Make a Contribution to Remove NSFW Ads

YouTube Plans To Make Conspiracy Videos Harder To Find

Big Tex said:
Unlike you cats, I follow facts. You said you never said those things, I looked back and you were right, the difference between you and me is you will moonwalk forever to prove you’re right. Like you’ll never admit I never said I believed Columbus discovered America. You’ll deflect, move goalposts, and all kinds of shit.
Click to expand...
nah you flat out lied and claim I said a bunch of s hit I never said... You actually lied about several things you claimed I said... You didn't have to check anything cause those words were never typed by me at all... Your argument is about you hating lies pushed as facts I posted that Columbus comment to show you that theory is literally in children's textbooks for decades yet you claim you love facts and try to s hit on YouTube when the public education system has also done the same with some of its info... So don't s hit on one format when there's others that actually have bigger influences on society that also push lies as facts
 
tallblacknyc said:
Do supermarkets try to hide the national enquirer when they selling it? If YouTube feel like these videos are like the national enquirer why are they putting so much energy into hiding them? That right there puts up red flags on there's a bigger reason behind this... Some of that info hitting homeruns of truth and they got that phone call to hide them
Click to expand...

There is a bigger reason behind this. They are telling the truth and the lie at the same time. There are too many crazy videos on youtube that are causing misinformation. I don't think this can be denied. There are videos that will get grouped into "borderline" videos though that shouldn't be.


respiration said:
This is not good at all.

One primary reason is that we don't know who is at the top directing this action. As we don't know who exactly is directing this action we don't know what their agenda is.

We just know the stated reason that YouTube spokespeople are giving for this action.

It's not up to them to decide what does and doesn't constitute "conspiracies".

It is up to us to know how to thoroughly research the info that we see and hear in order to discriminate between what is correct and factual and what is bullshit.

These are the beginnings of information control, one of the warning signs of a totalitarian state.
Click to expand...

I already dropped this info on BGOL in another thread already. I said Europe's ruling last fall was going to start affecting all of youtube and this new ruling is one of them. Information is going to start getting controlled through copyrights. The EU article 11 and 13 explain why and there is truth in it, but also the omission of other reasons why they implemented this.

https://www.theverge.com/2018/9/12/17849868/eu-internet-copyright-reform-article-11-13-approved


respiration said:
Absolutely.

And this is happening while President Trump's usage of the term "fake news" has turned it into an American catch-phrase.

Bear in mind that what he is calling "fake news" is really factual information that happens to be critical of him.

He daily attacks mainstream news.
Click to expand...

The timing is perfect with what Trump wants to bring on board in terms of internet policing.

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-...s-fcc-free-latest-news-ajit-pai-a8067811.html
 
tallblacknyc said:
nah you flat out lied and claim I said a bunch of s hit I never said... You actually lied about several things you claimed I said... You didn't have to check anything cause those words were never typed by me at all... Your argument is about you hating lies pushed as facts I posted that Columbus comment to show you that theory is literally in children's textbooks for decades yet you claim you love facts and try to s hit on YouTube when the public education system has also done the same with some of its info... So don't s hit on one format when there's others that actually have bigger influences on society that also push lies as facts
Click to expand...

You said I believe Columbus discovered America. You’ve said it multiple times. I told you to prove I said it. You know I didn’t. And you are just proving my post to be correct. You won’t admit I never said it. You brought in the education system, textbooks, influences on society, when the matter at hand is you proving that I said I believe Columbus discovered America.

You know it is false, yet you will still argue it. And refuse to admit you were not telling the truth. Just like I said.

Difference between you and me, I said I stand corrected. You would rather argue something you know is a lie.
 
Big Tex said:
You said I believe Columbus discovered America. You’ve said it multiple times. I told you to prove I said it. You know I didn’t. And you are just proving my post to be correct. You won’t admit I never said it. You brought in the education system, textbooks, influences on society, when the matter at hand is you proving that I said I believe Columbus discovered America.

You know it is false, yet you will still argue it. And refuse to admit you were not telling the truth. Just like I said.

Difference between you and me, I said I stand corrected. You would rather argue something you know is a lie.
Click to expand...
Actually I first posted that Columbus comment to mock you for trying to s hit on 1 format that provided misinformation and saying you blindly follow another format like it's 100 percent fact... See I can easily tell you I'm being sarcastic or mocking an individual...you on the other hand straight up lied and accused me of various bs comments... So now that we got that out of the way you happy now... Juss because a certain format has lies in it doesn't also mean it doesn't have truth in it... That goes with YouTube as well as textbooks... Both formats can have rights and wrong in them..I'm smart enough to understand that are you?
 
Big Tex said:
Lmao
Click to expand...

This guy here, will defend this shit til the end!! You have bought into the system big-time!! Unbelievable!! Rockerfeller, Mcgraw&Hill have done a number on you bruh!!! You bought the deception and swallowed it whole, never once thought about chewing,, huh??
 
roots69 said:
This guy here, will defend this shit til the end!! You have bought into the system big-time!! Unbelievable!! Rockerfeller, Mcgraw&Hill have done a number on you bruh!!! You bought the deception and swallowed it whole, never once thought about chewing,, huh??
Click to expand...

Where them facts? Who is the minister of information and prove he or she approves all media.
 
roots69 said:
Yall do know, the word conspiracy was a word invented by our boys from the cia!! That should answer all your questions!! I bet sum nut hugger is going to come in and totally agree with whats going on!! Not knowing all their doing is a form of censorship!! Wait, Ive already seen nut hugger #1 has showed his head.. He will quote cnn and msnbc word for word, watch!!! Not knowing, that they are misleading the people with a narrative that been okay by the minister of information!!
Click to expand...

I already proved you were wrong about who invented the word conspiracy. Now tell us who thw minister of information is.
 
respiration said:
This is not good at all.

One primary reason is that we don't know who is at the top directing this action. As we don't know who exactly is directing this action we don't know what their agenda is.

We just know the stated reason that YouTube spokespeople are giving for this action.

It's not up to them to decide what does and doesn't constitute "conspiracies".

It is up to us to know how to thoroughly research the info that we see and hear in order to discriminate between what is correct and factual and what is bullshit.

These are the beginnings of information control, one of the warning signs of a totalitarian state.
Click to expand...

He gets it.
 
wwetv100 said:
There is a bigger reason behind this. They are telling the truth and the lie at the same time. There are too many crazy videos on youtube that are causing misinformation. I don't think this can be denied. There are videos that will get grouped into "borderline" videos though that shouldn't be.




I already dropped this info on BGOL in another thread already. I said Europe's ruling last fall was going to start affecting all of youtube and this new ruling is one of them. Information is going to start getting controlled through copyrights. The EU article 11 and 13 explain why and there is truth in it, but also the omission of other reasons why they implemented this.

https://www.theverge.com/2018/9/12/17849868/eu-internet-copyright-reform-article-11-13-approved




The timing is perfect with what Trump wants to bring on board in terms of internet policing.

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-...s-fcc-free-latest-news-ajit-pai-a8067811.html
Click to expand...
Great relevant info.
 
Big Tex said:
I already proved you were wrong about who invented the word conspiracy. Now tell us who thw minister of information is.
Click to expand...

You havent proved anything, but you have shown you will defend this illusion by any means.. I can tell you the military, media and government are working together and you wont believe it!! Its all one big ole illusion and you cant see it!! Your minister of information are those 6 ceo's that run the media.. But you dont believe it!! Now your going to defend the media,,huh??
 
roots69 said:
You havent proved anything, but you have shown you will defend this illusion by any means.. I can tell you the military, media and government are working together and you wont believe it!! Its all one big ole illusion and you cant see it!! Your minister of information are those 6 ceo's that run the media.. But you dont believe it!! Now your going to defend the media,,huh??
Click to expand...

Let this be exhibit A. We ask for facts and you have none.
 
2 ONE 3 said:
Nigga you think every book has facts?


What about the books in the 19th century calling block people less than human to justify their experiments and everything else


You niggas might be book smart but you are dumb as fuck
Click to expand...

Nope.

But I do know I’m not believing random niggas spouting shit that have no degrees, haven’t been validated by a group of their peers and with no math, science, or factual, quantifiable evidence.

I’m not going to believe someone that says the moon is hollow without showing the math proving it’s mass, how the structure can sistain itself, and by being able to predict it’s motion based on it being hollow and how all the science about the moon up to this point is wrong.

Now, you might just take the niggas word for it. I think that’s dumb as fuck
 
Big Tex said:
Show me a youtube video about the moon landing being faked or the earth being flat that cites a peer reviewed and validated source of information.

I’ll wait.
Click to expand...
Why would you ask me to provide proof of something i never said?:hmm:

Some people need didnt types of proof to be convinced.

Some circumstantial evidence will suffice.
Some need to see hear taste and touch to believe.
Some need testimonials from independent sources and there are others that wont believe r kelly pissed on a minor and they saw it with their own 2 eyes.

Im not trying to convince you of shit. So you can wait all you want. Just pointing out your stumbling block. :beer:
 
Big Tex said:
Nope.

But I do know I’m not believing random niggas spouting shit that have no degrees, haven’t been validated by a group of their peers and with no math, science, or factual, quantifiable evidence.

I’m not going to believe someone that says the moon is hollow without showing the math proving it’s mass, how the structure can sistain itself, and by being able to predict it’s motion based on it being hollow and how all the science about the moon up to this point is wrong.

Now, you might just take the niggas word for it. I think that’s dumb as fuck
Click to expand...
:hithead:

True knowledge and wisdom does not come in formal educational system. The dumbest shit i heard all year as of jan 30 2019. Congratulations:clap:
 

SOFTWARE

CONTACT US
1-800-465-6089

i-sight-specialits-headers-culture-640x300.jpg

15 Types of Evidence and How to Use Them

Evidence comes in many forms, and even if it’s not admissible in court it can still be relevant to a case and provide valuable insight during an investigation

Understanding Types of Evidence.

The first rule is that evidence must be relevant to the investigation. If it is not directly related to the case it isn’t relevant evidence. That said, there are many types of evidence that, while not admissible in court, can be valuable to an investigator trying to reach a conclusion in a workplace investigation or other non-criminal investigation. And even some evidence that is not admissible on its own may be admissible in conjunction with other types of evidence.



1. Analogical Evidence
While not a kind of evidence you’d use in court, this kind of evidence can be useful for increasing credibility by drawing parallels when there isn’t enough information to prove something in a workplace investigation. Analogical evidence uses a comparison of things that are similar to draw an analogy.

2. Anecdotal Evidence
Anecdotal evidence isn’t used in court, but can sometimes help in a workplace investigation to get a better picture of an issue. The biggest problem with this kind of evidence is that it is often “cherry picked” to present only anecdotes that support a particular conclusion. Consider it with skepticism, and in combination with other, more reliable, kinds of evidence.

Phrases-You-Should-Never-Say.jpg



3. Character Evidence
This is a testimony or document that is used to help prove that someone acted in a particular way based on the person’s character. While this can’t be used to prove that a person’s behavior at a certain time was consistent with his or her character, it can be used in some workplace investigations to prove intent, motive, or opportunity.



4. Circumstantial Evidence
Also known as indirect evidence, this type of evidence is used to infer something based on a series of facts separate from the fact the argument is trying to prove. It requires a deduction of facts from other facts that can be proven and, while not considered to be strong evidence, it can be relevant in a workplace investigation, which has a different burden of proof than a criminal investigation.

Need a tool for tracking and reporting on your investigation and the evidence you collected? Download our free Investigation Report Template.

5. Demonstrative Evidence
An object or document is considered to be demonstrative evidence when it directly demonstrates a fact. It’s a common and reliable kind of evidence. Examples of this kind of evidence are photographs, video and audio recordings, charts, etc. In a workplace investigation, this could be an audio recording of someone’s harassing behavior or a photograph of offensive graffiti.

How to Record Digital Evidence with Camtasia Screencasting Software

6. Digital Evidence
Digital evidence can be any sort of digital file from an electronic source. This includes email, text messages, instant messages, files and documents extracted from hard drives, electronic financial transactions, audio files, video files. Digital evidence can be found on any server or device that stores data, including some lesser-known sources such as home video game consoles, GPS sport watches and internet-enabled devices used in home automation. Digital evidence is often found through internet searches using open source intelligence (OSINT).

Digital-Evidence.jpg



OSINT is one of the most efficient ways to gather digital evidence online. Search online using this comprehensive link list ofOSINT tools and resources.

Challenges of digital evidence
Collecting digital evidence requires a skillset not always needed for physical evidence. There are many methods for extracting digital evidence from different devices and these methods, as well as the devices on which evidence is stored, change rapidly. Investigators need to either develope specific technical expertise or rely on experts to do the extraction for them.

Preserving digital evidence is also challenging because, unlike physical evidence, it can be altered or deleted remotely. Investigators need to be able to authenticate the evidence, and also provide documentation to prove its integrity.



7. Direct Evidence
The most powerful type of evidence, direct evidence requires no inference. The evidence alone is the proof. This could be the testimony of a witness who saw first-hand an incident of sexual harassment in the workplace.

8. Documentary Evidence
Most commonly considered to be written forms of proof, such as letters or wills, documentary evidence can also include other types of media, such as images, video or audio recordings, etc.

9. Exculpatory Evidence
This type of evidence can exonerate a defendant in a – usually criminal – case. Prosecutors and police are required to disclose to the defendant any exculpatory evidence they find or risk having the case dismissed.

2384689.jpg



10. Forensic Evidence
Forensic Evidence is scientific evidence, such as DNA, trace evidence, fingerprints or ballistics reports, and can provide proof to establish a person’s guilt or innocence. Forensic evidence is generally considered to be strong and reliable evidence and alongside helping to convict criminals, its role in exonerating the innocent has been well documented. The term “forensic” means “for the courts”. Its use in workplace investigations is generally limited to serious cases that may end up in court.



11. Hearsay Evidence
Hearsay evidence consists of statements made by witnesses who are not present. While hearsay evidence is not admissible in court, it can be relevant and valuable in a workplace investigation where the burden of proof is less robust than in court.



12. Physical Evidence
As would be expected, evidence that is in the form of a tangible object, such as a firearm, fingerprints, rope purportedly used to strangle someone, or tire casts from a crime scene, is considered to be physical evidence. Physical evidence is also known as “real” or “material” evidence. It can be presented in court as an exhibit of a physical object, captured in still or moving images, described in text, audio or video or referred to in documents.

gun-1.jpg



13. Prima Facie Evidence
Meaning “on its first appearance” this is evidence presented before a trial that is enough to prove something until it is successfully disproved or rebutted at trial. This is also called “presumptive evidence”.

14. Statistical Evidence
Evidence that uses numbers (or statistics) to support a position is called statistical evidence. This type of evidence is based on research or polls.

15. Testimonial Evidence
One of the most common forms of evidence, this is either spoken or written evidence given by a witness under oath. It can be gathered in court, at a deposition or through an affidavit.






i-Sight-Resource-Featured-Image-Dawn-Lomer-150x150.jpg

Dawn Lomer
Managing Editor

Dawn Lomer is the managing editor at i-Sight Software and a Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE). She writes about topics related to workplace investigations, ethics and compliance, data security and e-discovery, and hosts i-Sight webinars.

Related Resources
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
"Our project manager called them the best vendor he has ever dealt with. The support he has received from the i-Sight team is amazing."
enbridge.png

gray-logo.png

1-800-465-6089
info@i-sight.com
2255 Carling Ave., Suite 500
Ottawa, Ontario
K2B 7Z5
© 2019 i-Sight
by Customer Expressions
Click to expand...


https://i-sight.com/resources/15-types-of-evidence-and-how-to-use-them-in-investigation/
 
Big Tex said:
Nope.

But I do know I’m not believing random niggas spouting shit that have no degrees, haven’t been validated by a group of their peers and with no math, science, or factual, quantifiable evidence.

I’m not going to believe someone that says the moon is hollow without showing the math proving it’s mass, how the structure can sistain itself, and by being able to predict it’s motion based on it being hollow and how all the science about the moon up to this point is wrong.

Now, you might just take the niggas word for it. I think that’s dumb as fuck
Click to expand...


So a degree in mathematics or science validates...?


:lol:


I don’t know how so many people with degrees and non degrees who have astral projected to the moon & the cosmos have had similar accounts.


Now how can that be that so many people come up with the same things? People whom never met before yet their experiences have been similar.


You would discredit all these people if they didn’t have a funky ass piece of paper on from a man made university...?


:lol:


You are bogus
 
Big Tex said:
Let this be exhibit A. We ask for facts and you have none.
Click to expand...
do you realize......that truth does not need evidence? No honestly no rhetorical trick question.

Do you understand that truth does not require evidence?

It may require evidence in order for you yo believe......but truth doesnt.

There is no evidence tomb or coffin for imhotep of egypt. Yet scholars rely on historical accounts that he existed.

So historical accounts has allways been reputable for establishing truth. Now mind you a historical "fact" still is not a fact.
 
2 ONE 3 said:
So a degree in mathematics or science validates...?


:lol:


I don’t know how so many people with degrees and non degrees who have astral projected to the moon & the cosmos have had similar accounts.


Now how can that be that so many people come up with the same things? People whom never met before yet their experiences have been similar.


You would discredit all these people if they didn’t have a funky ass piece of paper on from a man made university...?


:lol:


You are bogus
Click to expand...

Since you guys believe youtube..



How do you discredit all these people that saw a leprechaun?
 

Make a Contribution to Remove NSFW Ads
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

lightbright
The ‘Arc de Trump’: President Shows Off Plans For His Latest Grandiose D.C. Construction project... what a fucking monuMENTAL clown
Replies
5
Views
186
geechiedan
geechiedan
lightbright
Amazon Plans to Replace 500,000 People With Robots, CUTS 14,000 CORPORATE JOBS AND THEY'RE NOT FINISHED
2 3 4
Replies
115
Views
2K
kidmegaii
kidmegaii
lightbright
The test for U.S. citizenship is about to get harder
Replies
1
Views
68
lightbright
lightbright
lightbright
I Tested Every Find My Card with Wireless Charging
Replies
2
Views
68
lightbright
lightbright
playahaitian
WTF?!? They’re using AI to make videos of Black women yelling about their EBT cards on Tik Tok
Replies
7
Views
73
playahaitian
playahaitian
Back
Top