swift justice to these trolls, shit talkers and spammer as they have a damn near zero tolerance policy . . . over there).

HOWEVER, something ORIGINAL and unique emerged organically (in a social sense) on THIS very board that distinguishes it from all other boards, (related to shit talkers, spammers and trolls). Adults on this board policed themselves, and through a UNIQUE mixture of creativity, technical skill, and comedic genius extrapolated from various regions came up with 'OCKING'!!!

This emergent practice IS the VACCINE, and APPROPRIATE PRESCRIPTION MEDICINE against the awful practice of TROLLING.

In a world where folks are FREE to TROLL and FLAME with impunity, is it not reasonable to expect retaliation against such a heinous and sad practice? Shouldn't paying members expect from monitors and mods the REMEDY OF A BAN??

My point is simple. If you're NOT gonna ban trolling, spamming, and shit talking with a zero tolerance policy (especially since you've said that the board needs 'characters'); Why then unfairly target the counterpart to trolling, which is uncensored 'ocking'? ESPECIALLY for one person. And remember, you're the one who set up the Ocking HALL of FAME.


2. Censoring will create more unnecessary work for you and the mods. Especially since 'ocking' doesn't occur every day. As well, trolling has been tolerable BECAUSE there is a board SUPPORTED prescription for it. AND it makes the job of mods easier and more entertaining . . . I imagine.

3. THIS board is different from other boards BECAUSE of it's differences, not in spite of it. And ONE lone individual, male or female, regardless of race, should be not be allowed to troll with impunity, and be exempt from the consequences of THEIR actions.


4. You ALSO said that you weren't implementing any new changes/rules. By establishing a Ocking hall of fame, you sanctioned the practice. Moreover, 'ocking' doesn't even rise the the level of 'Online Bullying', (which is for children). So how come the overprotection for one ADULT member at the insult to many other contributing ADULT members?



Look, you got something cool and unique here.

But if the 'donations' didn't kill the board, CHOKING the board through censorship WILL. And you also made the argument that the majority of the board don't care about the 'Blunt' drama . . . But you also KNOW that it's a MINORITY of the board that keeps this joint hoppin' like jumpin' jacks.


MIA: high caliber contributors banned due to the regression of the board or unfair board policy.

lawnmowerman
makkonnen
dert bagg
heist
JD Walker

. . . To name a few


Food for thought.

JG
Click to expand...

Well done.
 
blackras9 said:
This is what makes BGOL, BGOL. You could've deleted the addresses and last names and allowed the ocking to continue with no harm done, save Duece who had to be banned on prinicple. Blunt has been trolling for over a DECADE. Justice needed to be done. This really could've been handled better. Unless Blunt finances the board, the ocking should continue. It will be EPIC.
Click to expand...

:yes:
 
jeanzy5342 said:
all praise to your new religion my Brutha....... RETLAW is lurking........beware.....I can sense his presence.... the power of RETLAW.......:eek:
Click to expand...

if you see me rollin in real life, im always ridin shotgun. driver's side be empty(you cant see retlaw) but he's there
 
BiggBawlzMcGee said:
Does Femme get a percentage of those t-shirt sales since her tits and stomach are on them?
Click to expand...

:hmm::hmm::hmm:

funny how capitalism ($$$) resulted from femme's ocking... but extreme censorship and member banning occurred from retlaw's potential ocking.

now, that's protection you can believe in.
 

Make a Contribution to Remove NSFW Ads
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

MASTERBAKER
Trump roasts Dems with ‘Christmas Vacation’ turkey parody video on Thanksgiving
Replies
0
Views
66
MASTERBAKER
MASTERBAKER
BronxBomber
Started a virtual stock game for a friend - Any of the resident investors want in?
Replies
15
Views
451
BronxBomber
BronxBomber
0utsyder
Stephen A. Smith spreading TheOnion like news about Brittney Griner
Replies
22
Views
703
Costanza
Costanza
DC_Dude
Who is The Greatest Pharaoh of all Time?(It’s Not King Tut):If you had to name a battleship after a pharaoh who represents power—who would you choose?
Replies
8
Views
112
mcguyver
mcguyver
the artist
Bootsy Collins Remembers the Moment Crack Destroyed His Relationship With George Clinton
Replies
0
Views
38
the artist
the artist
Back
Top