With all the talk of superteams in the NBA, which Big Three would you take?
- Thread starter Mask
- Start date
Exactly. They have 4 guys that are the top 10-15 players in the league. That's some ol' Boston in the 50's type shit. When ninjas worked in factories during the offseason lol.
Man think about this, they 3 (CheatCode, KD, MoufStayWideOpen)have players that's top 2 at there slot and another that maybe top 4(Klay)
I view Green as a spark plug high energy player. Normally those players are role players/bench payers but this dude run the offense and anchor the defense. I also feel cheatcode is a high energy player. They have one in the front court and in the back court whom they run the offense thru.
That's just my views...nothing to take to the bank just my thoughts that don't mean shit
Didnt mean to sound like I was questioning your wisdom Sir.... I was simply going ask you, since those try have inconsistent jump shots, while you are locking teams up... Who is going to score for you? Games will br 50-47 Sir. Please offer wisdom... Thanks
Totally agree big fella
Word. And you can make a reasonable argument that Klay is better than Steph and/ or that he's the best 2 in the league when you talk about his size, defense, mental toughness and defensive ability.
No one in their right minds will argue that Klay is better than Steph... I mean Klay may have better games (especially when hot) and may have better match ups vs certain teams, but for the most part Klay feeds off the attention given to Steph a lot more than the other way around..
Klay is a more complete player and the more versatile. The things that Curry does, are more highlight-reel Worthy and get more media attention. Anyone that understands the game, and the nuances of what makes a complete player will know that Klay is overall a better player than Steph. a casual fan who primarily focuses on ESPN highlights, would argue Curry is better
I don't think they were good offensively. They believed in the system they was running. Set plays and stuff, but I always thought their offense was a struggle. Seems like they have to work too hard at times. Probably because Rondo was such a non-threat shooting the ball.
Warriors are cocky? Green is sure. Don't know about the whole team.
Everybody I named gonna score points
U forgot jimmy a 20+ppg scorer
Wade already been a SCORING LEADER
And bosh getting his 20
ALL WHILE LOCKING NIGGAS UP
So far in preseason the Warriors are doing what I said they would do, that is having problems getting shots for the big three and to make matters worse Green numbers are way down..
Now if it were up to me I would have Curry take more shots because I don't care what you say about Klay nobody on that team is harder to stop than Curry...
Anytime you play the Warriors and you hold Curry to under 24 then you have to love your chances of winning, regardless of what Thompson does, so if their plan is to get rid o cheat code mode by taking the ball out of Curry's hand, then I am warning them its only making things that much more easier for the opposing defense...
Respect Sir
On paper snicks lookin real good..
Jeff need to like Jennings start and Rose play SG.. Have Lee come off the bench
Could be which makes the dubs so deadly, who's struggles shooting
Shit very
Not anymore cocky than that Heat team people loved.
Is it because they celebrated before the shot went in? I think that's dope as hell to have that much confidence.
After being spanked by them
Now me calling them cocky ain't like when most folks call them that. I'm a fan of basketball first and players next.
I don't have a problem with nothing cheatcode and his band of noise makers do. They talk shit, they let folks talk shit too them, they back up the shot they talk, they want folks to back up the chatter, they about embarrassing you at high levels.
So just because I say cocky don't mean I'm a hater.
Cheatcode's 2011 jersey was my second jersey behind Lebron's 2009 or 2010 allstar game.
87 Lakers. Kareem, Magic, Worthy or 86 Celtics: Bird, McHale, Parrish
Yea I'd leave the shit like it was... KD you in Barnes slot so you getting his looks which we're great touches.
The Warriors big 3 plays zero defense. They will win though because 3's love them like a ho loves money.
I would have adjusted the team by adding more rebounders and gritty two way players, but to throw away your bench (one of the best benches in the NBA) in favor of another shooter in a already shooting rich team... I don't know, maybe it will work our for them, and if anything they will be exciting to watch, but you know me I am not swayed by glitz and glam I like hard nose team ball and would rather stick with team chemistry rather than having a team that needs to run you out the gym to win..
Whats going to be interesting is clearly the Warriors and the Cavs are the two best teams in the NBA, but this time around the Cavs are going to have a much deeper bench vs the Warriors who on paper has the most talent, so our finals may come down to superior talent with no bench vs depth and great talent..
the crazy thing is if okc wasn't cheap kd, westbrook, and harden would've easily been on this list..okc had the nail in the coffin as far as creating a dynasty team thru the draft..they had 1 job to do and failed
They play great transition defense are good at fucking with your passes and rotating from the strong to the weak side, but if you have a typical balanced half court set team, than forces them to play one on one, then their flaws pop up, good thing for them most of the teams in the west don't have the team to exploit their flaws on defense..
Bruh.... Stop posting Please...
For you to say that, shows either you just got out, OR you are a casual fan... Especially saying Klay plays no defense...
Stop it, please...
Would it be a fail if they don't go 82-0? Because you see what they did last year minus DurantPeace,
This new Dubs team is going to DESTROY the rest of the league.
Would it be a fail if they don't go 82-0? Because you see what they did last year minus Durant
I don't think you can define the success or improvement of a team based on that... Too many factors, injuries, how the coach plays the players. If they are 20 games up in first place by game 70 I'm sure Kerr will not play the core the same amount of minutes he would normally, so if they lose 7 of the last 10, that in no way can say this team is less dominant. I think you have to gauge the entire body of work in defining improvement...
Would it be a fail if they don't go 82-0? Because you see what they did last year minus Durant
their incentive will be a chip not most regular season wins which they already claim
Peace,
They're going 70-12 and winning the chip. They've already got the regular season record, so they don't care about that anymore. And they're DEFINITELY going to rest players at the end of the season when they've got shit wrapped up.
Would it be a fail if they don't go 82-0? Because you see what they did last year minus Durant
They're going 70-12 and winning the chip. They've already got the regular season record, so they don't care about that anymore. And they're DEFINITELY going to rest players at the end of the season when they've got shit wrapped up.
Similar threads
- Poll
