what do you personally believe about the OJ murders?

???

  • OJ killed them both unassisted

  • OJ killed them with an accomplice

  • OJ hired/persuaded someone to kill them

  • OJ was framed; he wasn't involved at all


Results are only viewable after voting.
Dude, you're going to believe what you believe no matter what's posted.

There could be a video of OJ doing the killing and you'd say it was Norbert not OJ.

And I don't know if he did it or not, we do know that there's circumstantial evidence that ties him to the crime.

But you don't believe the evidence so it's pointless mentioning it.

What is the circumstantial evidence? Please don't say the DNA
 
OJ didn't do that shit and they fucking know it. Motherfuckers that are in their forties know he didn't do it either. Shit, especially if your were a former athlete with fucked up knees I know he didn't do it. Man, most times when you get older it hard to get out of bed. You ain't killing nobody. You might be killing you damn pillow. I know a lot of former athletes. We are hard press about getting out of bed. Plus, he didn't have a history of beating up women. If you ain't doing that shit, you ain't gonna start. Its hard press for a motherfucker to do something he ain't used too. Not to say you can't kill nobody, but if you not punching are doing shit like that, more than likely you not doing something so profoundly out of character. Why do you think they have soldiers fighting one another in bootcamp? You can't kill nothing if you haven't even been in a fight. It takes a lot for a person to hit another person because it goes against the human directive. For the motherfuckers who are going to rebuttal why we have people killing others, I say it is a small percentage. Most people who hurt others are used to a path of violence. Most serial killers have a history of violence in their lives. You have to be broken mentally to kill another human being. Well, unless you are defending yourself. There are some exceptions, but for the most part, you got a history of violence somewhere. In conclusion, OJ didn't do it. He was a bit old and he didn't have a history of beating his former wife.
 
Yes because it was a crime of passion or extreme anger. Again I'm not saying that he did it, I'm just saying that he could.

And people keep saying that it's hard to believe that one person could kill two people with one knife...

It's actually easy. Because if the person caught her from behind first it was a wrap. And once Ron ran up to help he's getting poked with the quickness.

And if he caught Ron first and she saw it, she probably ran away and got ran up on from behind and she was done for.

Both of those murders happened very quickly because it doesn't take long to get stabbed up with a knife.
So your saying in a crime of passion he did a Columbia necktie to both of them. That’s pretty surgical
 
It definitely pissed of KD and still pissed off cacs.

And at some point we have to get realistic about the glove not fitting.

The glove shrank because it was saturated in blood, plus OJ was wearing latex gloves trying to put on the glove.

And let's be honest, do we "Really" think that OJ was trying his best to put on the glove?


200w.gif


Again, I don't know if he did it or not but I'm not blinded by bullshit.

If he did it he did it, if he didn't he didn't. But to act like there's no way he could've done it and nothing tying him to the crime scene is a stretch.

Man, you really are invested in this subject.

Very "spirited" dialog happening here sir
 
Ron Goldman was a physically fit individual, who was a skilled fighter.

OJ Simpson was 15 years retired and played during the NFL's most violent era, at the hardest position in football, at a time when it was the second most important position after the QB.

There is a good chance that the running backs that will be drafted in this year's draft will be done playing before or right around the time this current decade is out due to the toll it takes on the body.

So how in the hell did he manage to damn hear cut dude's head off?
 
I think these are the most plausible scenarios, but I've heard all kinds of WILD shit. what you think??

Reason I doubt OJ did it is, why go thru all the theatrics of gutting em out with a knife??

You risk:
1) being in a long, drawn out fight
2) more blood trail evidence
3) victims screaming, etc..

A few bullets to the dome with a silencer will have did the job quickly, quietly & cleanly. Same result without the mess

OJ’s oldest son did it and OJ took the blame to save him.
 
Man, you really are invested in this subject.

Very "spirited" dialog happening here sir

I wouldn't say spirited but you would. We're in here speaking on what we know and what we think we know, sometimes that requires research and details.
 
none of this was valid when it came to the trial because
if those were the same gloves - they would have fit him at trial - no?
:lol:

everything about the shoes were impeached because
1. there were 2 different sized sets of bloody foot prints leaving the scene - that the DA didn't present -allowing team OJ to cut them off at the knees

2. there was no bloody shoe found
but they found bloody socks in his bedroom? ok

3 the shoe prints found in the Bronco were disregarded because
a. passenger side was location of collection
b. the various impossible blood splatter collected in the truck

the weird thing about the bronco is - initially -the first exam collected blood traces that matched to OJ, were found on the drivers side and passenger side - nothing else
- but later they find Nicole and Ron blood matches were found -only on the passenger side and in places impossible to reach unless the interior was disassembled




its a fact that in that trial every piece of circumstantial evidence was impeached

1. in addition to the "non naturally occurring " or "physically impossible" evidence -
LAPD had broken chain of custody for multiple pieces of evidence. -including OJ voluntary blood sample and much of the evidence collected at OJ house - eg. one detective kept the sample at his house for a weekend

If the chain of custody has been broken or tampered with, evidence can be ruled as inadmissible, meaning it cannot be presented or believed to be authentic in a court of law and therefore cannot be used to convict a defendant.

2. The defense presented to the jury LAPD evidence room logs including descriptions of condition
along with then putting cops on the stand to try to explain how why multiple logged evidence items
in the OJ trial had disappeared completely -
or worse, others were clearly tampered and or altered from the condition they were in when originally logged


If you want to argue that OJ got a pair of hitmen -ok
but its not a stretch when there is no viable evidence that physically puts OJ at the scene that night

1. weeks after the murder a detective - not crime scene tech, but a detective finds OJ blood splatter in the court yard
but when analysed it is incontrovertible that the blood came out of a collection vial not a body

2. the condition of gloves and socks is not possible if being worn when bloodied

3. OJ had a cut on his finger - no bruising no defensive wounds vs Ron n Nicole have extensive defensive wounds

Apparently I'm having too "Spirited" of a conversation and now my Blackness is questioned so I'll have to stop.

OJ was framed, OJ's innocent and every thing about the case that possibly connects OJ was a lie.


200w.gif
 
Do you think a Columbian surgeon did it? Or someone who specialized in the cutting off of heads?
It’s more than just cutting a head off. So your saying someone that has never done this before did this in 25 minutes to 2 people.


Colombian necktie (Spanish: corte de corbata, tie-cut) is a form of execution or post-mortem mutilation in which the victim’s tongue is pulled through a deep cut beneath the jaw and left dangling on the neck.
 
Dude was a world-class athlete. Big, strong, and fast as fuck. You can't believe how fast somebody can move when they on they business. And you can't believe how people freeze when their brains can't comprehend what's happening.

Occum's razor - I think he did it unassisted.
 
It’s more than just cutting a head off. So your saying someone that has never done this before did this in 25 minutes to 2 people.


Colombian necktie (Spanish: corte de corbata, tie-cut) is a form of execution or post-mortem mutilation in which the victim’s tongue is pulled through a deep cut beneath the jaw and left dangling on the neck.

Listen man, I don't wanna talk about OJ anymore because all Black people are supposed to believe that he had nothing to do with it. :lol:

And you're forcing me to look I to the inside so about your 25 minute statement:




LOS ANGELES, JUNE 9 -- Ronald L. Goldman was entrapped in a small, enclosed corner of Nicole Brown Simpson's yard where he was quickly and savagely murdered while she lay unconscious nearby, the Los Angeles County coroner testified today in the O.J. Simpson murder trial.


The 25-year-old waiter suffered more than 15 knife wounds, including fatal stab wounds to his neck, chest and abdomen, all of which could have been inflicted within a minute as Goldman struggled to escape from the tight space, Lakshmanan Sathyavagiswaran told jurors, who were shown grisly autopsy photographs of the various wounds.

"He's stuck there . . . you're cornered," Sathyavagiswaran said. "A minute is a long time. . . . You can do 15 thrusts in about 15 seconds," he said, demonstrating by clenching his fist as if holding a knife and thrusting it up and down rapidly.



Again, we're talking about a "Person" and not specifically OJ.
 
I'm O.J. Simpson famous athlete, actor, pitchman and bitches throw pussy at me even at the age of 76. I have no history of violence against anyone except this one time where I supposedly got in my $1000.00 shoes and killed my ex-wife and the dude she was screwing who is a trained martial artist. Now there was blood everywhere except in my car and on my cloths.
 
Listen man, I don't wanna talk about OJ anymore because all Black people are supposed to believe that he had nothing to do with it. :lol:

And you're forcing me to look I to the inside so about your 25 minute statement:




LOS ANGELES, JUNE 9 -- Ronald L. Goldman was entrapped in a small, enclosed corner of Nicole Brown Simpson's yard where he was quickly and savagely murdered while she lay unconscious nearby, the Los Angeles County coroner testified today in the O.J. Simpson murder trial.


The 25-year-old waiter suffered more than 15 knife wounds, including fatal stab wounds to his neck, chest and abdomen, all of which could have been inflicted within a minute as Goldman struggled to escape from the tight space, Lakshmanan Sathyavagiswaran told jurors, who were shown grisly autopsy photographs of the various wounds.

"He's stuck there . . . you're cornered," Sathyavagiswaran said. "A minute is a long time. . . . You can do 15 thrusts in about 15 seconds," he said, demonstrating by clenching his fist as if holding a knife and thrusting it up and down rapidly.



Again, we're talking about a "Person" and not specifically OJ.
Wait. So you came into a oj discussion thread to say you don’t want to talk about oj. Ok.
You’re basing your opinion on feelings not on the facts. Your premise is on a crime of passion for a nicca that been divorced for 2 years.
And your source is media coverage.



 
My footprints weren’t at the crime scene.

I also don’t own a pair of Bruno Magli shoes in size 12 nor do I have a pair of Aris Isotoner gloves in a rare size XL.

But OJ did.

Here's a pic of him wearing the exact same gloves that was left at the crime scene when he was broadcasting a football game.

An Aris Isotoner executive stated that he was sure they were the same gloves that OJ was wearing in the broadcast that were left at the crime scene.


prosecutor-christopher-darden-and-former-isoto.webp


And here's a picture of OJ's wearing the same shoes that left a footprint at the crime scene...

In the same size that OJ wears.

oj-simpson-wearing-bruno-magli-shoes.jpg


That OJ said that he didn't own a pair of.

Now these all could be coincidence's. Maybe OJ and the killer had the same taste, or maybe the LAPD planted it?

But to say that "Every" piece of circumstantial evidence was impeached is a bit of a stretch.

LAPD botched the case with forensics and also appeared to have planted evidence to make the case stick.

And that's why he was acquitted, not because he didn't do it.

But to say that anyone's 100% confident that he didn't do it should be kinda a stretch.
OJ was size 13
they real killer wore like a 9.5 or 10..

Stop bro, you're embarrassing yourself.
 
Yes because it was a crime of passion or extreme anger. Again I'm not saying that he did it, I'm just saying that he could.

And people keep saying that it's hard to believe that one person could kill two people with one knife...

It's actually easy. Because if the person caught her from behind first it was a wrap. And once Ron ran up to help he's getting poked with the quickness.

And if he caught Ron first and she saw it, she probably ran away and got ran up on from behind and she was done for.

Both of those murders happened very quickly because it doesn't take long to get stabbed up with a knife.
do you know that the autopsy of the bodies shows wounds and bruises consistent with an extended fight for both victims?

why are you trying to be a devils advocate while not knowing the facts of the crime scene / investigation ?'
 
Last edited:
Dude was a world-class athlete. Big, strong, and fast as fuck. You can't believe how fast somebody can move when they on they business. And you can't believe how people freeze when their brains can't comprehend what's happening.

Occum's razor - I think he did it unassisted.
both autopsy reports contradict your theory




fyi
 
That would be exculpatory evidence, was it introduced in court? What are your sources?
Hearsay..
But you posted right after that the size was similar to OJs size 12..
But the odds that OJ owned one of the 299 TOTAL shoes sold in the US of that particular model of shoes...
 
Also the family dog, that OJ purchased and knew, was barking during the killings?!!??

My dogs aint NEVER barked at me in life!!!


Yall negroes hella off code
:smh:
 
Hearsay..
But you posted right after that the size was similar to OJs size 12..
But the odds that OJ owned one of the 299 TOTAL shoes sold in the US of that particular model of shoes...
I'm not sure what you mean, what's hearsay? There were more than 30 pictures of Simpson in those shoes, including one that was printed in a newspaper before the murders.
 
Also yall sambos believe that OJ did a double murder at 10:05pm and was On a plane headed to Chicago at 10:30pm?!?!?!?!

He changed clothes, healed his wounds, showered, and got on a flight....

Yall aren't serious AT ALL
I'm going to guess your timeline is wrong because that would be impossible. If your timeline is correct, that would be irrefutable exculpatory evidence. I don't recall any of his defense attorneys saying because of the timeline it was impossible for Simpson to commit this crime. Is the sambo accusation just for Simpson, or is any Black man that believes another Black man committed a crime a sambo?
 
Yall aren't serious AT ALL
You know what's serious? Simpson giving the middle finger to his children. When Simpson put his name on that book, he was saying fuck you to his his kids. His children's Mother was brutally murdered and he puts his name on a booked called If I Did it. How low do you have to be to do something like that? To me, what Simpson did is worse than George Zimmerman selling autographed bags of Skittles, because we know Zimmerman didn't give a fuck about Trevon Martin, or the Martin family but Simpson is supposed to care about his kids . I want you to think about how Emmett Till's Mom felt when after the men that brutally murdered her son were acquitted, they went to Life Magazine and helped write an article stating how they murdered Emmett Till. Simpson's kids probably felt the same way.
 
Back
Top