WTF! Obama and Freemasonary!

[Bain316]

Obama, Freemason, Related
To Both Bush, Cheney
By Leo Zagami
2-13-8


Obama outlines his ambitious geopolitical plans in a recent essay for Foreign Affairs magazine. Foreign Affairs is published by the Council on ForeignRelations, which describes itself as a non-partisan group of which he is a member. Established in the 1920's and headquartered in New York, its membership includes prominent politicians and business elite, including heads of academia and media. The organization seeks to centralize both political power and market power to craft legislation outside the checks and balances of democracy.

The CFR is rarely mentioned by the mainstream media... Obama is also a 32nd degree Prince Hall Freemason loyal to the Craft and devoted to his principles so forget about the "changes" and start thinking about the same old , same old , coming once again into power.

Obama is illuminati aristocracy. his appearence from 'nowhere', and subsequent rocket to the front of the political line are no coincidence. Believe it or not, Barack Obama is related to both President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney as you can check here: http://www.nypost.com/seven/10172007/news/regional
news/dissing_cousins__obama__cheney.htm

So, the possible scenario is that Hillary might become the Vice President of Obama at the end of this political show , but in any case let's enjoy what the American call Democracy a good show in the hands of the usual suspects , and remember America the Pope is coming with His Blessings this spring..ha..ha....and make sure Brother Obama doesnt miss his Zionist masonic meetings as he would love to be the main actor in the reconstruction of the Temple of Solomon in Jerusalem.

Maybe the next AntiChrist to hit the US presidential scene will be darker then some people have expected.

http://www.rense.com/general80/obmw.htm

 

[Bain316]

The Duvalls are Obama's great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-grandparents, and Cheney's great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-grandparents, the paper said.

George W. Bush and Obama, meanwhile, are 10th cousins once removed - linked through a 17th century Massachusetts couple, Samuel Hinckley and Sarah Soole, according to the Sun-Times.



http://www.nypost.com/seven/10172007/news/regionalnews/dissing_cousins__obama__cheney.htm

 

[Bain316]

he barrage against "Barack"

Sen. Barack Obama has already faced tiresome media scrutiny about his last name ("Obama" evokes Osama!) and his middle name ("Hussein" evokes Saddam!), so it was only a matter of time before his first name got the once-over. Even though David Wallis of Slate described "Barack" as "unfamiliar but innocuous" and hence the least problematic of his three names, now comes some fresh nonsense claiming that Obama has been somehow duplicitous in explaining the origins of his given name. The charge was aired by Mike Allen, former White House correspondent for Time who was recently snapped up by a new online magazine called The Politico. On Feb. 10, Allen published a piece entitled "Undoing Obama: Inside the Coming Effort to Dismantle A Candidate," which warns Obama that his "free ride is ending" and that he is about to "endure a going-over that would make a proctologist blush." So what's the very first question that Allen says Obama will have to answer?

Why has he sometimes said his first name is Arabic, and other times Swahili?

Further down, Allen elaborates on the question:

Even his name offers fodder for the critics. When he was growing up, his family, friends and teachers called him "Barry." Then as a young man, he started insisting on "Barack," explaining in a memoir published in 1995 that his grandfather was a Muslim and that it means "blessed" in Arabic. His dad, who was Kenyan, had gone by "Barry" -- probably trying to fit in when he came to the States, his son figured. On the campaign trail during his 2004 Senate race, Obama told reporters that "Barack" was Swahili for "blessed by God."

Is this really the best that Obama's opponents can do? And shouldn't a seasoned political reporter like Mike Allen have done just a little bit of legwork to investigate this alleged inconsistency? Many voices in the blogosphere, such as Brad DeLong, Matthew Yglesias, and The Poor Man, pounced on Allen's story to make a very simple point: there is no inconsistency in Obama's interpretations, since "Barack" is rooted in both Arabic and Swahili. Swahili has an enormous number of loanwords from Arabic, and "Bara(c)k" is pretty obviously one of them. It's derived from the Arabic triliteral B-R-K (برك), the morphological basis for many words having to do with the act of blessing. Commenting on Crooks and Liars, bulbul (one of the erudite regulars in Languagehat's comment section) provides this helpful background:

I'd venture a guess and say that Obama's name comes from "baaraka" (بارك), a III. form verb which most often crops up in the phrase "baarak(a) Allaah fiik" (بارك الله فيك) meaning "may God bless you" or even "thank you". My Swahili dictionary lists "barak(a)" as a noun meaning "blessing, prosperity, abundance".
The Arabic for "blessed" is "mubaarak" (مبارك), as in the surname of the Egyptian president.
So to recap: Barak Obama's first name is both Swahili (as it is a part of Swahili lexicon) and Arabic (since it is Arabic by origin).

Some of the critics of Allen's piece could stand to do a little linguistic research too. Matt Stoller on MyDD claims that "Swahili and Arabic are extremely similar languages because of millenia of trade between East Africa and the Middle East." Similarly, The Daily Background posits that "Swahili is very similar to Arabic (in fact the former evolved out of the latter)." Swahili and Arabic are in different, unrelated language families, and any similarities derive strictly from Arabic borrowings into the Swahili lexicon. Meanwhile, Media Matters admirably links to the Kamusi Project, a (defunct) Swahili dictionary project at Yale, but misreads the entry for barak(a). Bariki is not the Arabic root, as Media Matters claims, but is rather one of the related Swahili words listed in the entry (kibaraka and tabaruki are also listed).

Journalistic silliness over Obama's first name is nothing new. Back in July 2004, when Obama was first running for Senate, Jim Geraghty of the National Review Online was already depicting him as the Democrats' dream candidate:

Before ducking off from the press scrum, Obama took a moment to explain that his first name is Swahili, and means "one who is blessed by God." It also relates, through Arabic and Semitic roots, to the Hebrew baruch, which means "blessed."
An African-American Senate candidate who can speak a little Hebrew? Could focus groups have come up with a better candidate for a diverse America?

Arabic barak(a) is cognate with Hebrew baruch, so Obama can "speak a little Hebrew"? I'm hoping Geraghty was just joking about that. But if questions linger about the origins of "Barack," I wouldn't be surprised if Obama defuses the doubters by pointing out the shared Semitic root of baruch. Along the same lines, the New York Times recently reported on an imam and a rabbi in Minneapolis who jointly teach lessons on the kinship between Arabic and Hebrew, "using etymology as a symbol of a shared Abrahamic heritage." That sounds like a refreshing application of etymological understanding, and a welcome antidote to divisive arguments about language, culture, and religion.

[Update, 2/14: See this follow-up post for various reader comments and questions.]

http://72.14.205.104/search?q=cache...mology+barak&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=2&client=safari

 

[Bain316]

The whole Antichrist shit is B.S. However, every US president is related to the Queen and European Monarchy or the elite. There are powerful people behind him such his economic adviser the zionist. To sum it all, we really don't have a choice in elections. If he deviates from the CTF plans he may pay for it just like the Kennedies. Clinton, and Mccain are all the same wolves in sheep clothing.

 

[smokedacane]

 

[Bain316]

I feel you on that one.

 

[Ming Fei Hong]

The whole Antichrist shit is B.S. However, every US president is related to the Queen and European Monarchy or the elite.

Thanks to slavery, so is everybody on the board.

 

[sirwoodz]

man i use to be deeeeeeeep into this shit in college and let me say this...if u wanted to, the way most of these little "conspiracy pyramids" are set up, you can tie anybody to just about anything.

 

[smokedacane]

Thanks to slavery, so is everybody on the board.

I have no idea of knowing whether or not this is absolutely credible. Buuuuuut If this is true, you don't find it strange at all that every U.S. President that has ever been were all related to European Royalty?


The chance that this is mere coincidence is astronomically impossible but also insinuates that only a select group of people are able to become President.

 

[Bain316]

Thanks to slavery, so is everybody on the board.

I disagree cause that in possible for all of us to be related to the illuminati elite or the Queen or Monarchy in general.
As far as servitude europeans peasants who came to the free world- YES! just regular europeans.

 

[Dert Bagg]

I have no idea of knowing whether or not this is absolutely credible. Buuuuuut If this is true, you don't find it strange at all that every U.S. President that has ever been were all related to European Royalty?


The chance that this is mere coincidence is astronomically impossible but also insinuates that only a select group of people are able to become President.

...i know...i know...but I have to:

What are the odds?
What does it take to be European Royalty?
And what really are the percentages of European descendants who are not related distantly to some one with a claim to European "royalty?"

 

[thetipisthick]

Thanks to slavery, so is everybody on the board.

 

[Bain316]

I have no idea of knowing whether or not this is absolutely credible. Buuuuuut If this is true, you don't find it strange at all that every U.S. President that has ever been were all related to European Royalty?


The chance that this is mere coincidence is astronomically impossible but also insinuates that only a select group of people are able to become President.

Every election they seem to publish genealogy reports of all most viable candidates. The "illuminati and masonic history of th forefathers in itself is peculiar and coincidental in itself. Barack was a superstar before running.

 

[Nok17]

I have no idea of knowing whether or not this is absolutely credible. Buuuuuut If this is true, you don't find it strange at all that every U.S. President that has ever been were all related to European Royalty?


The chance that this is mere coincidence is astronomically impossible but also insinuates that only a select group of people are able to become President.

lincoln,kennedy,nixon - not freemasons and I guess 1 lived

 

[Bain316]

...i know...i know...but I have to:

What are the odds?
What does it take to be European Royalty?
And what really are the percentages of European descendants who are not related distantly to some one with a claim to "royalty?"

Remember they were inbreds so they kept the marrying into different families or siblings. The occurance is still less.

 

[ArsenalCannon357]

2 b 1 .....

 

[smokedacane]

...i know...i know...but I have to:

What are the odds?
What does it take to be European Royalty?
And what really are the percentages of European descendants who are not related distantly to some one with a claim to European "royalty?"

What are the point of these questions, really? They seem to have no real purpose other than to just say something for the sake of saying something.


All I'm saying is that it's impossible for this to be a mere coincidence if it's true. Any rational person would come to the same conclusion.


You can't sit here and tell me (if any of this info is actually true) that there is nothing peculiar about every President who has served a term in office has genetic ties to European Royalty.

 

[Nok17]

l0l? Obama & George Bush are 11th cousins and Obama & Cheney are 9th cousins.

OH SNAP?

 

[Zero]

 

[Bain316]

 

[PainInDAss]

I have no idea of knowing whether or not this is absolutely credible. Buuuuuut If this is true, you don't find it strange at all that every U.S. President that has ever been were all related to European Royalty?

The chance that this is mere coincidence is astronomically impossible but also insinuates that only a select group of people are able to become President.

they're related to Royalty becuase that's been their role since the beginning of the U.S.

what do you think Washington was?

the only president who was poor was Andrew Johnson and that in the late 1700s everybody else has made more than average money.
how many fools in your neighborhood aspire to become president other than CEO of a make-shift/make-pretend record company?

You have to have that drive to be a leader and most of these people do.

Everybody's related to africa so I don't know where the fuck you're coming from with this bullshit. stop with this nonsense already.

 

[Brown Bear]

...i know...i know...but I have to:

What are the odds?
What does it take to be European Royalty?
And what really are the percentages of European descendants who are not related distantly to some one with a claim to European "royalty?"

Well, I got an email stating that I had won the UK National Lottery the other day....
Said all they needed was my name, DOB, Social Security #, and a valid Credit card, with correct password. To verify I am who they think I am....

Funny thing is, I don't even remember ever entering into their lottery

 

[Nok17]

Two curious political relationships of Senator Barack Obama came to light last month in The Chicago Sun-Times: he is an 11th cousin to President Bush, and a 9th cousin once removed to Vice President Dick Cheney. The Bush-Obama ancestors are Samuel and Sarah Soole Hinckley of 17th-century Massachusetts, The Sun-Times wrote; the Cheney-Obama ancestors are Mareen and Susannah Duvall, 17th-century immigrants from France.

The story sent new ripples through the political world last week when Lynne Cheney repeated Mr. Obama’s link with her husband in a television interview promoting her new book. It’s not as if Mr. Bush and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad were found to be identical twins separated at birth; still, the genealogy was incongruous.

But the Bush-Obama-Cheney nexus means rather less than it may seem. Conventional genealogies conceal how rapidly genes get diluted down the generations. You inherit directly only half of your father’s genes, a quarter of each grandfather’s, an eighth of any great-grandfather’s. And with ancestors much further back, you may share no more genes than you do with a random stranger met in Times Square.

That may be why many people cannot trace their family tree very far back: perhaps intuitively, they realize they don’t share much, genetically speaking, with those distant forebears.

Tracing ancestry through the father’s surname, a surrogate for the Y chromosome, may seem absurd given that the Y carries just 70 of the 25,000 or so genes in the human genome. But the compilers of Burke’s Peerage could be engaged in a quest less ludicrous than it might sound. In in-bred populations like Europe’s nobility, just as in isolated villages, everyone dips from the same little gene pool. In such cases, you inherit only half of your father’s genes directly, but of the half that got left on the cutting-room floor, some may have come to you via your mother, who shared them with your father via a joint ancestor.

But in out-bred populations, like that of the United States, where people generally marry people who are not related to them in any known way, genes get diluted really fast. Mr. Obama probably inherited a minute fraction — one divided by two to the 11th power — of Mareen Duvall’s genome, which would amount to less than one gene, assuming the Y chromosome was not inherited. Much the same would be true of Mr. Cheney. The chance that they inherited the same one gene is vanishingly small. So the fact of their genealogical relationship, whatever its political symbolism, is genetically meaningles

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/21/weekinreview/21basic.html

 

[Bain316]

Bruce Harrison, founder of the Waikoloa[, Hawaii]-based Family Forest Project, says he found links between the Democratic senator from Illinois and Presidents George Washington, James Madison, Harry Truman and Jimmy Carter.

Apparently the common ancestor is one Lawrence Washington, an English wool merchant born circa 1500. Lawrence is Obama's great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandfather on his mother's side. Lawrence was George Washington's great-great-great-great-great grandfather on his father's side. In addition to four presidents, Stanton reports, Lawrence Washington's descendants include Gen. George S. Patton, Adlai Stevenson, and Quincy Jones.

Stanton neglects to tell readers that this Obama ancestor built the
Washington family estate in Oxfordshire, Sulgrave Manor, on land that King Henry VIII confiscated from the Catholic Church. She also neglects to point out that, according to the same genealogical database, George Washington is President George W. Bush's 11th cousin eight times removed, and that Dubya may be "at least a 79th great-grandson of the famous King Solomon of the Bible, whose name is synonymous with great wisdom." Talk about regression to the mean!

http://www.slate.com/id/2159260

 

[ShortyCumStain]

What are the point of these questions, really? They seem to have no real purpose other than to just say something for the sake of saying something...

Don't mind him, you know that man lost. Anyways, continue w/the enlightenment...

 

[smokedacane]

they're related to Royalty becuase that's been their role since the beginning of the U.S.

uuuuuuuh huh?

What is their role?


That there can only be Presidents with genetic ties to European Royalty? Are you kidding me?.....sounds like a Monarchy to me, but since it's their 'role' I guess it's fine

how many fools in your neighborhood aspire to become president other than CEO of a make-shift/make-pretend record company?

Is there supposed to be a defining point to your statement?

Everybody's related to africa so I don't know where the fuck you're coming from with this bullshit. stop with this nonsense already.

Stop with the madness? More than half of your rebuttal made no sense and failed to make a prevailing point.

 

[delock]

lincoln,kennedy,nixon - not freemasons and I guess 1 lived

Lincoln was one...

Kenned wanted to be 1

2 b 1 .....

ask 1!

 

[Zero]

Damn

Folks are paranoid because dude might be Solomon's cousin 10,234 removed. Shit, EVERYBODY is EVERYBODY's cousin if you go back far enough.

 

[sharkbait28]

 

[Zero]

uuuuuuuh huh?

What is their role?


That there can only be Presidents with genetic ties to European Royalty? Are you kidding me?.....sounds like a Monarchy to me, but since it's their 'role' I guess it's fine








Is there supposed to be a defining point to your statement?





Stop with the madness? More than half of your rebuttal made no sense and failed to make a prevailing point.

What if John McCain wins?

 

[Dert Bagg]

What are the point of these questions, really? They seem to have no real purpose other than to just say something for the sake of saying something.


All I'm saying is that it's impossible for this to be a mere coincidence if it's true. Any rational person would come to the same conclusion.


You can't sit here and tell me (if any of this info is actually true) that there is nothing peculiar about every President who has served a term in office has genetic ties to European Royalty.

It would be peculiar by definition, if it was in fact statistically rare for people of European descent to be distantly related to members of European royalty.

And that has assumes that this claim that "all presidents" fit the description is proven (or even provable).

It sound like bull...
I'd be more with you if American Presidents all had a distant relative in the Chinese Royal family....but Europeans related to Europeans without further demographic data is just another iffy claim...

 

[ARDMORESTAR]

 

[Bain316]

Lawrence Washington the grandpa of George Washington has a another candidate that's great grandson: Mcain
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Washington_(1602-1655)

You can see the resemblance Obama has with his greats...

 

[Ming Fei Hong]

I disagree cause that in possible for all of us to be related to the illuminati elite or the Queen or Monarchy in general.
As far as servitude europeans peasants who came to the free world- YES! just regular europeans.

[sarcasm]Yeah, you're right... There's no way an 'elite' White person would raw dog a peasant or slave.[/sarcasm]

 

[Nok17]

Hillary, Bush, Kerry, Al gore and Queen Elizabeth II share the same bloodline as well [hide] amd i'm not being sarcastic [/hide]

Hillary Rodham Clinton, and Barbara Pierce Bush (Dubya's Mom), are both 8th Great Granddaughters of Robert Lovering, born 06 Sept 1620 in Boston, Massachusetts.

Robert Lovering is the 4th Great Grandson of Margaret De Clare, who was born 1281 in Thomond, Connaught, Clare, Ireland. Margaret De Clare is also the 8th Great Grandmother of Queen Elizabeth II.

Margaret De Clare is a direct originator of a bloodline that includes Hillary Rodham Clinton, George W. Bush, and Queen Elizabeth II.

http://msn.ancestry.com/landing/strange/bush4/tree.htm

http://www.rstolley.org/london001025.html