Why can't white people take a little pressure????? WTF!

max-dawg said:
white people think we hate them because they're rich... they're white... etc. they have NO IDEA that black people and other minorities actually do NOT hate them; we just hate their condescending, SUPER-hypocritical attitudes.

you hear that blunt? i'm talking to you.

What's really sad is that you don't see your own hypocrisy, innaccuracy and inconsistency (which is what I like to point out). I simply throw YOUR condescending, superior attitude back at you (which is exactly what YOU think you're doing to whites). What's good for the goose is good for the gander.

Neither whites nor blacks can claim to be more righteous than the other. As this board demonstrates daily, fools are not relegated to one gender or so-called race. The self-righteous, full-of-shit black ones (who simply mimic white racist/sexist/homophobic/anti-semitic tactics) tend to dominate here, so they always need to be exposed/confronted.

If you really were disturbed and resentful of bigotry (historical and contemporary) then you'd stop engaging in it yourself (against whites, women, gays, Jews ...etc.). Blacks who choose not to live up to the righteous, high ideals that they demand of others are aways fair game for insult.
 
Blunt said:
What's really sad is that you don't see your own hypocrisy, innaccuracy and inconsistency (which is what I like to point out). I simply throw YOUR condescending, superior attitude back at you (which is exactly what YOU think you're doing to whites). What's good for the goose is good for the gander.

Neither whites nor blacks can claim to be more righteous than the other. As this board demonstrates daily, fools are not relegated to one gender or so-called race. The self-righteous, full-of-shit black ones (who simply mimic white racist/sexist/homophobic/anti-semitic tactics) tend to dominate here, so they always need to be exposed/confronted.

If you really were disturbed and resentful of bigotry (historical and contemporary) then you'd stop engaging in it yourself (against whites, women, gays, Jews ...etc.). Blacks who choose not to live up to the righteous, high ideals that they demand of others are aways fair game for insult.
http://objection.mrdictionary.net/go.php?n=1831136
 
Blunt said:
What's really sad is that you don't see your own hypocrisy, innaccuracy and inconsistency (which is what I like to point out). I simply throw YOUR condescending, superior attitude back at you (which is exactly what YOU think you're doing to whites). What's good for the goose is good for the gander.

Neither whites nor blacks can claim to be more righteous than the other. As this board demonstrates daily, fools are not relegated to one gender or so-called race. The self-righteous, full-of-shit black ones (who simply mimic white racist/sexist/homophobic/anti-semitic tactics) tend to dominate here, so they always need to be exposed/confronted.

If you really were disturbed and resentful of bigotry (historical and contemporary) then you'd stop engaging in it yourself (against whites, women, gays, Jews ...etc.). Blacks who choose not to live up to the righteous, high ideals that they demand of others are aways fair game for insult.

blunt, fuck you and 3 more bitches that look like you. plus, fuck ALL the people you influence.

Dr. Truth said:

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
 
XXXplosive said:
Do you feel the same way when a black person does something negative that's a rare occurrence (like the guy who gave the those little kids blunts to smoke), or do you say (like most people on here) "What's wrong with us black folks?"

Looks like in this country when a white person does something crazy it's only on that one person, but when a black person does the same thing it's a mark on EVERY black person.

Why can't it be the other way around??

Why should it have to be the other way around?!?!?!?

There is ignorance everywhere. Why fall into the same ignorant bullshit that others fall into?

There is no justifiable ignorance.
 
NYC36 said:
Why should it have to be the other way around?!?!?!?

There is ignorance everywhere. Why fall into the same ignorant bullshit that others fall into?

There is no justifiable ignorance.


Why fall into the same ignorant bullshit that others fall into?


What are you scared of?????

Holding yourself to the same standard YOU set for others?????

You are so accustomed to having an unfair advantage that when you are held to the same standard, you complain.

Man up..................:angry:

Not even your women respect you..........:lol:
 
Sub0 said:
Individualism and "we" don't really go together. "We" need to work together as a people. "Our" potential is unlimited if "we" work together.

Great acts of unity began with individuals. Martin Luther King, Malcolm X, Rosa Parks, Rodney King................
 
kayanation said:
Why fall into the same ignorant bullshit that others fall into?


What are you scared of?????

Holding yourself to the same standard YOU set for others?????

You are so accustomed to having an unfair advantage that when you are held to the same standard, you complain.

Man up..................:angry:

Not even your women respect you..........:lol:

You obviously don't understand what you read from me.

I'm not scared of anything. I don't set standards for anyone. I do me.

If you want to act a fool because others do, or you want to justify being a dumb fuck because others are dumb fucks then the only thing you will do is keep the cycle going and advocate idiocy.

Who the fuck is complaining? What unfair advantage do I have?

My women don't respect me? LOL

Who are "my" women and why don't they respect me?

Come on, spew some more general assumptions and ignorant bullshit.
 
NYC36 said:
You obviously don't understand what you read from me.

I'm not scared of anything. I don't set standards for anyone. I do me.

If you want to act a fool because others do, or you want to justify being a dumb fuck because others are dumb fucks then the only thing you will do is keep the cycle going and advocate idiocy.

Who the fuck is complaining? What unfair advantage do I have?

My women don't respect me? LOL

Who are "my" women and why don't they respect me?

Come on, spew some more general assumptions and ignorant bullshit.




It seems YOU (singular) need a refresher course on the English language.


When I say

" Holding yourself to the same standard YOU set for others?????

You are so accustomed to having an unfair advantage that when you are held to the same standard, you complain."


That "YOU" is plural.........got it?????

Acting a fool has nothing to do with the point in contention. That is a singular view.


Don't want to spend too much time arguing with a noobie who hasn't posted shit ever.

Contribute (start a new thread) and come back and see me............
 
I see, having 2,000+ posts is a pre-requisite for having an opinion or a point.

Wow, you owned me on that one. I need to put my shame hat on and come back to you when I have 2,000+ posts because that means I'm a real man and can rise to your level.

:wepraise:
 
max-dawg said:
highlighted above is the #1 basis for what i call, "ultimate white hypocrisy."

when WHITE FOLKS do bad things, they blame:

1. bad parenting
2. drugs & alcohol
3. peer pressure
4. rap music
5. black people
6. "copycat" criminal
7. etc.
8. etc.
9. black culture
10. "anything" except their "whiteness" and cave-dwelling animalistic behavior.

but when a black person does something bad, they simply blame the crime on their "blackness," saying that they basically can't help it... it's in them to do crimes. ALL black people are represented by the actions of a few. :confused: :smh:

white people think we hate them because they're rich... they're white... etc. they have NO IDEA that black people and other minorities actually do NOT hate them; we just hate their condescending, SUPER-hypocritical attitudes.

you hear that blunt? i'm talking to you.

So then you think all white people are like that then? You think all white people are rich, racist, hypocritical, condescending, etc?
 
"Desperate Dad" Robs Local Bank

Notice how they're making excuses for this guy (who just happens to also be white) :rolleyes:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

(4/05/07 - KTRK/HOUSTON) - Authorities are trying to find a bank robber, apparently driven by desperation to provide for his family.

The FBI Bank Robbery Task Force needs the public's assistance in identifying the "Desperate Dad" who robbed the Wachovia Bank on San Felipe over the lunch hour on March 6. Bank surveillance captured a short video of the entire robbery.

At approximately 12:30, the armed robber entered the bank and was greeted by three employees working in the lobby. As the robber walked quickly towards the counter, he pulled out a small chrome pistol from a navy blue zippered bag he was carrying.

The robber repeatedly told the tellers all he needed was a thousand dollars.

He explained, "I just lost my job and I have a small baby at home. I don't care if I go to jail."

The robber was very nervous and visibly shaking during the robbery. He held the zippered bag up to one of the tellers and she placed the money inside the bag. The robber then ran out of the bank in a hurry. No one was hurt. No getaway vehicle was seen.

The subject is described as a white male, approximately 23-24 years old, about 5'6"- 5'7" tall, weighing approximately 150-160 pounds with a pale complexion and a skinny build. He had short blonde hair, no facial hair and wore a white t-shirt with an open gray sweat jacket over it. He also wore large dark sunglasses to hide his appearance. The man carried a navy blue leather bag with a zipper and a small chrome pistol.

Crime Stoppers is offering up to $5,000 for information leading to the charging and arrest of this bank robber. If you believe you know who this man is or have any information about this case, please contact the Crime Stoppers Hotline at 713-222-TIPS or contact the Houston office of the FBI at 713-693-5000.
 
Last edited:
Denied handgun, alleged killer bought shotgun

Legal loophole apparently helped Mich. accountant carry out office shooting



April 13, 2007

070413_lacalamita_vsml_330a.rp350x350.jpg


LANSING, Mich. - Despite being denied a permit by police to buy a handgun last month, Anthony LaCalamita III had no trouble buying a shotgun a few weeks later. Police say the accountant bought the 12-gauge shotgun Friday — the day after he was fired — and used it Monday to shoot three people at his former office in a Detroit suburb, killing a secretary and wounding two executives.

LaCalamita, 38, was able to buy the shotgun because Michigan, like all but four states, doesn’t require a permit to buy a shotgun or rifle. The state is one of only 12 states that require background checks for handgun buyers, but those buying shotguns or rifles need only pass an FBI criminal background check.

The discrepency is a legal loophole that needs to be closed, say gun control advocates like Paul Helmke, president of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence.

“The bottom line is, we make it awfully easy in this country to get weapons,” Helmke said.

Only 15 states do their own background checks on long gun buyers, while 26 do their own checks on people buying handguns, according to the Brady Campaign.

Helmke said more states should do background checks because they have better access to criminal databases than federal authorities do and state checks are often more thorough.

No mental health check
Despite what his estranged wife’s attorney said is a history of depression and mental health problems, there was apparently nothing in LaCalamita’s FBI background check that prevented him from buying the shotgun. It’s left up to applicants to admit on their FBI background check form if they have psychological problems.

When LaCalamita requested a handgun permit last month from the Troy Police Department, the check was much more extensive.

Department spokesman Lt. Gerry Scherlinck said he couldn’t comment on why the department chief turned down LaCalamita’s request for a handgun permit. But he said the department looks at records that go beyond arrests or convictions.

“Theoretically, you could have a clear criminal history but still have contacts with law enforcement that would not rise to the level of an arrest or conviction,” Scherlinck said. A police chief “can use those contacts to deny a permit whether or not those involved arrests that might show up on a criminal history.”

LaCalamita was arraigned Wednesday on one count of first-degree murder, two counts of intent to commit murder, three counts of possessing a firearm in the commission of a felony, and one count of fleeing and eluding police. A not guilty plea was entered for LaCalamita by the judge.

Police say LaCalamita walked into his former office as employees were scrambling to beat the approaching federal tax deadline and opened fire with the shotgun.






:smh:
 
311xInlineGallery.jpg


Dad indicted after baby is burned in microwave
:smh: :smh: :smh:
By HARVEY RICE and KEVIN MORAN
Copyright 2007 Houston Chronicle

GALVESTON — An Arkansas man accused of burning his 2-month-old daughter's face by putting her in a microwave oven was indicted Wednesday on a charge of felony injury to a child.

A Galveston County Grand Jury indicted Joshua Royce Mauldin, 19, on one count carrying a maximum sentence of five to 99 years in prison and a fine up to $10,000. Mauldin, who police said claimed he was sent by God to be a preacher in Galveston, remained in jail late Wednesday on $250,000 bail.

The Warren, Ark., native was in the jail's medical unit under observation as a precaution, a jail spokesman said. He is being checked at least every 15 minutes, although he is not listed as a suicide risk.

The father told police that he put the baby in the microwavebecause he was under stress, said Galveston police Sgt. Annie Almendarez, who declined to elaborate.

Felony charge
Mauldin was arrested about 3 p.m. Tuesday and booked on the felony child injury charge three hours later.

On the same day, the child underwent a second skin graft performed by University of Texas Medical Branch physicians at Galveston's Shriners Burns Hospital. She was listed in critical but stable condition, Almendarez said.

A UTMB medical history search indicated that the Mauldin case is one of only four nationwide known in which a child is alleged to have been injured by direct exposure to radiation from a microwave oven.

Police first became aware of the incident about 2 a.m. on May 10 when Mauldin called authorities and reported the child had suffered burns when he stumbled on carpeting and spilled coffee on her, Almendarez said.

Police are now trying to determine whether Mauldin's wife participated in the alleged attack, Almendarez said. The woman's name was withheld by police Wednesday.

Mauldin was staying with his wife and mother at the Quality Inn Hotel on Seawall Boulevard the night he is accused of placing the child in the microwave oven, Almendarez said.

"They looked like any tourists you would see in Galveston," she said.

Mauldin told police that he was working at a Sonic Drive-In in Warren, a town of about 6,000 in southern Arkansas, when "he was called to be a minister by God" and decided to begin his ministry in Galveston.

The family had arrived in Galveston May 9 and were looking for a permanent residence, Almendarez said. Mauldin called for emergency services the next morning.

Almendarez said medical evidence and a tip from a family member led police to believe that Mauldin placed the child in the microwave oven. The child was in the microwave for up to 20 seconds, she said.

Rare injuries
UTMB burns surgeon Dr. Art Sanford said Wednesday he has no experience with injuries to humans of any age from direct exposure to microwaves.

"No one here does," Sanford said.

An extensive computer search of medical literature nationwide revealed only three instances in which children were believed to have been burned in microwave ovens. One of those is a 2006 Ohio case in which the mother was accused of killing her baby, he said.

The literature search turned up only one research effort to determine the effects of microwave exposure on living pig flesh, Sanford said. The report indicated that skin and muscle, which have considerable water content, are burned during short, direct microwave exposure, Sanford said.

Houston Chronicle reporter Anne Marie Kilday contributed to this report.
 
bigirl said:
It is to me. <shrugs> I REAL cautious around ALL A DEM!!!! I know how they be. You think you found a nice one or a cool one or a different one and it always ends up in the same shit. Forwarned is forarmed.


:yes:
 
Back
Top