What drives you?

sean69

Star
BGOL Investor
So I was having a conversation the other day with two friends, a neurophysicist and a psychologist, about congnition, intuition and motivation theory and in the course of our convo the question arose:

"What's the most fundamental driver of our volition. Basically what, at the most fundamental level, drives the decisions we make and the consequent actions?

After screening through a bunch of stuff (that most people come up with, like ambition, success, money, fear, love, etc) I broke it down to three things:

1) Self (need to survive)

2) Community (need to belong)

and

3) Protection/conservation of community

In that order.


However, I guess at the very very very fundamental level ... more fundamentaler than genetics ... it's the need to reduce (local) entropy but forget about that for now.


Number (1) is propbably not a huge revelation as, fundamentally, everything we do is selfish no matter how we try to spin it.
But number (2) is particularly intriguing.

Discuss.
 
Last edited:
My children
My Man
&
My need to have what I want

I can feel that.

However, I can make the argument (again, argument) that number 1 on your list stems from (2) on mine.

As does number 2.

And number 3. I'm thinking you're refering to satisfying your carnal/material and perhaps emotional desires? If so, yeah.

I'm trying to see if anyone can break it down further.
 
1. Survival would be at the top of the list.
The 3 on your list IMO would be subsets of survival. self,community, conservation of community and I would add procreation are probably instinctual and we have little control over it.

2. Self awareness
What drives me on the conscious level is do I have any limitations on my abilities. I'm going to test perceived limits to see if they can be expanded or if there's another level to be reached.
 
Motivation has always intrigued me. I truly believe that motivation is not something that can be applied universally as is thought in certain academic environments.

Psychology has so many variables that, in most cases, two people can be driven to want the same the thing for different reasons.

As a corporate worker, I achieve because I want more for my wife and I. I also, however, do want the esteem of a certain corporate sector of the business. I guess this could fit into the community notion.

I also, however, have a nagging desire to beato these cats in every angle of their game for my own gratification. I believe the sociologist W.E.B Dubois put it best, " The exchange was merry, till one girl, a tall newcomer, refused my card, --refused it peremptorily, with a glance. Then it dawned upon me with a certain suddenness that I was different from the others; or like, mayhap, in heart and life and longing, but shut out from their world by a vast veil. I had thereafter no desire to tear down that veil, to creep through; I held all beyond it in common contempt, and lived above it in a region of blue sky and great wandering shadows. That sky was bluest when I could beat my mates at examination-time, or beat them at a foot-race, or even beat their stringy heads."
 
1. Survival would be at the top of the list.
The 3 on your list IMO would be subsets of survival. self,community, conservation of community and I would add procreation are probably instinctual and we have little control over it.

Yeah, I guess you could view conservation of community as a sub-set of self preservation if you consider self a "subset" of community. But that's not necessarily, strictly speaking.
Self preservation is still a fundamental drive for recluse or introverts.
However, I don't think that a person's aversion to social interaction can exists without some a posteriori experience of community.


2. Self awareness
What drives me on the conscious level is do I have any limitations on my abilities. I'm going to test perceived limits to see if they can be expanded or if there's another level to be reached.

I've always considered the use of the term "self awareness' as a fallacy of ambiguity as it requires the self to identify its self.
But anyway, I think what you're really describing above is ego.

As for testing your limits, is it possible for someone to be an objective evaluator of ones self?

That being said, perhaps this "self-awareness" falls under community after all?
 
That being said, perhaps this "self-awareness" falls under community after all?

:yes:

It does. One has to be self-aware in order to determine if they need a sense of acceptance from the community. But then again there are those who have this awareness but feel no need to be accepted, which can debunk your number 2 theory. Then again there are those who want to be known as the 'other', going against the grain and find acceptance in being shunned.

(Hot damn I miss talking like this in my English classes)

It's a complex and almost never-ending cycle of speculation.



As for your original question, I'll get back to you when I figure out an answer. I know the things I want to be motivated for but after the mental and emotional problems I find myself grappling with I wonder if this 'want' is coming from a place it shouldn't be coming from.

Perhaps there is no real catalyst for motivation and there is just the natural instinct to move forward and provide. I mean for good parents, you don't not get your children food cause you don't feel like it; you do it because it moves you and them forward.

...


...I need to stop here. I'm about to go off into some tangents and I think both you and I are going to get lost...
 
:yes:

It does. One has to be self-aware in order to determine if they need a sense of acceptance from the community. But then again there are those who have this awareness but feel no need to be accepted, which can debunk your number 2 theory. Then again there are those who want to be known as the 'other', going against the grain and find acceptance in being shunned.

(Hot damn I miss talking like this in my English classes)

It's a complex and almost never-ending cycle of speculation.

As for your original question, I'll get back to you when I figure out an answer. I know the things I want to be motivated for but after the mental and emotional problems I find myself grappling with I wonder if this 'want' is coming from a place it shouldn't be coming from.

Perhaps there is no real catalyst for motivation and there is just the natural instinct to move forward and provide. I mean for good parents, you don't not get your children food cause you don't feel like it; you do it because it moves you and them forward.
...
...I need to stop here. I'm about to go off into some tangents and I think both you and I are going to get lost...[/quote]


If you read the second part of my response to BigUnc, I'm saying that the term "self-awareness" is an ambiguous and an abstraction at the best.
Everyone wants to be accepted. This is what compels the ego.

And it really isn't speculation.

Feeding your kids = community
 
I drive myself i know i will never be perfect especially in my own eyes but i am my toughest critic and i could never let me down.
 
This is a great thread!!!!!!

Just a bit about me before you read...that way you'll understand where I'm coming from.

I'm a 30 year old Male from NJ. I grew up in the city but recieved a scholarship to a Quaker School for grades 9-12. Went to college on a basketball scholarship then to Law School...and Now I teach Legal Studies.

The reason why I am telling you all this is because I have seen the intimate side of both spectrums. I can remember leaving my home on the bus and getting to school and my classmate...17 years old had Porsche keys....his home has elevators in it....The Family owned the "Italian Bistro Restaurants." My high school was near 20k a year...College was near 30...and Law School was 65k. I now have two sets of associates and each side would answer this question differently. I'm going to give you my interpretation. I guess you can imagine that a majority of my friends would not adopt my views on this question.

First off that conversation you and your associates were having was loaded and could have lasted for days without coming to a definitive answer.

But...with that said I'm going to add my 2 cents. I agree that self will be the predominant 1st choice, but if you delve a bit deeper our sense of self is usually shaped by our religious beliefs (95% of us anyway) which lead me to say that God may or the higher being to which we ascribe to, may the most aggressive force driving us.

I would say that community should be number 2. The familial structure is included in this term "community" and each individual will have to prioritize his/her community values. For most of our family will be the community to which we place our most energy.

**What we too have to realize is that the ordering of these drives will be different for Men and Women. Men of substance should be able to see that by ordering you priorities to serve your family and your community you undoubtedly serve to protect the women and children of that same community. And by protecting the women of your community you ensure that you in turn will be cared for.

And I agree that the third is protection of community...as it should be!


Sometimes it is difficult to see or understand but when you live this way you feel a sense of strength and accomplishment that self service cannot fulfill.
 
If you read the second part of my response to BigUnc, I'm saying that the term "self-awareness" is an ambiguous and an abstraction at the best.

Is it really? I believe that one can have a false sense of awareness, (just like one can have a false sense of truth), but the concept isn't really that vague- or is it?

Feeding your kids = community

Though a family or a group of families can make a community, does ensuring your children are taken care of build a community? :confused:

I had a different take of community and keeping it preserved as a priority, and that is not a part of it. I'm interested as to specifically why you think this.

**What we too have to realize is that the ordering of these drives will be different for Men and Women. Men of substance should be able to see that by ordering you priorities to serve your family and your community you undoubtedly serve to protect the women and children of that same community. And by protecting the women of your community you ensure that you in turn will be cared for.

Wow, well said.

What might this hierarchy of needs be for men who are not 'of substance'?
 
This is a great thread!!!!!!
Just a bit about me before you read...that way you'll understand where I'm coming from.
I'm a 30 year old Male from NJ. I grew up in the city but recieved a scholarship to a Quaker School for grades 9-12. Went to college on a basketball scholarship then to Law School...and Now I teach Legal Studies.

The reason why I am telling you all this is because I have seen the intimate side of both spectrums. I can remember leaving my home on the bus and getting to school and my classmate...17 years old had Porsche keys....his home has elevators in it....The Family owned the "Italian Bistro Restaurants." My high school was near 20k a year...College was near 30...and Law School was 65k. I now have two sets of associates and each side would answer this question differently. I'm going to give you my interpretation. I guess you can imagine that a majority of my friends would not adopt my views on this question.

First off that conversation you and your associates were having was loaded and could have lasted for days without coming to a definitive answer.

But...with that said I'm going to add my 2 cents. I agree that self will be the predominant 1st choice, but if you delve a bit deeper our sense of self is usually shaped by our religious beliefs (95% of us anyway) which lead me to say that God may or the higher being to which we ascribe to, may the most aggressive force driving us.

I would say that community should be number 2. The familial structure is included in this term "community" and each individual will have to prioritize his/her community values. For most of our family will be the community to which we place our most energy.

**What we too have to realize is that the ordering of these drives will be different for Men and Women. Men of substance should be able to see that by ordering you priorities to serve your family and your community you undoubtedly serve to protect the women and children of that same community. And by protecting the women of your community you ensure that you in turn will be cared for.

And I agree that the third is protection of community...as it should be!

Sometimes it is difficult to see or understand but when you live this way you feel a sense of strength and accomplishment that self service cannot fulfill.

Interesting perspective Jeruzalum.

However, I think there might be a whole bunch of atheists and agnostics that would disagree with you on the religion thing. In the United States I think that number would be about 16% or so. At least those who openly identify. Given the sample size which I think was >70% of the population, I'd say that's a significant stat. And i think it's a little less than 15% world wide.
I'm just curious where you get your 95%, and I'm assuming you're referring to 95% of the religious?

But even if that were the case, the actions of most religious people are ususally compelled by fear (of going to hell for eternity or reincarnating as a stop sign or some lower form thing) and guilt (of sinning or breaking moral codes) and reward (eternal paradise, 70 virgins, etc).

These are all cognitive emotional experiences that reinforce and drive behavior

Even 'love', in it's most pristine form, (love of God) is correlated with a sense of respect and affection for yourself, your neighbor and your environment which all appeal to self preservation and the sense of community.

The whole concept of religion can be viewed, in a sense, as a mechanism where dogma is used to drive societal behavior to favor the spread of an ideology which then feeds back into the closed loop. There are fields of study related to this stuff ... memetics, game theory, etc.

Pretty cool stuff, but I digress.



Is it really? I believe that one can have a false sense of awareness, (just like one can have a false sense of truth), but the concept isn't really that vague- or is it?

I think it is.

Having a false sense of awareness (delusion) is different from "self-awareness".
As for false sense of truth, that's a whole different topic.


Though a family or a group of families can make a community, does ensuring your children are taken care of build a community? :confused:

Yes.

To further clarify this answer, do this exercise: ask yourself why you take care of your kids, then ask why your answer is what it is and go on until you get to the end.


I had a different take of community and keeping it preserved as a priority, and that is not a part of it. I'm interested as to specifically why you think this.

Why I think family is a subset of community?
 
So I was having a conversation the other day with two friends, a neurophysicist and a psychologist, about congnition, intuition and motivation theory and in the course of our convo the question arose:

"What's the most fundamental driver of our volition. Basically what, at the most fundamental level, drives the decisions we make and the consequent actions?

After screening through a bunch of stuff (that most people come up with, like ambition, success, money, fear, love, etc) I broke it down to three things:

1) Self (need to survive)

2) Community (need to belong)

and

3) Protection/conservation of community

In that order.


However, I guess at the very very very fundamental level ... more fundamentaler than genetics ... it's the need to reduce (local) entropy but forget about that for now.


Number (1) is propbably not a huge revelation as, fundamentally, everything we do is selfish no matter how we try to spin it.
But number (2) is particularly intriguing.

Discuss.


Google "Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs"
 
I think there's a bit of confusion with the question of what drives us. I'm approaching this as survival is a function of the primitive aspect of our brain with some influence from the upper conscious part. Our survival instincts are preprogrammed from birth and drives us everyday. Things such as food,shelter, sleep/rest,fight/flight and mating/bonding.Without those basics of survival the higher brain functions are moot.

There is a hierarchy within the survival instinct also. Would you really be concerned about mating when your dying of thirst?

Survival of self comes first. Period

There has to be a concept of self awareness. It's what makes us human. Does a dog know it's a dog? Does a Shrimp know it's sole purpose is to eat plankton so it can grow to be a bigger link in the food chain? Do either dogs or Shrimp take a moment to wonder about the origin of the universe and there place in it?

We have to agree on a common starting point or like Melon said we'll just go around and around and not get anywhere.
 
my children(i live forever threw them,only if they have kids too)

money does nothing for me

once they can go on thier own i'll put some me in there somewhere
 
Google "Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs"

I was waiting to see how long it would take before someone brought this up.

I'm familiar with Maslow's "theory" and it's biases but that's all pretty much covered under the 3 drives I mentioned.

Self, Community and Preservation of the the aforementioned.

The assembly of his pyramid doesn't necessarily hold for everyone albeit a fair generalization as he admits, many of the needs are non-hierarchically causally linked.

Again, I'm trying to see if more fundamental drives/compulsions for human actions and behavior exist.
 
Last edited:
I think it is.

Having a false sense of awareness (delusion) is different from "self-awareness".
As for false sense of truth, that's a whole different topic.

Sean, of course it is. :lol:


But couldn't it also be the same thing producing different results?

Yes.

To further clarify this answer, do this exercise: ask yourself why you take care of your kids, then ask why your answer is what it is and go on until you get to the end.

The end? It ends?

Maybe I'm just thinking different on this topic??? :confused:

Why I think family is a subset of community?

No, the children. I can see why family would be a subset.
 
1) Why?

2) What if you didn't have kids?

why,cause they are my flesh,half my soul,my everything,i would die for them,and if anyone would harm them.i would unleash slow painful death to them.


a world without them does not exist to me

once you become a parent everything else comes second

well for me it was the first time i felt them move inside their mom
 
I think there's a bit of confusion with the question of what drives us. I'm approaching this as survival is a function of the primitive aspect of our brain with some influence from the upper conscious part. Our survival instincts are preprogrammed from birth and drives us everyday. Things such as food,shelter, sleep/rest,fight/flight and mating/bonding.Without those basics of survival the higher brain functions are moot.

There is a hierarchy within the survival instinct also. Would you really be concerned about mating when your dying of thirst?

Survival of self comes first. Period

There has to be a concept of self awareness. It's what makes us human. Does a dog know it's a dog? Does a Shrimp know it's sole purpose is to eat plankton so it can grow to be a bigger link in the food chain? Do either dogs or Shrimp take a moment to wonder about the origin of the universe and there place in it?

We have to agree on a common starting point or like Melon said we'll just go around and around and not get anywhere.

I don't think there's any ambiguity regarding the question I posed.

Again, Maslow's hierarchy is just an extrapolation and level graduation of the three fundamental drives I posited. IMO.

Did you read my responses to Mel regarding my skepticism about this?

Again, I think it's a fallacy of ambiguity.

Now as for the concept of self-awareness, you say it's what makes us human.
True humans have a more developed cerebral cortex which affords us with the abilities of abstract thought, emotion, perceptual experience of our environment - awareness and understanding.

However, the physiological development of our brains and the mental processes that enable our perception of the environment and "self" is inescapably anthropomorphic and as such, by default, the notion of a conscious, say, DNA molecule or even constituent nucleic acids is nonsensical.

But is it really?

I can expatiate on the point I'm trying to make if you want, but I don't want to detract the thread. But if need be I'll explain.
 
I don't think there's any ambiguity regarding the question I posed.

Again, Maslow's hierarchy is just an extrapolation and level graduation of the three fundamental drives I posited. IMO.

Did you read my responses to Mel regarding my skepticism about this?

Again, I think it's a fallacy of ambiguity.

Now as for the concept of self-awareness, you say it's what makes us human.
True humans have a more developed cerebral cortex which affords us with the abilities of abstract thought, emotion, perceptual experience of our environment - awareness and understanding.

However, the physiological development of our brains and the mental processes that enable our perception of the environment and "self" is inescapably anthropomorphic and as such, by default, the notion of a conscious, say, DNA molecule or even constituent nucleic acids is nonsensical.

But is it really?

I can expatiate on the point I'm trying to make if you want, but I don't want to detract the thread. But if need be I'll explain.

Once you get past the basics ingrained in our DNA. everything is abstract. such ideas as individuality comes into play. How a person interacts with his/her environment.How that person perceives their environment What a person desires.

Your asking for something that doesn't have a single answer. Humans can have multiple stimuli that makes them get off their butt and do something on one day and the next the same stimuli has no effort on them at all.
 
If you read all of my response to patience54 you wouldn't be asking this.

I read dammit :angry:. I'm just per perpetually tired...:(

Mel.
Children = subset of family, right?

But in the right or different context children could be different from family. Depending on your definition of family, children could come before them in the hierarchy. Or if they are included family could come before anything else on the hierarchy. It depends on how you look at each category and its elements.

(Obviously I see children and family as two different entities in this case.)
 
such ideas as individuality comes into play. How a person interacts with his/her environment.How that person perceives their environment What a person desires.
Your asking for something that doesn't have a single answer. Humans can have multiple stimuli that makes them get off their butt and do something on one day and the next the same stimuli has no effort on them at all.

Yes the same stimulus can elicit different emotional responses in different people. These same responses can be suppressed by stronger emotions for whatever reason. This appears as a lack of emotional response to stimuli. For example, using anger to mask embarrassment or laughter when you're nervous.

I think there is/are fundamental drives. I also think most of the things that people say motivate them can all be distilled into the fundamental drive(s)


I read dammit :angry:. I'm just per perpetually tired...:(
But in the right or different context children could be different from family. Depending on your definition of family, children could come before them in the hierarchy. Or if they are included family could come before anything else on the hierarchy. It depends on how you look at each category and its elements.
(Obviously I see children and family as two different entities in this case.)

I see we're not communicating here so let's agree to disagree.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top