Same person probably owns all three.I dont eat there but there are 3 mcdonalds on the same street within 2 miles of each. No way each are making good profit.
I'm going to post a vid in here soonI dont eat there but there are 3 mcdonalds on the same street within 2 miles of each. No way each are making good profit.
Same person probably owns all three.
Same person probably owns all three.
But each store is almost 2 million just to get started. You’re not seeing a return on your investment for damn near 20 years.Seems like just getting past the initial investment you can make good money.. trick is you gotta own more than 1 store.. so basically 150k times say 10 stores.. that’s 2.5 mill.. not bad
He was probably rich before considering you need a high net worth of liquid capital to even get one. You not owning a Micky D’s unless you already worth a few million.BS..... can’t count another ninjas money but I know a guy that owns a couple McDonald’s and he’s filthy rich travels everywhere kids go to private school he lives the life .......
This is a great question. And for those in this thread, a great business lesson. I used to teach competitive strategy and this was one of the lessons except, I used Starbucks as the case study.
Starbucks uses this same strategy mentioned in this thread regarding multiple units within close proximity of each other. The primary reason for this is to restrict competition by increasing the barriers. Property pricing and rental goes up when these franchises enter the market. There are zoning restrictions regarding the number of restaurants in a particular radius. Additionally, as someone correctly stated, more than likely, one person owns the restaurants. This owner will benefit from scaling. He will only need one store manager to run all three. Additionally, he or she will surely have some employees that work at all three. Most importantly, the more food you buy at wholesale, the cheaper the price and the more leverage you will have to negotiate the price down, which of course adds to the bottom line. This is the same for POP and advertising. One more important factor is the tax benefits. Employing that many people in that radius will surely gain him or her favor with local government who will in turn give kick backs regarding taxes.
Lastly, someone said "$150K" ain't shit. Even a millionaire would appreciate $150k/ yr in passive income. Owners are not in the stores at all. Maybe once or twice a month. Plus, I assure you from first hand knowledge, $150k is on the low end of what franchise owners make.
Even then...you're competing with your own business and most importantly paying taxes and bills for all three.
But each store is almost 2 million just to get started. You’re not seeing a return on your investment for damn near 20 years.
Which is why its ridiculous for MF's to ask for $15.00 and hour. The owners wouldn't make any fucking money150k ain’t shit . You basically ain’t even turning a profit for over a decade. You need to buy in for almost 2 million
This is a great question. And for those in this thread, a great business lesson. I used to teach competitive strategy and this was one of the lessons except, I used Starbucks as the case study.
Starbucks uses this same strategy mentioned in this thread regarding multiple units within close proximity of each other. The primary reason for this is to restrict competition by increasing the barriers. Property pricing and rental goes up when these franchises enter the market. There are zoning restrictions regarding the number of restaurants in a particular radius. Additionally, as someone correctly stated, more than likely, one person owns the restaurants. This owner will benefit from scaling. He will only need one store manager to run all three. Additionally, he or she will surely have some employees that work at all three. Most importantly, the more food you buy at wholesale, the cheaper the price and the more leverage you will have to negotiate the price down, which of course adds to the bottom line. This is the same for POP and advertising. One more important factor is the tax benefits. Employing that many people in that radius will surely gain him or her favor with local government who will in turn give kick backs regarding taxes.
Lastly, someone said "$150K" ain't shit. Even a millionaire would appreciate $150k/ yr in passive income. Owners are not in the stores at all. Maybe once or twice a month. Plus, I assure you from first hand knowledge, $150k is on the low end of what franchise owners make.
I understand your logic. Please allow me to politely correct your statement. This is where being able to play "the game" comes in. In this particular case, an owner with multiple units would be established as a corporation and would only pay one tax. For example, Walmart doesnt pay taxes on each individual store. The corporate office reconciles the quarterly reports and the taxes are paid/ adjusted accordingly.
Think about this, apple has all of those apple stores across the nation and paid zero taxes in 2018 and won't in 2019. Here is another gem, did you know that as a company, you can report net losses and get it back via taxes? So, if you opened your McDs, had a "loss" due to startup costs etc, you can get most if not all if it back? This same thing can be done with stocks as well. Buy stock, it goes down, you sell. You can report the loss and get it back via taxes. Unfortunately, this type of information isn't traditionally shared at the barber shop.
Won't the city still want their land tax, don't you still pay utilities?
#factsIt's clever accounting and exploits holes in laws. This is the shit they told me was unethical in college, but it seems like business as usual in real life.
I was about to post this same fucking thing. Folks need to get the fuck out of here with that bullshit. 2 million down and only $150,000 profit annually? You don't have to go to business school to tell you that this is not a good deal150k ain’t shit . You basically ain’t even turning a profit for over a decade. You need to buy in for almost 2 million
#facts
Most undergraduate universities are not preparing you to be an entrepreneur. Majoring in business at the undergraduate level is a waste of money. Most people do not know that you can pursue an MBA degree with ANY undergraduate degree. Art, music, philosophy, basket weaving, etc. It doesnt matter. You need, a BS or BA, GRE or GMAT score, and the ability to pay. You can get an MBA. Noone really cares if it is a one, two or three year program or if it is online or campus based. There are only two categories of MBA. Ivy league (which includes non Ivy's such as Duke, Stanford, MIT, and others) and then everyplace else. If you cant get into an Ivy, find a one year online program that's inexpensive. Same thing with MD programs.
I was about to post this same fucking thing. Folks need to get the fuck out of here with that bullshit. 2 million down and only $150,000 profit annually? You don't have to go to business school to tell you that this is not a good deal
You'd be better off opening a McDowell's. They've got the golden arches, we've got the golden arcs
SO ELON MUSK DOESN'T TRIP WHEN HIS STOCK VALUE GOES DOWN $900 MILLION IN ONE DAY? DAMN.I understand your logic. Please allow me to politely correct your statement. This is where being able to play "the game" comes in. In this particular case, an owner with multiple units would be established as a corporation and would only pay one tax. For example, Walmart doesnt pay taxes on each individual store. The corporate office reconciles the quarterly reports and the taxes are paid/ adjusted accordingly.
Think about this, apple has all of those apple stores across the nation and paid zero taxes in 2018 and won't in 2019. Here is another gem, did you know that as a company, you can report net losses and get it back via taxes? So, if you opened your McDs, had a "loss" due to startup costs etc, you can get most if not all if it back? This same thing can be done with stocks as well. Buy stock, it goes down, you sell. You can report the loss and get it back via taxes. Unfortunately, this type of information isn't traditionally shared at the barber shop.