Women Accuse Cain

This fourth women that is claiming sexual harassment isn't sexual harassment under the law. She wasn't an employee of the National Restaurant Association when this occurred, she had lost her job and wasn't working. She wasn't interviewing for a position. If a women needs a jump on her car, and I request sex for my help, that isn't sexual harassment.

She approached him for help looking for a job, he made a ill-timed sexual advance tied to helping her. This approach might have worked with other women that consented to sex. This story should not have been reported by the media, the other candidates are smearing him to get the nomination...

:smh::smh::smh:

Bialek's "allegations":

"I met him in the lobby of a bar somewhere and met Mr. Cain and he asked me if I liked my room, which was normal. Mr. Cain then smirked and said I “upgraded you”. Mr. Cain and I then went to an Italian restaurant and we had dinner. Cain asked me why I was there and what I wanted and I told him that I wanted my job back. Cain said I will look into that”.

Cain reached under my dress to touch my genitals and then put his head on my chest. I told him that I have a boyfriend and he said

“You want a job right?”.




Sexual Harassment

It is unlawful to harass a person (an applicant or employee) because of that person’s sex. Harassment can include “sexual harassment” or unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical harassment of a sexual nature.

Harassment does not have to be of a sexual nature, however, and can include offensive remarks about a person’s sex. For example, it is illegal to harass a woman by making offensive comments about women in general.

Both victim and the harasser can be either a woman or a man, and the victim and harasser can be the same sex.

Although the law doesn’t prohibit simple teasing, offhand comments, or isolated incidents that are not very serious, harassment is illegal when it is so frequent or severe that it creates a hostile or offensive work environment or when it results in an adverse employment decision (such as the victim being fired or demoted).

The harasser can be the victim's supervisor, a supervisor in another area, a co-worker, or someone who is not an employee of the employer, such as a client or customer.​





http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/types/sexual_harassment.cfm


 

Bialek's "allegations":

"I met him in the lobby of a bar somewhere and met Mr. Cain and he asked me if I liked my room, which was normal. Mr. Cain then smirked and said I “upgraded you”. Mr. Cain and I then went to an Italian restaurant and we had dinner. Cain asked me why I was there and what I wanted and I told him that I wanted my job back. Cain said I will look into that”.

Cain reached under my dress to touch my genitals and then put his head on my chest. I told him that I have a boyfriend and he said

“You want a job right?”.




Sexual Harassment

It is unlawful to harass a person (an applicant or employee) because of that person’s sex. Harassment can include “sexual harassment” or unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical harassment of a sexual nature.

Harassment does not have to be of a sexual nature, however, and can include offensive remarks about a person’s sex. For example, it is illegal to harass a woman by making offensive comments about women in general.

Both victim and the harasser can be either a woman or a man, and the victim and harasser can be the same sex.

Although the law doesn’t prohibit simple teasing, offhand comments, or isolated incidents that are not very serious, harassment is illegal when it is so frequent or severe that it creates a hostile or offensive work environment or when it results in an adverse employment decision (such as the victim being fired or demoted).

The harasser can be the victim's supervisor, a supervisor in another area, a co-worker, or someone who is not an employee of the employer, such as a client or customer.​





http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/types/sexual_harassment.cfm




:lol::lol::lol:

I see your point, It is unclear if she was an applicant or asking for Cain to pressure somebody to hire her over other qualified candidates which isn't right.

She wasn't interviewing for a particular position; and therefore wasn't an applicant. It looks like she needed inside help from Cain in getting selected over other applicants. She could have gone to the HR department to see about available positions or look online.

It looks like the decision to hire was going to be from somebody beneath him, she was going to use Cain to pressure that person to hire her. She should have gotten in line like everybody else to get the position.

Women trade sex or withhold for gifts or money all the time, why can't men in an non-employment situation.

Some men don't want to talk to their food (do you talk to your lunch?), they want to take down their prey immediately, get into their 'purse'.

:lol
 
Last edited:

Not to dispute your point, but to add a few comments to ponder:

. . . It is unclear if she was an applicant or asking for Cain to pressure somebody to hire her . . .

She said, "I want my job back" - - is that not an application, though informal ???

She wasn't interviewing for a particular position; and therefore wasn't an applicant.
"My job back" is not particular (though particular job is probably not a requirement) ???


It looks like she needed inside help from Cain in getting selected over other applicants. She could have gone to the HR department to see about available positions or look online.
Cain was the "Top Dog" wasn't he ???


It looks like the decision to hire was going to be from somebody beneath him, she was going to use Cain to pressure that person to hire her.

Again, was Cain not the "HNIC" ??? Ultimately, his call. And, (if we believe her version of the facts) didn't he appear to make re-employment conditioned upon her sexual cooperation? - i.e., "You want a job right?"


Women trade sex or withhold for gifts or money all the time, why can't men in an non-employment situation.
Men do, all the time (in non-employment situations). But, arguably, this isn't a non-employment situation - - but even if it isn't, its pretty close (if not in fact) criminal, isn't it ? ? ?

Free Advice: persons who are in positions to make or influence employment decisions (hiring, promotion, termination, etc.) would be well advised to steer well clear of decisions based, dependent or having the appearance of being dependent or based on sex.
 
<blockquote>Herman Cain's wife — Gloria Cain cancels her scheduled Nov. 4th 2011 appearance on <s>FOX</s> FAKE News. She still might appear on <s>FOX</s> FAKE News at some point in the future — but one might not expect to see or hear from her for a while.

</blockquote>


Herman Cain: Yes, My Wife Is A Democrat


jlIaJoDg3Y8Kk.jpg


I am surprised, no wonder she doesn't accompany him on the road

http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/11/herman-cain-yes-my-wife-is-a-democrat.php
 

Herman Cain: Yes, My Wife Is A Democrat


jlIaJoDg3Y8Kk.jpg


Damn :eek:

You've done it now muckraker. :lol:

There's just no way in hell the Republican Party is going to allow this guy, under these circumstances, with his various contradictions to Conservative dogma -- who is married to a Democrat! -- to claim the Republican nomination.


no_way_sign12669.JPG






 
Back
Top