Yup.....They Know the White Birth Rate is Bottoming Out....3.2
- Thread starter Dark19
- Start date
I dont even have children and Im like
about time they are getting back to
the STRAIGHT FAMILY....
but this society aint neva give a fuck
about the single male fathers..
ESPECIALLY THE BRUHS....
sheeeet single bruhs dont even exist...
but when we start forming Kniggatron
Its gonna be game over!!
about time they are getting back to
the STRAIGHT FAMILY....
but this society aint neva give a fuck
about the single male fathers..
ESPECIALLY THE BRUHS....
sheeeet single bruhs dont even exist...
but when we start forming Kniggatron
Its gonna be game over!!
Property taxes = homeowners. This is actually a tax break for 4+ childen. To support 10 kids in this day and age you need to be a very high earner or on public assistance. It's also for married couples only and says the children have to have been born AFTER they were married.
Black folks have the highest number of oow kids. This is a bill targeting white folk meant to encourage them to wed and reproduce young. Tax breaks don't kick in until after the fourth kid has been born.
That said, few women want to have 10 kids. Medical expenses, child care, food, clothing etc add up, and that's before you consider time and expenses for school activities, etc.
It's designed to be anti black and anti gay and for traditional Christian families.
well...we as a people need to be married before we have Kids...like I did...women need to stop fuckin broke dusties...bae
sounds very similar to what Putin implemented last year in Russia.....
nypost.com
www.bbc.com
Vladimir Putin offers Russian mothers $16K cash bonus if they have 10 children
“It was about service to the motherland,” Kristin Roth-Ey, an expert on Slavonic and East European Studies, said via the Washington Post. “(It is) obviously a conscious echo of the Stalinist past.”…
nypost.com
Russia's Putin seeks to stimulate birth rate
Russia's president announces a series of measures including benefit payments for new mothers.
www.bbc.com
#bingo
.....
while those are great point you raise... It definitely is not for us.. but
its great incentive for our young...who right now aint even thinking
about marriage.. and thats a whole other thread by itself...
My problem with the gay agenda is they always hijack our movements,
but when they had their chance in the sun, they wasnt even thinkin about
us true organic americans aka so called "african" americans..
They showed their true colors... and NOW that they are getting that push back
which is picking up steam, they are trying to play nice now...
they even hijacked our word "woke" to now mean gay tranny agenda...
its like their movement has ZERO energy unless they piggy back off of us...
that SHIT is WAAY played out...
the straw that really exposed them was.. the whole BLM hijack... the real Leaders
were murdered or jailed..
then the whole movement turned into the gay and tranny agenda....its like
they are here just to monkey wrench any progress we make... they continue
to push so hard.. especially by going after the children...
They are going to cause a push back they are not quite ready for...
They bill of course favors wight families but that doesnt mean,
we cant take advantage of it as well.
in addition to fighting for our Single Mothers and Fathers out here
holding it down..
Mostly the fathers tho because they get NO love or Govt support..
WE need to change THAT!!!
anything that supports Straight Pride Im all for it...!!!!
Which is why a shit ton of dumb unmarried peckawoods gonna be fuckin like rabbits without reading the fine print.
And after that 10th child I would love to see the look on their faces.....
They made it specifically for married couples, not single “Baby Mama’s”.
They know a large majority of Black men are not married to the mothers of their children.
So it’s obvious who is gonna profit from this.
They know a large majority of Black men are not married to the mothers of their children.
So it’s obvious who is gonna profit from this.
US births in 2022 didn't return to pre-pandemic levels
U.S. births were flat last year, as the nation continues to see fewer babies born than it did before the pandemic. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on Thursday released provisional birth data for last year.
apnews.com
"More findings from the report:
— The highest birth rates continue to be see in women in their early 30s. The number of births for women that age was basically unchanged from the year before. Births were down slightly for women in their late 20s, who have the second-highest birth rate.
— Births to Hispanic moms rose 6% last year and surpassed 25% of the U.S. total. Births to white moms fell 3%, but still accounted for 50% of births. Births to Black moms fell 1%, and were 14% of the total."
US births in 2022 didn't return to pre-pandemic levels
U.S. births were flat last year, as the nation continues to see fewer babies born than it did before the pandemic. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on Thursday released provisional birth data for last year.
"More findings from the report:
— The highest birth rates continue to be see in women in their early 30s. The number of births for women that age was basically unchanged from the year before. Births were down slightly for women in their late 20s, who have the second-highest birth rate.
— Births to Hispanic moms rose 6% last year and surpassed 25% of the U.S. total. Births to white moms fell 3%, but still accounted for 50% of births. Births to Black moms fell 1%, and were 14% of the total."
- It also may show whether births were affected by the U.S. Supreme Court decision last June overturning Roe v. Wade, which allowed states to ban or restrict abortion. Experts estimate that nearly half of pregnancies are unintended, so limits to abortion access could affect the number of births.
- If such restrictions are having an affect on births, it didn’t show up in the national data released Thursday.
- It’s possible the abortion restrictions will lead to higher births rates in 2023 — more likely among younger women than older moms, said Ushma Upadhyay, a reproductive health researcher at the University of California, San Francisco. But even if there is a rise, it may not bring the nation back to pre-pandemic birth levels, given other trends, she added.
- “I don’t know if we’ll ever get back there,” she said.
Yeah, and it is not coming back for them and they know it. But before going out the door they were going to cause havoc. Also, there appears to be a “children of men” scenario going on.US births in 2022 didn't return to pre-pandemic levels
U.S. births were flat last year, as the nation continues to see fewer babies born than it did before the pandemic. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on Thursday released provisional birth data for last year.
"More findings from the report:
— The highest birth rates continue to be see in women in their early 30s. The number of births for women that age was basically unchanged from the year before. Births were down slightly for women in their late 20s, who have the second-highest birth rate.
— Births to Hispanic moms rose 6% last year and surpassed 25% of the U.S. total. Births to white moms fell 3%, but still accounted for 50% of births. Births to Black moms fell 1%, and were 14% of the total."
Their "solution" is already in play but you're not paying attention to it.
Last edited:
That solution is not feasible and you know it
Yep because the areas with the most population is sort of in blue states. Which abortion still legal. And that last comment is correct.- It also may show whether births were affected by the U.S. Supreme Court decision last June overturning Roe v. Wade, which allowed states to ban or restrict abortion. Experts estimate that nearly half of pregnancies are unintended, so limits to abortion access could affect the number of births.
- If such restrictions are having an affect on births, it didn’t show up in the national data released Thursday.
- It’s possible the abortion restrictions will lead to higher births rates in 2023 — more likely among younger women than older moms, said Ushma Upadhyay, a reproductive health researcher at the University of California, San Francisco. But even if there is a rise, it may not bring the nation back to pre-pandemic birth levels, given other trends, she added.
- “I don’t know if we’ll ever get back there,” she said.
They're pushing back on student loan forgiveness. The housing market is going to shit, while rental prices are climbing. They're against raising the minimum wage. Food prices are steadily going up, and they want to cut government programs. And now, they expect people to want to have 4 to 10 kids in this environment. Make it make sense.
These lawmakers are usually not speaking for the common people. They have one or two kids which you can call manageable. But average families with 3 to 4 or more kids probably don't want to have that many kids anymore based on the financial, mental stress, and managing extracurricular activities that comes with having many kids. So even if they want to give you free money to have more kids, some middle class people won't take it. Especially when you consider that you must be married and stay married. It's a trap.
Now the illiterate folks and rednecks will jump at this because they never look at this from a professional family's perspective.
Now the illiterate folks and rednecks will jump at this because they never look at this from a professional family's perspective.
Similar threads
