Why Did Heist Get banned?

1z359xy.jpg


...or is that one of those self titles

that he crafted under his name?

He hasn't posted in a minute when

before he was posting non-stop

for a month or two.

Maybe the mods got tired of him

riding trump's dick here lately. :dunno:

:smh:
 
Trump deek suck was the least of his offenses. He had gone full blown rightwing beta male cac storm front racist. He was literally posting shit that would be included in mass shooter manifestos. He was giving out bad history, false information, and purposely spouting off racist propaganda. He was also a compulsive fucking liar who had held down every occupation from Navy SEAL to airline pilot to Pentagon janitor. That guy was the most deserving ban recipient in about a decade.

I think "most deserving ban recipient" is an overstatement-- it can't have been ten years since the last tranny attack, for instance-- but I understand where you're coming from. My view is more that nobody was forced to engage with him but my point is not at all about defending Heist.

I just think that REGARDLESS, it should not be arbitrary. There could be a rule against racist propaganda, just as there used to be rules against posting gay/tranny porn, porn from specific websites, or calling black people monkeys. Those are the ones I remember. Rules used to be posted and I'd feel better about paying to access the site if they were again rather than the only rule being mod whims.
 
Last edited:
That’s rich coming from someone who caped for having sex with 14 year olds.

You’re part of the problem.

This is the slippery slope.

What's next-- Should Dave Chappelle's "How Old Is 15 Really?" routine be banned?

If he was a BGOL member and blessed us with that routine in the form of a post, some mod who disliked him could use it as reason to ban him.

We can ban some speech-- like the old rule that was posted about calling black people monkeys-- but I don't think banning ideas is a good idea except for explicit anti-blackness.
 
I think "most deserving ban recipient" is an overstatement-- it can't have been ten years since the last tranny attack, for instance-- but I understand where you're coming from. My view is more that nobody was forced to engage with him but my point is not at all about defending Heist.

I just think that REGARDLESS, it should not be arbitrary. There could be a rule against racist propaganda, just as there used to be rules against posting gay/tranny porn, porn from specific websites, or calling black people monkeys. Those are the ones I remember. Rules used to be posted and I'd feel better about paying to access the site if they were again rather than the only rule being mod whims.
There is one
 
Y’all will ban heist

But not this nigga

Aite

They DID ban me! I get banned once a month! Here I am! :cheers:

Each time I get banned, I create 5 more variations of that screen name. I have posted 4 times under different screen names, IN THIS THREAD ALONE. HEISCHT was ONE of them. I am the herpes of bgol!

Ha ha ha ha ha ha HAW!

images










i-cant-stop-laughing_c_7248056.jpg
 
Last edited:
This is the slippery slope.

What's next-- Should Dave Chappelle's "How Old Is 15 Really?" routine be banned?

If he was a BGOL member and blessed us with that routine in the form of a post, some mod who disliked him could use it as reason to ban him.

We can ban some speech-- like the old rule that was posted about calling black people monkeys-- but I don't think banning ideas is a good idea except for explicit anti-blackness.

The only mod participating in that thread was me and when his posts were reported I intentionally left it for someone else to deal with and didn't even comment on the report. So if you are speaking in general terms, you're wrong, but oh well. If you are sending subliminals go kick rocks because I had nothing to do with it. There was a guy he quoted we probably should have banned tho.
 
The only mod participating in that thread was me and when his posts were reported I intentionally left it for someone else to deal with and didn't even comment on the report. So if you are speaking in general terms, you're wrong, but oh well. If you are sending subliminals go kick rocks because I had nothing to do with it. There was a guy he quoted we probably should have banned tho.

I'm not sending subliminals... I didn't even guess who banned him because I have no idea. I didn't assume you banned him because you were a participant in the thread.

All of my comments are aimed at the process.
 
Heist and many like him still here are right wing informants on this board sent as plants to undermine black voter turnout in elections. It worked in 2016. African Americans in big states stayed home because they thought there was no difference voting between Clinton and Trump. Having members like Heist is dangerous to the weak minded among us.

If you want to support that racist cac shit, take yo ass to a Fox News board.
 
Idk if it's posted or not, I know HNIC sent out a mass pm about that bullshit a few years back when it was half as ignorant around here.

Are you saying a posted rule is required for it to make sense to police that kind of garbage on a black forum?

Imagine the shit in real life that you could say there doesn't need to be a rule for. Impermissible garbage used to be defined on this board. I'm saying the rules shouldn't vary based on who is online or personal opinion, which is what happens when you take down the posted rules and make the standard supposed common sense.
 
I think "most deserving ban recipient" is an overstatement--
I dont.
it can't have been ten years since the last tranny attack, for instance-- but I understand where you're coming from.
I hadnt seen a tranny attack since the W Bush administration... But if thats your bar then you kinda make my point..
My view is more that nobody was forced to engage with him but my point is not at all about defending Heist.
I kinda disagre.. If hes littering a thread with rampant propaganda and bigotry then it becomes kinda hard to avoid to a certain extent. But more importantly, i dont think being "forced" to engage should be the standard. Nobody was "forced" to engage tranny attacks by that logic. Some shit just shouldnt be allowed. Abject racism is one of those things.
I just think that REGARDLESS, it should not be arbitrary. There could be a rule against racist propaganda,
It wasnt arbitrary. @HNIC communicated a zero tolerance policy for racism years back in response to members complaints on the matter.
 
Imagine the shit in real life that you could say there doesn't need to be a rule for. Impermissible garbage used to be defined on this board. I'm saying the rules shouldn't vary based on who is online or personal opinion, which is what happens when you take down the posted rules and make the standard supposed common sense.
Only a certain type of person typically defends the shit in question, either someone who can't see the forest for the trees, or someone who supports, covertly or overtly, said behavior.

You're going micro on some shit to make the point that racial trolling should be allowed on this board, and it shouldn't. And policy, however well enforced, was created to support that.

It's not being selectively applied, heist was just the latest jackass to force it into use because most folks aren't here to troll, even people who have unpopular opinions or hot takes. Ignoring that or pretending not to see it is really white folks shit. Trying to manipulate technicality to allow bad actors to continue to act bad.

Instantly reveals the goals of the people who press that argument, honestly.
 
It wasnt arbitrary. @HNIC communicated a zero tolerance policy for racism years back in response to members complaints on the matter.

I think it makes a lot more sense to have rules posted, as they were for years, than to rely on a mass PM sent out years ago.

Only a certain type of person typically defends the shit in question, either someone who can't see the forest for the trees, or someone who supports, covertly or overtly, said behavior.

You're going micro on some shit to make the point that racial trolling should be allowed on this board, and it shouldn't. And policy, however well enforced, was created to support that.

It's not being selectively applied, heist was just the latest jackass to force it into use because most folks aren't here to troll, even people who have unpopular opinions or hot takes. Ignoring that or pretending not to see it is really white folks shit. Trying to manipulate technicality to allow bad actors to continue to act bad.

Instantly reveals the goals of the people who press that argument, honestly.

I'm an ACLU kind of guy. I'm with them when they defend the most heinous free speech, such as Klan marches and such. If you can't even comprehend that as a possibly sincerely-held approach, this exchange is not worth my time.

My main point has been that the rules should be posted so that there is clarity in enforcement, regardless of what the rules are. If you think that makes me a secret Heist supporter, oh well.
 
Trump deek suck was the least of his offenses. He had gone full blown rightwing beta male cac storm front racist. He was literally posting shit that would be included in mass shooter manifestos. He was giving out bad history, false information, and purposely spouting off racist propaganda. He was also a compulsive fucking liar who had held down every occupation from Navy SEAL to airline pilot to Pentagon janitor. That guy was the most deserving ban recipient in about a decade.
giphy.gif
 
I can agree with your post which doesn’t happen much.

The irony of the liberal minded is that if you don’t agree with them, you get subjected to abuse, bullying, guilt shaming, ridicule, etc. There is too much emotion and too little logic which you would think would occur with the conservative minded.

BGOL is still the best forum online but it has declined, mainly because of lack of adjusting and the generational and cultural divides.

you mean like when you were going back and forth the other day, and I pointed out that both of you had valid points..

that kind of logic??
 
This is the slippery slope.

What's next-- Should Dave Chappelle's "How Old Is 15 Really?" routine be banned?

If he was a BGOL member and blessed us with that routine in the form of a post, some mod who disliked him could use it as reason to ban him.

We can ban some speech-- like the old rule that was posted about calling black people monkeys-- but I don't think banning ideas is a good idea except for explicit anti-blackness.

This. Are we really at the point where we're trying to silence different opinions?

That faggit fake doctor pleaded with members to put him on ignore. Why not let people decide personally who they want to ignore instead of an outright ban if you don't like what he's saying?
 
Since when? I've seen every race and religion get called slurs and reduced to stereotypes on here.

I always thought anybody could get it. The minute @Dannyblueyes post anything people are going at him calling him a CAC...
It’s because he’s a slum dweller. He thinks he belongs because he’s a bottom tier CAC
Remember...the worst white man thinks he’s better than the best Black man
Think of that the next time you see him giving his 2 cents

I used to think he posted her cuz he was an Octaroon. But he’s just a down on his luck CAC who thinks his word is law amongst Blacks due to his CAC DNA
 
you mean like when you were going back and forth the other day, and I pointed out that both of you had valid points..

that kind of logic??
No, the kind when the other side doesn’t even want to listen, and immediately dismisses the counterpoint. Not to mention, they completely disregard all facts shown and cling to what makes them feel good, even if it is 100% false (i.e. when me and @roots69 were attacked for calling out that fraud Alex Haley)

I don’t agree with @Watcher much but at least I see where he is coming from. If I ask some of these ultra liberals for the plan or what benefits do following their lead provide, there won’t be any substance returned.
 
This is the slippery slope.

What's next-- Should Dave Chappelle's "How Old Is 15 Really?" routine be banned?

If he was a BGOL member and blessed us with that routine in the form of a post, some mod who disliked him could use it as reason to ban him.

We can ban some speech-- like the old rule that was posted about calling black people monkeys-- but I don't think banning ideas is a good idea except for explicit anti-blackness.

Yeah if this place endorses and discusses pedophilia, I’m out. There is no slippery slope.

You pedo cats can have this shit.
 
No, the kind when the other side doesn’t even want to listen, and immediately dismisses the counterpoint. Not to mention, they completely disregard all facts shown and cling to what makes them feel good, even if it is 100% false (i.e. when me and @roots69 were attacked for calling out that fraud Alex Haley)

I don’t agree with @Watcher much but at least I see where he is coming from. If I ask some of these ultra liberals for the plan or what benefits do following their lead provide, there won’t be any substance returned.

you watch a lot of fox news??? you throw this word liberalism around a lot??

thats usually a sign of someone mindfucked by right wing media

liberals, conservatives, democrats, republicans they all bullshit divide an conquer tools.

to keep us all divided so we will be easier to manage...

arent you tired of this bullshit?? arent you tired of being mind fucked??
 
Back
Top