Yup even the stupidest, dummied down mostly white movies become classics.
Made 40 million on a 65 million dollar budget. Bomb. There's a reason why MGM sat on it for three years and it wasn't because they were going bankrupt.
Yup even the stupidest, dummied down mostly white movies become classics.
Sure he did50 cent has raised 200 million through his production company Cheetah Vision.www.vibe.com/article/50-cent-gets-200-million-cheetah-vision-films

thats money moves.
Then why is Nollywood the 2nd largest film industry in the world?
Hollywood is 3rd
![]()
Tyler is already making the type of moving he wants to make and so are the others. Doesn't Spike already do this as well? Furthermore, they don't executive produce most of the their own movies. They user other people's money. I think you have a great idea but the plan to execute it is nonsense.
Why focus on BLACK MOVIES?
Why even pigeon-hole ourselves?
Why not make good movies that people will watch and love?
That said nothing wrong with making black films but it shouldn't be what defines a company...investors will want their returns, period!
Ask your self this:
George Clooney's paycheck for Ocean's Eleven was reportedly $20 million.
The guys that started PARTICIPANT MEDIA (Skoll) got him to star in, cowrite, and direct Good Night, and Good Luck - a movie with a $7 million budget and it went to win an OSCAR....ever asked yourself how did he manage to get someone like Clooney?
The answer is simple: First of all the actors have to believe in the material so much that they are willing to take a break on their rates. And the production needs to be scaled to the money it's likely to make....
Limiting your audience limits your revenue. Why can't a black film company produce the next Hangover? Let's get out of the "black movie" category and get into the "movie" category.
As far as securing good actors on the cheap, as you said, it has to be something they believe in. Don Cheadle is an amazing actor, and he's playing a crazy Captain Planet for free on Funnyordie.com just because it is fun.
Then why is Nollywood the 2nd largest film industry in the world?
Hollywood is 3rd
![]()
You guys act as if it is that simple. Movie making is your highest risk for reward investment on the planet. Higher than drug dealing and stocks. You know how many movies fail a year? Most of you asking for others to do something you won't do.
Jay can easily put in 200 mil
will smith can put in 300 mil
Magic Johnson 200 mil
Denzel 150 mil
Oprah....400 mil
Now tell me they couldn't set up a Private Equity fund with that dosh
Jay can easily put in 200 mil
will smith can put in 300 mil
Magic Johnson 200 mil
Denzel 150 mil
Oprah....400 mil
Now tell me they couldn't set up a Private Equity fund with that dosh




https://thsppl.com/how-the-media-se...r-of-their-generation-fc1484070d7f#.aoapel4np
![]()
Exerpts
![]()
Spike Lee used to be the media’s darling.
Everyone wanted to be in business with him. Consider the fact that Spike was barely into his career when Jim Riswold begged Wieden Kennedy execs to give Lee the Michael Jordan commercial franchise. Consider the fact that Spike was once followed around and quoted on all things New York and all things Black. Consider the fact that while Spike made movies for and about Black people, critics celebrated his efforts.
Lee has had one of the most prolific careers of any filmmaker, having directed over thirty films, yet when his name is mentioned now, the discourse immediately gravitates to his personality or his love of the Knicks or his battles with other filmmakers — anything but his films. What that noise has done is drown out Lee’s voice from being heard by his core audience — Black people. How did that happen?
The End of An Era (1992 Esquire Article right before MAlcolm X Launched really hurt Spike) He protested it with Esquire but they still ran it how they wanted to. It damaged him
![]()
If one had to locate a turning point, this October 1992 Barbara Grizzuti Harrison written Esquire piece would be a good start.
The title alone, meant to stir up emotion, is — surprise — racist. The tone of the article is confrontational and has more to do with Lee than the film.
When Lee phoned the editor, Terry McDonell, he told him, “You’ve damaged me.”
McDonell in a Los Angeles Times article balked, “He couldn’t believe we had done this.”
Adding that Lee failed to see the “irony” the magazine intended.
This was the beginning of the portrayal of Spike as The Angry Black Man and, boy, have they got a lot of mileage off of that one. But let’s look at it.
“I’m doing what every other person in Hollywood does: they dictate who they want to do interviews with,” he said. “Tom Cruise, Robert Redford, whoever. People throw their weight around. Well, I get many requests now for interviews, and I would like African-Americans to interview me. Spike Lee has never said he only wants Black journalists to interview him. What I’m doing is using whatever clout I have to get qualified African-Americans assignments. The real crime is White publications don’t have Black writers, that’s the crime.”
Same month as the Esquire article, four weeks before the opening of Malcolm X, Spike requested that publications send Black writers to interview him, arguing that they would be more responsive and sympathetic to the life, and therefore depiction, of Malcolm X. A request that even the author of the New York Times article, Bernard Weinraub, notes isn’t unusual, but his tone, like Harrison’s, was confrontational.
Using words like heatedly to describe how Lee explained his request, one gets the picture that Lee is neither making the request, nor responding to the interviewer, in a calm and rational way — but instead:
He’s angry.
Biopics, period pieces, large, expansive stories are usually perfect Oscar fodder. Malcolm X had all of those characteristics and then some. Yet when the nominations for the 1992 Oscars rolled around, the film only received two nominations (Best Actor in a Leading Role and Best Costume Design).
Soon, Ernest Dickerson would go on to direct his own films breaking up the two 3-peat team. Unlike the earlier films, up until 25th Hour, most of them lost money. Spike would have a harder time finding financing. Still, Lee would still be able to make fifteen plus films over the next twenty-three years. People started writing Lee off. Then came Inside Man.
Reuniting with frequent collaborator, Denzel Washington, Inside Man (06) was made for $45 million and brought in a roaring $184 million; Spike’s greatest box office haul to date. He followed that with the critically acclaimed and well-received Hurricane Katrina documentary, When The Levees Broke. One would think that Spike Lee would now be officially written up as back. But that didn’t happen.
Again, the focus was put on anything but his movies. First it was the supposed ‘08 war against Clint Eastwood where Lee addressed Eastwood’s lack of Black soldier representation in Eastwood’s double WWII films — then it was the ’12 battles with Tarantino over Django Unchained. In both cases, Lee’s points were missed. Spike merely wanted to address diversity and appropriation. Very valid issues. But the messenger had already been killed.
By this point, most Black people just wanted Spike to be quiet. Unless you have the personality of Ali, or the credibility of Minister Farrakhan, Black folk get tired of you talking. Then the media presented the veritable last straw — Tyler Perry.
The Tyler Perry debate, in all actuality, is a non-debate. Lee and Perry make totally different types of films. But because Hollywood marginalizes the Black audience and believes that we all are the same, they make it an either/or situation. When asked about Perry, it would have been in Lee’s best interest, not to address it at all. He should have smelled the stench of divisiveness. Yet, Spike took the bait and soon everyone and their grandmothers — literally — were attacking Spike.
CONCLUSION
From 1972 to roughly 1977, Stevie Wonder had what people call his Golden Era. Prince had one from 1982 to 1988. Both still have loyal fans who support their work. Surely no one is of the belief that current Scorsese films hold up next to Taxi Driver or Raging Bull. Nonetheless, people still turn up for whatever his latest release is.
But rack your brain and try to think of any Black filmmaker who has a filmography with 80% of his output focused on the Black American experience. Show me a Black filmmaker that, despite obstacle after obstacle being thrown at them, continues to find innovative ways of putting out product. Find me another Black filmmaker who has kept working for over thirty years.
Personally, I feel that Spike’s Golden Era was between 86 to 92. Some would extend it to ‘94 to include Crooklyn, yet I think he may still have some great films in him. I also believe that Spike should be wiser about the battles he picks. It’s okay to not state your opinion on each and every thing. Sometimes it harms more than it helps. And perhaps Lee thought he had more power than he actually did. These issues I attribute to him.
What I attribute to the media — Hollywood — White press — however you want to label the same machine — is the attempted castration of Spike Lee in the eyes of the public.
Even early on, Spike made note of the fact that:
“They don’t love you and the second you’re not making them money, you’re out of there. They can build you up and they can tear you down.”
We live in a world where White people behaving badly is celebrated, humanized, understood. Sean Penn’s legacy hasn’t been tarnished by his alleged brutality towards women. Nor do we discount Woody Allen’s movies for marrying his daughter. Those things are barely focused on.
I doubt that any review of An Irrational Man began with, “Woody Allen who married his daughter Soon Yi.”
If filmmaking is an art, Spike Lee is The Greatest of our era. He’s influenced many, not only Black filmmakers, but filmmakers in general to take up the camera and start documenting their life. He was once the voice of not just Black oppression — but Black art — and he continues to make Black movies for Black people.
Spike Lee pulled back the veil on Hollywood, exposed the double standards, making him a pariah in their eyes. So let’s continue to show our support for him. At least give him a chance even if we don’t understand how Nick Cannon or an older Wesley Snipes could be cast as gangsters.
Spike Lee’s Chi-Raq will be released as Amazon Studios first film on Dec 4, 2015.





Why focus on BLACK MOVIES?
Why even pigeon-hole ourselves?
Why not make good movies that people will watch and love?
That said nothing wrong with making black films but it shouldn't be what defines a company...investors will want their returns, period!
Ask your self this:
George Clooney's paycheck for Ocean's Eleven was reportedly $20 million.
The guys that started PARTICIPANT MEDIA (Skoll) got him to star in, cowrite, and direct Good Night, and Good Luck - a movie with a $7 million budget and it went to win an OSCAR....ever asked yourself how did he manage to get someone like Clooney?
The answer is simple: First of all the actors have to believe in the material so much that they are willing to take a break on their rates. And the production needs to be scaled to the money it's likely to make....
what i think most folk like the op miss out on is these black folk
HAVE learned from the white bosses they serve
what they have learned is to:
NOT
rock the boat
NOT
bite the hand that feeds them
NOT
put anybody on
NOT
build in their communities
the list goes on but u get my point
this is Will's latest movie
looks like he learned very well