And how often was OJ seen around Brentwood with this son he loved so much he was willing to go to jail for life for? Man, you wouldn't even know OJ had a son if you didn't do research.
GTFOH.
what do you personally believe about the OJ murders?
- Thread starter prose00
- Start date
And how often was OJ seen around Brentwood with this son he loved so much he was willing to go to jail for life for? Man, you wouldn't even know OJ had a son if you didn't do research.
GTFOH.
And how often was OJ seen around Brentwood with this son he loved so much he was willing to go to jail for life for? Man, you wouldn't even know OJ had a son if you didn't do research.
GTFOH.
only OJ blood on the driver side
Nicole and goldman blood were only on passenger side and in locations that could only be accessed after interior of car disassembled (like under the center console)
Goldman had extensive defensive wounds on knuckles forearms leg and foot - but OJ's only wound was a cut on a finger - not a single bruise
And how often was OJ seen around Brentwood with this son he loved so much he was willing to go to jail for life for? Man, you wouldn't even know OJ had a son if you didn't do research.
GTFOH.
Yoooooooo! I'm late as fuck! Never heard that theory before. I just looked it up and read about this "theory" on another site.....This shit all makes sense now!
Not true
Watched the trial and based mostly on the limo driver's testimony I was firmly in the OJ did it camp...because it was and still is clear that he was not home when the driver got there and was lying about it...and the limo driver had no dog in the race.
Didn't have a problem with the verdict because the defense successfully proved the top state witness was a liar and that evidence collection was fucked so I know a juror could have legit doubt.
... But after hearing William Dear's theory and investigation years back, I am 90% thinking the oldest son did it and called OJ after asking for help... And on went there to the scene which accounts for footprints etc. The only thing that still bugs me is the cuts on his finger. Shit, I even turned some white people towards the innocent camp when I gave them the bill dear clip.
Didn't have a problem with the verdict because the defense successfully proved the top state witness was a liar and that evidence collection was fucked so I know a juror could have legit doubt.
... But after hearing William Dear's theory and investigation years back, I am 90% thinking the oldest son did it and called OJ after asking for help... And on went there to the scene which accounts for footprints etc. The only thing that still bugs me is the cuts on his finger. Shit, I even turned some white people towards the innocent camp when I gave them the bill dear clip.
Not always the case man. As I said above I was oj guilty for probably ten years. Looked at the other shit real skeptically but too much of it fit. My father was an ex-homocide detective and he had serious doubts about his guilt during a d after the trial and I argued with him a lot at the time.
I do too.
Not you, but look at most of the dudes in this thread. If OJ confessed with his own mouth, they wouldn't believe him.
This is just like the question how many licks to get to the center of a Tootsie Roll Pop, the world may never know.
lol @ 1 family picture and 1 publicity shot.
While most people looked at the evidence and came to a guilty conclusion, I still struggle with two things: 1) I can't name not one instance where a black man sliced a woman's neck to the point it was practically separated from her body. Black men don't impress me as being grizzly like that. I mean you gots to be a sinister muthafucka to do some shit like that...like Charlie Manson or Jeffrey Dahmer, Jack The Ripper, Son of Sam, etc. Further, if you plan on killing someone, a knife would NOT be the primary weapon of choice imo. 2) If I'm in a struggle for my life against someone with a knife, you best believe the attacker wouldn't leave the scene unmarked. I mean the #1 Law of Nature kicks in instantaneously...all rules are out the window. It ain't a "fair one" no more...not when my life is on the line. I'm biting, scratching, poking, pulling, and whatever else I have to in order to escape with my life. I don't know if even a professional killer could have left that crime scene relatively unmarked. Because of these tow things, I had always believed he didn't do it. However, I don't know whether or not he was involved in some other way.
Most people are completely ignorant of the evidence
The $25 million question is why would he kill her then? At that point he was well aware she was a hoe.
Nothing happened that day to make him almost miss a flight drive over there with a knife and kill her.
The son did it and pop took one for the team.
Nothing happened that day to make him almost miss a flight drive over there with a knife and kill her.
The son did it and pop took one for the team.
Niggas believe OJ was blade or some shit......he killed two cacs with a knife had no bruises and very small traces of blood
Lack of bruises and no bloody clothes or weapon leads me to believe he didn't do it or if he did, he clearly wasn't alone. He didn't have time to murder them and dispose of everything/wash all the blood away. If you watched the trial and pay attention to what they jury actually heard, the verdict was correct. Cochran and Co owned that white bitch and Darden.
And alot these legal analysts on cable owe their careers to OJ.
And alot these legal analysts on cable owe their careers to OJ.
Yeah Greta Van Sustren, Tavis were made as tv analysts during the trial. I think Starr Jones too.
to this very day i think his son did it. whether oj knew it or not.
The thing that always bugged me about this case is if OJ did that shit, why would he leave his little kids sleeping upstairs alone after killing their mom? You would have to be a cold blooded savage to leave your seeds in the house alone after offing their mom. What if they had heard the ruckus and came downstairs? I just don't see a father risking his babies seeing their mom practically decapitated.
Plus the EDTA in the blood evidence was shady as hell. Even if he did do it, the cops had to plant some of that blood for EDTA to be present in blood evidence.
^^^^
Heard about a study that said 57% of blacks think he did it.
That's because of the MSM and the public's selective amnesia concerning the trial. The media doesn't really mention the investigating detective Mark Fuhrman who believed "all 'blacks' should should be rounded up and burned alive", provided the blood n gloves plant kit, and pleaded the 5th during the trial when asked if he ever falsified police reports or planted evidence.
He sold a book and was given a gig at Faux News.
Oh but OJ is guilty
None of the above: I believe OJ was involved. You just happen to cut your hand the same night 2 people you know personally die at your home. Coincidence? Maybe.
The biggest thing is the LAPD went out of their way to frame a guilty man and got caught. Then the LAPD gets caught not following their own procedures compromising the evidence collected.
The biggest thing is the LAPD went out of their way to frame a guilty man and got caught. Then the LAPD gets caught not following their own procedures compromising the evidence collected.
Nicole Simpson and Ronald Goldman Murder Crime Scene
https://www.documentingreality.com/...son-ronald-goldman-murder-crime-scene-167834/
https://www.documentingreality.com/...son-ronald-goldman-murder-crime-scene-167834/
Similar threads
