What Will Actually Happen if Russia Invades Ukraine

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
Russian General Announces Plan to Invade Moldova after Ukraine


MSN
Arjun Singh
April 22, 2022


A Russian General announced plans to occupy the Transnistria region of Moldova on Friday.

Speaking at a defense industry meeting, Brigadier General Rustam Minnekayev, acting commander of Russia’s Central Military District, stated that the Russian Armed Forces plan to “make passage” into the region – in Moldova’s East, bordering Ukraine and less than 30 miles from the port city of Odessa – to create a “land corridor to Crimea,” Russian media reported. Such a corridor would also purport to connect the Russian mainland to Transnistria.

Minnekayev stated that the measure was part of Russia’s second phase in its war in Ukraine, which involves establishing full control over the Donbas Region and Ukraine’s coast along the Black Sea. No timeline was provided for the maneuver to begin, however.

In his remarks, Minnekayev cited the strategic value of the region, claiming “control over the south of Ukraine is another exit into Transnistria, where there are also facts pointing to the oppression of the Russian-speaking population.” Transnistria is a separatist region of Moldova – comprised primarily of Russian speakers – akin to Donetsk and Luhansk in Ukraine, which has been autonomously run by a pro-Russian faction since 1990. It is not internationally recognized by any country, including Russia, though nearly 1,500 Russian troops are stationed in the region and its trade is primarily conducted with the Russian mainland.

Ukraine’s Armed Forces had previously warned on April 2 that Russia was mobilizing troops in Transnistria, though this was initially denied by Moldova. Ukraine believes that such mobilization is a prelude to attacks on Odessa, Ukraine’s largest port city and a gateway for its international trade.

Russia’s occupation of Transnistria would expand the conflict with Ukraine to another European nation-state, since it began in late February of 2022.

More ominously, in his remarks, Minnekayev said that Russia was now “at war with the whole world, as it [was] in the Great Patriotic War.”


Russian General Announces Plan to Invade Moldova after Ukraine (msn.com)


.
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator

BUT, BUT . . .

Ukraine’s tiny neighbor is WORRIED
it could be next on Putin’s list

Moldova is poor, dependent on Moscow and split by a separatist movement, making it especially vulnerable to Russia.


BENDER, Moldova — On its journey to the Black Sea from its source in Ukraine close to the Polish border, the Dniester River runs through the tiny country of Moldova. Its banks are home to boar, pheasant and Russian soldiers, who nominally protect a breakaway slice of the country.

Passing through a checkpoint in early April manned by the Operational Group of Russian Forces on the way to the breakaway region known as Transnistria, which has aligned with Russia, one blue-eyed soldier threw himself back in a chair, the flag of the Russian Federation on the shoulder of his camouflage uniform. Another stood, black shoelaces loosely tied, with a rifle slung over his arm. Dug in beside them was an armored personnel carrier. A third uniformed man watched from the shade.

The river separates not only the Russian-speaking area from the Republic of Moldova, but also two competing ideological visions for the region’s future: a Russian-backed enclave under Russia’s control and the other in the European camp of Western democracies. Following Russia’s invasion of neighboring Ukraine, the specter of armed conflict looms ever larger over Moldova.

An impasse here has existed since 1992, when a civil war followed the collapse of the Soviet Union and the establishment of the Republic of Moldova as an independent state.


Moldova worries it may be next on Russia's list after Ukraine (nbcnews.com)
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
everybody-has-a-plan-until-they-get-punched-in-the-mouth.gif
@QueEx
QueEx


Well MB, I guess this guy didn't have a Plan .... huh ? ? ?

. . . :smh: :smh: :smh:






.
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
US Secretary of Defense says US wants to see Russia's military capabilities weakened

April 25, 2022
CNN
By Kylie Atwood and
Jennifer Hansler

Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, left, and Secretary of State Antony Blinken, center, attend their meeting Sunday, April 24, 2022, with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, left, and Secretary of State Antony
Blinken, center, attend their meeting Sunday, April 24, 2022,
with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.



(CNN)Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin insisted Monday that Russia was failing in its Ukraine incursion, with Austin explicitly saying that the US wants to see Russia's military capabilities weakened.

The two top US officials, speaking at a news conference at an undisclosed location in Poland near the Ukrainian border, made the comments following a trip to Kyiv, where they met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to pledge US support in the war and announce that US diplomats would be returning to Ukraine.

"We want to see Russia weakened to the degree that it can't do the kinds of things that it has done in invading Ukraine," Austin said at the news conference. "So it has already lost a lot of military capability. And a lot of its troops, quite frankly. And we want to see them not have the capability to very quickly reproduce that capability."

Blinken told reporters that Russian attempts to "subjugate Ukraine and take its independence" has "failed."


"Russia has sought as its principal aim to totally subjugate Ukraine, to take away its sovereignty, to take away its independence -- that has failed. It has sought to assert the power of its military and its economy. We, of course, are seeing just the opposite, a military that is dramatically underperforming and an economy ... as a result of sanctions that is in shambles," Blinken said.

"We don't know how the rest of this war will unfold, but we do know that a sovereign independent Ukraine will be around a lot longer than Vladimir Putin is on the scene," he said.


The remarks are the latest in a series of public comments by US leaders challenging Putin's longevity as Russia's President and as the war in Ukraine has shifted to a new phrase in the east. US President Joe Biden and the White House have said the US is not officially calling for regime change and officials have also predicted a potentially drawn-out conflict.

Austin's comments also seem to represent a further extension of US goals, building on past comments from Blinken and other officials about Moscow's status at the end of the war.

Blinken last week said in a statement that the US' "continued efforts to ratchet up pressure on Putin's crumbling economy together will help weaken the Russian Government's position and further isolate them from the world until Russia ends its unprovoked and unjustified war on Ukraine."
The White House said Monday that Austin was talking about the US "objective to prevent" the Russian military from taking over Ukraine, and described it as consistent with the administration's long-held goal.

Asked about the defense secretary's comments, a National Security Council spokesperson said the US wants Ukraine to win and "that's why we're doing everything we can to help Ukraine defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity, and to strengthen the Ukrainians' hands on the battlefield and at the negotiating table."

A senior State Department official told the traveling press Monday that such negotiations are "evolving," noting that "Russia's hand has been weakened as a result of these first two months, Ukraine's hand has been strengthened, that effects the positions that there would be in any negotiation," but "part of the problem is as best we can tell there is no effective negotiation going on right now."

US diplomats to return to Ukraine
The visit to Kyiv by Blinken and Austin makes them the highest-level US officials to have traveled to the country since the Russian invasion began in late February.

While in Kyiv, Blinken and Austin met with Zelensky, Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba, Defense Minister Oleksiy Reznikov and Interior Minister Denys Monastrysky for an extended, roughly 90-minute bilateral meeting, the senior State Department official said.

RELATED: Live Updates: Russia's war in Ukraine

As part of the resumed US diplomatic presence in Ukraine, diplomats will "start with day trips into the Lviv" and "will graduate to potentially other parts of the country and ultimately, to resume presence in Kyiv," according to a senior State Department official.

Blinken and Austin discussed the Biden administration's intention to provide $713 million in additional foreign military financing to Ukraine and allied European and Balkan partners, according to the senior State Department official and a senior Defense Department official. Part of that new military assistance funding will help Ukraine transition to NATO-capable systems, the State Department official said. The two secretaries also discussed deliveries of recent US military assistance to Ukraine and the ongoing training for Ukrainian soldiers, the officials said.

Biden on Monday announced that he willnominate Bridget Brink as US ambassador to Ukraine. The post that has been without a confirmed
ambassador since Marie Yovanovitch was recalled in May 2019. Brink is the current US ambassador to Slovakia.

Zelensky's office issued a readout of the meeting on Monday, stressing the importance of the visit and saying the country "counts on the support of our partners."

"We appreciate the unprecedented assistance of the United States to Ukraine," Zelensky said, according to the readout. "I would like to thank President Biden personally and on behalf of the entire Ukrainian people for his leadership in supporting Ukraine, for his personal clear position. To thank all the American people, as well as the Congress for their bicameral and bipartisan support. We see it. We feel it."

Officials reiterate no involvement by US forces
The traveling US press corps did not travel with the secretaries to the Ukrainian capital. In a background briefing, the State and Defense officials made clear that the US military would still not be involved directly in the war.

"The President has been very clear there will be no US troops fighting in Ukraine and that includes the skies over Ukraine," the defense official said, adding, "This visit does not portend actual involvement by US forces."

In the Monday press briefing, Austin said the US believes Ukraine can win the war against Russia with "the right equipment and the right support."

Exclusive: Zelensky rejects 'tall tales' his forces need months of training to operate advanced weapons
Exclusive: Zelensky rejects 'tall tales' his forces need months of training to operate advanced weapons


"In terms of their ability to win -- the first step in winning is believing that you can win. And so, they believe that we can win. We believe that we -- they -- can win, if they have the right equipment, the right support, and we're going to do everything we can and continue to do everything we can," Austin told reporters.

He said, "we're going to push as hard as we can as quickly as we can to get them what they need", adding that the nature of the fight between Ukraine and Russia has evolved. He said "they're now focused on is a different type of terrain. So they need long-range fire."

While officials hailed the trip as a testament to the US commitment to Ukraine, they have also faced questions about why Biden did not make the trip himself.

"The President of the United States is somewhat singular, in terms of what travel would require. So it goes well beyond what a Cabinet secretary would or what virtually any other world leader would require," the State Department official noted.
UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson visited the country earlier this month. Top officials from the EU and the Baltics have also visited Zelensky in Kyiv.

Fresh training for Ukrainians
What happens to weapons sent to Ukraine? The US doesn't really know
What happens to weapons sent to Ukraine? The US doesn't really know


Blinken and Austin's visit came as the first tranche of about 50 Ukrainians will complete artillery training in a country outside Ukraine, the defense official said. Another tranche of about 50 Ukrainians will also begin training soon, the defense official said.
"The first tranche of artillery training is complete," Pentagon spokesperson John Kirby told reporters Sunday who traveled to the region with the secretaries in a briefing in Poland. "We train soldiers that will go back, and their colleagues will be able to follow and be all in on systems."

Some of the howitzers included in the most recent military assistance package for Ukraine are already in the country, the defense official said. The howitzers are expected to be effective at this stage of the war as it's shifted to the Donbas, where the terrain is suited to "long range" weaponry, Kirby said.

Kirby noted the speed with which the military assistance shipments has arrived in Ukraine and said that the decision for how to deploy the assistance is up to the Ukrainians.

"It's not taking more than 24 to 48 hours depending on what's being shipped and the availability of ground transportation to get it into Ukraine," Kirby said. "As we've said before, when (the assistance is) transferred to Ukrainian hands, it's Ukrainian property, and we are not dictating to them how fast they get it to the front line or what units get them."

Military officials described to reporters the ongoing concern among NATO countries about the threat that Russia poses to them.

"Not just here in Poland, I think many of the countries are concerned about Russia's next steps," said Lt. Gen. John Stephen Kolasheski, the commanding general of V Corps in Poland. "And are very pleased to have the US military here working side by side -- helping them develop their capabilities and capacity. ... I think they are recognizing that Russia is currently and will be a threat in the future."


 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
What Will Actually Happen if Russia Invades Ukraine?


Russian energy giant confirms suspension of gas to NATO Members Poland and Bulgaria for refusing to pay in rubles

A view of giant tubes part of one of the physical exit points and compressor gas station of the Yamal–Europe gas pipeline on February 19, in Wloclawek, Poland.

A view of giant tubes part of one of the physical exit points and compressor gas station of the Yamal–Europe gas pipeline on February 19, in Wloclawek, Poland. (Omar Marques/Getty Images)

Gazprom halted gas supplies to Poland and Bulgaria on Wednesday after both countries refused to pay the Russian energy giant in rubles, the company said in a statement.
“At the close of business on April 26, Gazprom Export did not receive payments for the supply of gas in April from Bulgaria and Poland in rubles…Gazprom has notified Bulgaria and Poland about suspending the supply of gas starting from April 27 until payments are made according to the order established by the decree,” the company said.
The "decree" refers to legislation introduced by Russian President Vladimir Putin in March, which orders gas exports to be paid for with Russia's currency.

Poland was notified of the suspension Tuesday when its national energy company PGNiG was told by Gazprom that all supplies along the Yamal pipeline would be “entirely suspended.”

In late March, Russia announced that “unfriendly” foreign nations would need to pay for their gas in rubles starting April 1, or risk being cut off. Since then, gas shipments to the bloc have largely continued until now.

 

MCP

International
International Member

German energy firm Uniper ready to meet Russian pay demand
_124344207_gettyimages-1338832197.jpg

One of Germany's biggest energy firms has said it is preparing to buy Russian gas using a payment system that critics say will undermine EU sanctions.
Uniper says it will pay in euros which will be converted into roubles, meeting a Kremlin demand for all transactions to be made in the Russian currency.
Other European energy firms are reportedly preparing to do the same amid concerns about supply cuts.
Uniper said it had no choice but said it was still abiding by EU sanctions.

"We consider a payment conversion compliant with sanctions law and the Russian decree to be possible," a spokesman told the BBC.
"For our company and for Germany as a whole, it is not possible to do without Russian gas in the short term; this would have dramatic consequences for our economy."

Germany's biggest energy supplier RWE declined to comment on how it would pay for Russian gas.

In late March, Russia said "unfriendly countries" would have to start paying for its oil and gas in roubles to prop up its currency after Western allies froze billions of dollars it held in foreign currencies overseas.

Under the decree, European importers must pay euros or dollars into an account at Gazprombank, the Swiss-based trading arm of Gazprom, and then convert this into roubles in a second account in Russia.

The European Commission said last week that if buyers of Russian gas could complete payments in euros and get confirmation of this before any conversion into roubles took place, that would not breach sanctions.

However there are different views among countries on how to interpret its initial guidance, and this week EC boss Ursula von der Leyen sparked confusion when she said firms could still be breaking the rules.

On Thursday, an EU official confirmed that any attempt to convert cash into roubles in Russia would be a "clear circumvention of sanctions" as the transaction would involve Russia's central bank.

"What we cannot accept is that companies are obliged to open a second account and that between the first and second account, the amount in euros is in the full hands of the Russian authorities and the Russian Central Bank, and that the payment is only complete when it is converted into roubles."
On Tuesday, Poland and Bulgaria both refused to pay for gas in roubles leading to Russian state gas firm Gazprom shutting off supplies.

Both countries had already planned not to renew their contracts with Gazprom when they expired later in 2022.

Poland - one of the staunchest advocates of tougher sanctions on Russia - said the EU should penalise countries that used roubles to pay for Russian gas. Climate minister Anna Moskwa singled out Germany, Hungary and Austria as resisting a gas embargo.

"We are counting on there being consequences for these countries [which pay in roubles] and that as a result they will cease paying in roubles," she said.

_123630756_optimised-russia_gas_exports-nc.png

The move by Russia - which has not given countries the same deadline to begin paying in roubles - is seen as an attempt to divide Western allies in their response over Ukraine.

The majority - 97% - of EU companies' gas supply contracts with Gazprom stipulate payment in euros or dollars.

Hungary and Slovakia have both said they will use Russia's conversion payment method, while German economy minister Robert Habeck said on Wednesday that it was "the path that the EU marked out for us".

"It's the path that is compatible with sanctions, and as far as I understand the German companies that are doing it this way are in compliance with their contracts," he said. "Most EU countries are taking this approach."

Europe gets about 40% of its natural gas from Russia, but it is much higher for some countries and sudden supply cuts could have a huge economic impact.

"A lot of European companies will say OK, we'll pay into a euro-denominated bank account and there will be a back-to-back trade so they stay within the limits of the EU sanctions," said Nathan Piper, an energy analyst at Investec.

"But there are two sides of this - those firms need to supply gas to consumers and in Germany there is no alternative to supplies of Russian gas right now."

According to the Financial Times, Austrian energy giant OMV is also planning to adopt the mechanism while Italy's Eni is considering the move.
Eni declined to comment while OMV denied it was opening a Swiss account with Gazprom. It told the BBC: "We have analysed the Gazprom request about payment methods in light of the EU-sanctions and are now working on a sanctions-compliant solution."
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
The Washington Post
The Washington Post

Western artillery surging into Ukraine will reshape war with
Russia


Dan Lamothe
Stringer/Reuters


The Western artillery flooding into Ukraine will alter the war with Russia, setting off a bloody battle of wits backed by long-range weapons and forcing both sides to grow more nimble if they hope to avoid significant fatalities as fighting intensifies in the east, U.S. officials and military analysts predict.

The expanded artillery battle follows Russia’s failed effort to rapidly seize Ukraine’s major population centers, including the capital, Kyiv. It comes as the government of President Volodymyr Zelensky and his Western benefactors brace for what is expected to be a grinding campaign in the Donbas region. The conflict there is expected to showcase the long-range cannons that are a centerpiece of Russia’s arsenal, weaponry already used to devastating effect in places such as Mariupol, a southern port city that has been pulverized by unrelenting bombardment.

Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, speaking alongside his Canadian counterpart at the Pentagon on Thursday, said long-range artillery will prove “decisive” in the next phase of the war. The Biden administration, which along with Canada is training small numbers of Ukrainian troops how to operate the dozens of 155 mm howitzers that both countries have pledged to provide, is expected to approve the transfer of even more artillery to Ukraine in the coming days, Austin said.

Pentagon chief Lloyd Austin pushes hard on Ukraine — but quietly
The U.S. and Canadian howitzers bound for Ukraine are towed on trailers, while those pledged by France — systems known as self-propelled Caesar howitzers — fire the same 155 mm explosive rounds, but from the back of a truck chassis.

The United States alone already has promised Zelensky nearly 190,000 artillery rounds, plus 90 howitzers to fire them. As of Thursday, more than half had arrived in Ukraine, said a senior U.S. defense official who, like some others, spoke on the condition of anonymity under ground rules set by the administration.

A new $33 billion request to Congress for additional Ukraine aid includes proposed funding for “longer-range artillery of a heavier caliber,” Secretary of State Antony Blinken told lawmakers on Capitol Hill, though he stopped short of identifying which specific systems are under consideration. Other allies, such as Britain and Sweden, also could send artillery, analysts said.

Ukraine uses Soviet-era weapons against Russia
To date, Russia and Ukraine have traded fire using some of the same systems, including the powerful 300 mm Smerch multiple-launch rocket system, which can shoot rounds some 55 miles, and aging 122 mm howitzers first fielded in the 1960s. The introduction of various Western artillery pieces is expected to accelerate a tactical shift by both sides to employ what is known as counter-battery fire, in which military forces seek out their enemy’s artillery, determine its location and attack, analysts said.

“You’re trying to find, fix and finish,” said George Flynn, a retired three-star Marine general and former artillery officer. “You want to find the enemy howitzers. You want to fix their position. And then you want to finish them off. That’s the essence of targeting.”

After an artillery unit attacks an adversary, it needs to keep moving, Flynn said. “Once you get into a counter-battery fight, it’s shoot and scoot,” he added. “You don’t stick around and let yourself get targeted.”


1651346478946.png 1651346824295.png

  • © Provided by The Washington Post Western artillery surging into Ukraine will reshape war with Russia

Ukraine’s ability to target Russian artillery units is especially important, analysts say, because of the Kremlin’s demonstrated willingness to lob round after round into cities and towns, destroying civilian homes and infrastructure. “Just the existence” of more Ukrainian artillery units performing counter-battery fire will degrade Russia’s ability to “sit there, pile up ammo and go to town,” said Scott Boston, a former U.S. Army field artillery officer who studies the Russian military for the Rand Corp.

“The problem” that Ukraine and its Western allies would “like to impose on the Russians,” he said, “is for them to never have confidence that a headquarters, or a key ammunition dump, or an important cluster of firing platforms, can ever be stationary for very long.”

The Pentagon on Friday assessed that Russia has not been as effective as it would like at using long-range artillery. A senior defense official noted that, as the West continues to send so much artillery to Ukraine, “this could become a bit of a gun battle.”

Artillery units often disguise themselves with camouflage or other forms of cover, and it can require a mixture of intelligence, unmanned aircraft and radar to spot them. The West is providing Ukraine with drones and counter-battery radar to do just that.
Western artillery surging into Ukraine will reshape war with Russia
© Provided by The Washington PostWestern artillery surging into Ukraine will reshape war with Russia


Zelensky also has requested some form of multiple-launch rocket artillery, such as the highly accurate M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket System, known as HIMARS, that is used by the U.S. Army and Marine Corps. Such weapons launch rounds quickly, which is useful in firing on enemy artillery forces before they reposition, said Mark Cancian, a retired Marine Corps colonel who studies the war for the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington.

Cancian, a former artillery officer, said that there “will be a lot of pressure to provide” HIMARS in the coming days and that he would not be surprised to see the United States begin supplying it soon. Another type of multiple-launch rocket system, such as the M270 operated by the U.S. Army, also could be sent, he surmised. The HIMARS is newer and moves about the battlefield more freely, while the M270 carries more rockets.

“I think there will be a lot of pressure to provide that, and since we seem to be announcing an aid package a week, I wouldn’t be surprised to see HIMARS next week or the week after,” Cancian said.

Ukrainian officials also have sought more self-propelled howitzers rather than towed weapons such as the M777. A Ukrainian official, speaking on the condition of anonymity because the issue is sensitive, said that while it appears easier to perform maintenance on and find parts for the M777 howitzer, they are more vulnerable to Russian counter-battery fire than self-propelled howitzers, like the Army’s M109 Paladin.

Cancian said he would be watching to see whether advanced, highly accurate 155 mm Excalibur rounds make it to Ukraine. The weapons are guided by GPS and designed to fly up to 25 miles, according to Raytheon, the Excalibur’s manufacturer. The Pentagon has declined to specify what types of artillery rounds are being sent.

The shipping of Western artillery into Ukraine is important partly because there are few places where Ukraine can find replacement rounds for its Soviet-era systems, said Sam Cranny-Evans, an analyst at the Royal United Services Institute in London. Poland, Bulgaria and a few other NATO allies produce them, but many more countries produce ammunition for Western weapons.

Lethal darts were fired into a Ukrainian neighborhood by the thousands
While the West has promised tens of thousands of artillery rounds to Ukraine, they may be depleted quickly, Cranny-Evans said, requiring defense contractors to ramp up production. Russia also has a significant advantage in the number of artillery pieces it possesses, and it’s unclear how many of Ukraine’s legacy systems are still operational or how much ammunition is available for them, he added.

Russian forces are using artillery to extricate themselves from Ukrainian ambushes and inflict fatalities as well as to avoid having to go “into the teeth of these very high-end Western weapons,” including Javelin and NLAW anti-armor missiles, that already have destroyed some Russian units, Cranny-Evans said.

“They’re just going to sit back and let their long-range assets to do the work because they don’t have the manpower to waste,” he said.

Canadian Defense Minister Anita Anand said in an interview that there is a role for collaboration among Western countries in providing weapons to Ukraine that are “consistent and interchangeable,” allowing Ukraine to learn the systems and maintain them when they are damaged.

“The M777s are a perfect example of the way in which allied countries with that capability can band together and respond to a desperate need that Ukraine has,” she said. “And that’s a model that we’ll continue to utilize going forward.”
The use of artillery and other weapons has been complementary in Ukraine and will continue to be, Boston said.

“If you do a good job of bottling someone up, then they’re going to be way more vulnerable to artillery than if they were dispersed and in cover,” he said. “If the Russians don’t have confidence that they can disperse because they’re going to get picked off by Javelin teams, then they might be bunching for security against that — and then be more vulnerable against artillery.”

Karen DeYoung in Washington, David L. Stern in Mukachevo, Ukraine, and Alex Horton in Kyiv contributed to this report.


Western artillery surging into Ukraine will reshape war with Russia (msn.com)
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
From: Aljazeera

Russia-Ukraine live news: Attack destroys Odesa airport runway | Russia-Ukraine war News | Al Jazeera

News|Russia-Ukraine war
Russia-Ukraine live news:
Attack destroys Odesa airport runway

Russia targets the main airport in Ukraine’s key Black Sea port of Odesa, a city so far relatively unscathed in the war.

1651371900209.png
A Ukrainian service member inspects a destroyed Russian armoured vehicle in the Zaporizhzhia region, Ukraine [Ueslei Marcelino/Reuters]


By Patrick Keddie and Zaheena Rasheed
Published On 30 Apr 202230 Apr 2022

  • Russia has carried out missile attacks across southern and eastern Ukraine, including one that destroyed the runway at Odesa airport.
  • A group of 20 civilians have left the Azovstal steelworks, where the last Ukrainian troops are holed up in Mariupol, according to the Azov regiment.
  • A Russian reconnaissance plane briefly violated Sweden’s airspace, Swedish defence officials said.
  • A Russian official told state media that the risks of nuclear war should be kept to a minimum amid conflict in Ukraine.
  • Fourteen Ukrainians including a pregnant soldier have been freed in the latest prisoner exchange with Russian forces, Ukraine says, without revealing the number of Russians returned to Moscow.

1651371999512.png
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
Russia just retaliated against the U.S.
by sanctioning Mark Zuckerberg
and Vice President Kamala Harris


Russia has sanctioned Mark Zuckerberg and Vice President Kamala Harris | Fortune

BY
JONATHAN VANIAN
April 21, 2022 1:54 PM CDT


Russia has imposed sanctions against Facebook cofounder Mark Zuckerberg, Vice President Kamala Harris, Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan, and 26 other Americans.

The country’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs announced the sanctions on Thursday, saying that the various business executives, politicians, scientists, and journalists will be “denied entry to the Russian Federation on an indefinite basis.”

The ministry said it levied the sanctions in response to the Biden Administration’s “ever-expanding anti-Russian sanctions” against an increasing number of Russian citizens.

The U.S. and several other allied countries have imposed extensive sanctions against Russia over its invasion of Ukraine. Some of the sanctions include banning Russian oil imports, partially removing the country from the SWIFT banking system, and freezing assets of Russian oligarchs suspected to have been aiding the Kremlin.

Russia’s sanctions against Zuckerberg follow earlier actions taken by the Kremlin to limit access to Facebook because of allegations that the social network was blocking access to several Russian news outlets.

Here are the 29 Americans who can no longer enter Russia:
  1. Kamala Devi Harris, Vice President of the United States
  2. Kathleen Holland Hicks, First Deputy Secretary of Defense
  3. Christopher Watson Grady, Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
  4. John Francis Kirby, Deputy Secretary of Defense, official representative of the Department of Defense
  5. Ronald Klain, White House Chief of Staff
  6. Evan Maureen Ryan, Secretary of the President's Cabinet, wife of Secretary of State E. Blinken
  7. Margaret Goodlander, adviser to the Secretary of Justice, wife of Assistant to the President of the United States for National Security J. Sullivan
  8. Douglas Craig Emhoff, husband of Vice President Harris
  9. Robert Kagan, political scientist, husband of Senior Deputy Secretary of State W. Nuland
  10. Edward Price, State Department spokesman
  11. Richard/Rachel Levine, Deputy Minister of Health
  12. Brian Thomas Moynihan, chairman and CEO of Bank of America
  13. Mark Zuckerberg (Mark Elliot Zuckerberg), co-founder and head of the board of directors of Meta (former Facebook)
  14. Kathy Warden, president and CEO, Northrop Grumann Corporation
  15. Phebe Novakovic, president of General Dynamics
  16. Michael Petters, president of Huntington Ingalls Industries
  17. William Brown, president of L-3 Harris Technologies
  18. Wahid Nawabi, president of Aerovironment
  19. Roger Krone, president of Leidos
  20. Horacio Rozanski, president of Booz Allen Hamilton
  21. Eilee Drake, president, Aerojet Rocketdyne
  22. David Deptua, head of research institute Mitchell Institute of Airspace Studies
  23. Ryan Roslansky, CEO of the social network LinkedIn
  24. George Stephanopoulos, host on the ABC television channel
  25. Matthew Kroenig, deputy director of the B. Scowcroft Center for Strategic Security NGO
  26. David Ignatius (David Reynolds Ignatius), journalist, expert at the Wilson Center
  27. Edward Acevedo, former member of the Illinois Legislature, expert at the Wilson Center
  28. Kevin Rothrock, expert at the Wilson Center, editor-in-chief of the English version of the Meduza media portal
  29. Bianna Vitalievna Golodryga, senior international analyst at CNN


. . . hmm there doesn't appear to be any BGOL names on this list :hmm:
. . . not even Cointelpro :eek2:
 

COINTELPRO

Transnational Member
Registered
. . . hmm there doesn't appear to be any BGOL names on this list :hmm:
. . . not even Cointelpro :eek2:

:lol: :lol::lol:

I have been offered citizenship in many other countries. Where the U.S. treats me like garbage and tries to detain me, I am a God like figure in other countries that is worshipped.

I am just worried about the U.S. chasing after me, I get a sense they will even though I want nothing to do with this country.
 

MASTERBAKER

༺ S❤️PER❤️ ᗰOD ༻
Super Moderator


When Russian dictator Vladimir Putin invaded Ukraine, he arrogantly expected to conquer it easily. He was wrong. Despite being badly outnumbered and completely outgunned, Ukrainian soldiers have shown extraordinary fight. And leading the resistance has been their President Volodymyr Zelensky. His transformation from former actor and comedian to hero of the free world is inspirational. As one observer put it, he's Charlie Chaplin morphed into Winston Churchill. Now he wants to talk to Australia, and he's invited us into his secret inner sanctum to explain the horror show that is this ongoing war.
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
The Only way Russia’s war in Ukraine ends
is with
Russian President Vladimir Putin dead

“This is his end,” Ukraine’s defense intelligence
chief said in an explosive interview on Monday.



The Daily Beast
Shannon Vavra
National Security Reporter

May 02, 2022


The only way Russia’s war in Ukraine ends is with Russian President Vladimir Putin dead, Kyrylo Budanov, Ukraine’s top military spy, said Monday.

“Leaving him a way to retreat is one of the strategies, but it is almost unrealistic,” Budanov said when asked if Putin could end this war alive. “He is a war criminal for the whole world. This is his end, he drove himself into a dead end.”

“Don't worry, Ukraine will win,” Budanov said, speaking during an interview The New Voice of Ukraine released Monday.

Once Putin is somehow offed—and Budanov does not offer up any potential details of how an ouster or assassination may happen—the future of Russia could go one of two paths. First, Russia could be divided into multiple parts, Budanov opined. The other option, however, could lead to the “relative preservation of the territorial integrity of the Russian Federation when changing the country's leadership,” he said.

President Joe Biden, too, has suggested that Putin should not remain in power.

“For God’s sake, this man cannot remain in power,” Biden said in remarks delivered in Warsaw, Poland, during a visit in March.

The White House sought to walk back the remarks to some extent, urging caution at assuming Biden meant Putin should be assassinated or assuming that the Biden Administration is now seeking regime change in Russia.

U.S. Secretary of State Tony Blinken has also suggested that it would be up to the Russian people to determine whether Putin would remain in power.

The comments from Ukraine’s military intelligence chief, though, come days in advance of May 9, or Victory Day, the day Russia celebrates the Soviet Union’s victory over Nazi Germany—a date which many military analysts have warned could be a key date for escalation in Russia’s war in Ukraine. Putin has harped repeatedly on his false claim that he wants to “de-nazify” Ukraine, and Victory Day could be a pivotal and symbolic moment for Putin, whose forces have been blundering their way through the war, to try to declare victory, analysts warn.

Russian forces have not been securing as many wins or moving as quickly as Putin would have liked, U.S. defense officials have said. They’ve been abandoning equipment, quitting on the spot, and stalling on roads after failing to secure the appropriate supplies to refuel. And after failing to take Kyiv, the capital, Russian forces have been retreating and regrouping to launch attacks anew in eastern portions of Ukraine in the Donbas.

And after failing to reach multiple deadlines in the war, Putin is likely scrambling for some kind of victory to bring home and tout to his country, Budanov said, adding that he is convinced Putin, for now, is planning to try to mobilize for Victory Day.

“They had the main deadline—to have time to finish by April 24 . . . they completely failed him. The second date is to complete the operation at least in Donbas by May 9,” Budanov said.

“Putin cannot admit that he is losing to Ukraine,” Budanov warned.


Ukraine’s Defense Intelligence Chief Kyrylo Budanov Says Russia’s War Will End With Vladimir Putin Dead (thedailybeast.com)
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
"Budanov warned."

Interesting phrase to end the statement with "WARNED" . . . as if to let us know maybe to expect someting "extraordinary" from Putin . . . because Putin simply cannot go out this way "Losing"? If so, what craziness could Putin engineer, as he . . . leaves us?
.
 

MASTERBAKER

༺ S❤️PER❤️ ᗰOD ༻
Super Moderator


Conflict Camera

2.03K subscribers


SUBSCRIBE
Journalist Volodymyr Zolkin interviews Nikita Ponomarov a surviving Russian 'VDV' airborne soldier on when he landed in Belarus, his first helicopter ride to Ukraine and finally his eventual capture by Ukrainian forces. Interview By: Volodymyr Zolkin #Ukraine #Russia #war
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
Vladimir Putin is on the horns
of a life-or-death dilemma


1651858516781.png

Russian President Vladimir Putin’s bizarre meeting with his defense minister on April 21 provided a smorgasbord of material for intelligence analysts trying to determine what is going on in his head. Rather than the massive 40-foot table that has separated Putin from his yes-men since the start of his war, we saw the Russian despot sitting at a diminutive table, practically knee-to-knee with Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu.

Putin has carefully cultivated an image as the macho man-in-charge. But the figure with hunched shoulders, tightly clutching the little table in his right hand, gave off a rather deflated, contrite appearance. He used this strange setting to make the odd announcement that his forces had won the battle for Mariupol and would discontinue their vicious assault against the Azovstal steel plant in the devastated city.

It may be that his new general, Aleksandr Dvornikov, famously known as the “Butcher of Syria,” had convinced Putin that his dogged efforts to eradicate the small force of intrepid defenders was a waste of resources. It would be better to declare victory and use it as an overture toward a negotiated settlement to consolidate his gains to date.

It seemed that Putin was experiencing a moment of doubt about his strategy of continuous escalation. Just as he met with Shoigu, a story broke that a Russian billionaire had called the war “insane” and pleaded with the West to provide Putin an “off-ramp.” The billionaire’s plea could well have been instigated by Putin.

Putin’s favored French presidential candidate, Marine Le Pen, lost her election bid against French President Emmanuel Macron on April 24. The same day, another Putin friend, Slovenian Prime Minister Janez Jassa, lost his bid for reelection. The very next day, Sweden and Finland agreed to submit simultaneous applications for NATO membership. The alliance against Putin’s Russia is growing larger and stronger.

The West’s economic sanctions are biting deeper into Russia’s war effort, reportedly impacting the weapon supply chain. Funds to finance the war have diminished and will likely suffer additional impacts because Germany has concluded that a full embargo on Russian oil is “manageable.” European Union (EU) countries are fashioning a potentially-crippling oil embargo that could be approved during the first week of May.

On April 26, U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin told representatives of 40 nations gathered to support Ukraine that the embattled country “can win” its war with Russia. In context with Austin’s statement that the U.S. seeks to “weaken” Russia’s military, this appears to be closer to a commitment than a mere prediction. President Biden followed up with a request for an additional $33 billion in aid for the Ukrainians. Having served as a heavy artillery officer in Vietnam, I can attest that the artillery slated for Ukrainian forces can be a game changer, provided it can get to the battlefields in time.

This cascade of adverse developments, plus chronic logistics and command problems and mysterious fires at weapons and fuel facilities in Russia, would be enough to drive an average psychopath to distraction. Add to that the fact that his oligarchs are getting restless about the future of their fortunes, as well as the dire situation of their country.

To make matters worse, many Kremlin insiders reportedly have serious concerns about Putin’s war and the long-term damage it is inflicting upon the Russian Federation. Putin is certainly aware of the unrest in his inner circle. He knows that ugly things can happen to a leader who appears to be running the country off the rails, threatening the personal interests of powerful insiders. Some reports have surfaced that Putin replaced around 1,000 Kremlin staff out of concern for his personal safety.

The Russian dictator is on the horns of a serious dilemma — either bow to the gathering strength of the coalition against him and settle for negligible gains, or stay on the path of continuing escalation, hoping to pull off a stunning battlefield victory. Since a decisive victory is a rather remote possibility, Putin’s last desperate escalatory step may be to resort to the use of tactical nuclear weapons.

Putin may soon be coming to the end of his rope. If he can’t figure a way out of the mess he created with his ego-driven war, it may be up to his old KGB cohorts to find a solution. It is quite possible that some among them will not allow him to take their country down with him.

Jim Jones is a Vietnam combat veteran who served eight years as Idaho attorney general (1983-1991) and 12 years as a justice on the Idaho Supreme Court (2005-2017). He is a regular contributor to The Hill.


Vladimir Putin is on the horns of a life-or-death dilemma (msn.com)
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
Zelensky Spells Out Key
Condition for Peace Talks
With Putin


1651965928588.png A
A FIG LEAF ?

Newsweek

May 6, 2022
BY DAVID BRENNAN


Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said on Friday that peace talks with President Vladimir Putin cannot proceed until Russian troops have retreated to their pre-invasion positions, which he said is the "minimum" that Kyiv expects.

Zelensky addressed a virtual meeting of the British Chatham House think tank on Friday, telling attendees that Ukraine wants to "regain our territories" and that his country has "a bright future," despite "the cruelty of the Russian forces."

The president said his priority is the "integrity of our borders" and the ability of all displaced people to return to their homes.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said on Friday that peace talks with President Vladimir Putin cannot proceed until Russian troops have retreated to their pre-invasion positions, which he said is the "minimum" that Kyiv expects.

Zelensky addressed a virtual meeting of the British Chatham House think tank on Friday, telling attendees that Ukraine wants to "regain our territories" and that his country has "a bright future," despite "the cruelty of the Russian forces."

The president said his priority is the "integrity of our borders" and the ability of all displaced people to return to their homes.

"I was elected by the people of Ukraine as president of Ukraine, not as president of a mini-Ukraine of some kind," Zelensky said to a question about Kyiv's conditions for a peace deal with Russia.

"This is a very important point, and I would like us to realize we need some arrangements in terms of talks to stop the killing."

"We can use diplomatic channels to regain our territories," the president said. The minimum Zelensky's government expects, he said, is to return to "the security of the situation as of the 23rd of February," one day before Russia's latest invasion.

"They have to fall back and go beyond the contact lines, and they should withdraw the troops," Zelensky said. "In that situation, we'll be able to start discussing things normally. But for them to withdraw, they have to say something and we have to start talking.

NEWSWEEK SUBSCRIPTION OFFERS >
"I realize that despite the fact that they destroyed all our bridges, I think not all the bridges are yet destroyed, figuratively speaking."

Zelensky also warned that Russian conduct in the devastated city of Mariupol—where a small number of defenders and civilians remain entrenched inside the mammoth Azovstal steel works facility—threatens the chances of any future peace deal.

The strategic port city on the Sea of Azov has been destroyed by weeks of fierce fighting. A key Russian objective, invading forces have been unable to root defenders and surviving civilians out of the Azovstal area, which is equipped with a network of Cold War-era bunkers and tunnels designed to survive nuclear strikes.

"If they kill people who can be exchanged—as POWs, or just released as civilians, or be helped as wounded or injured, civilian and military alike—if they destroy them, I don't think we can have any diplomatic talks with them after that," Zelensky said.

Those hidden in Azovstal have no access to food, medicine or other aid, Zelensky said. The United Nations has been rushing to evacuate as many civilians as possible from the area, with about 500 rescued in recent weeks.

"This is a beastly attitude," Zelensky said of Russia's siege. "Anyone would agree it's not human."

"That's how the military, the Russian military, treats people," he said. "That's inhuman treatment, of humankind...the cruelty, the sheer cruelty, the assured degrading and torture...This is not a military event. This is torturing, this is terrorism and hatred."
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
Ukraine lays out peace-talk demands
as the West braces for escalation


Zelensky says Ukraine must get E.U. membership, restoration of pre-invasion borders, Russian accountability and the return of refugees.

1651967463471.png
A Ukrainian man smokes in front a house that according to him was damaged by
shelling in Novotavrycheske village, Zaporizhzhia region, Ukraine, on May 7.
(Ueslei Marcelino/Reuters)

Washington Post
By Liz Sly

Karoun Demirjian
Timothy Bella and
Ellen Francis
May 6, 2022


RIGA, Latvia — Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky outlined his conditions Friday for entering peace talks with Russia, demanding a restoration of preinvasion borders, the return of more than 5 million refugees, membership in the European Union and accountability from Russian military leaders before Kyiv would consider laying down its arms.
Are you on Telegram? Subscribe to our channel for the latest updates on Russia's war in Ukraine.

Zelensky’s slate of requirements, which he listed during an online forum organized by Chatham House, are in direct conflict with the military objectives Russian leaders have articulated as they bear down on the Donbas region and southern Ukraine — inflicting additional casualties Friday in apparent violation of a cease-fire.

They also come as Ukraine and its Western allies await possible pronouncements or dramatic shifts on the battlefield by the Kremlin before Monday, when Russia observes Victory Day, commemorating the surrender of Nazi Germany and the end of the European front in World War II.

U.S provided intelligence that helped Ukraine sink Russian warship

New curfews have been announced in Zaporizhzhia, a Ukrainian enclave that abuts regions experiencing heavy fighting, while the mayor of Kyiv, Ukraine’s capital, warned residents to be ready for increased missile attacks on the holiday. Britain’s Defense Ministry, meanwhile, warned Friday that Russia would probably try to complete its takeover of the port city of Mariupol — where a small cadre of forces and civilians remain holed up in the Azovstal steel plant — before the Victory Day celebrations.

Russia’s Foreign Ministry dismissed speculation it might try to deploy a nuclear weapon, noting its doctrine on that point was “not applicable to implementing the tasks set during the special military operation in Ukraine.” But there were signs that Russia was taking a series of softer power steps to assert its dominance in Ukrainian areas in which it has claimed control.

Municipal workers were photographed replacing road signs around Mariupol in Ukrainian script with signs in Russian script, days after reports and images being shared online indicated that Russian authorities have forced residents of Kherson, an area just north of Crimea, to shift their currency from the Ukrainian hryvnia to the Russian ruble.
Russia has long justified its incursions into Ukraine by saying it is protecting the rights of Russian speakers in eastern regions.

President Biden is expected to mark Monday by signing the Ukraine Democracy Defense Lend-Lease Act, a bill that aims to speed up the process by which the United States can send weapons to Ukraine. That bill-signing will happen a day after Biden is scheduled to meet virtually with Zelensky and the leaders of the Group of Seven nations to discuss the situation on the ground.

Ukraine has seen an enormous influx in pledges of weapons assistance since beating back the Russian advance in the north of the country.

U.S. sends Ukraine laser-guided rockets, surveillance drones

The United States has already sent the “vast, vast majority” of the 90 howitzers it committed to provide Ukraine, as well as approximately 60 percent of the 144,000 artillery rounds it had pledged to supply those weapons systems, Pentagon spokesman John Kirby said. On Friday, Germany pledged to send an additional seven howitzer systems to help Kyiv, while U.S. officials announced they would send nearly $140 million more in aerial drones, laser-guided rockets, binoculars and other support items.

But the pipeline is not unlimited. On Friday, Biden announced that the United States would be sending another package of “additional artillery munitions, radars, and other equipment” for Ukraine, but he said the government has “nearly exhausted” congressionally approved funding that could be used to send more help. Earlier on Friday, Kirby said that the administration had approximately $250 million in drawdown authority left.

Biden has requested an additional $33 billion in Ukraine aid, nearly two-thirds of which would be dedicated to security spending. Kirby has said that package should carry Ukraine through another five months of fighting. Congress has not yet approved the funding, and there are concerns about how quickly defense contractors would be able to meet the government’s demands to replenish U.S. stockpiles to ship Ukraine what it needs.

“This is pretty unprecedented, the amount of munitions that are being used right now,” the Pentagon’s acquisition chief, Bill LaPlante, told reporters Friday. He said the United States and Europe will be “reexamining our assumptions” about future levels of weapons production needed during peacetime to avoid being caught flat-footed, “where all of a sudden we find our production lines need to be boosted up.”

International leaders appear to be bracing for an extended period of conflict, warning on Friday that the global threats posed by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine could metastasize in the weeks and months ahead. European Union foreign affairs chief Josep Borrell told the Associated Press that he is “very much worried” Russia could try to invade Moldova, which borders Ukraine to the west. Russia already has a military presence in Transnistria, a narrow breakaway region that runs along much of Moldova’s border with Ukraine.

Jill Biden arrives in Romania on trip to boost U.S. allies

Amnesty International released a comprehensive report Friday noting “compelling evidence” of war crimes in the Ukrainian village of Bucha, including “apparent extrajudicial executions … reckless shootings, and torture.” Amnesty’s senior crisis response adviser, Donatella Rovera, noted that the findings were “very much part of a pattern wherever Russian forces were in control of a town or a village.”

The United Nations warned that nearly 25 million tons of grain intended for export is stuck in Ukraine as a result of the fighting there, which has crippled infrastructure and resulted in a blockade of port cities like Mariupol.
Ukraine, normally one of the world’s largest exporters of wheat, also has accused Russia of “stealing their grain en masse” from farmers. Either way, the shortfalls in the global exports are expected to cause price shocks, according to U.N. officials, and could exacerbate resource conflicts elsewhere in the world.

Zelensky outlines demands for peace talks between Ukraine and Russia - The Washington Post
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
Why May 9 is a big day for Russia, and
What a declaration of war would mean




(CNN)Russia invaded Ukraine on February 24, and since then President Vladimir Putin has insisted that his troops are carrying out a "special military operation" instead of a war.

But speculation is growing that this could change in the coming days. Western officials believe Putin could formally declare war on Ukraine as soon as May 9, a symbolic day for Russia, paving the way for him to step his campaign.

What is May 9?
May 9, known as "Victory Day" inside Russia, commemorates the Soviet Union's role in defeating Nazi Germany in World War II.

Victory Day is marked by a military parade in Moscow, and Russian leaders traditionally stand on the tomb of Vladimir Lenin in Red Square to observe it.

"May 9 is designed to show off to the home crowd, to intimidate the opposition and to please the dictator of the time," said James Nixey, director of the Russia-Eurasia Programme at Chatham House told CNN.

Western officials have long believed that Putin would leverage the symbolic significance and propaganda value of the day to announce either a military achievement in Ukraine, a major escalation of hostilities -- or both.

The Russian president has a keen eye for symbolism, having launched the invasion of Ukraine the day after Defender of the Fatherland Day, another crucial military day in Russia.

Russian military vehicles at a parade rehearsal on April 28.


Russian military vehicles at a parade rehearsal on April 28.

Preparing for mobilization?
Putin has many options on the table, according to Oleg Ignatov, senior analyst for Russia at Crisis Group. "Declaring war is the toughest scenario," he said.

Meanwhile, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky -- who has not formally declared war on Russia -- imposed martial law in Ukraine when the Russian invasion began in late February.

Another option for Putin is to enact Russia's mobilization law, which can be used to start a general or partial military mobilization "in cases of aggression against the Russian Federation or a direct threat of aggression, the outbreak of armed conflicts directed against the Russian Federation."

That would allow the government not just to assemble troops but also to put the country's economy on a war footing.

Russian servicemen at a parade rehearsal on April 28.


Russian servicemen at a parade rehearsal on April 28.

Russian forces have lost at least 15,000 soldiers since the beginning of the war, according to Nixey, and reinforcements will be needed if Moscow is to achieve its goals in Ukraine.

Mobilization could mean extending conscription for soldiers currently in the armed forces, calling on reservists or bringing in men of fighting age who have had military training, said Ignatov.

But it would also represent a big risk for Putin.

"It would change the whole Kremlin narrative," said Ignatov, noting that the move would force Putin to admit that the invasion of Ukraine has not gone to plan. Full-scale mobilization could also damage the struggling Russian economy, he said.

In addition, it could diminish support for Putin at home, as some Russians support the invasion of Ukraine without wanting to personally go and fight, the analyst said.

"If they declare full-scale mobilization, some people wouldn't like it," said Ignatov.

It could still be possible for Putin to enact the mobilization law without officially declaring war on Ukraine, he said.

Putin could also impose martial law in Russia, suspending elections and further concentrating power in his hands, Ignatov said.
This would impose rules such as restrictions on men of fighting age leaving the country, which could also prove unpopular, he added.

On Wednesday, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said there was "no chance" Putin would declare war on May 9.

What else could happen?
If Putin doesn't declare war, he may look elsewhere to make a statement to mark Victory Day.

Other options include annexing the breakaway territories of Luhansk and Donetsk in eastern Ukraine, making a major push for Odesa in the south, or declaring full control over the southern port city of Mariupol.

There are also indications that Russia could be planning to declare and annex a "people's republic" in the southeastern city of Kherson.

"He (Putin) will be able to declare that the Russian army had some victories in Ukraine," said Ignatov. "He can try to use this date to solidify his support."

Opinion: Expect Putin to make a big announcement on May 9
Opinion: Expect Putin to make a big announcement on May 9


However it is hard to predict what Russia and its president will do, the analyst added.

"All the decisions are made by "one man" and a couple of his advisers," said Ignatov.

Yet US State Department spokesman Ned Price said Monday there is "good reason to believe that the Russians will do everything they can to use" May 9 for propaganda purposes.

"We've seen the Russians really double down on their propaganda efforts, probably, almost certainly, as a means to distract from their tactical and strategic failures on the battlefield in Ukraine," Price said at a State Department briefing on Monday.

Why May 9 is a big day for Russia, and what a declaration of war would mean - CNN
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
Nukes Hitting Ukraine Would Be
'Attack on NATO' Due to Radiation:
Sen. Graham


1652065750283.png
Republican Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina said Sunday that a Russian nuclear attack on Ukraine
would be an assault on NATO countries due to the spread of radiation. Above, Graham on May 3 at the U.S.
Capitol in Washington, D.C.WIN MCNAMEE/POOL/AFP/GETTY IMAGES

Newsweek
BY NATALIE COLAROSSI
May 8, 2022 at 1:14 PM EDT

Senator Lindsey Graham said Sunday that he believes a Russian nuclear attack against Ukraine would be an assault on nearby NATO countries due the spread of radiation.

Graham, a South Carolina Republican, made the comments while speaking about Russia's aggression on Fox News Sunday.

Russian President Vladimir Putin has repeatedly warned the West against interfering in Ukraine, and has alluded to the possibility of using nuclear weapons if tensions continue to escalate.

"If [Putin] explodes a nuclear weapon inside of Ukraine to break our will, to me that will be an attack on NATO," he said during his interview. "The radiation will go all over Europe."

Senator Lindsey Graham said Sunday that he believes a Russian nuclear attack against Ukraine would be an assault on nearby NATO countries due the spread of radiation.

Graham, a South Carolina Republican, made the comments while speaking about Russia's aggression on Fox News Sunday.

Russian President Vladimir Putin has repeatedly warned the West against interfering in Ukraine, and has alluded to the possibility of using nuclear weapons if tensions continue to escalate.

"If [Putin] explodes a nuclear weapon inside of Ukraine to break our will, to me that will be an attack on NATO," he said during his interview. "The radiation will go all over Europe."

He also said that the U.S. should do "everything in its power" to keep Russia from invading other countries, but stopped short of suggesting that American troops become involved. The senator said he fears Putin is "getting desperate" after several failed military advances.


Ultimately, the South Carolina senator said he believes NATO should expand and that Putin should be labeled a war criminal.

"NATO needs to get bigger, not smaller," he told Fox News. "If Finland and Sweden join NATO, and Europe breaks away from dependence on Russian oil and gas, and Putin is declared a war criminal, that would be the best outcome for the world writ large."

Since Russia first invaded Ukraine on February 24, the U.S. has sent billions of dollars in aid to assist with military equipment and to address humanitarian impacts of the conflict. President Joe Biden and the Pentagon have repeatedly said that while American troops will not be sent to assist in the fighting, the U.S. would be obligated to respond more strongly if Russia expands its invasion into NATO countries.

In the past several weeks, Russian state media has boasted about its nuclear capabilities, and has even suggested that European countries deserve to be targeted with the deadly weapons. Moscow also recently test-fired a nuclear-capable intercontinental ballistic Sarmat missile, also known as Satan II.

Putin said the weapon should make adversaries "think twice,"
while implying that he could use such force if Russia believes it is threatened. Other officials, including Russia's ambassador to the U.S., Anatoly Antonov, recently told Newsweek that the West is not taking Russia's nuclear threats "seriously" enough.

Nonetheless, Russian Foreign Ministry deputy spokesman Alexey Zaitsev attempted to walk back the nation's nuclear warnings this week by stating that Russia has no intention to use such weapons.

"The scenarios of our potential use of nuclear weapons are clearly prescribed in Russian doctrinal documents," he said on Friday. "Russia firmly abides by the principle that there can be no victors in a nuclear war."

Newsweek contacted the foreign ministries of both Russia and Ukraine for comment.


Nukes Hitting Ukraine Would Be 'Attack on NATO' Due to Radiation: Graham (newsweek.com)
 

COINTELPRO

Transnational Member
Registered

The war with the Soviet Union was really another type of Holocaust where they invade your country and take the land of the inferior race for settlement by Germans based on my research. The corporate media tries to portray this as a conflict when it wasn't, Germany intent was clear.

Screenshot-2022-05-10-030053.png


The reason Russia is having problems in Ukraine is because they are fighting NATO instead of Ukrainians through a proxy war. Their military is not inferior or incapable if they retreat or withdraw. Giving another country access to your technology, weaponry, and intelligence makes them equivalent to fighting the U.S. in a direct conflict.

Many people will draw the conclusion that the Russians are weak militarily due to their struggle in Ukraine and this would be foolish. Putin is going to eventually see this as a conflict with NATO and escalate since a country like Ukraine should have ben toppled in days.
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
Top U.S. Spy Spills on:
Putin’s ‘Drastic’ Secret Plan to Win War


U.S. spy chief Avril Haines has dished on the extreme measures to which Russian President Vladimir Putin might resort for a victory in Ukraine.

1652222938768.png



The Daily Beast
hannon Vavra
National Security Reporter

May. 10, 2022


The U.S. intelligence community has assessed that Russian President Vladimir Putin is prepared to dig his heels in over the war in Ukraine and let it drag on for some time—and along the way, Putin might resort to extreme measures to ensure Russia wins in the end, top U.S. spies warned Tuesday.

The next steps Putin might take include escalating domestic measures that could contribute to the war effort, such as instituting martial law, the U.S. Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Avril Haines warned in a Tuesday briefing.

“The uncertain nature of the battle... combined with the reality that Putin faces a mismatch between his ambitions and Russia's current conventional military capabilities likely means the next few months could [be] more unpredictable and potentially escalatory,” DNI Haines told senators. “The current trend increases the likelihood that President Putin will turn to more drastic means, including imposing martial law, reorienting industrial production, or potentially escalatory military actions to free up the resources needed to achieve his objectives as the conflict drags on.”

The assessment, which Haines delivered to lawmakers on Capitol Hill Tuesday, comes as Russia’s war in Ukraine enters its 76th day. Russian forces have turned their attention to taking Eastern Ukraine in recent weeks after failing to take the capital, Kyiv, in the early days of the war due to a series of logistical and planning issues.

And as the Russian military has shifted its attention to the Donbas, or eastern portions of Ukraine, the fighting is beginning to reach somewhat of a “stalemate,” the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) Director, Scott Berrier, said Tuesday.

“I would characterize it as the Russians aren't winning, and the Ukrainians aren't winning, and we’re at a bit of a stalemate here,” Berrier said.

Putin doesn’t view the Donbas as the final stand in Ukraine, though, Haines warned, suggesting that more carnage might be on the way. Putin views it as just a “temporary” focus so that the Russian military can “regain the initiative,” Haines said.
“We are not confident that the fight in the Donbas will effectively end the war,” Haines said. “We assess President Putin is preparing for prolonged conflict in Ukraine during which he still intends to achieve goals beyond the Donbas.”

The assessment that Putin might escalate comes a day after Victory Day in Russia, when Russians celebrate the victory in World War II—a day U.S. and Ukrainian officials alike had warned Putin would seize on to mobilize more troops for the war. Victory Day came and went without any public mobilization, however.

But Russians are starting to see signs that Putin might be secretly putting in the legwork to pull in more resources to make the war effort function beyond the near term, just as Haines is warning Putin has his sights set on doubling down. Moscow Metro employees have been threatened in recent days that they might be sent to the war in a possible mobilization “if there are not enough soldiers to be sent to the ‘special operation,’” one of the employees’ wives told the Coalition for Conscientious Objection to Military Service in Russia and Verstka.media, using the term Russia has been using to describe the war in Ukraine.

“At a meeting in the metro depot… all men were ordered to undergo an extraordinary medical examination for subsequent possible sending to the war in Ukraine,” she said, adding that if they disobeyed they were told they could be fired or face criminal accusations. “It was precisely and clearly stated that the leadership is obliged to allocate a certain number of people for possible sending to the war.”

The Daily Beast has not independently verified the claims.

Russia has already lost tens of thousands of troops in the invasion and for weeks has been looking for alternative sources of manpower. Russia’s been looking to Syria for more fighters, the Wall Street Journal reported, and Russia’s defense minister has said Russia is recruiting 16,000 people from the Middle East to fight in Ukraine, too.

Members of Congress have been questioning the U.S. intelligence community for weeks now about whether the Kremlin has tapped into mercenaries working for a private Russian contractor known as the Wagner Group.

Haines confirmed Tuesday the Russian government has indeed pulled Wagner in for operations in Ukraine. “We do see Wagner being used in ... Ukraine. We see that,” Haines said. “Russia deployed them effectively in Ukraine.”]

The U.S. intelligence community’s assessment that Putin intends the war to last for some time could spell disaster ahead. Putin could become more likely to make a miscalculation and resort to using nuclear weapons, Haines warned.

Putin would only “authorize the use of nuclear weapons if he perceived an existential threat to the Russian state,” she said, adding that “with tensions this high there is always an enhanced potential for miscalculation—unintended escalation.”
“There is not… an imminent potential for Putin to use nuclear weapons,” Haines clarified.


National Intelligence Director Avril Haines Warns Vladimir Putin Could Take Extreme Steps to Win Ukraine War (thedailybeast.com)
 

MASTERBAKER

༺ S❤️PER❤️ ᗰOD ༻
Super Moderator


CNN


13.9M subscribers


SUBSCRIBED



New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman and CNN's Michael Smerconish discuss the possibility of the United States engaging in a direct military conflict with Russia.
 
Top